TITLE: Math Anxiety: Is Mathematics a Bogeyman? AUTHORS: Marina Videnović, Jelena Radišić AIMES OF THE STUDY 1. Examine relationship between math anxiety and achievement in domain of math literacy 2. Determine predictors of math anxiety 3. Examine contribution of math anxiety as a predictor of achievement 4. Empirically separate groups of students which differ in their relation to mathematics 5. Deepen the understanding about learning environment that favors anxiety METODOLOGY Method. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the study. A quantitative analysis of PISA results was done in the first stage. Based on these results a qualitative analysis was performed. Sample. Students involved in PISA cycles in 2003 and 2009. Variables Independent variables: school/classroom climate (attitudes toward school, sense of belonging, student-teacher relations, teacher support, discipline climate), motivation, self-related cognition (mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics self-concept), learning strategies (control, elaborative, memorizing),educational level of parents, expected educational level of student, SES Dependent variables: math anxiety, achievement in domain of math literacy BASIC FINDINGS Math anxiety correlates negatively with achievement in mathematics tests; at PISA (r=-0.37 p=0.00) and entrance test in mathematics (r=-0.28 p=0.00). Due anxiety high school students loose 31 points at PISA testing and 2 points at entrance test. Independent variables used in the study help explain 40% of variance on math anxiety (R=0.399 F=200.100 p=0.00 df=9 and df=2718). Mathematics self-concept, disciplinary climate in math and memorization strategies explained largest percentage of variance. Three groups of students have been identified regarding their relationship towards mathematics. These are: 1) anxious in mastering and applying mathematics, 2) uninterested and non-anxious and 3) interested in the content of mathematics. Students from the first group achieve the lowest scores (F=115.298 df=2 p=0.00). Qualitative analysis showed that most interviewed teachers and students were not aware that anxiety negatively influenced achievement more than lack of motivation. These are some of their reason why mathematics PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS is the “bogeyman” (or how to make math less of a bogeyman?) Extensive and unenforceable curriculum (teacher: Frankly, most things they learn they will not need. There is a lot of mathematics, every day and of course they are bored by it.) Bad learning strategies (teacher: They practice math. Do not learn it. Do not learn the principle of math itself.) Student’s character traits (teacher: They give up easily, as soon as they run into a problem) Lack of working habits (student: I think I’m good at it because every day I do couple of mathematical 1. Raising teachers’ awareness about negative impact of math anxiety on achievement 2. Training students to be actively participating in the process of acquiring knowledge (to seek support from the teacher when necessary). 3. Support students in acquiring working habits in math. 4. Mathematics curriculum must be modernized. 5. Secure working atmosphere in class but not authoritative one. problems.) Uncertainty (student: Before, it was a problem for me to raise my hand, because I was afraid not to make a mistake. It was a problem for me to ask if I did not understand something). 6. Reduce options for memorization as a dominant learning strategy.