Theory of War Capsule: Part II Schools of Strategic Thought Schools of Strategic Thought Continental School. Maritime School. Aerospace School. Revolutionary School. – Guerrilla war. – Rural Insurgency. – Urban Insurgency. – Terrorism. Continental School Chanakya/Kautilya - 325 BC Sun-tzu - 300 BC Clausewitz - 1780 - 1831 AD Jomini - 1779 - 1869 AD Liddle Hart - 1895 - 1970 AD KAUTILYA Arthashastra Balance of Power (Mandala Concept) Theory of Expanding Empires Concept of Territorial Defence On Principles of Statecraft – Sama – Dana – Bheda – Danda – Maya – Upeksha – Indrajal : : : : : : : Negotiations Reward Divide Punishment Deceit, Treachery Ignore Psy war, Deception On Philosophy of War – Last resort – Continuation of State Policy – Use High Strategy to Sap the Enemy’s Morale (Psy War) – Emphasis on Trg of Armed Forces – Stress on Selection of Ground for diff Mil Ops – Thoughts on Org & Conduct of Covert Wars – Imp of Int and Espionage Sun Tzu War is nothing but a continuation of Political intercourse with an admixture of other means. War is a matter of vital imp to the State - hence importance of proper study of the subject. Destroy the enemy’s army without engaging it. Take his cities without laying siege. If war is inevitable :– Win in shortest possible time. – At least cost in terms of lives, resources & effort. – With infliction of least casualties on the en. Effect of war on economy Shape the enemy. On Deception. – When capable, feign incapacity. – When near, make it appear as if you are far. – Move as a ghost in starlight. Know the mind of the en Cdr. Avoid prolonged campaign. Withdraw offensively. Weather & Terrain. Flexible tactics. National unity. Clausewitz War is a continuation of State policy. Viewed war as an art. Strategic triad of Govt, military & people. Synergy between political & military leaders. Theories on conduct of war – Theory as a Guide. Jomini Views similar to Clausewitz. Both were influenced by the exploits of Napoleon. While Clausewitz was philosophical, Jomini was more doctrinaire. Tried to derive a framework of rules for the conduct of war. Liddel Hart Indirect approach. Formulated principles on which modern mobile warfare would be fought. Concepts studied by German General Staff=> Blitzkrieg. Foresaw implications of nuclear wpns. Continental School Oldest school – most applicable presently in our context. Theories shaped by the way wars were fought – to capture & retain territory. Req defeat & annihilation of en mil forces. Continental School Main Charactersitics: – Wars revolved around clash of massed armies. – Modern interpretation: AF & Navy essentially exist to sp the land battle. Also the crux of existing “turf battles”. Continental School Applicability to modern Wars: – Continues to be applicable with modifications. – AF & Navy have roles besides sp of land battle. Req is for jt application of avl mil force for max synergy. Maritime School Alfred T Mahan - 1890 Sir Julian Corbett - 1910 Maritime School Alfred Mahan – Influenced by Jomini. – Big navies with overseas bases for power projection => Command of the sea through decisive encounters. – Impact of maritime power on economics. – Factors affecting dev of maritime power, incl geographical position, extent of territory etc. – Failed to appreciate effect of sub-surface warfare, and airpower. Maritime School Sir Julian Corbett – Theater specific sea control (“Control of passage & Communication”). – Weaker fleet to remain in existence by avoiding encounters. – Impact of sub-surface warfare and airpower not factored. Maritime School Covers exploitation of the sea medium in peace & war. Historically concepts understood even before formal theories put up. – Ancient Roman fleet. – Maritime capabilities of colonial powers: Spain Portugal France Britain Only school of strategic thought that operates under geographical constraints (Mahan). Applicability to modern war (by syndicate) Aerospace School Douhet - 1873 - 1930 AD Mitchell - 1878 - 1936 AD Trenchard - 1873 - 1956 AD Col John Warden USAF Aerospace School Wars can be won by air power alone (D) Air power could make protracted wars obsolete (D) Command of the air (D) Emp of air power (T & M) :- Primary : centers of pop & industry - Secondary : in sp of army Creation of air force as an independent service (D, T & M) Five ring theory of Col Warden. Applicability to modern war (by syndicate) Revolutionary School Guerrilla warfare. Rural Insurgency. Urban Insurgency. Terrorism. Revolutionary School Revolutionary War. Process that involves the forcible overthrow of a Govt, or an attempt to do so with the purpose of destroying an existing society and its institutions, and replacing them with a completely new structure. Revolutionary war occurs within the state, whereas, a conventional war is essentially an external phenomenon. Revolutionary School Necessary ingredients: – Popular sp. – Organisation. – Cohesion. – External sp. – Environment. – Effectiveness of the victim Govt. Revolutionary School Marx : – Urban centric communist revolutionary warfare. Polarisation of society due economic disparity => violent overthrow of the elite. Applicable to Industralised nations. Lenin: – Modified framework to fit conditions prevailing in Russia. Urban centric. Focus on political aspects. Revolutionary School Mao Tse Tung: – Combined both pol & mil aspects. – Modified to rural base to suit China. Small core of ‘believers’. Pol indoctrination of expanding cadre. Expand ambit to guerrilla warfare against Govt forces, encompassing pol, social & economic fields. End state: Total takeover of the Govt. Control of the country. Revolutionary School Vo Nguen Giap: – Modified Mao’s theories to suit conditions peculiar to Vietnam to overthrow the French sponsored Vietnamese Govt. – Emphasized transition from guerrilla warfare to conventional warfare in final stages. – Greater focus on international sit, & outside sp. Revolutionary School Che Guevara: – Modification of Mao’s theories: Revolutionary sit can be created. Pol aspects take precedence over mil aspects. Advocated use of suburban guerrilla activity. Revolutionary School Applicability to modern warfare: – Insurgency & terrorism applicable: International System. Greater voice, reduction in sovereignty of individual states. Can pass moral judgment, and even intervene (Kosovo). Involvement by neighbouring States. Terrain / Geography. Shift towards urban areas. Indian Philosophy of War No expansionist thought – self sufficiency. Non-aggressive attitude – tolerant. Defensive in nature – reactive. Non-alignment (?) Peaceful co-existence – Panchsheel. Defensive strategy. Indian Philosophy of War External Perceptions 1994 Rand Corpn study – India potential future threat: – Ancient civilization & stable democracy. – Only country to have created another country by use of force since WW II. – Agro Industry – overtaken USA in milk production. – Will dominate computer field with 30% share. – Ability to act – Maldives. – INDIANS HAVE FAITH IN EVERYBODY EXCEPT THEMSELVES. Col Warden’s Five Ring Theory En Command Essential Production Tpt network Popular Sp Fielded Mil Forces