Synchrotrons, Mannitol, Prazosin, etc. Synchrotron radiation is accessible, decisive Hydrogen bonding affects molecular conformation Work performed with V.V. Chernyshev, A.V. Yatsenko, O.B. Ryabova, V.A. Makarov, C.E. Botez, R. Suryanarayanan, C. Nunes. See also poster #14 on R-albuterol, S. Cuffini Physical adsorption of Kr on graphite X-ray diffraction of Kr on exfoliated graphite. Crystallography with one Bragg peak - Kr(1,0) Experiments at SSRL in 1979. (Moncton, Birgeneau, Horn, Brown, PWS) 20x better angular resolution Substrate coherence length is ~2000Å Completely new picture! There is a disordered phase between the commensurate and incommensurate solids. Interesting new physics. Heroic age of synchrotron radiation. Parasitic on high energy physics. Huge investment of effort to get one or two weeks of access per year. National Synchrotron Light Source at Brookhaven National Laboratory Produces electromagnetic radiation from IR to -rays. Easy to obtain access. ~75 experimental stations ~2500 users per year Typical of many facilities worldwide: APS, ESRF, SLS, SRS Daresbury, SSRL, …, which are eager for users. Synchrotron access is for: Academic: Industrial: Who publish in the open literature* Hold data for proprietary reasons** The people who operate these facilities need to have them widely used! * Access by writing competitive proposals or arranging collaboration. ** You have to pay for the prorated cost of operating the facility - ~$250/hour = $2000/pattern at NSLS. Compare lab vs. synchrotron data sets. This drug has two polymorphs that can’t be quantified except by Rietveld. Form 1 -- Lab Form 2 -- Lab Form 1 -- Synchrotron Form 2 -- Synchrotron THEORY OF POWDER DIFFRACTION (series of elementary recipes) CONTENTS OF UNIT CELL UNIT CELL RECIPROCAL LATTICE, SPACE GROUP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTENSITIES 2 2i ( hkl )( xyz ) j I hkl ~ f je POWDER PEAK POSITIONS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 (degrees) 10 11 12 13 14 15 INSTRUMENT AFFECTS PEAK SHAPES 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 (degrees) 10 11 PHYSICAL SAMPLE AFFECTS LINESHAPES OTHER ARTIFACTS: PREFERRED ORIENTATION, ETC. 12 13 14 15 POWDER DIFFRACTION PATTERN USE OF POWDER DIFFRACITON TO SOLVE A CRYSTAL STRUCTURE Chemical knowledge of contents Data 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 (degrees) 10 11 12 13 14 15 1. Start with the best data you can get (but no better). 2. Get a list of accurate diffraction peak positions. 3. Figure out a lattice that explains the peaks. 4. Guess the space group (systematic absences, # molecules). 5. Search for the best place to put the molecule(s), best conformation of the molecule. 6. Refine, refine, refine, refine, refine, … At any stage, you can be forced to jump back to any stage. Don’t think that people only use powders for organic molecules, or that direct space modelling is the only useful technique Lausenite: Fe2(SO4)3·5H2O J. Majzlan, …, PWS Direct Methods (EXPO) Souzalite (Fe,Mg)3(al,Fe)4(PO4)4(OH)6·2H2O A. Le Bail, …, PWS Real Space (ESPOIR) #1, 2 This is a data-driven enterprise. Students may think that we spend all our time talking about algorithms, software, etc., but the results are no better than the data! Powder diffraction station at X3B1 beamline, National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory, U. S. A. From storage ring GE (111) analyzer crystal Scintillation detector Monochromatic X-ray beam Si(111) double monochromator Ion chamber sample Analyzer crystal geometry measures angles – eliminates significant aberrations of familiar Bragg-Brentano diffractometer. Capillary sample geometry is very helpful. Eliminates preferred orientation, peak shifts that bother flat plate #3. Indexing Given some values of d spacings, find a lattice that fits them, i.e., find {A,B,C,D,E,F } such that every d can be expressed as 1/d 2 = Ah 2 + Bk 2 + Cl 2 + Dkl + Ehl + Fhk for some integers h, k, l. Familiar programs, in the public domain: TREOR, ITO, DICVOL, have their quirks, but basically they always work, given sufficiently good data. (Often possible with good lab diffractometers, nearly always with synchrotron data.) TOPAS (Alan Coehlo, Bruker AXS) has indexing tools that are qualitatively more powerful. Prazosin Designer drug – selective antagonist for α1-adrenoceptors (blood pressure). Four other polymorphs claimed in US Patents 4092315, 4739055, 4816455, and JP Patent 03206088. Department of Medicinal Chemistry, State Scientific Center of Antibiotics, Moscow, could not reproduce any of them. Patent literature : Literature Military intelligence : Intelligence 50000 Powder diffraction pattern of prazosin HCl = 1.15019Å compared to peak positions from PDF 42-1864 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Four of the lines in the Powder Diffraction File for that compound are impurities, not seen in our pattern. Throw them away and use TOPAS to index the lab data. 0.1 2theta (measured - indexed) 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 -0.02 -0.04 -0.06 5 xx 10 x x 15 20 25 30 2theta Errors 0.021° ± 0.024° Triclinic TOPAS FOM = 15.99 a = 8.717Å b = 7.572Å c = 16.381Å α = 90.01° β = 72.43° γ = 108.95° Vol = 969Å3 -0.08 (There is a lot of not-quite-good data in the data bases. Is not-quite-good distinguishable from bad?) Given sufficiently good data -> pattern can be indexed easily Data quality = sample instrument If a pattern from a good instrument* cannot be indexed, there is something wrong with the sample *Test your instrument by trying to index known phases of comparable complexity. Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen are good organic test cases to get started. #5. Make a model of the molecule, put it into the lattice. Move the model around seeking best agreement between calculated and observed diffraction patterns. Lots of options: software DASH, PSSP, FOX, TOPAS, PowderSolve, … _ In this case, assumed P1, coauthor searched nine parameters with software developed with H. Schenk. Cl 2 #6. Refine, refine, … If your presumed rough solution is close enough, you can roll down hill to the correct solution, using refinement programs such as GSAS, TOPAS, FULLPROF, … ~100 refined variables THE GLOBAL TOPOLOGY MAY LOOK MORE LIKE THIS Any fit looks good on this scale d = 1.47Å χ2 = 2.31, Rwp=5.92%. No restraints except for tethering all H atoms. Same steps for prazosin free base – only 6 search coordinates Monoclinic, Cc, χ2 = 2.78, Rwp=5.92% Planarity of the aromatic rings gives a measure of the degree of accuracy of the finished atomic geometry. Prazosin refinements. Geometry of piperazine ring Hydrochloride N17 C18 Bonds Hydrochloride Free Base N17-C18 1.489Å 1.521Å C18-C19 1.509Å 1.491Å C19-N20 1.513Å 1.507Å N20-C21 1.471Å 1.489Å C21-C22 1.538Å 1.610Å C22-N17 1.472Å 1.543Å N17 123.1 117.9 C18 102.3 107.7 C19 114.2 114.6 N20 115.8 111.0 C21 106.2 111.0 C22 105.1 102.8 Angles Free base Hydrochloride 3 N-H…Cl Free base 1 N-H…N 3.02Å 1 N-H…O 3.02Å Prazosin conclusions: •That wasn’t so hard •Of relevance to quantitative modeling of structure-activity relationships Hydrochloride Free base Hydrochloride methanol solvate (single xtl) Prazosin2 tetrachloro-copper(II) (s x) The rest of the talk 1. Enalapril Maleate. Y.H. Kiang, Merck 2. Proxy for a real business problem. 3. Delta D-Mannitol 4. Mannitol hemihydrate Enalapril Maleate is a potent angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with two known polymorphs, Form I and Form II. The single crystal structure of Form I has been known for almost twenty years. On the other hand, the crystal structure of Form II has never been reported before because of the difficulty to obtain single crystals of this polymorph, which is made by water slurry of Form I. The crystal structure of Form II is of interest for several reasons: 1. Form II is the more stable of the two polymorphs. 2. The two forms are structurally similar based on X-ray, IR, and solid-state NMR. 3. The conformation of ACE inhibitors is important to their biological activity. Lab(Sealed Tube) and Synchrotron XRD patterns of Enalapril Maleate Form I Cu Ka1 Form II 4 9 14 19 2q 24 29 34 39 Form I =1.15Å, Form II 5 9 13 17 2q 21 25 29 33 Enalapril Maleate form II a=17.838 b=6.640 c=11.649 b=106.29 form I Monoclinic P21 Orthorhombic P212121 a=33.987 b=6.642 c=11.210 23 parameters: 11 enalapril torsions (+2 maleate) + 6 orientation + 6 position At the time of the original work, we couldn’t solve from simulated annealing. We could have benefited from the systematic geometric insights presented by Claire Gervais Form I green:carbon yellow:nitrogen red:oxygen Form II Y.-H. Kiang of Merck found the solution by hand, using Cerius. Y.-H. Kiang, Ashfia Huq, Peter W. Stephens, Wei Xu, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 92, 1844-53 (2003) Real business problem: _____ has a patented polymorph of _____ , and suspects that _____ is selling material that infringes. It is desired to examine the commercial tablets and determine the polymorph of the API for potential litigation. Proxy: Examine commercial tablet of Endocet 500/7.5 Gross tablet 607 mg Acetaminophen 500 mg – known lattice & structure Oxycodone (as HCl) 7.5 mg – pattern in PDF but lattice unknown,* * In general, I’d like to get better info into the PDF database. Please get in touch if you can help. X-ray Intensity (counts per 10^6 monitor) 80000 Endocet (intact tablet) 500 mg Acetaminophen 7.5 mg. oxycodone HCl 60000 data: endocet.631 Measured x 50 Profile fit of acetaminophen 40000 20000 0 Acetaminophen 2 4 6 8 10 12 2theta (degrees) 14 16 18 20 Powder patterns of oxycodone hydrochloride from ICDD Powder Diffraction File. Strucutures and lattices are not known. 100 PDF 06-0014 Peak Intensity 50 0 100 50 PDF 38-1799 0 0 4 8 12 2q (degrees) at = 0.70Å 16 20 X-ray Intensity (counts per 10^6 monitor) Endocet (intact tablet) 500 mg Acetaminophen 7.5 mg. oxycodone HCl data: endocet.631 Profile fit Measured 4000 ? 3000 ? 2000 1000 0 Oxycodone HCl peaks from PDF Acetaminophen 100 0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 2theta (degrees) 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 Back to structures: Mannitol H | H - C | OH H | C | OH OH | C | H OH | C | H H | C | OH H | C - H | OH D-Mannitol (naturally produced in various plants) Long-standing confusion about how many forms of D-mannitol exist – finally laid to rest by Burger, Henck, & co. (2000). (Their II, I, and III are more commonly known as α, β, δ) α and β were solved from single crystals in 1968. δ (lowest melting) identified in 1968, but no single crystals grown (until ~2002, Henck & Benet-Buchholz, unpublished). We solved the structure of δ from a powder sample (with 20% β) Mannitol is widely used as an excipient in freeze-drying; metastable hydrate discovered by Lian Yu. TGA shows it is hemihydrate. Structure solved from powder sample with 26% δ, 2% β, ~10% ice. P 21 2 1 21 8.942 x 18.798 x 4.893Å 205.6 Å3 / molecule Middle melting P 21 21 21 8.672 x 16.875 x 5.560Å 203.4 Å3 / molecule Highest melting Present work P 21 5.089 x 18.250 x 4.917Å β = 118.304° 201.0 Å3 / molecule Lowest melting All the same steps. At extraction, we did a Le Bail refinement of the δ lattice along with Rietveld refinement of (known) β structure. λ = 0.70224Å 4-cycle Zig-zag chain Alpha D-mannitol, H bonds (beta is very similar) Delta D-mannitol, H bonds One zig-zag chain alpha beta The molecules in alpha, beta, delta D-mannitol are essentially identical delta Mannitol hemihydrate Start with the best data possible? Play the hand you’re dealt! Lab x-ray (Minnesota) TGA 100 (a) 98 97 96 95 94 DSC 0 (b) (c) (d) (e) 2q (degrees) Heat flow (W/g) Int en sit y (c ou nt s) Weight (%) 99 -2 -4 -6 -8 Lab x-rays identify the sample TGA -> hemihydrate 120 140 160 180 Temperature ( C) -10 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Temperataure (°C) 25000 Normalized X-ray counts 20000 x5 data fit 15000 10000 5000 Differnce 0 Hydrate Delta Beta Ice 2000 0 -2000 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 Two Theta (deg) Index the peaks that are not any other identified phase to a triclinic lattice: 9.896 x 10.542 x 4.786 Å, 102.59°, 86.09°, 116.08°, 2 mannitol in P1. Search two independent mannitol molecules, one O atom. Several different starts. B A Hydrogen bonding pattern in hemihydrate Conformation with one leg lifted water Normal conformation Only mannitol hemihydrate has an OH twisted up into the plane of the C-C-C-C-C-C backbone. What is the energy cost relative to the conformation of all other observed mannitol crystal structures? Is there no way to pack “table” mannitols and a water of solvation without straining the molecule? Structure determination from powders requires: Good data Fundamental understanding of the available tools Motivation Choose good problems. If you are stuck with a crystallographic problem, try a synchrotron.* You pay taxes – claim your share. Find one where there is already a strong program of structure determination. * Also single crystal.