Humerus to Radius Ratio and It’s Effect on Stride Length in Canis lupus familiaris The
Effect of Humerus to Radius Ratio on Stride Length in Canis lupus familiaris
Chelsea Lindwall
Saddleback College Biology 3B
Chelsea Lindwall
Department of Biological Sciences
Saddleback College
Mission Viejo, California 92692
Abstract
Canis lupus familiaris Canis lupus familiaris , the domesticated dog, is a species with a great amount of variety between breeds. The high amount of variability between breeds makes dogs interesting to study. In this study we are trying to find whether or not the humerus to radius length ratio has any effect on the length of a dog’s trotting stride (state your hypothesis because it is unclear what you are testing. Are you testing for a correlation?) .
Results showed a (The) mean stride length of (was) 51.16cm with an average standard deviation of 0.133
(Should be mean ± standard error)
and mean humerus to radius ratio of
0.9628 with an average standard deviation of 7.047
(Should be mean ± standard error. Also indicate the number of samples used by n=?. Did you use different breeds? If so then you should say the mean for each breed . No trend line could be found in the graph indicated by
Fig. 1, and therefore stride length is independent of the ratio between the humerus and radius in dogs. Again, what are you exactly looking for, between breeds or just dogs in general? Don’t reference your graph in the abstract.
Introduction
Canis lupus familiaris Canis lupis familiaris , or the domesticated dog, has evolved from it’s its ancestor, the Gray Wolf, to a huge variety of shapes and sizes. Dogs have been selectively bred over thousands of years for specific purposes, including hunting, herding, sled pulling, retrieving, guarding, and general human companionship. All this ( omit) s elective breeding has led to hundreds of distinctly different dog breeds, which when compared look almost like different species rather than types. From color, to fur length, even down to bone structure, every breed is different. This high amount of variability within the canine species makes dogs very interesting to study. (Ostrander, 2007) What all canines do have in common though is a love for running along with a great amount of speed and stamina for their size.
(wording; and is this referenced)
The investigator is dc (OMIT).
Similar studies in horses have shown that the stride length is dependent upon the length of the humerus (Stashak and Adams, 2002) but the investigator would like to know if the stride length is more effected by what may seem like the

more obvious variable, the length of the radius, which accounts for a large percentage of a dog’s leg bones (Don’t use “investigator.” Your reasoning does not flow well.) In putting these two bones together in the form of a humerus vs. radius ratio, we can find whether or not the length of stride in dogs is dependent upon either.
The objective of this investigation is to discover whether the length of a dog’s trotting stride is mostly dependent upon the length of it’s humerus or the length of it’s radius. From research it is hypothesized that a dog with a radius longer than it’s humerus will have a stride length that is longer than a dog with a shorter humerus or a radius and humerus that are the same length (Reword).
Materials and Methods
Twenty-five canine participants will be volunteered by friends, family, and clients of the
Irvine Pet Complex in Irvine, CA. All will be in good physical condition as supervised by Dr.
Harner, DVM, between the ages of 1.5 and 7 years, and weigh between 10kg and 55kg.
Humerus length will be taken using a measuring tape by measuring from the point at which the humerus meets the scapula to the point at which the humerus meets the ulna. Radius measurements will be taken by measuring from the point where the humerus and radius meet to the point where the radius meets the metacarpals.
Dogs will have their paws dipped in water, and be trotted at a speed of 2.5 m/s on asphalt
(how did you measure 2.5 m/s) , and the distance between wet pawprints will be measured. A dog’s trot is a two-beat gait, with the legs moving in diagonal pairs (front left/hind right and front right/hind left), so trotting pawprints appear as two prints diagonally separated by about one or two centimeters, and then another two prints at an average of 50 centimeters away. The larger distance (the stride length) will be measured and the mean of three sets will be taken. The mean distance will be used in final data and calculations.
Results
Mean stride length was 51.16cm with an average standard deviation of 0.133 and mean humerus to radius ratio was 0.9628 with an average standard deviation of 7.047
(
Should be mean ± standard error. Also indicate the number of samples used by n=?. Did you use different breeds? If so then you should say the mean for each breed .) .

Fig.1
(Figure 1).
This graph shows (OMIT).
the mean stride length as it corresponds to the humerus to radius ratio in dogs. The formula for the ratio is humerus/radius so a value closer to zero indicates a humerus that is shorter than the radius, and a value more than one indicates a humerus that is longer than the radius (explain in results).
Discussion
No data trend could be found in the graph indicated by Fig. 1. From this data it can be concluded that the length of a dog’s trotting stride is independent of the ratio between its humerus and radius. Using the data collected I also tried seeing if stride length was simply dependent on the total leg length (the values for the humerus and radius combined), yet there was no visible trend in that data either. In conclusion, I have found that stride length in dogs is independent of the ratio between the humerus and the radius, and therefore must be dependent upon some other factor. (Discussion should discuss results in each case. I am still unclear about what you were testing for. Discussion is a place to talk about other research and how yours did not fit your hypothesis and/ or fit in with other research.)
Literature Cited
Covington, W. Wallace. 1975. Altitudinal Variation of Chlorophyll Concentration and
Reflectance of the Bark of Populus tremuloide. Ecological Society of America 56:
715-720. THIS IS THE CORRECT FORMAT.
Only research cited in your paper may be in the Literature Cited and must be from a peer reviewed journal!

Kharlamova, Anastasia V., Lyudmila Trut, David N. Carrier, Kevin Chase, and Carl G. Lark.
"Genetic Regulation of Canine Skeletal Traits: Trade-offs between the Hind Limbs and
Forelimbs in the Fox and Dog." Integrative and Comparative Biology . 47.3 (2007): 373-381.
Print.
Wong, Aaron K., Allison L. Ruhe, Beth L. Dumont, and Kathryn L. Robertson. "A
Comprehensive Linkage Map of the Dog Genome." Genetics . 184.2 (2010): 595. Print
Ostrander, E.A. (2007). Genetics and the shape of dogs. American Scientist , 95 (5), Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=2&did=1370718871&SrchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=3&VI nst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1271860665&clientId=27893
Tanaka, T., Amadio, P.C., Zhao, C., Zobits, M.E., & Kutsumi, K. (2005). Effect of elbow position on canine flexor digitorum profundus tendon tension. Journal of Orthopaedic Research ,
23 (2), Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.socccd.edu/ehost/detail?vid=8&hid=12&sid=ee3b6917-7e03-
4b92-
82967f0714b43b%40sessionmgr11&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=cmedm
&AN=15734233
Ratzlaff, M.H. (1989). Quantitative methods for the analysis of equine locomotion and their applications to other species . American Zoologist , 29 (1), 267-285.
Stashak, T.S., & Adams, O.R. (2002). Adams' lameness in horses . Baltimore, MD: Lippincott,
Williams & Wilkins.
Hayes, M.H. (1987). Veterinary notes for horse owners . New York, NY: Prentice Hall Press.
Schwartz, M. (1997). A History of dogs in the early americas (Times Reader 2.0 version),
Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/s/schwartz-dog.html
Scientists fetch useful information from dog genome publications . (2005, December). Retrieved from http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-news/Scientists-fetch-useful-information-from-doggenome-publications-2118-1/#
Ostrander, E.A. (2007, September). Genetics and the shape of dogs. American Scientist , 95(5),
Retrieved from http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/feature/2007/5/genetics-and-the-shapeof-dogs/1 doi: 10.1511/2007.67.3724

Department of Biological Sciences
Saddleback College, Mission Viejo, CA 92692
Author (s):_Chelsea Lindwall____________________________________
Title:
Humerus to Radius Ratio and It’s Effect on Stride Length in Canis lupus familiaris
Summary
Summarize the paper succinctly and dispassionately. Do not criticize here, just show that you understood the paper.
The investigator trotted dogs and measured the distance between paw prints. The radius and humerus were also measured. A comparison between the ratio of radius and humerus and the stride length showed no correlation.
General Comments
Generally explain the paper’s strengths and weaknesses and whether they are serious, or important to our current state of knowledge.
It sounds like an interesting idea, but the paper does not live up to the idea. The main purpose of the study needs to be explained more clearly because I am left confused. I am unsure if the research followed what it said it was going to do. The paper just needs to follow the guidelines of a scientific paper and it will be worthy of publishing.
Technical Criticism
Review technical issues, organization and clarity. Provide a table of typographical errors, grammatical errors, and minor textual problems. It's not the reviewer's job to copy Edit the paper, mark the manuscript.
This paper was a final version This paper was a rough draft

Recommendation
 This paper should be published as is
 This paper should be published with revision
 This paper should not be published