District Self Study Guide
Each school district and accredited non-public school in Iowa is required to develop a written plan
to describe their implementation of the Iowa Core Curriculum. The first phase of the
implementation of the Iowa Core Curriculum is the completion of a comprehensive district self study
of current practices, actions taken in the past, work already completed, and work that must be
completed. This document provides broad guidance on the use of the Scoring Rubric and related
documents, organized across the following areas:
 Purpose and Use
 Content
 Future Directions
 Steps to Complete
 Scoring Rubric
 Consensus Rating form
 Feedback form
 Appendices – PowerPoint Overview, Outcome 2 documents, Profile of Iowa Professional
Development Model Components
Purpose and Use
The purposes of the Iowa Core Curriculum District Self Study are to:
(1) Obtain baseline information for districts to use to develop their implementation plan,
(2) Provide progress monitoring information for continuous improvement of Iowa Core
Curriculum implementation,
(3) Help districts prioritize their needs in preparation for the development of their Iowa Core
Curriculum Implementation Plan,
(4) Provide the state a way to evaluate the rollout and progress of Iowa Core Curriculum
implementation.
Districts need to complete the self study as baseline prior to the development of any part of their
implementation plan; district self study results should be used to develop an initial implementation
plan. It is not anticipated that districts will score at the highest levels on this rubric during the
baseline phase; rather it is more likely that districts will score low-to-medium and use results to
identify priorities and actions that will result in growth that will be reflected on future administrations
of the rubric. Further, the ultimate and most important outcome for districts is the discussion that
surrounds the self study; the score on the rubric is a reflection of this facilitated discussion.
The district self study is to be used as an individual district baseline and progress monitoring tool
embedded into a continuous improvement process. Results should not and will not be used as
comparison scores across districts. It is most important that districts experience growth across
Outcomes/Actions and years.
The Scoring Rubric and Consensus Rating form have been developed by outcome and released for
use subsequent to established Iowa Core Curriculum vetting procedures. Therefore, it is expected
that districts will complete the self study by outcome, as subsequent rubrics become available and
develop initial implementation plans over time using results from these self studies.
The following are recommended practices for completing the Scoring Rubric:
(1) Diverse Stakeholder Input - The full Iowa Core Curriculum District Leadership Team should
be engaged to complete the Scoring Rubric for baseline and subsequent progress
monitoring administrations. Processes should be used that elicit not only input, but
ownership in self study results and subsequent initial implementation plan;
(2) Facilitator- Self study facilitators should review the entire contents of this document prior to
leading any group to complete the Scoring Rubric. The facilitator could be district
personnel or personnel from the AEA Iowa Core Curriculum Network.
1
(3) Data Collection and Reporting - The Scoring Rubric and the Consensus Rating form should
be completed prior to the development of the implementation plan 1 for baseline and
annually for progress monitoring. The self study may be completed as often as the
district deems necessary; at a minimum, annually.
(4) AEA as Partners – Districts should partner with their AEA Iowa Core Curriculum Network
personnel to complete the Scoring Rubric. Each AEA will have someone who is able to
provide technical assistance in how to collect, report and use the self study data/results.
Content
The content of the self study is based on the six major outcomes of the Iowa Core Curriculum:
Outcome 1 – Leadership: School leaders build and sustain system capacity to implement
the Iowa Core Curriculum.
Outcome 2 – Community: Community members and other supporting agencies work
together to support the implementation of the Iowa Core Curriculum.
Outcome 3 – Schools: A continuous improvement process to improve teaching and
learning is used at the district and school level.
Content -- Instruction -- Assessment
Outcome 4 – Content Alignment: District leaders and other educators monitor and use
data to increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s
enacted curriculum and other relevant educational opportunities to the Iowa
Core Curriculum.
Outcome 5 – Professional Development: Educators engage in professional development
focused on implementing Characteristics of Effective Instruction and
demonstrate understanding of Essential Concepts and Skill Sets.
Outcome 6 – Instruction and Assessment: Educators implement effective instructional
practices to ensure high levels of learning for each and every student.
Each outcome has one or more targets; each target has one or more district actions that are
necessary to meet the target and therefore each major outcome of the Iowa Core Curriculum. In
order for districts to evaluate current practices, actions taken in the past, work already completed,
and work that must be considered. A Scoring Rubric has been developed for districts to
complete. The rubric is tied to the district actions, and based on a five-point Likert scale.2
Future Directions
For the first year, the Scoring Rubric will be completed as a paper document until an online data
management system can be developed for statewide use. The online system will be developed by
2010.
It is anticipated that the Iowa Core Curriculum District Self Study and Implementation Plan will be
embedded into the school improvement process (IAC Chapter 12 requirements) within the next five
years. At the current time, these processes need to be separate as we work as a state to refine
how we can realize the Iowa Core Curriculum in each Iowa classroom.
Providing feedback on the process of completing the Scoring Rubric will be essential to help the
state refine this work. To this end, there are built-in feedback procedures for the Scoring Rubric for
each outcome; it is expected that districts will provide important and salient feedback to the
Network and to the Department of Education using these procedures. This feedback will be used
to further refine the self study process(es).
It is anticipated that the full District Self Study Guide will be in final form in conjunction with the release
of the online data management system for the Iowa Core Curriculum.
1
Districts may complete the self study by Outcome and therefore use results to develop an implementation plan by Outcome
over time.
2
Five point Likert scale is from 0=Emerging Practice to 4=Established Practice.
2
Steps to Complete the Scoring Guide, Consensus Rating Form, and Feedback Form.
Total time depends on the Outcome: Outcome 1 approximately 160 minutes; all other Outcomes
approximately 120 minutes.
1. Identify the members of the District Leadership Team who will complete the self study.
All members of your District Leadership Team should complete the self study. Review
Leadership Action 1 on page 5 regarding who should be members of this team.
2. Present overview of the self study to all members of the team.
An overview of the self study is available for facilitator use; hardcopy of the powerpoint is
included in Appendix A of this document.
[Activity length – 5-10 minutes]
3. Review, individually, the content of the Scoring Rubric.
Each member of the team should review the content of the documents for the specific outcome
the group is rating (e.g., Leadership, Community, School, and so on)
[Activity length – 30 minutes for Outcome 1; 15 minutes for all other Outcomes]
4. Discuss as a group any questions as a result of the review
Questions should be answered by the facilitator after the overview and document review.
[Activity length – 10 minutes]
5. Rate the full Scoring Rubric, individually.
Each member of the team should rate each Action independently; this is an opportunity for
each person’s voice to be heard. If a member does not know how to rate a specific Action, they
may abstain from doing so.
[Activity length – 20 minutes for Outcome 1; 10 minutes for all other Outcomes]
6. Vote as a group using the fist of 4 to reach a consensus - There are several steps to
consensus voting:
[Activity length – 60 minutes for Outcome 1; 30 minutes for all other Outcomes]
a. Vote: Begin with Action 1 – ask for each member to vote using the Fist of 4 (fist=0,
Index finger=1, 2 fingers=2 and so on)
b. Modal Number Identification: Identify the number that is most frequent – the Modal
Number (if three members vote 2, five vote 1 and two vote zero, the most frequent
number that members voted is 1 – this is the Modal Number)
c. Discuss Rationale of the Modal Number: Ask a representative of the Modal Number
voting to talk about why he/she voted in this way
d. Discuss Rationale of Non-Modal Number(s): Round robin and have other members talk
about why they voted in a particular way.
e. Vote: Use the Fist of 4 a second time – members may change their votes based on the
discussion.
f. Record Rating: If there is a Modal Number – this is the consensus rating that is
recorded on the Consensus Rating form.
---If consensus is not reached (there is no Modal Number) then continue
discussing/voting on the Action until consensus is reached.
g. Continue across all Actions: Repeat this process for each Action.
7. Prioritize the Actions and identify 2-3 top priorities for action planning; informally discuss
possible next steps/activities.
[Activity length – 10-20 minutes]
8. Record the consensus score, priorities, and informal next steps/activities on the Consensus
Rating form.
[Activity length – 10 minutes]
9. Evaluate the Scoring Rubric, District Self Study Guide, Consensus Rating form and process
using the Feedback form
[Activity length – 10-15 minutes]
10. Submit 1 of each form to your AEA Network representative: Consensus Rating and Feedback.
3
Scoring Rubric
The Scoring Rubric has been developed by outcome and released for use subsequent to established Iowa
Core Curriculum vetting procedures. Therefore, it is expected that districts will complete the self study by
outcome as subsequent self study rubrics become available, and develop initial implementation plans over time
using results from these self studies.
Outcome 3: School
Outcome 3 is primarily focused on data and the continuous improvement process. Districts need to strive to streamline and align across as many improvement
processes as possible (e.g., CSIP, SPP, specific projects and so on). It is important to note that OUTCOME 3, ACTION 1 will sunset subsequent to obtaining baseline
data – baseline data is the FIRST time a district completes the Scoring Rubric, which should be completed in 2009. Further, OUTCOME 3, ACTION 2 reflects all subsequent
Scoring Rubric administrations; districts should start annual self study administrations in 2010, and annually thereafter.
Outcome 3 – Schools. A continuous improvement process to improve teaching and learning is used at the district and
school level.
If the Iowa Core Curriculum and related school improvement processes function as ongoing continuous improvement
processes based on data, then all elements of the system will constantly adjust and improve to yield positive outcomes for
all students.
There are two targets and 3 LEA Actions related to Outcome 3 – Schools. Below is a brief overview of the TARGETS and
LEA Actions for Leadership.
TARGETS (What are we trying to accomplish?) and LEA Actions ((What are districts going to do to reach the target?)
Target: Data are used to develop, and monitor the implementation of, the Iowa Core Curriculum Implementation Plan.
Action 1: District Leadership Team uses self study baseline results to write implementation plan.
Action 2: District Leadership Team uses self study annual results to monitor progress of Iowa Core Curriculum implementation over time.
Target: Processes and procedures are used to engage stakeholders, develop school improvement plans, and integrate various district/school plans.
Action 3: District Leadership Team develops a cycle for document/district continuous improvement plan review to incorporate the Iowa Core
Curriculum and integrate various planning processes.
Please remember the steps to complete this rubric as this provides all participants a voice in the process and results.
Steps to completing this rubric:
1. Rate each Action independently;
2. Vote as a group using the fist of 4;
3. Discuss the voting differences;
4. Vote a final time to come to a consensus;
5. Record the consensus on Consensus Rating form and submit to the AEA Network representative for your area.
4
Outcome 3: A continuous improvement process to improve teaching and learning is used at the district and school level.
Target: Data are used to develop, and monitor the implementation of, the Iowa Core Curriculum Implementation Plan.
Action 1 - District Leadership Team uses self study baseline results to write the Iowa Core Curriculum Implementation Plan.
Practice in Place
0
Data are reviewed
prior to developing
the implementation
plan.
[NOTE: It is not the
purpose to review all
data a district has
available, but to be
strategic and
targeted in data
selection. The Iowa
Core Curriculum
District Self Study
provides an
opportunity for
global self-reflection
and guidance; these
results are not the
only data a district
would or should use
in the development
or review of the
status of Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation]
OUTCOME 3,
ACTION 1 will
sunset subsequent
to obtaining
baseline data –
baseline data is the
FIRST time a
district completes
the Scoring Rubric,
which should be
completed in 2009.
3
1
2
3
Established Practice
4
One component is in
place:
Two components are in
place:
Three components are in
place:
All components are in
place:
A. Conduct and analyze
results of the Iowa
Core Curriculum
District Self Study and
related tools:
A. Conduct and analyze
results of the Iowa
Core Curriculum
District Self Study and
related tools:
A. Conduct and analyze
results of the Iowa
Core Curriculum
District Self Study and
related tools:
A. Conduct and analyze
results of the Iowa Core
Curriculum District Self
Study and related tools:
1. Learning Supports
review (Outcome 2 see Appendix B)
2. Curriculum Alignment
review (Outcome 4)3
3. Professional
Development review
(Outcome 5 – see
Appendix C)
4. Instruction/
Assessment review
(Outcome 6)
1. Learning Supports
review (Outcome 2 see Appendix B)
2. Curriculum Alignment
review (Outcome 4)
3. Professional
Development review
(Outcome 5 - see
Appendix C)
4. Instruction/
Assessment review
(Outcome 6)
B. Additional personnel,
stakeholder and/or
student-level data are
identified to review to
assess progress on
the implementation of
the Iowa Core
Curriculum.
B. Additional personnel,
stakeholder and/or
student-level data are
identified to review to
assess progress on
the implementation of
the Iowa Core
Curriculum.
C. The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
is clearly and
specifically based on
the Iowa Core
Curriculum District
Self Study and
additional data.
C. The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
is clearly and
specifically based on
the Iowa Core
Curriculum District
Self Study and
additional data.
1. Learning Supports
review (Outcome 2 –
see Appendix B)
2. Curriculum Alignment
review (Outcome 4)
3. Professional
Development review
(Outcome 5 - see
Appendix C)
4. Instruction/
Assessment review
(Outcome 6)
B. Additional personnel,
stakeholder and/or
student-level data are
identified to review to
assess progress on the
implementation of the
Iowa Core Curriculum.
C. The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan is
clearly and specifically
based on the Iowa
Core Curriculum
District Self Study and
additional data.
1. Learning Supports
review (Outcome 2 – see
Appendix B)
2. Curriculum Alignment
review (Outcome 4)
3. Professional
Development review
(Outcome 5 - see
Appendix C)
4. Instruction/ Assessment
review (Outcome 6)
B. Additional personnel,
stakeholder and/or
student-level data are
identified to review to
assess progress on the
implementation of the
Iowa Core Curriculum.
C. The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan is
clearly and specifically
based on the Iowa Core
Curriculum District Self
Study and additional
data.
Possible Evidence
ACompletion of the Iowa
Core Curriculum District
Self Study and completion
of all related reviews.
BDocumentation of
additional data identified
that are used to develop
and annually review
progress of the
implementation of the
Iowa Core Curriculum.
C- D
Data review plan
ETurnover/new enrollment
plan
[NOTE: it is not the
purpose to have extensive
data review or
turnover/new enrollment
plans or to develop
separate plans from other
processes – rather it is
important to align/embed
as much as possible, and
streamline processes]
Reviews for Outcomes 4 and 6 will be ready in concert with the District Self Study for Outcomes 4 and 6. Anticipated rollout is Summer 2009.
5
D. The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
describes how data
will be reviewed at
least annually as well
as how these data are
aligned/embedded
with the district
continuous
improvement
schedule.
D.
E. The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
addresses staff
turnover/new
enrollment so that
new personnel,
families/students
understand the
school’s
implementation plan
and the Iowa Core
Curriculum.
E.
The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
describes how data
will be reviewed at
least annually as
well as how these
data are
aligned/embedded
with the district
continuous
improvement
schedule.
The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
addresses staff
turnover/new
enrollment so that
new personnel,
families/students
understand the
school’s
implementation plan
and the Iowa Core
Curriculum.
D.
E.
The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
describes how data
will be reviewed at
least annually as well
as how these data are
aligned/embedded
with the district
continuous
improvement
schedule.
The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
addresses staff
turnover/new
enrollment so that
new personnel,
families/students
understand the
school’s
implementation plan
and the Iowa Core
Curriculum.
D.
The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
describes how data will
be reviewed at least
annually as well as
how these data are
aligned/embedded with
the district continuous
improvement schedule.
E.
The Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
addresses staff
turnover/new
enrollment so that new
personnel,
families/students
understand the
school’s
implementation plan
and the Iowa Core
Curriculum.
Guiding Questions
 What defines our district’s continuous improvement process?

What additional data will the district collect? What are the specific sources of data for student outcomes and teacher behaviors?

How will information gained from the continuous improvement process facilitate teacher and administrator professional growth (evaluation and
professional development)?

What considerations need to be taken to address staff and administrator turnover?

How will these data keep efforts focused on priorities?

Does your district have an Iowa Core Curriculum Implementation Plan?

Is your district’s Iowa Core Curriculum Implementation Plan based on data and the Iowa Core Curriculum District Self Study results?

Does your Iowa Core Curriculum Implementation Plan include a plan to inform new personnel, families and students about the plan?
6
Action 2 - District Leadership Team uses self study annual results to monitor progress of Iowa Core Curriculum implementation over time.
Practice in Place
0
1
2
3
Established Practice
4
Data are reviewed
annually.
One component is in
place:
Two components are in
place:
Three components are in
place:
All components are in
place:
OUTCOME 3,
ACTION 2 reflects
all subsequent
Scoring Rubric
administrations;
districts should
start annual self
study
administrations in
2010, and annually
thereafter.
A. Conduct and analyze
results of the Iowa
Core Curriculum
District Self Study and
related tools annually:
A. Conduct and analyze
results of the Iowa
Core Curriculum
District Self Study and
related tools annually:
A. Conduct and analyze
results of the Iowa
Core Curriculum
District Self Study and
related tools annually:
A. Conduct and analyze
results of the Iowa Core
Curriculum District Self
Study and related tools
annually:
1. Learning Supports
review (Outcome 2 see Appendix B)
2. Curriculum Alignment
review (Outcome 4)
3. Professional
Development review
(Outcome 5 – see
Appendix C)
4. Instruction/
Assessment review
(Outcome 6)
1. Learning Supports
review (Outcome 2 see Appendix B)
2. Curriculum Alignment
review (Outcome 4)
3. Professional
Development review
(Outcome 5 – see
Appendix C)
4. Instruction/
Assessment review
(Outcome 6)
B. Additional personnel,
stakeholder and/or
student-level data are
reviewed at least
annually and more
frequently when
appropriate to assess
progress on the
implementation of the
Iowa Core
Curriculum.
B. Additional personnel,
stakeholder and/or
student-level data are
reviewed at least
annually and more
frequently when
appropriate to assess
progress on the
implementation of the
Iowa Core
Curriculum.
C. Use results of
components A and B
to review and revise
implementation plan.
D. The information and
training needs of new
staff and new families
are addressed as
needed.
C. Use results of
components A and B
to review and revise
implementation plan.
D. The information and
training needs of new
staff and new families
are addressed as
needed.
1. Learning Supports
review (Outcome 2 see Appendix B)
2. Curriculum Alignment
review (Outcome 4)
3. Professional
Development review
(Outcome 5 – see
Appendix C)
4. Instruction/
Assessment review
(Outcome 6)
B. Additional personnel,
stakeholder and/or
student-level data are
reviewed at least
annually and more
frequently when
appropriate to assess
progress on the
implementation of the
Iowa Core Curriculum.
C. Use results of
components A and B
to review and revise
implementation plan.
D. The information and
training needs of new
staff and new families
are addressed as
needed.
1. Learning Supports review
(Outcome 2 - see
Appendix B)
2. Curriculum Alignment
review (Outcome 4)
3. Professional
Development review
(Outcome 5 – see
Appendix C)
4. Instruction/ Assessment
review (Outcome 6)
B. Additional personnel,
stakeholder and/or
student-level data are
reviewed at least
annually and more
frequently when
appropriate to assess
progress on the
implementation of the
Iowa Core Curriculum.
Possible Evidence
AAnnual completion of the
Iowa Core Curriculum
District Self Study and
completion of all related
reviews.
BDocumentation data
reviewed.
CDocumentation that results
of A and B are used to
inform revision of the
implementation plan.
DTurnover/new enrollment
plan used when
necessary.
C. Use results of
components A and B to
review and revise
implementation plan.
D. The information and
training needs of new
staff and new families
are addressed as
needed.
7
Guiding Questions
 What is the schedule for reviewing and analyzing data to inform next steps? How will the district ensure that the process for reviewing local alignment is
continuous?

What are the procedures and routines that will sustain implementation?

How will information gained from the continuous improvement process facilitate teacher and administrator professional growth (evaluation and
professional development)?

What considerations need to be taken to address staff and administrator turnover?


How will the Leadership Team examine implications of student achievement results and the Iowa Core Curriculum District Self Study?
How will data about the effectiveness of instruction in a classroom be used to identify areas of improvement on an ongoing basis?

How will these data keep efforts focused on priorities?
8
Target: Processes and procedures are used to engage stakeholders, develop school improvement plans, and
integrate various district/school plans.
Action 3 - District Leadership Team develops a cycle for document/district continuous improvement plan review to incorporate the Iowa Core
Curriculum and integrate various planning processes
Practice in Place
0
None of the
components are in
place.
[NOTE: Data
referred to in Action
3 includes the full
Iowa Core
Curriculum District
Self Study and
related tools]
1
2
3
Established Practice
4
One component is in
place:
Two components are in
place:
Three components are in
place:
All components are in
place:
A. The district leadership
team integrates data
collected for Iowa
Core Curriculum
action planning into
the needs
assessment process
for developing the
District’s CSIP
required by IAC
Chapter 12.
A. The district leadership
team integrates data
collected for Iowa
Core Curriculum
action planning into
the needs
assessment process
for developing the
District’s CSIP
required by IAC
Chapter 12.
A. The district leadership
team integrates data
collected for Iowa Core
Curriculum action
planning into the needs
assessment process
for developing the
District’s CSIP required
by IAC Chapter 12.
A. The district leadership
team integrates data
collected for Iowa Core
Curriculum action
planning into the needs
assessment process for
developing the District’s
CSIP required by IAC
Chapter 12.
B. The district leadership
team integrates
actions from the Iowa
Core Curriculum
Implementation Plan
into the District’s
CSIP action plan.
B. The district leadership
team integrates
actions from the Iowa
Core Curriculum
Implementation Plan
into the District’s
CSIP action plan.
B. The district leadership
team integrates actions
from the Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
into the District’s CSIP
action plan.
B. The district leadership
team integrates actions
from the Iowa Core
Curriculum
Implementation Plan
into the District’s CSIP
action plan.
C. The district leadership
team uses Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation data
and student
achievement data to
assist in monitoring
implementation of the
CSIP.
C. The district leadership
team uses Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation data
and student
achievement data to
assist in monitoring
implementation of the
CSIP.
C. The district leadership
team uses Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation data
and student
achievement data to
assist in monitoring
implementation of the
CSIP.
C. The district leadership
team uses Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation data
and student
achievement data to
assist in monitoring
implementation of the
CSIP.
D. The district leadership
team uses progress
data on Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation as
one source of
information for their
Annual Progress
Report.
D. The district leadership
team uses progress
data on Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation as
one source of
information for their
Annual Progress
Report.
D. The district leadership
team uses progress
data on Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation as one
source of information
for their Annual
Progress Report.
D. The district leadership
team uses progress
data on Iowa Core
Curriculum
implementation as one
source of information for
their Annual Progress
Report.
Possible Evidence
A-D
Documentation of
streamlined, integrated
processes between CSIP
and implementation of the
Iowa Core Curriculum.
9
Guiding Questions
 What procedures and/or routines are already in place to assist in this work? How does this work connect to SINA/DINA, CSIP, SPP, AYP, and APR?
 Are the findings related to the continuous improvement of teaching and learning being widely communicated to stakeholders?
10
Consensus Rating
DISTRICT______________________________
Outcome 3: A continuous improvement process to improve teaching and learning is used at the district and school level.
Complete this form by recording the results of consensus rating and discussion in regards to baseline self study results, priorities for action, and initial ideas for
next steps/activities
Send a copy of this completed form, along with a completed Feedback form, to your AEA Iowa Core Curriculum Network representative.
Item
Baseline
Action 1 - District Leadership Team uses self study baseline results to
write the Iowa Core Curriculum Implementation Plan.
0 1 2 3 4
Action 2 - District Leadership Team uses self study annual results to
monitor progress of Iowa Core Curriculum implementation
over time.
Action 3 - District Leadership Team develops a cycle for
document/district continuous improvement plan review to
incorporate the Iowa Core Curriculum and integrate various
planning processes.
Priorities
Initial Ideas for Next Steps/Activities
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
11
Feedback Form
DISTRICT______________________________
Providing feedback on the process of completing the Iowa Core Curriculum District Self Study is essential to help the state refine this work. To this end, there
are built-in feedback procedures for the Iowa Core Curriculum District Self Study for each outcome; it is expected that districts will provide important and salient
feedback to the Network and to the Department of Education using these procedures. This feedback will be used to further refine the self study, rubric,
process(es), and guidance document. Please submit only ONE self study Feedback Form per district as a consensus discussion.
Process (the fist of four process)
Products (Scoring Rubric, Consensus Rating Form)
What worked?
What didn’t?
What recommendations
do you have?
12