Different Scales for Higgs Physics From an obscure term in an equation to a headline discovery – and beyond John Ellis King’s College London (& CERN) The (G)AEBHGHKMP’tH Mechanism The only one who mentioned a massive scalar boson Why a Higgs Boson is Needed • Trouble with WW scattering: M ~ E2 uncontrollable infinities in loop diagrams • can be cancelled by • scalar exchange with HWW couplings • Need new physics @ TeV scale 2011: Combining Information from Previous Direct Searches and Indirect Data mH = 125 ± 10 GeV Gfitter collaboration Higgs Mass Measurements • CMS γγ and ZZ* measurements consistent Higgs Mass Measurements • Tension in ATLAS γγ and ZZ* measurements Comparison with Electroweak Fit Quite consistent: Δχ2 ~ 1.5 Theoretical Constraints on Higgs Mass • Large Mh → large self-coupling → blow up at low-energy scale Λ due to Instability @ renormalization 10 – 1013 GeV 10 • Small: renormalization due to t quark drives quartic coupling < 0 at some scale Λ → vacuum unstable • Vacuum could be stabilized by Supersymmetry Degrassi, Di Vita, Elias-Miro, Giudice, Isodori & Strumia, arXiv:1205.6497 Vacuum Instability in the Standard Model • Very sensitive to mt as well as MH • Present vacuum probably metastable with lifetime >> age of the Universe Degrassi, Di Vita, Elias-Miro, Giudice, Isodori & Strumia, arXiv:1205.6497 Some Questions • What is it? –Higgs or …? • What else is there? –Supersymmetry …? • What next? –A Higgs factory or …? Supersymmetric model fits Elementary Higgs or Composite? • Higgs field: <0|H|0> ≠ 0 • Quantum loop problems • Fermion-antifermion condensate • Just like QCD, BCS superconductivity e.g., cutoff Λ = 10 TeV • Top-antitop condensate? needed mt > 200 GeV Cut-off Λ ~ 1 TeV with Supersymmetry? New technicolour force? - Heavy scalar resonance? - Inconsistent with precision electroweak data? Higgs as a Pseudo-Goldstone Boson ‘Little Higgs’ models (breakdown of larger symmetry) Loop cancellation mechanism Little Higgs Supersymmetry Phenomenological Framework • Assume custodial symmetry: • Parameterize gauge bosons by 2 × 2 matrix Σ: • Coefficients a = c = 1 in Standard Model Global Analysis of Higgs-like Models • Rescale couplings: to bosons by a, to fermions by c Global bW Z τbbar γW τγZ • Standard Model: a = c = 1 No evidence for deviation from SM JE & Tevong You, arXiv:1303.3879 It Walks and Quacks like a Higgs • Do couplings scale ~ mass? With scale = v? Global fit JE & Tevong You, arXiv:1303.3879 • Red line = SM, dashed line = best fit Loop Corrections ? • ATLAS sees excess in γγ, CMS sees deficit JE & Tevong You, arXiv:1303.3879 • Loop diagrams ~ Standard Model? What else is there? • Higher-dimensional operators as relics of higherenergy physics? • Operators constrained by SU(2) × U(1) symmetry: Corbett, Eboli & Gonzalez2 • Constrain using LHC + Tevatron Higgs measurements What else is there? Combine Higgs coupling measurements with constraints on anomalous triple-gauge boson couplings Corbett, Eboli & Gonzalez2 What else is there? Constraints from energy dependence of Higgs production cross section on Λ > ~ 250 GeV JE, Sanz & You, arXiv:1303.0208 What else is there? Supersymmetry • Successful prediction for Higgs mass – Should be < 130 GeV in simple models • Successful predictions for Higgs couplings – Should be within few % of SM values • Could explain the dark matter • Naturalness, GUTs, string, … (???) MSSM Higgs Masses & Couplings Lightest Higgs mass up to ~ 130 GeV Heavy Higgs masses quite close Consistent With LHC Searches with ~ 5/fb8 @ TeV 8 TeV Data “Classic” missing-energy search Multiple searches including b, leptons 2 5 Scan of CMSSM Impacts of searches with full 2012 data Update of Buchmueller et al: arXiv:1207.3715 p-value of simple models < 10% 1 Gluino mass 5 CMSSM Update of Buchmueller, JE et al: arXiv:1207.3715 Favoured values of gluino mass significantly above pre-LHC, > 1.5 TeV 2 -40 10 -41 10 -42 10 -43 10 -44 10 -45 10 -46 10 -47 10 -48 Spin-independent Dark matter scattering Excluded by XENON100 5 .9 9 0 1 10 2 m χ˜ 01 [GeV] 5 .9 9 0 5 .9 9 0 10 Excluded by LHC 2. 30 2.3 00 5 .9 9 0 σpSI [cm 2 ] --- 1/fb ___ 5/fb 10 5 0 10 3 Buchmueller, JE et al: arXiv:1207.3715 Favoured values of dark matter scattering cross section significantly below XENON100 What Next: A Higgs Factory? To study the ‘Higgs’ in detail: •The LHC – Rethink LHC upgrades in this perspective? •A linear collider? – ILC up to 500 GeV – CLIC up to 3 TeV (Larger cross section at higher energies) •A circular e+e- collider: LEP3, TLEP – A photon-photon collider: SAPPHiRE •A muon collider What Higgs Factory? New large tunnel could also be used for pp collisions ECM up to 100 TeV TLEP Steering Group, arXiv:1208.0504, 1305.6498, 1306.5981 Possible Layouts for TLEP Comparison of Possible Higgs Factory Measurements Impact of Higgs Factory? • Predictions of current best fits in simple SUSY models • Current uncertainties in SM calculations [LHC Higgs WG] • Comparisons with – – – – LHC HL-LHC ILC TLEP • Don’t decide before LHC 13/4 Supersymmetric model fits Part of a Vision for the Future • A large circular tunnel – Circumference ~ 80 to 100 km • Could accommodate TLEP and VHE-LHC – ECM up to 100 TeV with 15 Tesla magnets • Could be sited around Geneva – Interest in China, US • TLEP Study Group under way • Timely to study VHE-LHC Conversation with Mrs Thatcher: 1982 What do you do? Think of things for the experiments to look for, and hope they find something different Then we would not know how to progress! Wouldn’t it be better if they found what you predicted?