People & Performance Management Hand outs Core learning September 2008 Title Page number Overview of programme 3 Motivation 5 Other theories on motivation 7 Leadership and motivation 10 People management 12 Action centred leadership 13 Situational leadership 15 Setting objectives, goals or standards 17 Four leadership styles 18 Appraisal systems 24 The performance management cycle 25 Nine steps to objective setting 26 The interview 26 Feedback 30 Feedback – “The Ten Commandments” 31 Case study: Emma O’Hara 33 The Ask/Tell Repertoire 35 Active listening 36 Asking questions 37 How to develop people 39 Supporting people through learning 40 Learning style preferences 42 Performance improvement meetings / Discussions 43 2 Gaining agreement to improving poor performance 44 Five styles of managing conflict 45 Resolving conflict 47 Skills for dealing with difficult behaviour at work 48 Effective communication 51 Exploring why behaviour differs 54 Communication Skills 57 Possible sources of bias in assessment 62 Personal feedback questionnaire 63 The GROW sequence worksheet 64 Performance Management Crib Sheet 68 Performance management for Reviews – Individual preparation forms 69 Save the Children’s rating scale descriptors 72 Performance Management Form 74 Performance Management Form for managers 75 Written for Save the Children by Andy Catto – In – I6T and Fran Walsh and Anne Kristine Arbon in Save the Children. 3 People and Performance Management who is it for? All managers of people aim: To support participants in their crucial role of management with an overview of the key skills and behaviours needed to get the best out of their people, and also how to use the SCUK performance management system effectively as an aid key objectives: By the end of the programme, participants will: Have gained a good knowledge of the techniques required to manage people Have a good understanding of their personal style of leadership Have a clearer understanding of how to use the SCUK performance management system as a means of motivating their teams outline: The programme will cover: What motivates people Our role as managers/leaders Styles of leadership The Save the Children performance management system Setting effective objectives Monitoring performance Effective appraisals Effective feedback – giving and receiving Developing people Handling performance issues 4 Motivation Needs: - A H Maslow – The Hierarchy of Needs – 1940 Human beings are motivated by their needs. Maslow proposed that: a. Needs are arranged in a hierarchy from the physiological to those of selfactualisation. b. When any need is satisfied it ceases to motivate, motivation then results from promoting of the next highest need in the hierarchy. c. The five groups of needs develop in a chronological sequence e.g. the survival of needs are with us at birth. E D Ego C B A Self-Actualisation Social Safety/Security Physiological Fullest possible use of current activities Fullest possible development of potential activities Respect from others for ability; Leadership; Self-respect for ability and achievement Love relationships, Friendships belonging to groups whose values are shared Physical safety, Security & Order in environment, emotional Food, Drink, Air, Rest and other bodily functions Maslow suggested that the higher level needs overlap to some extent, each emerging before the next lower level has been completely satisfied. He also stated that individuals might jumble around the order and importance of the higher needs. Taking Needs to Work The needs of the individuals serve as driving forces in human behaviour and it is as well to recognise that each person brings all of these needs to the work situation. The fact that some or many needs are not being met at work can lead to such situations as frustration and resultant hostility. The manager seeking to motivate members of staff is faced with these facts. If a person experiences nagging safety needs or insecurity, e.g. fear of redundancy, or feels an absence of order and equity in the organisation due perhaps to wage 5 structures or ranking, they will not be interested in the organisations policies or plans designed to assist them fulfil higher needs. If an easy, straightforward way to satisfy these safety needs is not seen, one is liable to behave irrationally; obstructing or sabotaging the work of the organisation and adopting a negative attitude. Lack of success in early years in attracting the esteem of others may result, in later years, in an insatiable appetite for success to the exclusion of satisfying some lower order needs. However there must be a minimum satisfaction of the love and friendship and belonging needs for life to feel worthwhile. It is no use trying to motivate a member of staff by offering a chance to satisfy a need that is already satisfied; neither is there any point in offering satisfaction of a higher need than the most pressing one, it would be seen as a pointless challenge that may well increase the degree of need at the lower level. 6 Other theories on motivation 1. Theory – X, Theory – Y, Douglas McGregor 1960 McGregor was a contemporary of A H Maslow. His theory on motivation was based upon Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. It consisted of two different sets of assumptions about people and their degree of motivation, Theory X and Theory Y. 2. Theory – X, The Conventional View a. Management is responsible for organising the elements of productive enterprise – money, materials, equipment, people – in the interest of economic ends. b. With regard to people, this is a process of directing their efforts, motivating them, controlling their action, modifying their behaviour to fit the needs of the organisation. c. Without this active intervention by management, people would be passive – even resistant – to organisational needs. They must therefore be persuaded, rewarded, punished, controlled; their activities must be directed. This is management’s task in managing subordinate managers or workers. We often sum it up by saying that management consists of getting things done through other people. Behind this conventional view there are several additional beliefs; less explicit, but widespread. d. The average person is by nature indolent; they work as little as possible. e. They lack ambition, dislike responsibility, prefer to be led. f. They are inherently self-centred, indifferent to organisational needs. g. They are by nature resistant to change. h. They are gullible, not very bright, ready dupes of the Charlatan and Demagogue. Conventional organisation structures, managerial policies, practices and programmes reflect these assumptions. In accomplishing its task, management conceived a range of possibilities between two extremes – hard and soft. At one extreme, management could be hard or strong. The method used for directing behaviour involving coercion and threat; usually in disguised form, close supervision, tight controls over behaviour. Thus management work on peoples natural needs for physiological wellbeing and security. People would have to conform in order to maintain a sufficient degree of satisfaction in these basic areas. 7 At the other extreme management can be soft or weak, resorting to such things as permissiveness. This form functions in the belief that by satisfying demands and achieving harmony people will become tractable and accept direction. The soft approach could also produce difficulties, advantage being easy to take. More and more being expected for less and less. In between these two extremes sits the popular ‘firm but fair’ approach which could be summed up as ‘speak softly but carry a big stick’. McGregor felt that management by direction whether hard, soft or firm but fair failed to provide efficient motivation of human efforts towards organisational objectives. It failed because direction and control were useless in an era when peoples physiological and safety needs were reasonably satisfied and whose social, ego and self-actualisation needs were predominant. He therefore advanced a different theory of motivation based on what he considered were more adequate assumptions. 3. Theory –Y, A New Perspective a. Management is responsible for organising the elements of productive enterprise money, materials, equipment, people – in the interest of economic ends. b. People are not by nature passive resistant to organisational needs; they have become so as a result of experience in the organisation. c. The motivation, the potential for development, the capacity for assuming responsibility, the readiness to direct behaviour towards organisational goals are all present in people. Management does not put them there. It is a responsibility of management to make it possible for people to recognise and develop these human characteristics for themselves. d. The essential task of management is to arrange organisational conditions and methods of operation so that people can achieve their own goals best by directing their own efforts towards organisational objectives. This does not involve the abdication of management, the absence of leadership, the lowering of standards, or the other characteristics usually associated with the soft approach under Theory – X. On the contrary, difficulties exist in changing to Theory – Y from Theory – X because the former expects people to be responsible, be adult, think for themselves. This would however enable people to realise their full potential and thus the organisations full potential. At the same time people would be able to realise and satisfy the higher order needs and as a result society as a whole should benefit. 4. The Hygiene – Motivation Theory – R Herzberg Herzberg’s theory is based upon the findings of an experiment carried out using two hundred engineers and accountants in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It was an inquiry into 8 job satisfaction. The basis of the experiment was to ask the subjects about events they had experienced at work, which either had resulted in a marked improvement in their job satisfaction or had led to a marked reduction in job satisfaction. The results are that all the high feelings or ‘motivators’ as Herzberg calls them result directly from the work itself. The satisfaction of a job done well, praise for doing a good job, doing something nice, being trusted with an important task etc. The dissatisfiers or ‘hygiene’ factors on the other hand do not stem from the actual work but the factors that go with a job e.g. the boss, workmates, company policy, pay and working conditions. It can be seen therefore that just satisfying a work forces complaints about pay, working conditions, policy etc will not necessarily result in lasting degrees or motivation of that work force. Such factors are certainly important but it is the degree of satisfaction obtained from the job which may really count. Herzberg proposed that motivation will come through job enrichment. 9 Leadership and motivation Leadership is the art or process of influencing people so that they perform assigned tasks willingly and in an efficient and effective manner. According to Gary Yukl (Leadership in Organisations) successful leaders are capable of adapting to changed circumstances, aware of the social environment, ambitious and assertive, willing to co-operate with others and decisive when making decisions. They can be trusted, they tend to assume a dominant role with a group, and they have energy and are persistent. They have self-confidence, they can absorb a great deal of stress and they are willing to take on a role of responsibility. Leaders tend to be intelligent, creative, to have tact and diplomacy, possess good communication skills and to be persuasive, to be knowledgeable, to possess good social skills, to possess self-discipline and be capable of organizing things. Leaders and Managers It is useful to distinguish between managers and leaders; managers have legitimate or positional power as a result of their post. However, for leaders the source of their ability to influence others comes from their expertise or from their personality. It is possible to be a leader without being a manager, and possible to be a manager with no leadership skills. On the other hand, the best managers are also leaders. Management is: the efficient and effective use of resources to achieve objectives with and through the efforts of other people. Leadership is: inspiring others to follow your lead by creating a compelling vision of the future. In short: ‘people have to follow managers, they want to follow leaders’ Theories of Leadership Charismatic: Authority based on leaders’ exemplary character Inspiration coming from empathy to followers needs and dramatising the mission Awe of followers based on self-assurance, focus on present and future, no need for approval; consistency creating trust Empowerment of followers based on assuring them of competency and providing opportunities to experience success Transformational: Realistic vision creating sense of purpose Acts as role model Gives individual concern 10 Traditional: Based on power of position Focus on power and control Little trust in followers Behavioural Alter behaviour to suit circumstances Focus on task/people Situation depends on characteristics of subordinates (skills, motivation); task (routine, urgency); organisational characteristics (formality, cohesiveness) John Adair John Adair claimed that people can be trained for leadership as a transferable skill and that leadership is not a matter of inborn aptitude. The central skills are decisionmaking, communication, and the ability to manage time. In his action-centred learning model he argues that working groups share three areas of common needs: the need to accomplish a common task, the need to be maintained as a cohesive social unit or team, and the sum of the group’s individual needs. The functions of leadership are: planning and initiating, controlling and supporting, informing and evaluating. He identified 7 qualities of leadership Seven qualities of leadership: 1. Enthusiasm – it’s contagious 2. Integrity – adherence to values; consistency 3. Toughness – resilient; tenacious 4. Fairness – treat individuals differently but equally 5. Warmth – engages heart as well as mind 6. Humility – good listener; not arrogant 7. Confidence – self belief He also set out the actions that leaders/managers need to take to get the best out of their teams: 11 People management KEY RESPONSIBIL ITIES ACHIEVING THE TASK (hard skills) Setting Direction Define objectives within strategy Identify task, constraints and deliverables Establish priorities Establish programme, milestones and schedule Identify and acquire resources (people, tools, materials) Manage and implement change Set performance/conduct standards Identify, acquire and allocate resources (people – provide them with necessary tools and materials) Recruit if appropriate Brief the team. Check understanding Establish two-way communication process Report progress Maintain standards and discipline Achieve objectives/results Planning and Resourcing Communicating/ Briefing Supporting and Monitoring Performance BUILDING AND MAINTAINING THE TEAM (soft skills) Involve team Establish shared vision/values Agree team purpose/goals Establish commitment DEVELOPING THE INDIVIDUAL (soft skills) Consult with team Encourage ideas and actions Develop suggestions system Gain commitment to standards Assess skills (carry out skills audit) Build team and co operation Resolve conflicts Assign tasks and goals (delegate clear authority and responsibility) Clarify role Sell roles/jobs to individuals Manage aspirations Manage any resistance to change Provide information Obtain feedback Answer questions Provide information Obtain feedback Enthuse Co ordinate activities Review team effectiveness Provide regular feedback Reconcile conflict Motivate team Encourage innovation Provide regular feedback. Guide, assist, advise, reassure, motivate, counsel. Recognise effort and good performance Coach and develop Manage and correct poor performance Discipline if appropriate Coach and develop Assess/appraise Taking Corrective Action Modify plans, priorities, milestones, schedules and resources if necessary Encourage problem solving Negotiation within teams Negotiation between teams Avoid blame Evaluating and Summarise Recognise and celebrate Clarify understanding of direction Clarify contribution Gain acceptance 12 Reviewing achievements/failures Review objectives Re-plan if necessary success performance Learn from failure Identify and action Identify and action training and training and development needs development needs Evaluate effectiveness of Evaluate effectiveness training and development of training and against objectives development against objectives Action Centred Leadership The Adair prescription is that the action-centred leader gets the job done through the work team and relationships with fellow managers and staff. This is a simple but reasonably useful account of the role/functions of a leader. According to Adair's explanation and actioncentred leader must: direct the job to be done (task structuring) introduce, support and review the individual people doing it coordinate and foster the work team as a whole His trefoil model (three circle diagram), as a simplification of the variability of human interaction, is a first step device for thinking about what constitutes an effective leader/manager in relation to the job he/she has to do. The effective leader/manager carries out the functions and exhibits the behaviours depicted by the three circles. The leaves -- of course -overlap as, according to the specifics of the task/situation, the demands of role performance overlap (functional interdependence). The effective leader, situationally responsive, "brings into play" those leadership behaviours that enable the demands to be met. The problem imperatives and the variables will range across timing, quality, costs, the experience and capacity of the individuals and the team that have to do the work. 13 Thus - if budding team leader/managers can be given training and coaching to develop these situationally relevant skills (their repertoire of leadership competence) then -- or so the prescriptive argument goes -- they will be better placed to be effective leaders. Situational and contingent elements call for different responses by the leader. Hence imagine that the trefoil leaves may be bigger or smaller as the situation varies i.e. the leader will give more or less emphasis to the functionallyoriented behaviours according to what the actual situation involves. One expectation typical of most organisational society is that loyalty, shared values (reflecting organisational values) and team spirit need to be cultivated. Can you think of any business organisation - private, public or voluntary where this is not the case? Individual members of the organisation and work group (close or dispersed team) need to know what is expected of them e.g. the standards and tasks they must achieve to get the job done. However the individual is not a mechanical predictable thing - having wants, preferences, aversions, behaviours, attitudes, ambitions and needs. The organisational leadership expectation is that each person needs encouragement and support to be an active member of the team. The functional orientation of the ACL account indicates the types of activity that a team leader may need to carry out in their role according to the nature of the situation they face. Situational leadership Situational leadership is an approach based broadly on determining what an individual requires in order to perform successfully at a task and then providing a mix of behaviour to satisfy that need. This approach to leadership was originally developed by Hersey & Blanchard and proved to be a very practical way for managers to improve their flexibility. The starting point is for the manager to ask the question: ‘What does this individual need from me in order to achieve the right results and develop as an individual?’ From here, the manager can determine the individual’s ‘task maturity’ and provide the most appropriate leadership style. 14 Task Maturity Task maturity is the degree to which a person can work independently to complete a task to the standards required. Task maturity is not necessarily related to a person’s age; it is the combination of ability and willingness to carry out work. This distinction is important because both can be broken down into their component parts, as shown in the following diagram: Task Maturity Ability Willingness Knowledge & Skills Confidence Related Experience Motivation Not only will task maturity levels be different for different people at work but may also vary between different parts of a person’s job. For example, a secretary might show high task maturity for dealing with telephone queries but low task maturity for filing. Below are some indicators of a person’s task maturity level: High Maturity The person has the knowledge, skills and experience to carry out the work. The person will be able to work out what needs to be done, what the priorities are and the best way of getting the job done. The person will set very high standards of performance and strive to achieve them. The person will monitor his/her own performance rather than having to have it monitored by the leader. The person’s satisfaction at work will come from achieving his/her own high standards, recognition coming mostly from him/herself. Low Maturity The person will lack some of the Knowledge, skills and experience needed to do the job to a high standard. 15 The person does not have his/her own internal high standards and needs to be told what standards are required. The person will set varying standards of performance and strive to achieve them. The person needs to be told what to do, what the priorities are and how to do it. The person's satisfaction comes from outside and depends on his/her leader for praise and censure In simple terms, if an individual is lacking willingness it is appropriate to provide 'supporting' behaviour and if ability is lacking, it is appropriate to provide 'directing' behaviour. Leader Behaviour We can regard leader behaviour as the things a person does or says which are aimed at achieving work through others. It can then be divided into two categories as follows: Directing Behaviour This is the extent to which the leader tells people what has to be done, when to do it, and how to do it. A leader using a highly directing style would give detailed directions to people and supervise closely to ensure that tasks were being carried out correctly. Control over work is essentially with the leader. The 'task direction' dimension of leadership is very much about getting the job done and the leader would… 16 Setting objectives, goals or standards. Define people's roles in carrying out work. Plan people's work in advance and organise resources. Decide and communicate work priorities. Set timescales for completion. Determine how work is to be evaluated. Show and/or tell people how to carry out work. Check to see if work is carried out properly and on time. Supporting Behaviour This is the extent to which the leader is spending time talking to people, listening to them, explaining things to them, giving feedback and so on. A leader using a highly supporting style would be engaged in two-way conversations with people a lot of the time and talking not just about the work that needed to be done but about the people doing the work. The leader would… Listen to people's problems (work or non-work). Praise people for completing work well. Ask for suggestions for carrying out work. Encourage and reassure people that they can do the work. Disclose information about the company. Disclose information about him/herself (work or non-work). Facilitate people to problem-solve their work. Communicate and demonstrate appreciation of good work. 17 Four leadership styles Situational leadership offers four main styles of which directing and supporting behaviours are the main ingredients. The following diagram shows the four styles: SUPPORTING Behaviour S 3 SUPPORTING S 2 COACHING S 4 DELEGATING S 1 DIRECTING DIRECTING Behaviour When these styles are used in conjunction with task maturity levels, they can be very effective. Here is a brief explanation of the four styles: Directing High Direction & Low Support This style places the priority on carrying work out correctly rather than on the person doing it. The leader tells people what needs to be carried out, lays out a step by step plan for completing it, and solves any associated problems. The leader then supervises the work very closely to ensure that it is carried out correctly. Not very much time is spent on explaining why the work needs to be carried out, nor discussing how it should be done. The directing leader essentially treats people as an extension of him/herself. Essentially, the leader makes all the decisions and people carry them out. 18 Coaching High Direction & High Support This style places the priority on 'selling' work to people and having it carried out correctly. The leader continues to tell people what needs to be carried out and how, but also seeks to involve people in the decision making process. The leader will spend time explaining why the work is to be carried out and discuss with people the best way to do it, seeking their views. The leader then takes the final decisions and supervises closely to ensure that it is carried out correctly. Supporting High Support & Low Direction This style places priority on helping people to work out for themselves how best to carry out work. The leader explains what is to be achieved and the reasons behind it and then encourages people to work out how to do it, facilitating the decision making process. The leader will spend time as a helper and guide, facilitating ideas, pointing out factors overlooked and, above all giving people confidence and encouragement. Delegating Low Support & Low Direction This style places priority on giving the responsibility for decision making to people and allowing them to 'go solo'. The leader explains what needs to be achieved, providing very loose, general direction, and hands over responsibility. The leader will not supervise closely but not to the point of disinterest. This style is essentially a mark of trust. It does not mean that the leader stops talking to people but rather that the relationship has become more like that between colleagues than between boss and subordinate. 19 The relationship between these four styles and maturity levels is explained in the diagram below: M4 M3 M2 M1 High Willingness Low Support High Ability Low Direction Variable Willingness High Support High Ability Low Direction Low Willingness High Support Some Ability High Direction High Willingness Low Support Low Ability High Direction S4 S3 S2 S1 Directing Style - S1 To use the S1 directing style the leader provides a high level of task direction and a low level of support to the individual. Typically, the leader does the following: Identifies the problem(s). Sets objectives and standards and defines roles. Develops methods for solving problems. Controls decision making about the what, how, when and who of problems and work. Gives specific directions using mostly one-way communication. Initiates problem solving and decision making. 20 Asks lots of questions to check understanding. Closely supervises and evaluates people's work. This style is particularly appropriate when working with someone who is new to the job or task or, sometimes, with an individual who is at M2, when an especially complicated and important task has to be done, it is sometimes suitable in an ‘emergency' situation and in some cases of major organisational change. It is most important that this style is not used as a form of punishment, particularly with the use of aggression. A common mistake is to give very specific instructions but fail to check understanding and follow up properly. Coaching Style - S2 To use the S2 coaching style the leader provides high levels of both task direction and support to the individual. Typically, the leader does the following: Identifies the problem(s). Sets objectives and standards. Develops action plans to solve problems and then consults with people. Continues to supervise closely and evaluates people's work. Makes the final decisions after hearing people's work. Explains decisions to people and solicits their ideas through two-way communication. This style is particularly appropriate when working with an individual who has limited ability/information concerning a task and who is also unmotivated or disillusioned. It is a good style to use for building commitment of an individual who is performing well at M2. A leader might use this style on an individual who is at M3 and whose skills have become rusty or has lost sight of the objective. Common mistakes include not giving a comprehensive explanation to direction given and retaining this style after individuals have developed to M3. The latter can result in the leader coming across as a helpful but interfering 'back-seat' driver when using this style. Supporting Style - S3 To use the S3 supporting style the leader provides a high level of support and a low level of task direction. Typically, the leader does the following: 21 Involves people in identifying problems and setting objectives and standards. Allows people to take the lead in deciding how work is to be carried out or how problems are to be solved. Jointly evaluates people's work with them. Shares the responsibility for decision making and problem solving with people. Actively listens and facilitates decision making and problem solving by other people. Provides assurance, support, resources, and ideas if requested. This style is particularly appropriate when working with an individual who has most of the skills needed to carry out a task, but is either a little insecure, lacking in confidence or is unmotivated. It is a very effective intermediate step towards delegating complete responsibility, as the leader can check out ability and willingness. A leader might also use this style with an individual who is at M4 but slipping due to work/personal problems. Some individuals may always need a high level of support. Common mistakes with this style include failure to use open questions to encourage the individual to formulate his/her own action plan and retaining this style after individuals have developed to M4. The latter is typical of leaders who are overanxious about letting go of responsibility. Delegating Style - S4 To use the S4 delegating style the leader provides only a low level of support and task direction. Typically, the leader does the following: Accepts people's decisions and only periodically monitors their performance. Jointly defines problems with people. Allows people to evaluate their own work. Allows people to develop action plans and control decision making about the how, when and who of problems and work. This style is particularly appropriate when working with an individual who is motivated, confident, experienced and has demonstrated a good track record with the type of work being delegated. A leader, might also use this style with an individual who is at M3 where the type of work has long timescales, low stakes and built-in reinforcement. Common mistakes with this style include not giving a clear enough description of what has to be achieved and failing to follow-up on progress. 22 The Power of Questions A large part of developing people is concerned with helping people acquire new knowledge, skills and capacity for applying judgement. Effective use of the leadership styles can go a long way to achieving this. Initially, a high level of 'directing' behaviour is required although for an individual to develop, this must gradually switch to 'supporting' behaviour. A good way to make this switch is to ask more questions as part of your leadership style. Well framed questions can help and encourage people to think through and solve problems for themselves. Here are some good questions which can help an individual to think through how he/she can carry out a task: How will you tackle the task? What problems could you run into? How will you overcome these? What will you need in order to complete this task? How could you keep me informed of progress? 23 24 Appraisal Systems High Performance Cultures Organisations aspiring to high performance cultures are strong on: Clarity about objectives and goals Continuous assessment of performance and feedback Recognition of performance Personal development of individuals The above are essential components of every manager’s job. Improved Communication The essence of performance appraisal is about enhanced dialogue concerning particularly: Clarification of expectations about outputs and personal development Giving feedback regularly about how an individual is doing against these expectations Ensuring the communication is genuinely a dialogue i.e. 2-way Simple Process Following this simple 5-stage model typically encourages a work climate that increases motivation: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Achieving clarity about job to be done Setting SMART goals Reviewing performance in the job Preparing properly for the performance review discussion Conducting the performance review discussion Benefits The benefits of a well-conducted appraisal process include: Focuses everyone on the needs of the business: We=>we=>I Increased motivation Maximising the potential of all staff Best use of training and development resources Right people in the right jobs Everyone can see where they fit in and how important they are Communications within the business and between staff are improved 25 The Performance Management Cycle Define Roles and Responsibilities What does the employee do? Review Results Manager and employee evaluate performance over the entire period and conduct review Problem Solving and Employee Development Set Expectations Results expected of the employee? How will they be attained and measured? Coaching Performance Manager and employee monitor performance relative to expectations, and develop strategies on how performance can be maintained and improved 26 NINE STEPS TO OBJECTIVE SETTING 1. State your objective clearly: start with the words 'To have…', followed by a verb such as 'developed' or 'monitored'. Make sure the verb communicates action and not just a passive outcome. For example, a salesperson's objectives might be: To have developed a customer database with help from our IT department and used it for a mailing [by x date] State clearly how you will know when you have achieved the objective. Build measures into it, not just to do with time but to do with outputs. 2. Make it as specific as possible. For example, we might specify the features of the customer database, say that it enables cross-referencing between different product or service-based customer databases. So we might improve our initial objective by saying to have developed a customer database that enables cross referencing between different product/service subsets, with help from our IT department, and used it for mailing [by x date]. 3. State when you want to achieve the objective by. An objective without a time frame is open-ended. 4. Once you have a set of objectives, check whether any of the objectives conflict. 5. Identify any constraints (external or internal) which may prevent you from achieving your objective. 6. Identity any resources (external or internal) which will assist the achievement of your objective. 7. Check that it is realistic: can you really do it? 8. If there is nothing more that can get in your way, you are ready to go for it: … the next step is action planning! 27 The interview Preparation 1. Gather relevant information e.g. organisation’s aims and plans job descriptions last Performance & Development Review (PDR) and agreed action points examples of good/bad performance training record others’ opinions ‘customer’ feedback background to specific issues Make sure you review prior PDRs together with any progress reviews you’ve conducted. Concentrate on the employee’s areas of responsibility and how well the employee has performed in relation to these. Use the PDR to recognised good performance, document unmet expectations and identify opportunities for improvement. If you have been observing and recording specific examples of performance when they occur, you should have a good starting point for preparing the PDR. Don’t limit input to your own observations; try to gain feedback from others. Be specific in your feedback and give examples of the employee’s actions that support your points. If there are areas that need improvement, specify what the employee should do to improve. Ask yourself if the job requirements have changed since the last PDR. If so, do you have a clear definition of the new requirements? You may wish to discuss these during the PDR and gain the agreement of your employee. 2. Plan what you’re going to say Try to balance positive and negative performance feedback. Make sure you don’t overlook either positive or negative behaviour. You can usually find some positive performance by an employee who is generally unsatisfactory. Likewise point out areas of improvement for outstanding employees. Plan the best way to present your points. The emphasis should be on mutual problem solving and concentration on future actions. 28 3. Brief the recipient 4. Give the recipient the opportunity to prepare 5. Prepare the environment where to meet seating arrangements no interruptions allow time Interview Structure Beginning put the employee at ease discuss the purpose of the interview from the organisation’s point of view and how it can help the employee establish limit of confidentiality build the agenda - structure the discussion around your form encourage the employee to refer to their interview preparation form Middle Review action since last PDR: action points completed training Review performance: agree areas where performance is good agree areas in need of improvement discuss factors which have contributed to performance e.g. strengths, difficulties/ problems, lack of experience etc.. Contract for the future: discuss any expected changes in the job agree a job plan/objectives for the next review period identify training needs for the next review period discuss future aspirations/career development End clarify that there are no remaining concerns signal the end 29 summarise actions repeat details of what happens to documentation agree date for next review leave the interview on a high note Feedback Feedback is an essential leadership tool, allowing leaders to clarify standards and objectives and give motivation and encouragement. This core skill enables leaders to build the competence and effectiveness of their team by noticing and commending what is good (reinforcing feedback) and helping reduce what is unhelpful (developmental feedback). It has to be done effectively and there are some guidelines about how to do this below. A balanced combination of disclosure and feedback: o helps develop relationships and between leaders and their team – people generally prefer working for human beings that they know something about. A leader who is a ‘closed book’ can be challenging to work for as the team are never quite sure what his/her reaction will be. o can unleash the potential in someone, for example by giving them insights into their abilities that increases their self-confidence. SELF Solicits Feedback Things I Know Groups Self-Disclosure Or Gives Feedback Things They Know Arena Things They Façade (Hidden Area) Things I Don’t Know Blind Spot Insight Unknown Don’t Know Unconscious 30 Feedback – ‘The Ten Commandments’ The purpose of feedback is to support learning and change and these 'commandments' arise from the principle that people have a right to their individuality and integrity. Except in the special case of a training event, that also implies that feedback should only be offered in private. It can be used on an informal and formal basis and it can be accepted or not by the receiver. 1. Offer feedback on observed behaviour - what you see and hear - not on assumptions or intentions. e.g. 'You were gripping your pen so tightly that your knuckles went white…' rather than 'You were very stressed…' 2. Offer a description of what you saw and how you felt - rather than a judgement. e.g. 'When you shouted I felt anxious…' rather than 'You shouldn't have raised your voice…' 3. Focus on behaviour that can be changed. It is not helpful to tell someone that a nervous twitch is distracting. A persistent drumming of fingers can be stopped. 4. Choose those aspects that are most important and limit them. Nobody can concentrate on changing everything at once so set priorities. 5. Ask questions rather than make statements. This allows individuals the responsibility of reaching their own conclusions and forces them to think about the issues. e.g. 'How else could you have reacted when…?' rather than 'You should have…' 6. Set the ground rules in advance. Tell / explain the criteria against which they are being judged. 7. Comment on what the individual did well as well as areas for improvement. It is important that individuals feel empowered by the process if they are to improve performance. It is important that the praise is sincere and specific. 8. Be specific, relate feedback to actual words said and observable actions. Do not waffle about general feelings or impressions. e.g. 'I liked it when you went to the door and said 'hello'…' rather than 'You were very friendly…'. 9. Observe everyone's personal limits. If you offer too much feedback at once the receiver will switch off. 31 10. Before offering feedback consider its value to the receiver. If there is none, keep quiet. 32 Case Study: Emma O’Hara Personal Information Emma is a administrative assistant with Save the Children. She is 20 years old and joined the organisation just over a year ago. You become her manager about 6 months ago. She lives with her parents and has about an 45 minute commute to work. You are aware that Emma seems to have quite a fraught relationship with her boyfriend, and on occasion domestic disputes have spilled over into work. Interim Review Most of the time Emma is a competent and hardworking employee who has quickly grasped the main duties of her role. She seems intelligent and able to appreciate the wider implications of her work. She sometimes helps out other team members without being asked. You have picked up that sometimes she is too quick to give advice to customers without fully appreciating all aspects of their situation. Also she has occasions when her work rate drops dramatically and she becomes introspective and bad-tempered. This usually coincides with her being late to work and taking extended lunch breaks. During these periods her time keeping can be erratic and she has upset colleagues by not taking calls, seeming to either pretend to be busy of taking frequent breaks. Task 1 Consider what feedback you would wish to give to Emma, both positive and negative using the formula: Behaviour => Impact => Feelings => Future Further information Following the interim review Emma’s performance has generally improved. She appreciates the need to support the team, and has mostly controlled her occasional moodiness. Her time keeping is better, and if she is going to be late, she calls ahead and readily makes up any time lost. As part of her final appraisal, whilst you have overall rated Emma average, you are concerned over her reactions to angry or aggressive customers. You have rated Emma as a below average for the required behaviour ‘Self Control’ because of this, noting that she has difficulty responding appropriately in such situations. You have heard her shout down the ‘phone on more that one occasion, hang up abruptly on others, and sometimes seem to lose all interest in the call. You are aware that Emma is someone who likes to ‘do’ things, rather than pick up information from reading. Task 2 Please produce a ‘SMART’ development objective for Emma around improving this behaviour, setting out stages 1, 2 and 3 i.e. where she is now, where she needs to 33 get to and how she is going to get there (possible methods, milestones, support required etc.) 34 The Ask/Tell Repertoire More Empowering Ask questions and paraphrase Make suggestions More Controlling Demonstrate Ask questions and paraphrase Give advice Tell what and how Tell what and how Benefit Higher, if individual has reasonable skills and at least one creative idea to bring Quality of task completion Deeper understanding Learning by individual Higher in most cases Motivation of coachee Slightly more, depending on speed of individual’s learning Potentially high Tasks which the individual will probably need to repeat in some form Initial time from individual Learning by coach When to use Lower, unless the individual’s role is to repeat a relatively simple task that has little scope for being redesigned Deep understanding, but only if the coach is a true expert Lower, unless individual feels completely lost Slightly less, assuming that the task can be specified easily, and that the individual understands, and follows the instructions. Very little ‘Mission critical’ tasks where failure would lead to disaster, very simple tasks 35 Active listening Attentive Silence Attentive silence helps the: speaker to think and to express their feelings listener to reflect on what has been said (or not said) Try not to break silences. Reflective acknowledges the speaker’s feelings checks the accuracy of the listening, to the said and the unsaid e.g. “You feel ……………. Because ……………” Paraphrasing communicates the listener’s understanding to the speaker describes the listener’s understanding in their own works e.g. “When X said that, you replied ………….” Summarising communicates the listener’s understanding to the speaker describes the listener’s understanding in their own words e.g. “So, the sequence of events was Sue’s phone call to you, Dave’s phone call to Sue, your phone call to Sue” Barriers to effective listening cultural and value differences assumptions about the speaker preoccupations in listener’s own life preparing a reply while listening thinking about the next meeting, etc 36 Asking questions Good questioning skills are as essential as good listening skills. Using different types of questions will encourage the other person to give you relevant information. Questions to Ask Here are some useful types of questions:Open Questions Stimulates the discussion and encourages the other person to give information, so you can pick up on the key words and probe for detail. Open questions are ones to which you cannot answer ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. They usually start with how, what, who, where, which. Examples: “Which of your objectives was the hardest to achieve?” “What types of work do you enjoy the most?” Reflective Questions Check understanding, to show that you are listening and to encourage the other person to expand on what they have said. Examples: “So you are not sure which option will be the most suitable for you?” “You say dealing with the public was difficult, why was that?” Focusing Questions Pull together several threads and to move the conversation on. They can be used to speed up the discussion and direct it to practical steps to be taken. Examples: “How can we summarise that?” “So out of all the work, how did you prioritise the schedule?” 37 Probing Questions Allow you to follow up key words in order to obtain more information. They are the most important questions to ask at an interview to ensure that you have depth of evidence. Examples: “Tell me more about the customer service aspect” “What do you mean when you say it is a problem?” “If you had to pinpoint difficulties about achieving that objective, what would they be?” Questions to Avoid Are unlikely to simulate the conversation or encourage an open discussion. Closed Questions Require a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answer. They can be used to check facts, but if you use them too often it may appear you are interrogating the other person. Example: “Did you meet that deadline?” Loaded Questions Convey a judgement about the other person in an indirect way or, suggest you want a certain answer, based on your own values. This puts the other person in a difficult position. Do they give their view or what you want to hear? Example: “You liked doing that project didn’t you?” “Don’t you worry about missing deadlines?” Multiple Questions If you ask two questions as one, the other person is likely to only answer one of the questions. Typically, this will be the easiest question for them to answer. Example: ‘How would you describe your working day and what do you like the best?’ 38 How to develop people Development of people is an essential role of effective managers – it is a cliché, but none the less true, that ‘people are an organisation’s greatest asset’ and they need to be encouraged in the development of their knowledge, skills, behaviours and attitudes if the organisation is to continue to be successful. All development has resource implications and therefore needs to be structured to be as effective as possible. A typical process is; 1. Identifying the need – this can come form a variety of sources e.g. performance issues, change in job role, new systems, request from job holder 2. Specifying the development ‘gap’ – where are they now in terms of their attitude, skills or knowledge (‘ask’) and where do they need to be (using SMART to set down where exactly they will need to be after the development has taken place 3. Deciding what method to use to carry out the development (see list below) – decide on most effective given: resources, learning style (see below) 4. Carry out development and review effectiveness – enjoyment, learning, actions resulting, further needs etc. Methods Formal training courses. Involving them in projects. Work shadowing. One-to-one and group coaching. In-house workshops. On the job training with a more experienced worker. Delegating tasks. Job swaps. Secondments. Reading and studying. Covering for line managers. Taking turns to chair meetings. Organising visits to other work areas in own or other companies. Computer based training Encouraging and supporting team and individual work in the community. Organising focus groups to find out what customers think. All these methods have advantages and disadvantages and it is important to select the appropriate methods to suit the person, the type of job they do, the business needs etc. 39 Supporting people through learning EMPOWERING SUPPORT SUPPORT LEADING TO DEPENDENCY Affirms what people do. Does things for people. Encourages people to identify their own problems. Takes people over and rescues them. Deals with feelings of helplessness. Confirms feelings of inadequacy. Involves listening. Gives advice eg 'If I was you…'. Involves understanding and empathy. Only sees it from own point of view or experience. Respects others' rights to decide. Makes the decision. Involving people in evaluation: To find out the extent to which the agreed targets of empowerment activities have been achieved, involve the people in the evaluation because the benefits are: They can identify how far their activities have been effective. They can receive feedback on their performance and ideas for improvement. The evaluation of one activity can give ideas what to do next. It is the starting point for the next cycle of empowerment. Gathering useful information about the type of approaches that did or did not work with particular individuals or teams. Celebrating and rewarding successes encourages motivation for further empowerment. 40 'The wise leader is not collecting a string of successes. The leader is helping others to find their own success. There is plenty to go around. Sharing success with others is very successful…'. 'The Tao of Leadership' by John Heider 41 Learning Style Preferences Activist – what’s new? I’m game for anything. Reflector – I’d like time to think about this. Theorist – How does this relate to that? Pragmatist – How can I apply this in practice? These style preferences very significantly affect the sort of activities from which people learn best. For example, we have found that; Activists learn best from activities where: There are new experiences/problems/opportunities from which to learn. They can engross themselves in short “here and now” activities, such as business games, competitive tasks and role-playing exercises. They have a lot of the limelight/high visibility. They are thrown in at the deep end with a task which they think is difficult. Reflectors on the other hand, learn best from activities where: They are encouraged to watch/think/chew over activities. They are allowed to think before acting, to assimilate before commenting. They have the opportunity to review what has happened, what they have learnt. They can reach a decision in their own time without pressure and tight deadlines. Theorists learn best from activities where: They have time to explore methodically the associations and interrelationships between ideas, events and situations. They are in structured situations with clear purposes. They have the chance to question and probe the basic methodology, assumptions or logic behind something. They are intellectually stretched. Pragmatists learn best from activities where: There is an obvious link between the subject-matter and a problem or opportunity on the job. They are shown techniques for doing things with obvious practical advantages currently applicable to their own job. They have the chance to try out and practise techniques with coaching/feedback from a credible expert. They can concentrate on practical issues. 42 Gaining agreement to improving poor performance Make it easy for the poor performer to do what you want Give them openings for early successes Be prepared to ‘trade’ behaviour change Be clear about standards of performance Handle the problem not the person Easier to alter behaviour than personality Easier to get someone to do things differently than be different Easier to agree about behaviour than personality Personality terms will not get you far in an IT You can measure behaviour Strategy for Getting Agreement Agree standards Agree that there has been a gap Agree the size of the gap Agree who has responsibility for reducing the gap Agree the measures and time for this reduction Set time for reviews and follow up meetings 43 Five styles of managing conflict 1. Withdrawing / Avoiding People who use this strategy, tend to withdraw to avoid conflict. They give up their personal goals and relationships and normally stay away from issues involving conflict and from people who they are in conflict with. They believe it is hopeless to try to resolve conflict and feel helpless in these situations. They believe it is easier to withdraw from a conflict than to face it. 2. Forcing People who use this strategy, tend to try to over power their opponents by forcing them to accept their solution to the conflict. Their goals are very important to them, and people relationships are less important. They seek to win their goals at all costs. They do not care if others like or accept them and assume that conflicts are settled by one person winning and one person losing. Winning gives them a sense of pride and achievement and losing gives them a feeling of weakness and failure. They try to win by overpowering other people. 3. Smoothing These types of people believe that relationships with other people are of great importance, and their own goals are of little importance. They think that conflict should be avoided in favour of harmony and that people cannot talk about conflicts without damaging relationships. They try to “smooth” over the conflict for fear of harming relationships with others. 4. Compromising People who use this strategy are concerned with their own goals and their relationship with others. They seek workable compromises, give up part of their goals and persuade the other person in a conflict, to give up part of their goals too. They seek a conflict situation in which both sides gain something - they look for the 44 middle ground between two extremes and are willing to sacrifice part of their goals ( not all ) in order to find an agreement for the common good of both people in the conflict. 5. Confronting These types of people value their own goals highly and also value relationships. They view conflicts as problems to be solved and seek a solution that achieves both their own goals and the goals of the other person. They see conflict as a means of improving relationships by relieving tension between two people and clearing the air. By seeking solutions that satisfy both themselves and the other person ,they maintain and build relationships. They are not satisfied until a solution is found that achieves the goals of both parties and are not satisfied until the tensions and negative feelings have been fully resolved. 45 Resolving conflict Conflicts, tensions, difficulties with individuals and groups are inevitable. Conflict can arise as much because of disagreement on issues as because of the manner in which discussions take place. Whatever the nature of the conflict it is your responsibility as either a chair or participant to resolve it. 1. Examine what is causing the trouble between people or groups. 2. Gather as much information as you possibly can - to avoid making false judgements. 3. Establish that there is real conflict. 4. Bring the parties together to discuss the issues involved and to analyse their differences. 5. Active listening can improve understanding of common problems and create trust in difficult situations. 6. Concentrate on broad issues not just interpersonal tensions. 7. Reduce communication blocks - by reducing dominating, threatening or aggressive behaviour. 8. Clarify expectations and roles - using open-ended questions 9. Make your position clear - state important objectives, deadlines, targets etc. 1O.Give constructive feedback and ensure openness 11 .Reach an agreement about solutions and future actions - if possible try to generate solutions that are acceptable to everyone. This will increase the commitment to that course of action, minimise defensiveness if a compromise is reached. 46 Skills for dealing with difficult behaviour at work All of us can identify people that we find difficult to work with and for. We may also experience difficulties with certain clients/customers. Each situation must be viewed as a problem to be solved rather than a burden to bear. Managers and supervisors often ask 'How can I handle this person? They are really difficult'. They are forgetting that there are two sides to every relationship and the other person probably finds the relationship just as difficult. Understanding a difficult relationship requires you to see what you are doing or not doing that is affecting both of you. Fortunately, truly difficult employees are a minority. Still, even a few can foster unhappiness and unrest. How do staff become 'difficult'. Most staff do not start out like that; most want to work hard and satisfy their needs through work, to be secure, to belong, to win recognition, to enjoy their job and learn new skills. Often, however, what staff want is not what employers give them. Employers want a product or service produced with as little trouble as possible. As schools and colleges become more commercially run, efficiency and profitability will become more important than the real needs of their employees. Without realising it, managers can create the kind of negative atmosphere that causes employees to become difficult. When there is a 'them and us' atmosphere or when products, services, deadlines or profits are (or appear to be) more highly valued than the individual's potential and feelings, difficult staff will multiply. People have long been considered expenses, while stock, work in progress, supplies and buildings are viewed as assets. Smart employers are now beginning to realise that people are assets, essential to the success of their organisations. Difficult staff are often those who swim against the current, the ones who 'act out' their unhappiness by complaining, sloping off, stealing time and sometimes being destructive. They are often bright creative people who find they can't express themselves on the job. Working for a 'difficult' manager is often a harder problem to solve. Although they may display similar characteristics and motivations, it is inevitably more difficult to influence upwards. They may have more power over the situation, your relationship and the team. You have less control over the situation and may not feel in a position to make the necessary decision to effect change. Their difficulties can potentially demoralise the entire team and their staff. Difficult customers or clients are usually frustrated with their own situations, experiencing feelings of alienation and powerlessness and you may become the displaced object of their anger. Dealing with difficult clients can be very stressful, particularly when they are aggressive. 47 “If you are not part of the solution then you are part of the problem.” It is essential to first examine your own behaviour and attitudes, as these are areas within your immediate control. You must be able to 'get your shop in order' before you ask others to make changes in their own behaviour and attitudes. It is not easy to see oneself clearly. So many habits of thought and perception become ingrained. In order to see how you contribute to a difficult relationship, you must understand your own approach - by asking for feedback from others and exposing your underlying values and ideals. Other people feel the impact of your presence and react to what you say and do. People also react from their own perceptions, which may be far from the objective truth. You receive feedback by wanting and inviting others to share their views of you by: Asking for it directly By not reacting to others in an angry, offended or begrudging way By building a climate in which people feel free to give feedback easily By developing your own skills in giving feedback By expressing your reactions so that others know the effect of what they have said or done Inviting questions from others; not cutting them short Behaviour is at the root of most people's problems - the behaviour of both parties involved. Behaviour breeds behaviour. If you are angry and show that anger, you are more likely to have an angry response (or create fear in others). If you behave in a friendly and pleasant manner, you are more likely to receive a similar reaction; you can choose your own behaviour regardless of that of others. You can use your behaviour to hinder or help each meeting. To be convincing, visual and verbal behaviour must tell the same story. In every situation there will be moments when your behaviour can rescue or destroy a chance of communication. Try to take the positive behaviour path at all times. The majority of people are polite, friendly and easy to deal with; it is only the occasional one that is difficult. Sometimes they have justification, while sometimes the other may just enjoy being difficult or may be operating from (bad) habits. In order to deal with their behaviour or to depersonalise it, you must recognise that: People demonstrate their frustration in different ways Difficult behaviour is often a direct result of frustration They may be nice people underneath Anxiety can have a strange effect on personality Whatever the person says it is not a personal insult or intended as such Do not take personal offence Only the facts matter at the end of the day; hold out for the facts Take a deep breath before you speak or act 48 49 Effective Communication Definition of assertiveness: 'Assertive behaviour allows clear confident communication of our wants, feelings and needs with genuine respect for ourselves and others…' Assertiveness means: Respecting myself - who I am and what I do. Taking responsibility for myself - for how I feel, what I think, what I do. For example, ‘I FEEL angry…’ is more assertive than ‘YOU MAKE ME FEEL angry…’. Recognising my own needs and wants independently of others - as myself not as someone’s ‘employee’, ‘partner’, ‘parent’, ‘child’ etc. Speaking for myself - how ‘I’ feel, think and want. Allowing myself to make mistakes - I'm only human. Allowing myself to enjoy successes - sharing with others. Changing my mind - as and when I choose and taking responsibility for the decision. Asking for time and information - when considering a problem or decision. Asking for what I want or need - rather than hoping someone will ask me and feeling resentful if this does not occur. Setting boundaries - what you can/cannot, will/will not do. Recognising responsibilities ‘to’ others - rather than having responsibilities ‘for’ others eg as adults we have responsibilities for and to children, we have responsibilities ‘to’ our managers. Respecting other people and their right to be assertive and to be treated assertively. Assertiveness does not mean: Being ‘soft’ or ‘nice’. Always getting your own way or giving in to others. Undermining or hurting others. Being ‘pushy’ or intimidating others. Manipulating others or making them feel guilty. Winning or losing. Keeping quiet for a ‘peaceful’ life. Always behaving democratically. Advantages of Assertive Behaviour to the Individual Increased confidence in yourself and others. By developing a strong regard for our wants, feelings, needs, opinions, skills, capabilities, strengths and weaknesses we recognise and appreciate those of others. Increased self-responsibility By taking responsibility for our wants, needs etc we do not blame others if these are not met, neither do we ‘excuse’ ourselves. 50 Increased self control By managing the behaviour we want, rather than being controlled by others, events, pure logic or emotion. Closer working relationships Assertive behaviour is contagious! People will work with us rather than against us so we are more likely to achieve objectives especially in an awkward or conflict situations. Savings in time and energy By solving problems and making decisions more swiftly based on merit and not wasting time and energy in dispute, confrontation, worrying and scheming. An increased chance of everyone ‘winning’ By increasing the chances of everyone having their needs met, opinions heard and their strengths put to productive use. Value & Advantages of Assertive Behaviour to the Business: Improved communication with customers, staff, peers & managers. Supports & reinforces change situations. Decreases ‘fear of the unknown’. One message given & received by all. Less chance of bullying/victimisation/harassment. Savings in time & energy - increased productivity & effectiveness. Lower staff turnover/sick absence. ‘Can do - will do’ attitude - ‘yes and...........’ not ‘no, not................’. Happier, more motivated employees -> happier customers. Increase in business revenue. Behaviours Passive- YOU WIN, I LOSE When we do not take into account our own needs/wants or do not respect ourselves This is characterised by being a ‘doormat’ and allowing ourselves to be a target for others. The passive person sees themselves as a victim of unfairness and injustice at the hands of others or ‘fate’. Decision making is impossible finding it easier to opt out and let others decide so they can be blamed later on. This makes a passive person negative and frustrated at their own lack of willpower and reliant on negation and self pity. When confronted they immediately avoid, deny and agree. When dealing with this behaviour others become frustrated, resentful, guilty and confused as whatever is done for this person is never enough. Patience is lost and the person avoided. Aggressive - I WIN, YOU LOSE When we do not take into account others’ needs/wants or do not respect them 51 This is characterised by being competitive and ‘point scoring’ implying a winning situation where someone has to lose. This is achieved by putting others down, riding roughshod over feelings and emotions, conflict and confrontation and responding with attack. There is little consideration for others’ viewpoints or values and in extreme, over reacting with verbal abuse and physical violence. Others having to deal with this behaviour feel pain and dislike which is never openly expressed for fear of provoking an attack. This leads to harbouring negative feelings and deep-seated resentment. Manipulative / Indirectly aggressive – I WIN, YOU LOSE When we do not take into account others’ needs/wants or do not respect them by deception This is characterised by aggressive behaviour that is more subtle and hidden by deceiving oneself and others and achieving aims by making others feel guilty. Appearing to hold others in high esteem covers up an undercurrent of disapproval and a need to control and manipulate them rather than be open and risk rejection. Questions are not answered honestly and objections often denied. This behaviour has the effect of making others feel guilty, frustrated, confused and unsure about how to deal or act with the person as their true opinions and thoughts are never apparent. Assertive - I WIN, YOU WIN When we respect ourselves and take into account our needs/wants and respect those of others This behaviour involves genuine and demonstrable respect for ourselves and others. We accept our strengths and weaknesses and as there is no necessity to win there is no need to put people down or manipulate them. In accepting responsibility for our choices and actions, acknowledging needs, feelings and wants, clear communication is achieved by asking openly for what is wanted and taking the risk of negative responses. Approval is not dependent on others and we credit ourselves for achievements. Others respond positively because they know where they stand and do not feel threatened or undermined. Assertive behaviour is contagious and often encourages others to behave in the same way. Relationships are founded on trust without fear of conflict or manipulation. Exploring why behaviour differs Emotional Triggers – Self – esteem Definition of self esteem 52 'Self esteem is the evaluation we hold about ourselves and our worth which impacts on our self image…' This is based upon the extent to which we believe ourselves to be competent, good, likeable, successful, attractive etc. Aggressive and passive behaviour stems from low self esteem which leads to feelings of anxiety and stress when conflict situations arise. These can range from feeling ‘uncomfortable‘ and 'awkward’ to being physically threatened and verbally abused. In these cases our natural response is either ‘fight’ or ‘flight’. BEHAVIOUR BASED ON SELF ESTEEM ‘EVALUATION WE HOLD ABOUT OURSELVES’ LOW SELF ESTEEM FEEL THREATENED FLIGHT FIGHT FIGHT = AGGRESSIVE HIT OUT FLIGHT = PASSIVE DEFEND Hitting out with words / gestures, indirectly by making others feel guilty in order to win at their expense Backing off, defending to avoid conflict. Being submissive and allowing others to win at own expense ‘Awkward’ / ‘Difficult’ or conflict situations Examples of everyday situations which can be threatening: 53 Having to tell your manager you have made a mistake. Not getting co-operation from a colleague. Wanting to refuse requests. Having to give and receive criticism, feedback, praise etc. Passing unpopular decisions, giving bad news. Being on the receiving end of aggressive or harassing behaviour. Feeling annoyed at not being consulted on an issue that affects you. Being ‘volunteered’ to do something by others. Giving presentations, chairing meetings. These are a few instances that may present problems, however everyone has their own unique list of ‘threatening’ situations or emotional triggers. The issue at these times is that we feel ‘locked’ into responding passively, aggressively - directly or indirectly. Assertiveness gives an option for responsive behaviour For example: A colleague has asked you to help with some work. You are busy with something else. Assertive response - ‘I realise this is important, however I need to finish this off first, how about in an hour?’ - Takes account of both your needs & theirs’ Aggressive responses - ‘You must be joking, I’m up to my eyes in work, can’t you manage this yourself?’ - Takes into account your needs, ignores theirs’ Indirect Aggressive response - ‘I’ve had enough today and now you ask for help! I’m totally overloaded, honestly, our boss doesn’t have a clue what goes on!’ Ignores their needs, tries to induce guilt feelings, aggressive towards boss Passive response - ‘Well, I’m a bit busy now, but OK, what’s the problem? I’ll see if I can help for a while.’ - Takes into account their needs, ignores own The reasons for and roots of why we behave the way we do, what triggers feeling uncomfortable or threatened are very complex and concerned with our psychological make-up, childhood and family patterning, inherited characteristics, environment and cultures. The capacity to behave passively, aggressively and assertively is within everyone and varies from one situation to another. It would not be appropriate or possible to remove passivity or aggression from our behaviour but we can increase our ability to respond assertively. This can be achieved by focusing on the situation that we find challenging or where self-confidence is low and improving the use of skills associated with assertive behaviour. 54 55 Communication Skills 1 Posture Good posture is the natural alignment of the body, without any undue tension or strain. The body is aligned when a straight line can be drawn from the ear to the shoulder to the hipbone and then to the knee. Poor posture is often a result of developing bad habits, such as slumping at your desk. This poor posture becomes comfortable, and provides the base for other behaviours. Tension travels quickly through the body, and is highly contagious. For example tension in the hands due to nervousness before a presentation, can easily affect the neck and vocal cords, resulting in disrupted production of speech. There are many exercises that can easily be done in the work place to reduce tension: Rolling the head gently forwards, stretching the neck Revolving the shoulders forward and back Lifting your arms above your head then flopping them down, at the same time breathing out 2 Breathing Breath is the energy source of voice and speech. It is possible to develop the muscles of the diaphragm to deliver breath in the most economic and controlled fashion. Often we only use the top part of our lungs, not utilising the full capacity of lower, much larger half. If breath is inadequately produced, the voice will suffer, for example: Tension can produce uncontrolled speech, which can sound strident or breathy The voice can sound underpowered Breathing can become very audible Breathing can be an effective way of reducing stress, and helping control the fight or flight reaction. Simply taking deep breaths, not forcing the air down, but simply allowing it to fall gently into the lungs, followed by a slow breathing out, lasting at least as long as the in breath, can quickly reduce tension. 3 Pace Better breathing leads to less frequent breaths, and allows you to control the pace and pauses in your speech. Pauses help you recharge physically and mentally, and allow your listener to assimilate what has been said. 56 Very rapid pace can sound lacking in confidence, and slow ponderous speech can fail to hold attention. 4 Pitch This is determined by the frequency of vibration of the vocal chords. Tension can cause the pitch to be too high, and we can overcompensate and pitch too low. Many speakers use a restricted pitch range, which sound boring; others may over colour their speech, and may appear artificial or insincere. The pitch rising at the end of a sentence will encourage a response, whereas a falling pitch will discourage one. 5 Emphasis and Rhythm This is the amount of stress we put on words, often on nouns, and can completely alter the meaning of a sentence. Too much emphasis can sound hectoring, as with some public speakers. 6 Articulation and Projection Voice is converted into speech through the actions of the speech organs on the breath i.e. the tongue, the lips, the teeth, the jaw and the hard and soft palates. If you articulate well your voice can be more clearly understood. Conversing in whispers help focus on this skill. Increasing volume is often associated with increasing pitch, which will reduce impact. Poor breathing and voice control can lead to speakers forcing their vocal chords to ‘snap’ when wishing to project their voice. This can produce a strident, strangulated sound, and can damage the vocal chords over time. It can be helped by good breathing, relaxing the throat by sighing and yawning, and by good articulation. 57 Effective communication WORDS (7%) Assertive Aggressive Long, rambling statements Statements brief and to the point Excess of ‘I’ statements Fill-in words: maybe Frequent apologies ‘I’ statements Distinctions between fact and opinion Boastfulness, ‘my’ Opinions expressed as facts ‘I should’, ‘I ought’ Constructive ‘criticism’ without blame or assumptions Threatening questions Few ‘I’ statements Questions to find out the Blame put on others thoughts, opinions, wants of others Passive Self put downs Suggestions not weighted with ‘advice’ MUSIC (38%) and DANCE (55%) Sarcasm and other put downs Non Assertive Assertive Aggressive Quiet Whining Low energy Hesitant Level Tone Natural rise & fall Warm Firm Loud, sarcastic Hectoring Little variation Fast Facial expression Eyes downcast Brows wrinkled Frequent blinking Appropriate eye contact Eyes staring Frowning Chin out Posture Collapse Not straight Still and rigid Square Straight Mobile Leaning forward Tense Hands Nervous Fiddling Touching fact Easy natural movements related to words Finger pointing Fists Tapping finger Feet Fidgeting Wrapped around leg Firmly planted Tapping feet Type Voice Volume Tone Pace 58 Non-verbal communication Positive Personal Signals Behaviour Reason Leaning forward Concentration Increase emphasis Leaning back Circumstances Response Sales meetings Negotiation Putting ideas across Make points clear State your own case Maintain a win-win approach Allow silence for thought Ask if more information is needed Wait for the other to speak first Ensure the occasion doesn’t dawdle Maintain openness of situation Be positive about your own case Allow time for thought/absorption Make points clear Check Maintain positive attitude Check understanding Taking time to think Inviting expansion Looking for conclusions Clasping both hands Extreme behind back confidence Relaxation ‘Steepling’ fingers After a proposition/exploration Towards end of meeting Stroking chin Great interest Great concentration Learning situation Need to absorb information Interest Listening Discussion Instruction Leaning chin on knuckles Tilting head Non threatening situations In charge of situation Can be patronising 59 Negative Personal Signals Behaviour Reason Circumstances Response Invite people for particular topics only Keep the meeting on course, to the point Direct questions to individuals Give individuals a specific role Clarify the message Acknowledge the disagreement but give your reasons and benefits of co-operation Ask for reactions/feelings Ask for suggestions to improve the acceptability of what you say Allow expression of views Show you appreciate there are differences and give your reasons for your stance Keep concise and to the point Invite for specific topics only Give a specific role Allow expression of opinion Show you acknowledge a difference Give your reasons Yawning/cupping chin in hands Boredom Fatigue Long meetings Inactivity – no participation Scowling Annoyance, disagreement, confusion Exchange of opinions/ideas Unwelcome instruction Poor communication Continues straight gaze, no head movement Failing attention Dislikes what is communicated Lack of cooperation Disciplinary/dispute occasions Unwelcome instruction One hand on back Disagreement, of neck annoyance Discussions of views, actions etc.. Wants to put a different view Drumming fingers/tapping foot etc. Impatience Boredom Long drawn out meeting Topic irrelevant to them Looking over spectacles/narrow ing eyes Disapproval Disbelief Dislike Expects to challenge Patience may be short 60 Behaviour Reason Circumstances Response Glasses removed and put down No longer listening Has made a decision Has heard all that is necessary Does not want to hear more Shifting position, continually avoiding eye contact Not relaxed Disagreement (different from just staring into space) ‘Difficult’ situation Wants to end the occasion Wants to challenge Stroking nose/rapid blinking Exaggeration Lying Defensive occasions Negotiations Ask for the conclusion/decision Acknowledge their reluctance to continue but say there are other points Keep the rest brief and relevant Encourage verbal participation Ask open questions Direct questions to the individual Ask for a response or alternative Keep the atmosphere positive Ask for clarifying detail Maintain a confident attitude Challenge concisely but not threateningly 61 Possible Sources Of Bias In Assessment Error Halo Horns Primary ‘Recency’ Central tendency Strictness/leniency Mirror Prejudgment Blind spot Safety Stereotyping/ prejudice Description Definitely present for me Possibly present for me Definitely absent for me Assessing highly in all aspects because of one aspect Assessing poorly in all aspects because of one aspect Where one single event, success or failure sticks in the mind and unfairly affects overall assessment Allowing events close to time of assessment to have unfair weighting Reluctance to use extremes of any rating system Assessing too high or low when compared to the standard Assessment based upon similarities or otherwise to the appraiser Making an early assessment of performance and adjusting ratings to fit Failing to detect weaknesses because the appraiser has the same defects Avoiding negative comments in order to avoid conflict Giving an individual characteristics based on membership of a group, regardless of whether they apply to this individual 62 Personal Feedback Questionnaire Working on your own please complete the questionnaire below. Be as honest as you can and try to identify the areas where you could focus your efforts to improve your feedback skills. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Question Do I consider giving feedback an essential part of my job? Do I know someone whose feedback skills I admire and might emulate? Do I give feedback often enough? Is my feedback always timely? Is my feedback always appropriate? Has my feedback ever missed the mark through being ill timed, badly prepared or poorly expressed? Have I ever backed down because an aggressive response to feedback? Is my feedback always concise and specific Do I always consider the needs of the person I am giving feedback to? Is my feedback always intended to help? Am I confident that my feedback is always heard? Am I confident that my feedback is always understood? Am I confident that my feedback is always acted upon? Are there people I avoid giving feedback to? Do I give sufficient acknowledgement and praise? Do I ever give feedback just to make myself feel better? Does my feedback always look at ways of improving the situation? Does giving and receiving feedback have relevance in my life outside work? Have I got a clear idea of my strengths and weaknesses in giving feedback? Can I receive positive feedback without getting embarrassed or dismissive? Can I receive negative feedback without getting defensive? Can I give feedback equally well to my boss, my peers and my staff? Can I receive feedback equally well to my boss, my peers and my staff? Yes 63 No The GROW sequence worksheet The issue Goal Reality – what’s happening now? What’s working? What could be working better? What’s missing? What obstacles do you see? What have you done so far? 64 The GROW sequence worksheet continued…. Options – what could you do? Way forward – what will you do? When will you have done it? How long will it take? Who else should know? What could stop you from doing it? When will you start? On a scale of 1 to 10 score your: Intention enthusiasm commitment Follow-up review of actions 65 Examples of useful questions when using ‘GROW’ Goal What is it you would like to discuss? What would you like to achieve? What would you like from (to achieve in) this session? What would need to happen for you to walk away feeling that this time was well spent? If I could grant you a wish for this session, what would it be? What would you like to be different when you leave this session? What would you like to happen that is not happening now, or what would you like not to happen that is happening now? What outcome would you like from this session/discussion/interaction? Is it realistic? Can we do that in the time we have available? Will that be of real value to you? Reality What is happening at the moment? How do you know that this is accurate? When does this happen? How often does this happen? Be precise if possible. What effect does this have? How have you verified, or would you verify, that this is so? What other factors are relevant? What is their perception of the situation? What have you tried so far? Options What could you do to change the situation? What alternatives are there to that approach? Tell me what possibilities for action you see. Do not worry about whether they are realistic at this stage. What approach/actions have you seen used, or used yourself, in similar circumstances? Who might be able to help? Would you like some suggestions form me? Which options do you like most? What are the benefits and pitfalls of these options? Which options are of interest to you? Rate from 1-10 your interest level in/the practicality of each of these options? Would you like to choose an option to act on? 66 Wrap up What are the next steps? What might get in the way? Do you need to log the steps in your diary? What support do you need? How and when will you enlist that support? 67 Performance Management Crib Sheet Poor Performance Steps for dealing with poor work performance: Step 1 – Discuss the performance issue with the staff member Step 2 – Implement any training or support requirements arising from the initial discussion (if reasonable) Step 3 – Conduct performance review after agreed period of time Step 4 – If performance has not improved set clear achievable objectives and ensure that staff member is aware that if performance does not improve within the agreed timeframe that either the Incapability Policy or Disciplinary Policy may be invoked. Step 5 – Conduct performance review at agreed time Step 6 – If performance has not improved then invoke Incapability or Disciplinary Policy (whichever is relevant) and seek advice from HR. HR will then guide you through the process of setting up a formal hearing. Ensure that all steps are agreed in writing and the staff member is fully aware of the risks if their performance does not improve. Any agreed work objectives may be long term or short term (ie ranging from months or weeks), but should be measurable – ie you will complete x piece of work by y date. Exceptional Performance We are committed to looking at ways in which we can reward high performance, but of course, unlike commercial organisations we cannot offer significant financial rewards. There are however a range of other things we can do to reward high performance including saying thank you and acknowledging the staff member for what they have done. Steps for rewarding exceptional work performance: Step 1 – Arrange a performance review or 1 to 1 Step 2 – Congratulate and thank the staff member for their hard work Step 3 – Ask them what you can do to reward them (other than money). This could include access to training opportunities, career development, time off in lieu, secondments or opportunities to engage in other projects. Step 4 – Make a record for their file. 68 Performance management - preparation forms Performance Management - Individual Preparation guide for Performance Management I have given you this guide to help you think about and prepare for our Performance Management (PM) meetings. Some or all of the prompt questions below may assist you with this. The reason for our PM meetings is to have a discussion about your priorities for the next year, agree some objectives and identify the key activities for you to achieve those objectives. We will also discuss and agree ways to measure how you achieve your objectives and activities (success criteria), the time scales and the resources you will need. When we have worked through and agreed the overall work plan, we will then discuss any related learning needs you may have (skills and/or knowledge) and how they will be fulfilled (Learning and development plan). If you have any queries about the process or the PM system generally please let me know. You can also consult the Performance Management Intranet pages via the HR Global Gateway. Preparation guide – personal objectives Thinking about the year ahead - what contributions do you hope to make to Save the Children? eg 'help implement xxxx new system by managing team of operators'; raise funds for xxxx, from xxxx' How might these be phrased to demonstrate outcomes (specific objectives)? eg xxxx team motivated, competent and confident to complete stage xx of the xxx system implementation; £ xxxx income raised from xxxx area/branch. What are some activities you will need to carry out to achieve these outcomes? eg carry out PM process, hold regular team meetings and individual 1:1 meetings, arrange training; produce action plan, brief volunteers, produce regular progress reports. How will we know that the activities and objectives are completed on time and satisfactorily? What might stop you achieving the activities and objectives? Preparation guide Learning and development needs Thinking about your proposed objectives - what are your existing strengths that will help your achievement? Do these need developing further? Are there any areas where you might need to acquire new knowledge and/or skills? 69 How are your supervision (1:1) arrangements supporting you? Are any adjustments required? Any other comments? Performance Management Reviews - Individual Preparation guide I have given you this guide to help you think about and plan for your Performance (PM) review meeting so that you feel prepared and confident. Some or all of the prompt questions below may assist you with this. The main objectives for our PM review meeting are to have a discussion about your achievements against your personal objectives and prepare an agreed signed summary record of the review. I will then send this record to HR where it will be filed confidentially on your personal file. The meeting will normally involve jointly assessing progress or achievement on your objectives and activities using the previously agreed success criteria. We will also review your learning and development needs, discuss your supervision arrangements and agree any necessary adjustments. We will also discuss my view of your overall performance indicated by a rating on a 1-4 point scale. A description of these ratings is given at the end of this form. If you have any queries about the review process or the PM system generally, please let me know. You can also consult the Performance Management Intranet pages via the HR Global Gateway. Preparation guide - personal objectives Looking at the time scales and success criteria, which objectives and activities have been completed? Were they completed to your own satisfaction? How might you have carried out tasks differently? Which objectives and activities have not been achieved to plan and why? For example: Did priorities change? Were the resources agreed on the personal objectives plan available at the right time and in the right quantity/quality? What could you or others have done differently to meet the objectives/complete the activities? 70 Which tasks/activities have you found the most difficult and why? What changes might you propose to your personal objectives for the next period? Preparation guide - Learning and development needs Have the development activities identified been carried out to plan? Were your learning objectives met? If not - what actions do you propose? Are there any other learning needs you have identified through your work so far? Is there any learning required to help you achieve any proposed personal objectives for the next period? How have your 1:1 (supervision) arrangements supported you? Are any adjustments required? Any other comments? 71 Save the Childrens Performance Management rating scale 1 Outstanding Performer - exceeds the requirements of the role This means that the individual significantly exceeded his or her objectives in the period under review, and is likely to have developed the scope of the job by looking beyond the immediate tasks required and making a wider contribution. The individual would have demonstrated a commitment to continuous professional development and would not only have completed the learning and development plan but also have shown a willingness to assist others in achieving their learning and development plans. Staff who consistently demonstrate this type of performance would be considered as giving added value not only by their manager but by others, for example, their peer group or their staff if they are a manager. They will be an example to others; they will be a recognisable role model of competence and good practice. 2 Good Performer – doing the job fully and well This means that the individual fully met the expectations of his/her role, by achieving the objectives to the standards agreed. The work is good, targets are met and the learning and development plan is achieved. This level would be the standard to which all staff would normally be expected to perform. It may be that the individual is working at optimum level. However, there may be a lack of challenge, opportunity or stimulation that would assist some one who is interested in moving to the 1 rating. The action plan would address this issue by agreeing challenging short-term objectives, for example, related to a new project; involvement in a cross organisation working party; representing the team at an external event. 3 Developing Performer – further development needed This means that the individual did not fully meet the expectations of the role for one or more of the following reasons: Because he or she was new into the role and still learning – or still in the development phase of a complex role; and/or did not achieve a vital objective or fell short of the standards required on some; and/or did not complete the learning and development plan without good reason Consideration will need to be given to the individual’s next learning and development plan to enable him or her to move to the ’good performer’ assessment. The action plan might include further discussion of the issues to agree some more detailed success criteria for the next work plan, coaching by the manager, consideration within the learning and development plan of wider development activities. 72 4 – Unsatisfactory Performer This means that the individual did not meet the expectations of the role because he or she did not achieve most of the objectives and/or complete the learning and development plan. Rating at this level is not acceptable for the longer term and the line manager and the individual should quickly agree an action plan for moving forward. It may be that the individual who does not have the potential to achieve the requirements of this role. An option for the action plan is to explore suitability for the type of work. The action plan might include revised frequency of 1:1 meetings, coaching by managers or peers, agreeing a detailed short - term learning and development plan. 73 Performance management form Name: Dept/Programme: Date/Year: Purpose: OBJECTIVE ACTIVITIES & RESOURCES SUCCESS CRITERIA & TIMESCALE REVIEW: STAFF MEMBER’S COMMENTS REVIEW: MANAGERS COMMENTS LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT NEEDS LEARNING OBJECTIVES HOW AND BY WHEN WILL THEY BE MET? REVIEW: STAFF MEMBERS COMMENTS REVIEW: MANAGER’S COMMENT Date: OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: Additional Comments on rating: Signature Signature (Manager) Performance management form Name: Dept/Programme: Date/Year: Purpose: OBJECTIVE ACTIVITIES & RESOURCES SUCCESS CRITERIA & TIMESCALE REVIEW: STAFF MEMBERS COMMENTS LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT NEEDS LEARNING OBJECTIVES HOW AND BY WHEN WILL THEY BE MET? REVIEW: STAFF MEMBERS COMMENTS Date: OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: Signature Signature (Manager) REVIEW: MANAGERS COMMENTS REVIEW: MANAGERS COMMENT? Performance management form Additional Comments on rating: Name: Dept/Programme: Date/Year: LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOURS (How?) Strategic Leadership Rating Operational Leadership Rating Personal Leadership Communicating Vision and Strategic Purpose Delivery of Results Action Orientation External Orientation Managerial Courage Approachability, Integrity and Trust Strategic Awareness Building High Performance Teams Management of Cultural Differences Situational Agility Innovation and Creativity Self Development and Self Management Leadership of Change and Transformation Customer Focus Rating Performance management form Additional Comments on leadership behaviour ratings: