Bob Brown CCBC Dundalk Math 252 Calculus 2 Chapter 8, Section 5 Exercise 1a: Integrate 1 dx using an “old” method. Strap on your helmet! x 2x 8 2 Now, x 2 2 x 8 = x 2 2 x 8 = ( x 1) 2 3 2 is of the form Note that In this case, u = and a = , so we’ll use the trig sub u = . Thus, we have x that and so dx ( x 1) 2 32 Thus, dx (x 1) 2 32 2 1 = from page 2 of Handout 8.4 = 2 3 sec( ) tan( ) d = 9 tan 2 ( ) Now, x 1 3 sec( ) sec( ) = Thus, csc( ) = Hence, 1 1 dx = ln 3 x 2x 8 2 and cot( ) = x 1 x 2x 8 2 3 x 2x 8 2 +c = Bob Brown CCBC Dundalk Math 252 Calculus 2 Chapter 8, Section 5 Exercise 1b: Integrate It is a fact that x Hence, 2 1 dx using an algebraic insight. Sit back and relax. x 2x 8 2 1 1 1 1 1 = . 6 x4 6 x2 x 2x 8 2 1 6( x 4) Check it: 1 6( x 2) 1 1 dx = 6 2x 8 1 = 1 1 x 4 dx 6 x 2 dx = Exercise 2a: Use the textbook’s PFD method to decompose Factoring, x 2 2 x 8 = Thus 2 1 = x 2x 8 2 Then 1 . x 2x 8 2 1 = x 2x 8 2 The “numerator equation” is The textbook suggests that you substitute in any two (since, in this problem, there are two unknown coefficients, A and B) numbers for x. The two x-values easiest to use would be the zeroes of the denominator polynomial. x = -2 Hence, 1 A B = = x4 x2 x4 x2 x 2x 8 2 x=4 Bob Brown CCBC Dundalk Math 252 Calculus 2 Chapter 8, Section 5 3 Partial Fraction Decomposition Partial Fraction Decomposition (PFD) is an algebraic method for rewriting a rational expression as the sum and/or difference of “simpler” rational expressions. Exercise 2bob: Use Bob’s PFD method to decompose 1 . x 2x 8 2 Factoring as in Exercise 2a, x 2 2 x 8 = (x–4)(x+2). Then Thus 1 A B = . x4 x2 x 2x 8 2 1 A( x 2) B( x 4) = . x 2x 8 ( x 4)( x 2) ( x 2)( x 4) 2 Moreover, as we saw in Exercise 2a, he “numerator equation” is 1 = A(x + 2) + B(x – 4). Bob writes 0x + 1 = Ax + 2A + Bx – 4B Note 1: The method of Partial Fraction Decomposition is practical only for rational function integrands whose denominators factor “nicely.” For instance, if the denominator were changed slightly in the last problem from x 2 2 x 8 to x 2 2 x 7 , its factorization, which is x 2 2 1 x 2 2 1 , would likely be too cumbersome for the PFD method. Note 2: In the integrand, if the degree of the numerator is greater than or equal to the degree of the denominator (i.e., if the integrand is an “improper” fraction), then, as your first step, divide and rewrite the integrand as a “mixed” fraction. Bob Brown CCBC Dundalk Math 252 Calculus 2 Chapter 8, Section 5 4 A Case of Distinct Linear and Quadratic Factors 2x3 4x 8 Exercise 3: Determine 2 dx . x x x2 4 First, factor the integrand’s denominator as much as possible. = A B Cx D A 2 = x x 1 x 4 x The numerator equation is Thus, 2x3 4x 8 dx = x2 x x2 4 + 2x3 4x 8 = x2 x x2 4 B ( x 1) + (Cx D ) x2 4 2x3 4x 8 = x dx + x 1 dx + x dx = x 4 2 2 2 x dx + x 1 dx + Bob Brown CCBC Dundalk Math 252 Calculus 2 Chapter 8, Section 5 5 A Case of Repeated Linear Factors 2x 3 dx . Exercise 4: Determine 2 x 2x 1 First, factor the integrand’s denominator as much as possible. So, 2x 3 = ( x 1) 2 A B x 1 ( x 1) 2 = A ( x 1) + B ( x 1) 2 The numerator equation is Hence, Thus, 2x 3 ( x 1) 2 x 2 = 2x 3 dx 2x 1 x 1 = ( x 1) 2 x 1 dx + 2x 3 = x 2x 1 ( x 1) 2 dx 2 Bob Brown CCBC Dundalk Math 252 Calculus 2 Chapter 8, Section 5 6 A Case of Repeated Quadratic Factors x2 x 3 Exercise 5: Determine 4 dx . x 6x 2 9 x2 x 3 = x 4 6x 2 9 First, factor the integrand’s denominator as much as possible. So, x2 x 3 x 2 3 2 = Ax B Cx D 2 2 x 3 x2 3 So, x2 x 3 x 2 3 2 = ( Ax B ) x 2 3 + Cx D x 2 3 2 x 2 x 3 = ( Ax B) x 2 3 Cx D The numerator equation is Use Bob’s Method: = 0 x 3 1x 2 1x 3 = Ax B Cx D 2 2 x 3 x2 3 x2 x 3 dx = Thus, 4 x 6x 2 9 x dx + 3 2 x x 2 2 x 3 x 3 = x 2 x 2 3 2 dx = x dx 3 2 + x x 2 3 2 dx