Elementary District 102 Talent Development Program – Student Profile Summary
Reading/Language Arts Strand - Humanities Connections
2009-2010
EXAMPLE
Name AAAAAA
School/Grade PARK - 7
Standardized Measures
ABILITY
ACHIEVEMENT
ACHIEVEMENT
CogAT-Verbal
MAP-Reading (Fall)
MAP-Reading (Spring)
National
Local Percentile
Percentile Rank
Rank (LPR)
(NPR)
98
96
99
96
94
89
Combined transformed point value
sum (using the highest achievement
point value)
Transformed Point Value Conversion Table
80-83LPR
84-88LPR
89-92LPR
LPR
1
2
3
Points
93-95LPR
4
96-97LPR
5
Transformed
Point Value
(from LPR)
5
5
3
98LPR
6
10
99LPR
7
Point Value Sum and Corresponding Rank in Grade Level within District 102 Conversion Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sum
Top 25% Top 20% Top 16% Top 13% Top 10% Top 8%
Top 6% Top 4%
Top 3%
Rank
99+LPR
8
10
11
Top 2%
Top 1%
Teacher Rating Scale
Rated Area
Learning Ability
Creativity
Motivation
Max Points
Talent Pool Average
72
66
66
65
56
55
Student Score
68
56
66
Total number of areas at or
above the talent pool average
Talent Pool Comparison
(Above, Equal, Below)
ABOVE
EQUAL
ABOVE
3
Placement Decision:
___X_ Humanities Connections (with curriculum-based and/or school-wide enrichment as needed or pursued)
_____ Humanities Connections (with curriculum-based and/or school-wide enrichment as needed or pursued)
Progress will be closely monitored to detect possible student support or placement review.
_____ Core Reading/Language Arts (with curriculum-based differentiation as needed and/or school-wide enrichment as
pursued)
_____ Core Reading/Language Arts (with school-wide enrichment as pursued)
_____ Placement Review is suggested
A student’s combined transformed point total must place him/her within the top 25% of his/her grade level to be
considered for a placement review.
9/16/09
Elementary District 102 Talent Development Program – Student Profile Summary
Reading/Language Arts Strand - Humanities Connections
2009-2010
EXAMPLE
Name BBBBBB
School/Grade PARK - 7
Standardized Measures
ABILITY
ACHIEVEMENT
ACHIEVEMENT
CogAT-Verbal
MAP-Reading (Fall)
MAP-Reading (Spring)
National
Local Percentile
Percentile Rank
Rank (LPR)
(NPR)
95
89
86
66
83
68
Combined transformed point value
sum (using the highest achievement
point value)
Transformed Point Value Conversion Table
80-83LPR
84-88LPR
89-92LPR
LPR
1
2
3
Points
93-95LPR
4
96-97LPR
5
98LPR
6
Transformed
Point Value
(from LPR)
3
0
0
3
99LPR
7
Point Value Sum and Corresponding Rank in Grade Level within District 102 Conversion Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sum
Top 25% Top 20% Top 16% Top 13% Top 10% Top 8%
Top 6% Top 4%
Top 3%
Rank
99+LPR
8
10
11
Top 2%
Top 1%
Teacher Rating Scale
Rated Area
Learning Ability
Creativity
Motivation
Max Points
Talent Pool Average
Student Score
72
66
66
65
56
55
70
34
55
Total number of areas at or above
the talent pool average
Talent Pool Comparison
(Above, Equal, Below)
ABOVE
BELOW
EQUAL
2
Placement Decision:
_____ Humanities Connections (with curriculum-based and/or school-wide enrichment as needed or pursued)
___X_Humanities Connections (with curriculum-based and/or school-wide enrichment as needed or pursued)
Progress will be closely monitored to detect possible student support or placement review.
_____ Core Reading/Language Arts (with curriculum-based differentiation as needed and/or school-wide enrichment as
pursued)
_____ Core Reading/Language Arts (with school-wide enrichment as pursued)
_____ Placement Review is suggested
A student’s combined transformed point total must place him/her within the top 25% of his/her grade level to be
considered for a placement review.
10/19/09