Critical Thinking Terminology Review An attack on one’s opponent rather than one’s opponent’s argument. Ad hominem Reasoning from the similarity of two things in several relevant respects to their similarity in another. Analogical reasoning Accepting the word of an authority, alleged or genuine, when we should not. Appeal to authority Believing that something is true because there is not good evidence that it is false. Appeal to ignorance One or more statements (premises) offered in support of another statement (a conclusion). Argument Assuming as a premise some form of the very point that is at issue – the conclusion we intend to prove. Begging the question Fallaciously reasoning from a sample that is insufficiently representative of the population from which it is drawn. Biased statistics The argument’s conclusion. Claim The part of the meaning of a word or expression that refers to things, events, or properties of one kind or another. Cognitive meaning The fallacy in which it is argued that a particular item must have a certain property because all or most of its parts have it. Composition The fallacy in which a wrong is justified on the grounds that lots or most others do that sort of thing. Common practice Reasoning that employs several inductions and deductions, concluding to a pattern that fits what has been observed so far. Concatenated reasoning What the premises of an argument are claimed to prove. Conclusion A statement that is neither necessarily true nor necessarily false. Contingent statement A statement that is necessarily false or a group of statements that taken together are inconsistent. Contradiction A strong belief held despite strong evidence invalidating it. Delusion An argument that presents two alternative courses of action, both claimed to be bad. Dilemma The fallacy in which it is assumed that all (or some) of the parts on an item have a particular property because the item as a whole has that property. Division Mistakenly reasoning from two alternatives, one claimed to be bad (to be avoided), so that we ought to choose the other alternative in particular when there is at least another viable alternative. Either-or fallacy The positive or negative overtones of a word or expression. Emotive meeting Use of a term in a passage to mean one thing in one place and something else in another. Equivocation A fallacy in which a question at issue is avoided (usually) while appearing not to. Evading the issue Judging someone guilty solely on the basis of the company that person keeps. Guilt by association The fallacious drawing of a conclusion from relevant but insufficient evidence. Hasty conclusion The tendency to keep our beliefs, and thus our actions, within the bounds of what society as a whole will accept. Herd instinct A deductively valid argument having the following form: 1) if A then B 2) If B then C 3) if A then C. Hypothetical syllogism An argument in which the opposite of the desired conclusion is assumed as a premise, leading to a conclusion that is false, contrary, or absurd, justifying acceptance of the desired conclusion. Indirect proof Reasoning that a pattern of some sort experienced so far will continue the future. Induction Statements that literally say one thing although their intended meaning is something else, usually opposite to its literal meaning. Irony To be so confused or opaque as to be difficult to understand. Obfuscation Attacking the person instead of their argument is what type of fallacy Ad Hominem When we assume that some parts of an item have a property because the whole item does, it is a called the fallacy of division When we reason that the 2012 Olympics will be as fun as the 2008 Olympics, we reason by Analogy When someone changes their mind and you accuse them of a fallacy it is called False charge of fallacy The tendency to keep our beliefs and our actions within the bounds of what society will accept. Herd instinct Providing a statistic that is very precise when in reality we only can estimate it approximately is called Disestimation Self-deception – consciously hat Only selecting data that is favorable to your argument is called deeper level we know to be dubious. Cherry-picking An attitude of strong, often biased, allegiance to a faction, cause, or person that results in viewing everything in terms of “us” versus “them.” Partisan mind-set Thinking ill of others without sufficient warrant, particularly members of a specific group, race, or religion. Prejudice A reason offered in support of an argument’s conclusion. Premise A limited perspective shaped by the ideas, interests, and kinds of behavior favored by the groups with which we identify. Provincialism Theories that are without scientific foundation. Pseudoscientific theories Reasoning by an analogy that is not apt, not justified. Questionable analogy Labeling A as the cause of B on evidence that is insufficient, negative, or unrepresentative, or is in serious conflict with well-established high-level theories. Questionable cause A psychological ploy we use to justify our actions or beliefs, however wrong, by coming up with selfsatisfying but incorrect reasons to explain them. Rationalization One who is blamed for the ills of the world. Scapegoat Consciously believing at a deeper level what we know to be dubious. Self-deception the careful selection of facts so as to imply something else (usually something false). Slanting Objecting to a course of action on the grounds that once it is taken, another, and then perhaps still others, is bound to be taken and given that the last step is not justified, then neither is the first. Slippery slope argument A process that moves from the premise that a certain percentage of a sample has the particular property to the conclusion that the whole population from which it is drawn has the same percentage of that property. Statistical induction A conventional oversimplification, often negative, of characteristics that describe a specific group of people. Stereotype A fallacious form of reasoning in which an opponent’s position, or competitor’s product. Is misrepresented or a weaker opponent is attacked rather than stronger ones. Straw man An irrational belief, based on biased evidence or on small or unrepresentative samples, that ignores logical evidence to the contrary. Superstition The fallacy in which evidence contrary to one’s position is neglected (overlooked). Suppressed evidence Avoiding thoughts that are stressful by either not thinking about them or by thinking non-stressful thoughts. Suppression An argument containing exactly three categorical propositions, two of them premise, one a conclusion. Syllogism A statement that is logically, or necessarily, true or so devoid of content as to be practically empty. Tautology The conclusion of an extended argumentative passage, its conclusion. Thesis Mistaking a token gesture for the real thing, or accepting a token gesture in lieu of something more substantial. Tokenism The attitudes or feelings expressed by a passage. Tone Accepting an unsuitable practice because doing so follows a traditional or accepted way of doing things. Traditional wisdom Justifying a wrong by pointing to a similar wrong done by others, usually by one’s accuser. Two rights make a wrong Fallaciously reasoning from a sample that is insufficiently representative of the population from which it is drawn. Unrepresentative sample A word that appears to make little or no change in a passage while in fact sucking out most of the content. Weasel word Believing what we would like to be true, no matter what the evidence. Wishful thinking The most important of one’s background beliefs (including those about morality, God, the “meaning of life,” ect.), usually but not always very general; one’s philosophy. Worldview