Craig Whitaker, MBA Financial Analyst, Franciscan – St. Francis Health Operating Budget Productivity Reporting o Role of the Budget in o Primary Components of o Components of the Budget o Calculating the Standard Strategic Planning o Determining How Much to Budget o How Operational Data Flows into the Budget o Budget Approval Process Productivity (Benchmark) o Quick Method for Calculating FTEs needed o Monitoring and Analyzing Productivity o Productivity Reporting Tips o Requesting New FTEs Mission Statement Goals and Objectives Fiscal Responsibility per Business Unit Efficient Use of Resources (Labor and Supplies) Aligns Operations with Strategic Plan The Role of the Budget in Strategic Planning S T R A T E G Y T A C T I C S B U D G E Mission Goals & Objectives Internal Factors Financial External Factors Service Mix Quality Economic Capital Resources Market Share Regulatory Technology Employee Satisfaction Political Organizational Culture Productivity Efficiency Social Marketing Operations Financing Markets Labor Resources Short-Term Debt Services/Programs Roles & Responsibilities Long-Term Debt Price Information Systems Contributions Location Performance Measures Shareholders Capital Budget Budgets Operating Budget Proforma Financials Projects Revenues Income Statement Construction Expenses Balance Sheet Equipment Statistics In this presentation, when we say “budget” we mean the Operating Budget, which includes the following: Operating Plan Statistics Budget Revenue Budget Expense Budget FTE Budget Notes Summary (Pro Forma) Primary Objectives o Factors That May Aid / Prevent from Accomplishing Objectives o Operational Factors That Will / Will Not Occur Next Year o Any New Operational Factors That Will Occur Next Year Quality Improvement Plan o Less turnover, injuries, increased number of inspections Labor and Productivity Plan o Keep Square Footage updated, monitor overtime Other Expense Containment Plan o Less contract labor, standardize cleaning supplies *Stats are key to a good budget, they impact several other areas of the budget including: o Revenue projections o FTE projections (to be hired) o Reviewing variable expenses on a per statistic basis from year to year o Goals from the operating plan o Actual v Budgeted statistics are reviewed by management on a monthly (and/or biweekly) basis Some typical ES statistics might include: o Cleanable Square Footage o Number of Rooms o Visits (Guests, Patients, Students, etc.) o Adjusted Discharges (Hospitals) House keeping departments are overhead departments, meaning they typically do not generate revenue The revenue budget is likely made up of misc. income from various sources, which is categorized as “Other Operating Income” on the financial statement Sources of Income: o Income from recycling o Trade Credits – 2% 10 net 30 o Rebates on cleaning supplies / equipment o Contracted cleaning agreements Salaries Wages-Fixed Purchased Labor Svc - Var Purchased Labor Svc Benefits Fringes-Fixed Supplies Catered Food Medical Supplies Office Supplies Supplies Other Expenses Telephone Expense Repairs and Maintenance Printer/Copier/Fax MFD Purchased Services Minor Equipment Employee Retention Dues Seminars & Conferences Travel - Airfare Lodging Meals & Other Miscellaneous Courier Services Review current YTD expenses, and also previous year expenses Make sure your expense totals are accurate for the year by asking the following questions: o Are we receiving our trade credits? o Do the invoices hitting our accounts belong to us? o Have we received the refunds or rebates owed to us by our vendors? o Are we still being charged a lease expense for equipment we no longer posses? New equipment? o What has caused our cleaning supplies expense to fluctuate? • • • • • Level of Acuity – case mix? (Hospital only) More expensive cleaning solutions? Environmentally friendly? Special Event? Additional Square Footage? More equipment? Definition: Analysis technique used to compare changes in statistics, revenue, expenses and hours over various periods of time (typically years). Example: How much has our revenue increased in the last 5 years? (%) Formula: 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑌𝑟.𝑥 −𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑌𝑟.𝑥 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑌𝑟.𝑥 × 100 = %∆𝑥 X = Statistics, Revenue, Expense, or Hours 2007 Revenue = $195,000 2012 Revenue = $243,000 $243,000−$195,000 $195,000 × 100 = 𝟐𝟒. 𝟔% or $𝟒𝟖, 𝟎𝟎𝟎 Note: When using horizontal analysis, always calculate the $ change along with the % change. A change of 5% to $1,000 won’t be nearly as significant as a change of 5% to $1,000,000. Definition: Analysis technique used to identify how much a particular line item of a category contributes to the total. Example: What % of our expense budget is made up of purchased services? Formula: 𝑥 𝑥 × 100 = % 𝑥 X = Statistics, Revenue, Expense, or Hours Example: What % of our expense budget is made up of purchased services? Purchased Services = $33,000 Total Expense = $572,000 Formula: $33,000 $572,000 × 100 = 𝟓. 𝟖% Note: use VA to identify the particular expenses that contribute the most to your overall expense total and monitor the % changes each month. Then, identify the root causes of any trends that develop. There are a number of factors that determine the FTE budget: o The current year workload (amount of cleanable square ft) o Anticipated changes in the size of the workload (next year) o The strategic plan & operating plan o Task changes in individual job types o *Productivity efficiency The FTE section of the Budget may include: o Job Descriptions o Employee Names o Number of Current FTEs o Number of Projected FTEs (Next Yr.’s Budget) o Specific FTE Adjustments o Target Number of FTEs (Based on Productivity) o Salary / Wages Expense Always include a sidebar for notes and comments in your budget. Why? Senior management (budget committee) review process Reference for the Finance department – variance review For personal reference - after a few months, it is easy to forget what you budgeted for: o Various types of expenses o FTEs o Statistical fluctuations o Changes in FTEs What is it? – All of the estimates and projections used to create the various sections of the budget (revenue, expense, etc.) are calculated into a budget income statement for the following year. Why? – It can be used to compare to the actualized income statement of the current year to determine if adjustments need to be made to the budget, while the budget is still available to be edited. Annualize the first 6 months of the current year to project next year’s budget. (St. Francis method) Also compare last year’s actual to last year’s budget to see if there were any significant budget variances that need to be addressed for next year. Actual - Jan - Dec 2012 Projected - Jul - Dec 2012 2013 Budget Allow open participation of those involved with daily operations in order to estimate increases or decreases in expenses or other sections of the budget. Do not use a “gut feel” if possible, base estimates on facts and calculations. Charge Entry in Clinical Areas [Epic] Checks and Cash Received Income Hours / FTEs Payroll Databse [Peoplesoft] Revenue Stats General Ledger [Pathways Fin Mgmt] Budget [Kaufmann Hall] Clock-In System [Kronos] Manual Stats (Cleanable Sq Ft) Supplies from Mats Mgmt Expenses Journal Entries A/P System [OnBase] Invoices Check Requests Budget Preparation Process END HERE START HERE Final Budget Approval Board Budget Review Strategic Planning Budget guidelines Goals and Objectives Environmental Analysis Top Management Finance / Marketing / Planning Budget Revision Department Managers Evironmental Analysis Marketing Financial Focused Environmental Assessment Budget Preparation Budget Submission Resource Identification Staff Also keep in mind that it never hurts to bribe the budget committee with chocolates, desserts, baked goods, pizza, and especially donuts when having budgets reviewed for approval “What gets measured, gets counted!” How do I know how many FTEs to budget? Am I currently working too many FTEs? What productivity statistics should I be monitoring? How often should I review productivity? How should I go about requesting additional FTEs? Productivity reporting normally involves the following measures from which other metrics are then calculated and monitored 1. Operating Statistic (Cleanable Sq Ft) o [Output] 2. Total Worked Hours (Non-productive is excluded) o [Input] 3. Standard (Productivity Target or Benchmark) o Productivity = [Input] / [Output] o Helps answer the question, “How many FTEs do I need?” 1. The standard is calculated by dividing total productive hours by total cleanable sq ft, or how long it takes to clean a specified number of sq ft (in hours). 2. This same calculation is done biweekly (26 results) for one year or more. 3. The results are sorted starting with the shortest amounts of time used per square foot, descending to the longest. 4. (Subjective) A percentage of top performances must then be decided on, should we use the top 40%, 25%, 10%, etc? 5. Top 15% is chosen (15% x 26 = 4), so the top 4 lowest cleaning times per sq ft are averaged together as the new standard. Cleanable Sq Ft 90,000 Actual Worked Hours 9,146 x Time Period 14 Days ÷ Total Sq Ft Cleaned in 14 Days 1,260,000 = Total Sq Ft Cleaned in 14 Days 1,260,000 = Actual Worked Hours / Sq Ft 0.00725873 Per our last calculation, Actual Worked Hours / Sq Ft was 0.00725873 . This means for this 2 week period it took us on average 0.00725873 hours to clean 1 sq ft or 26.13 seconds. Our square footage total was 1,260,000. Remember that Actual Worked Hours / Sq Ft is a rate that will be compared during each two week pay period against subsequent pay periods. 0.00725873 is a very small, very ugly number to work with 1,260,000 is a very large, very ugly number to work with So... Actual Worked Hours 9,146 Total Sq Ft Cleaned in 14 Days ÷ (1,260,000 ÷ 1000) or 1,260 Actual Worked Hours / Sq Ft = (0.00725873 x 1,000) or 7.26 Pay Ending Pay Period # Hours/Stat Pay Ending Pay Period # Hours/Stat 1/15/2011 1 7.26 7/16/2011 14 6.29 1/29/2011 2 6.76 7/30/2011 15 6.39 2/12/2011 3 7.23 8/13/2011 16 8.08 2/26/2011 4 7.13 8/27/2011 17 7.06 3/12/2011 5 6.54 9/10/2011 18 6.67 3/26/2011 6 6.68 9/24/2011 19 7.59 4/9/2011 7 6.45 10/8/2011 20 7.07 4/23/2011 8 7.18 10/22/2011 21 7.11 5/7/2011 9 7.11 11/5/2011 22 7.69 5/21/2011 10 6.89 11/19/2011 23 8.02 6/4/2011 11 6.63 12/3/2011 24 7.41 6/18/2011 12 7.27 12/17/2011 25 6.84 7/2/2011 13 7.07 12/31/2011 26 7.36 Pay Ending Pay Period # Hours/Stat Pay Ending Pay Period # Hours/Stat 7/16/2011 14 6.29 10/22/2011 21 7.11 7/30/2011 15 6.39 5/7/2011 9 7.11 4/9/2011 7 6.45 2/26/2011 4 7.13 3/12/2011 5 6.54 4/23/2011 8 7.18 6/4/2011 11 6.63 2/12/2011 3 7.23 9/10/2011 18 6.67 1/15/2011 1 7.26 3/26/2011 6 6.68 6/18/2011 12 7.27 1/29/2011 2 6.76 12/31/2011 26 7.36 12/17/2011 25 6.84 12/3/2011 24 7.41 5/21/2011 10 6.89 9/24/2011 19 7.59 8/27/2011 17 7.06 11/5/2011 22 7.69 7/2/2011 13 7.07 11/19/2011 23 8.02 10/8/2011 20 7.07 8/13/2011 16 8.08 Pay Ending Pay Period # Hours/Stat 40% 25% 15% 10% 7/16/2011 14 6.29 AVG 7/30/2011 15 6.39 6.34 4/9/2011 3/12/2011 7 5 6.45 6.54 6/4/2011 9/10/2011 11 18 6.63 6.67 3/26/2011 1/29/2011 12/17/2011 5/21/2011 6 2 25 10 6.68 6.76 6.84 6.89 8/27/2011 7/2/2011 10/8/2011 17 13 20 7.06 7.07 7.07 AVG 6.42 AVG 6.50 AVG 6.61 We chose 6.42 as our new standard And our cleanable sq ft was 1,260 o ( 900,000 per day for 14 days = 1,260,000, adjusted to 1,260). So… 1260 6.42 80 = 101 FTEs To maintain our top performance (efficiency), we would need to use no more than 101 FTEs to clean 1,260,000 total square feet within a 2 week period *Per Employee Actual Time Worked 1 7 ÷ 2 Capacity (Hrs) 7 ÷ Shift (in Hours) 8 = Sample (Rate) Hrs 3 ÷ Utilization (%) 88% Sq Ft 5,500 [Standard Hrs/UOS] 3 Cleanable Sq Ft 170,000 ÷ Max Sq Ft Cleaned 12,833 = FTEs Needed 13.2 = Max Sq Ft Cleaned 12,833 Pay Ending 1/14/2012 1/28/2012 2/11/2012 2/25/2012 3/10/2012 3/24/2012 4/7/2012 4/21/2012 5/5/2012 5/19/2012 6/2/2012 6/16/2012 6/30/2012 7/14/2012 7/28/2012 YTD SQ FT 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 20,300 BUD SQ FT 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 18,900 In this report, actual sq footage exceeds budgeted sq footage in March. This change was not anticipated during the budget planning process. More sq ft means a larger workload and more staff required. Actual Hours worked will likely be higher than budgeted hours. Pay Ending 1/14/2012 1/28/2012 2/11/2012 2/25/2012 3/10/2012 3/24/2012 4/7/2012 4/21/2012 5/5/2012 5/19/2012 6/2/2012 6/16/2012 6/30/2012 7/14/2012 7/28/2012 YTD SQ FT 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 20,300 BUD SQ FT Actual Hrs 1,260 9,146 1,260 8,523 1,260 9,104 1,260 8,984 1,260 8,237 1,260 9,345 1,260 9,032 1,260 10,046 1,260 9,959 1,260 9,648 1,260 9,279 1,260 10,172 1,260 9,897 1,260 8,805 1,260 8,952 18,900 9,275 Bud Hours 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 Actual Hours were approx. 8,700 on average before the sq footage increase. After March, actual worked hours increased to 9,500 on average, leaving the YTD average 9,275 v 8,400 budget. Pay Ending 1/14/2012 1/28/2012 2/11/2012 2/25/2012 3/10/2012 3/24/2012 4/7/2012 4/21/2012 5/5/2012 5/19/2012 6/2/2012 6/16/2012 6/30/2012 7/14/2012 7/28/2012 YTD Statistics SQ FT BUD SQ FT Actual FTEs 1,260 1,260 114.33 1,260 1,260 106.54 1,260 1,260 113.80 1,260 1,260 112.30 1,260 1,260 102.96 1,400 1,260 116.81 1,400 1,260 112.90 1,400 1,260 125.58 1,400 1,260 124.49 1,400 1,260 120.60 1,400 1,260 115.99 1,400 1,260 127.15 1,400 1,260 123.71 1,400 1,260 110.06 1,400 1,260 111.90 20,300 18,900 115.94 FTEs Flex FTEs Budget FTEs 105.00 105.00 105.00 105.00 105.00 105.00 105.00 105.00 105.00 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 116.67 105.00 112.78 105.00 Std FTEs 101.12 101.12 101.12 101.12 101.12 112.35 112.35 112.35 112.35 112.35 112.35 112.35 112.35 112.35 112.35 108.61 Standard 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 6.42 FTE Type Measure Actual FTEs The number of hours actually worked (time off not included) Flex FTEs (Workload) How many FTEs were needed based on workload (Cleanable sq ft) Budget FTEs (Estimated) The number of FTEs budgeted Standard FTEs (Historic best) The number of FTEs that should have been used to meet productivity benchmarks Calculation 𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝑃𝑒𝑟 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 𝐵𝑢𝑑𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝑥 𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑞 𝐹𝑡 𝐵𝑢𝑑𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑞 𝐹𝑡 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝑃𝑒𝑟 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 𝐵𝑢𝑑𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝑃𝑒𝑟 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝑥 𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑞 𝐹𝑡 𝑆𝑞 𝐹𝑡 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝑃𝑒𝑟 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 Pay Ending 1/14/2012 1/28/2012 2/11/2012 2/25/2012 3/10/2012 3/24/2012 4/7/2012 4/21/2012 5/5/2012 5/19/2012 6/2/2012 6/16/2012 6/30/2012 7/14/2012 7/28/2012 YTD SQ FT 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 20,300 BUD SQ FT 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 18,900 Act v Flex Act v Bud -9.3 -9.3 -1.5 -1.5 -8.8 -8.8 -7.3 -7.3 2.0 2.0 -0.1 -11.8 3.8 -7.9 -8.9 -20.6 -7.8 -19.5 -3.9 -15.6 0.7 -11.0 -10.5 -22.2 -7.0 -18.7 6.6 -5.1 4.8 -6.9 (3.2) (10.9) Act v Std -13.2 -5.4 -12.7 -11.2 -1.8 -4.5 -0.6 -13.2 -12.1 -8.3 -3.6 -14.8 -11.4 2.3 0.4 (7.3) YTD Act v Flex Act v Bud (3.2) (10.9) Act v Std (7.3) Act v Flex – We should have budgeted 3.2 FTEs less for our workload (total cleanable sq ft) so far this year. Act v Bud – Our actual FTEs have exceeded our budget by 10.9 FTEs on average so far this year. Act v Std – In order to be in the top 15% of most efficient historic performances, we should have used 7.3 FTEs less so far this year on average. 1. More sq footage is cleaned w/o using additional FTEs 2. More sq footage is cleaned w/ less FTEs 3. Same sq footage is cleaned w/ less FTEs 4. Sq Footage remains the same, cleaning robots are used and FTEs are reduced (New Technology) 1. Consistent o Reporting over same time frame o Using the same statistic 2. Reliable o Data and calculations are consistent 3. Measurable o Statistic should be measurable o Data systems involved with productivity should be accurate 4. Quantitative o Do not use subjective or qualitative data for productivity o Productivity should have a numeric value, not “lazy” or “busy” 5. Comprehensive o Primary statistic should cover majority of work being done Business cases typically include, but are not limited to: 1. A Job Description (Estimated hours given for each task) 2. All of the benefits associated with the new hire (improved quality, safety, patient care, etc.) 3. Any field research or existing statistics to support the case What would be the consequences of not hiring the employee? o o o o Patient Safety Violations Legal Issues Lost customers Lower satisfaction Is there any added value in the position (i.e. does the added FTE provide a service that saves money or generates income?) Could the need for this employee be satisfied by shifting around existing employees in the department? What are other hospitals (companies) doing? o How is the need being satisfied elsewhere? Does this FTE help increase patient (customer) satisfaction? o Higher Press Ganey Scores? Does this FTE help increase employee satisfaction? Will there be enough additional volume to support the new FTE? What good will this position do, and for what people? Thank you for your attention, sorry for all of the math!