Probing deformed commutators with macroscopic harmonic oscillators Francesco Marin HUMOR Heisenberg Uncertainty Measured with Opto-mechanical Resonators Morning Session (2): Strong field tests of General Relativity (Pulsars, Black holes,...) Phenomenological quantum gravity General ‘remark’: one cannot determine a position with an accuracy better than the Planck length LP = hG/c3 = 1.6 10-35 m Generalized Heisenberg uncertainty relations (GUP) Generalized commutators between p e q Modified quantum physics Detecting signatures of Planck scale-physics in highly-sensitive metrological systems Basic assumptions: Heisenberg dynamics Deformed commutation relations from Solution: 3° harmonic Freq. shift Test on a wide mass range High mechanical quality factor ‘isolated’ oscillators Exploit the slow decay to obtain frequency/3° harmonic vs amplitude curves 1° oscillator: m1g 2° oscillator: m 100 g 3° oscillator: m 100 ng SiN membrane 0.5 x 0.5 mm2 x 50nm mass = 135 ng Q = 8.6x105 m = 20 μg fm = 141 KHz Q = 1.2 x106 T = 4.3 K Evidence of deformed commutator? Structural non-linearity ‘Model-independent’ limits MP H atom MP H atom AURIGA MP H atom AURIGA Equivalence principle MP H atom AURIGA Equivalence principle 3° harmonic dw vs q M. Bavaj. et al., arXiv: 1411.6410 What’s the meaning of our measurements? (my poor man view) We have a Planck energy concentrated on a Planck length? NO … but we are are searching tiny ‘residual’ effects Which models are we limiting/questioning? Strictly speaking, NO ONE : no model predicts a deformed commutator for macroscopic variables … but is there any satisfactory model? If a deformed commutator applies to the coordinates of a fundamental constituent, then its effect on a macroscopic object (composed of N such constituents) should decrease as 1/N • what is a fundamental constituent? • geometrical properties of space-time property of each particle … A different point of view: a foamy space-time If a deformed commutator applies to the coordinates of a fundamental constituent, then its effect on a macroscopic object (composed of N such constituents) should decrease as 1/N • what is a fundamental constituent? • geometrical properties of space-time property of each particle • not in the spirit of quantum mechanics: the position and momentum of an oscillator c.m. should be THE meaningful (i.e., measurable) quantities. Uncertainty relation between p and q is tightly related to the general problem of quantum measurements (see Braginsky, Caves, etc.) Focus on peculiar quantum properties Tracks in the quantum+GR field are diversified … … we are just setting some experimental poles