IT QM Part1 Lecture 2 Dr. Withalm 8-Apr-15 IT QM Bratislava Lectures at the University of Bratislava/Spring 2014 27.02.2014 Lecture 1 Impact of Quality-From Quality Control to Quality Assurance 06.03.2014 Lecture 2 Organization Theories-Customer satisfaction-Quality Costs 13.03.2014 Lecture 3 Leadership-Quality Awards 20.03.2014 Lecture 4 Creativity-The long Way to CMMI level 4 27.03.2014 Lecture 5 System Engineering Method-Quality Related Procedures 03.04.2014 Lecture 6 Quality of SW products 10.04.2014 Lecture 7 Quality of SW organization 2 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Today’s Agenda From Quality Control to Quality Assurance Definition of Quality Control Definition of Quality Assurance 4 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Conclusion of Part 1/1 Impact of Quality Quality wins Quality deficiencies Standards Quality definition Evolution from quality control to TQM Shewhart, Deming, Juran, Feigenbaum, Nolan, Crosby, Ishikawa Evolution of organization theory i.e. Taylorism, System Dynamics, System Thinking, Quality Assurance Product liability Customer satisfaction Criteria, two-dimension queries, inquiry methods 5 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Conclusion of Part 1/2 Quality costs Failure prevention, appraisal, failure, conformity, quality related losses, barriers Leadership Behavior, deal with changes, kinds of influencing control, conflict resolution, syndromes to overcome when introducing changes Audits Quality awards Creativity techniques Mind Mapping, Progressive Abstraction, Morphological Box, Method 635, Synectics, Buzzword Analysis, Bionic, De Bono Embedded Systems FMEA-Failure Mode Effect Analysis 6 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Quality Assurance & Organization Theory Quality Assurance is considered as an essential part of organizational theory Before starting to discuss organization theory the term quality control must be made aware Beginning of control goes back at least to 300000 BC. Some famous buildings as the Pyramids of Gizeh justify this opinion That processes were established which ensured that parts fit together At the peak of determination in 1787 the first time the replace ability was requested i.e. attempts were undertaken to accomplish the exact dimensions of the specifications (without any tolerances) However, they failed as practical experience shows: It‘ s impossible to produce absolute identical parts also when efforts are extremely increased. 7 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From Quality Control to Quality Assurance/1 The question was raised: Does raising of efforts make sense or are other approaches more appropriate ? And the following solution was found: values were introduced which enabled the producer to decide if product may be produced within the tolerances ( Go ) Nevertheless practitioners aim for exact values. 8 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From Quality Control to Quality Assurance/2 Example: Production of a cylinder Take into account values for accepting products What are the impacts on workers . Perception: Definition of windows to decide if produced products lie inside or fall outside the tolerances Go and No Go conditions For each target value: Declare upper and lower limit for tolerances 9 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From Quality Control to Quality Assurance/3 Evolution of Control Time Evolution of Control 1mio years bc Little Contol 300 000 bc Beginning of Control 8000 bc Parts fit together (Pyramids of Gizeh) Exact Control : 1787 ac Interchangeability of Parts 1840 ac Go Decision 1870 ac Go No Go Decision 1924 ac Shewhart’s Quality Control Chart 10 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From quality control to quality assurance/4 Philosophical View and Impacts. Transition from exact designed values to tolerance windows implies The advancement from deterministic school of thought to the probabilistic one. Confession that we are to a certain extent dependent on accident. Theory of probability gains in importance Investigation of new possibilities to reduce nonconforming units Search after methodologies to reduce efforts for testing However, an impact of all these discussion of tolerances lead to the establishment of standardization institutes And rapid development of standards 11 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From quality control to quality assurance/5 Development of Standards Standardization: Emerging of Standardization institutes 12 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From Quality Control to Quality Assurance/6 Walter Andrew Shewhart/1 From March 18, 1891 to March 11, 1967 was a physicist, engineer and statistician sometimes known as the father of statistical quality control In his book “Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control” he describes three steps of quality control Specification Production ( provision of accomplishment ) Inspection.“ Developed the Quality Control Chart 13 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From Quality Control to Quality Assurance/7 Walter Andrew Shewhart/2 Bell Telephone’s had been working to improve The reliability of their transmission systems Amplifiers and other equipment had to be buried underground There was a need to reduce the frequency of failure and repairs In 1918 when Dr. Shewhart joined the Western Electric Company Industrial quality was limited to inspecting finished products and removing defective items 14 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From Quality Control to Quality Assurance/8 Walter Andrew Shewhart/3 All changed on May 16, 1924 Dr. Shewhart prepared a little memorandum only about one page in length Over a third of that page was given over to a simple diagram Which we would all recognize today as a schematic control chart That diagram, and the short text which proceeded and followed it Set forth all of the essential principles and considerations Which are involved in what we know today a process quality control 15 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From Quality Control to Quality Assurance/9 Walter Andrew Shewhart/4 Shewhart’s work pointed out the importance of reducing variation in manufacturing process And the understanding that continual process adjustment In reaction to non conformance actually increased variation and degraded quality Shewhart framed the problem in terms of assignable – cause and chance- cause variation And introduced the control chart as a tool for distinguishing between the two Shewhart stressed that bringing a production process into a state of statistical control Where there is only common cause variation And keeping it in control is necessary to predict future output and to manage a process economically 16 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava From Quality Control to Quality Assurance/10 Walter Andrew Shewhart/5 Shewhart discovered that observed variation in manufacturing data Did not always behave the same way as data in nature Brownian motion of particles Dr. Shewhart concluded that while every process displays variation Same processes display controlled variation that is natural to the process While others display uncontrolled variation That is not present in the process causal system at all times 17 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/1 State at which specified values are within specified tolerances Shewhart’s most essential idea was to design a process Where you expect to produce products within a bandwidth When designing such a process Forecasting must be possible How often an expected product will lay within the specified borders Of course most complex technical challenges must be considered This production process should also ensure That variability can be reduced on an economic meaningful degree This variability usually stem from accidental failures of some machine tools Which are producing the products 18 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/2 Shewhart’s fundamental idea was: Specifying this production process Produce the product Inspect the produced product A tool which support all these phases is the so called control chart It’s a forecasting method with minimal error A means for minimizing the variability At producing a product at given costs 19 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/3 20 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/4 Definition of Control Chart 21 Is a statistical tool Intended to assess the nature of variation in a process Facilitating of forecasting and management Control Chart is also known as “Shewhart Chart” or “ Process Behavior Chart” Application of Control Chart facilitate the determination among common cause and special cause Common cause: data points are within the six sigma border Such causes are impacting natural mean variation Special cause: data points lie outside the six sigma border Such causes must be dealt by process designer Documentation of the values of measurement and statistical evaluation Control of center of tolerance Recognize the values of irritation before tolerance is exaggerated Calculation of the process ability 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/5 Processing a Control Chart 22 Analyze the Chart 1st Question: Is the process in statistical control? i.e. are the values within the 3 sigma limits If yes: Monitor the process for special cases Make changes to the process in order to continuously improve it If no: Circle point & investigate special cause 2nd Question: Did you find the cause? If yes finding may be desirable or not Desirable: Institute a special case & make a note Recalculate control limits if necessary Undesirable Remove special case & make a note Recalculate control limits if necessary If no: Make a note and recalculate the control limits 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/6 Composition of a control chart • A centre line, drawn at the process mean; • An upper control-limit also called an upper natural process-limit • drawn three standard deviations above the centre line; and • A lower control-limit also called a lower natural process-limit • drawn three standard deviations below the centre line How to proceed: •Render data points about the timeline. •Calculate the mean value •Calculate the standard deviation •Render mean value •Render two parallels to the mean at intervals of +3s and -3s 23 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/7 Example of a Control Chart 24 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/8 Scientific Reasons of 3 sigma limits Shewhart set 3-sigma limits on the following basis The coarse result of Chebyshev's inequality that, for any probability distribution, the probability of an outcome greater than k standard deviations from the mean is at most 1/k². The finer result of the Vysochanskii-Petunin inequality , that for any unimodal probability distribution, the probability of an outcome greater than k standard deviations from the mean is at most 5/9k². The empirical investigation of sundry probability distributions that at least 99% of observations occurred within three standard deviations of the mean. 25 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/9 Fundamental terms of statistics/1 characteristic quantitative continuous 26 qualitative discrete ordinal nominal Weight Population figure School grade Gender length Sum of the pips on the dice hardness grade color 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/10 Fundamental terms of statistics/2 See Generally Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) from Lecture 1 Error Critical Error 27 08.04.2015 (air crash) Main Error (car is not running) Minor Error (scratch on the mudguard) Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/11 Fundamental terms of statistics/3 Mean:In general, given n numbers, their arithmetic mean is computed by the formula Standard deviation of this population is defined as 28 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/12 Fundamental terms of statistics/4 Range R = xmax - xmin acceptance boundaries Upper acceptance boundary UCLx = x + 3 s Lower acceptance boundary LCLx = x - 3 s 29 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Control/13 Steps to reach the statistical quality control •Ascertain •How to collect data •Control criteria •Measures at deviations •Required data to control the process statistically 30 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/1 Deming’s improvement of Shewhart’s wheel/1 31 PLAN DO ACT CHECK 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/2 Deming wheel/1 Plan What could be the most important accomplishment of this team What changes might be desirable What data are available Are more observations needed If yes Plan or change or test Decide how to use the observations Do Carry out the change or test Preferably on a small scale 32 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/3 Deming wheel/2 Check Observe the effects of the change or test Act Study the results What did we learn What can we predict Step 5 Repeat step 1 with knowledge accumulated Step 6 Repeat step 2, and onward 33 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/4 Deming’s wheel in context with CMMI/1 34 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/5 Impact of Shewhart’s Quality Control Approach/1 Thanks to the specific Quality Control measures US material in the second world war was prevailing Sole nation with efficient infrastructure Producing products for the whole world Monopoly position because of the war Otherwise no willingness to deal with methods For increasing the efficiency Suggested by Deming 35 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/6 Impact of Shewhart’s Quality Control Approach/2 Through the defeat in the second world war Japan was ready for innovative approaches suggested by Deming Insular state with high population density Infrastructure destroyed by Second World War Devastating impact of two atomic explosions Hence, Japan was an ideal medium for Learning and applying Deming’s methods 36 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/7 Impact of Deming’s Quality Assurance Approach Deming Chain Reaction Improve Quality because Costs decrease because Less rework Fewer mistakes Fewer delays Snags Better use of machine time and materials Which implies that productivity improves Which furthermore implies that Market will be captured with better quality and lower price Staying in market Providing jobs and more jobs 37 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/8 Deming’s Approach Organizations were basing on Taylor’s principles Will be discussed in next lecture Example is “Working on the assembly line” Such organizations must be transcended by a transformation To reach the level of quality assurance Such a transformation is not One time project with defined starting and final conditions Measured on achievement criteria Such a transformation is a Cultural change as prerequisite for further operative changes Deming‘s 14 points are a forerunner of total quality management. 38 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/9 Deming’s 14 Points/1 1. Create constancy of purpose toward improvement of product and service, with the aim to become competitive and stay in business and to provide jobs. 2. Adopt a new philosophy. We are in a new economic age. Western management must awaken to the challenge, just learn responsibilities, and take on leadership for change. 3. Cease dependence on inspection to achieve quality. Eliminate the need for inspection on mass basis by building into the product in the first place. 4. End the practice of awarding business of price tag. Instead minimize total cost. Move toward a single supplier for any item, on a long-term relationship of loyalty and trust. 39 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/10 Deming’s 14 Points/2 5. Improve constantly and forever the systems of production and service, to improve quality and productivity and thus constantly decrease costs. 6. Institute training on the job. 7. Institute leadership. The aim of leadership should be to help people and machines and gadgets to do a better job. Leadership of management is in need of overhaul, as well as leadership of production workers. 8. Drive out fear, so that everyone may work effectively for the company. 40 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/11 Deming’s 14 Points/3 9. Break down barriers between departments. People in research, design, sales and production must work as a team, to foresee problems of production and in use that may be encountered with the product or service. 10. Eliminate slogans, exhortations and targets for the work force asking for zero defects and new levels of productivity. 11. Eliminate work standards (quotas) on the factory floor. Substitute leadership. Eliminate management by objective. Eliminate management by numbers, numerical goals. Substitute leadership. 12. Remove barriers that rob the hourly worker of his right to pride of workmanship. The responsibility of supervisors must be changed from sheer numbers to quality. Remove barriers that rob people in management and in engineering of their right to pride of workmanship. 41 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/12 Deming’s 14 Points/4 13. Institute a vigorous program of education and self-improvement. 14. Put everybody in the company to work to accomplish the transformation. The transformation is everybody's job. 42 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/13 Deming’s Inheritance Both ISO 9000 as well as CMMI Assessments request Involvement of top management is essential In introducing quality assurance Management is responsible for the general conditions Under which processes and activities are defined and performed 43 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/14 System of profound knowledge/1 Deming's theories are summarized in his two books, Out of the Crisis and The New Economics, in which he spells out his "System of Profound Knowledge” 44 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/15 System of profound knowledge/2 Four components: Appreciation of a system Knowledge about variation Theory of Knowledge Psychology 45 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/16 System of profound knowledge/3 Appreciation of a System/1 An organization must be understood as a complex system Then top management is enabled to establish respectively to improve long term and sustainable structures Including all employees Under structure building he understood Define borders, top down, bottom up, onion skin Proceeding From the whole (top management) to the part (employee) Policy deployment Working out of the visions and goals Workshops with all top managers and afterwards deployment in all departments 46 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/17 System of profound knowledge/4 Appreciation of a System/2 Vision/ Strategy d Coordination e Fe Po lic k yD c Ba ep lo ym en t Policy Deployment Organization 47 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/18 System of profound knowledge/5 Appreciation of a System/3 Example from Siemens 48 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/19 System of profound knowledge/6 Appreciation of a System/4 49 Outstanding quality is vital for our success. Quality is personal Quality is the responsibility of each employee. We all share the responsibility for our quality, with each of us making an active contribution to the quality of our products and services with his or her work. Quality is mandatory Reaching and maintaining high quality standards requires their permanent application and improvement in all our products and services. Quality must become a matter of course in our day-to-day work. Quality is all-encompassing It pertains to all divisions of the company and is relevant for all aspectsof our work. We all are called upon to boost the success of our company by showing individual creativity and personal commitment to the cause. 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/20 System of profound knowledge/7 Appreciation of a System/5 Budget Vision/ Strategy/ Budget Vision Strategies Processes Performance Indicators Which process supports the strategy How are we measure the progress superior strategy Indicator target derived strategy Indicator Actual Measures . 50 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm Target dates Actual Dates IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/21 System of profound knowledge/8 Knowledge about Variation/1 In evaluation problems and before making decisions basing on Numbers, data, facts Some classical quality tools were established Tools to identify/analyze problems Tools to work with ideas 51 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/22 System of profound knowledge/9 Knowledge about Variation/2 Tools to identify/analyze problems Identify Problems As well as flowchart Analyze Problems Paretodiagramm Histogram Test arc-tally sheet Cause/impact diagram Disperse diagram Brainstorming Characteristic diagram Control chart Nominal group technique lamination Process capacity Strength area 52 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/23 System of profound knowledge/10 Knowledge about Variation/3 Tools to work with ideas Work with Ideas Work with Numbers Flow Chart Test arc-tally sheet Brainstorming Paretodiagramm Nominal group technique Characteristic diagram Cause/impact diagrams lamination Strength area Histogram Disperse diagram Control chart Process capacity 53 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/24 System of profound knowledge/11 Theory of Knowledge Deming proposed some issues as: Learning organization Lifelong learning Half time of knowledge 54 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/25 System of profound knowledge/12 Psychology Some important issues/rules are: How to deal with employees Networking Virtual teams/cooperating New media Social manners 55 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Definition of Quality Assurance/26 System of profound knowledge/13 Application of „System of profound knowledge“ Counterpoint to Taylorism: Laborer who is unskilled and focused is displaced by a generalist. The Generalist Knows multi disciplinary contexts Introduces within an organization appropriate methods Trains colleagues to apply these methods Not necessary to be expert in one of the four components of the system of profound knowledge Appreciation of a system Knowledge about variation Theory of Knowledge Psychology 56 08.04.2015 Dr.Withalm IT QM Bratsilava Thank you for your attention! IT QM Bratislava