Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Scale up optimization using simulation experiments M. Bentolila, R.S. Kenett, S. Malca, R. Novoa, M. Hasson, B.N. Yoskovich Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Perrigo IL Structure Perrigo IL Finance Info. Systems Logistics Business Development Human Resources Pharma Int’l. Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Perrigo NY Consumer Prod ChemAgis Ltd. Neca ChemAgis Israel ChemAgis USA ChemAgis Germany (GmbH) Zibo Xinhua-Perrigo Pharma JV Careline DanAgis Natural Formula Agis Invest Pharma IL Scale up optimization using simulation experiments R & D Organization Chart Chemagis’ personnel constantly strive to develop new technologies and processes that meet the stringent scientific and regulatory demands and challenges to support today's global markets. Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Our Products Generic API – Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients production: 30 products py Examples ofr our products: • Pentoxifylline Vasodilator • Pramipexole Dihydrochloride Anti Parkinsonian • Rocuronium Bromide Neuromuscular blocker • Temozolomide Antineoplastic, alkylating agent • Terbinafine Hydrochloride Antidermatophyte (fungal infections of the nails) • Tramadol Hydrochloride Analgesic • Zonisamide Antiepileptic Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Scale Up Methodology (J.M. Berty. CEP, 1979) Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Scale Up Methodology (J.M. Berty. CEP, 1979) Scale up optimization using simulation experiments combined 2005 - 2001-2005 Before 2001 Advanced poor Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Before 2001 The scale-up process columnar didn’t use any simulation tools Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Visimix and Dynochem 2001 - 2005 DOE – Design Of Experiments Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Visimix Dynochem 2005 - Scale up optimization using simulation experiments The programs used for Modeling simulation and optimization: • VisiMix – Mixing simulation and calculation software. Mathematical modeling of mixing phenomena. Calculation of average and local characteristics of mixing flow and distribution of concentration. Simulation and calculation of real “non perfect” mixing. • DynoChem – Chemical dynamic simulation software. Fitting if chemical reaction models. Prediction of scale-up conditions. Optimization of laboratory and production results. Equipment characterization. Shows effects of scale dependent physical phenomena (mixing, heat transfer, mass transfer). Dynochem can be used for simulation of reactions performed in homogenous environment. When mixing is not ideal and the solution is not homogenous VisiMix is used for finding the required mixing conditions. Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Scale up optimization using simulation experiments TIme To market reduction via Statistical Information Management Project No. : GRD1 – 2000 - 25724 INTRASOFT (GR), London School of Economics (UK), POLITECNICO DI TORINO (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS (F), BLUE Engineering Group (IT), EASi Europe (D), KPA Ltd (IL), SNECMA (F), Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd IAI (IL) Scale up optimization using simulation experiments TEMO production Process 1. Crude TEMO production - The crude production step contains two main operations – the reaction and the precipitation. 2. Crystallization – This is the main purification step of the process. The reaction is described at these equations: Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Optimal reaction time yields maximum amount of TEMO and minimum amount of impurities (maximum yield). Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Model Fitting, Optimization and Simulation using Visimix and Dynochem Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Model Fitting, Optimization and Simulation Where: K – Reaction Constant (m3/mol.s) and (1/s) Ea – Reaction Activation Energy (kJ/mol) KLa – Mass transfer coefficient (1/s) Scale up optimization using simulation experiments optimization 8 TEMO batches were produced at RC1 scale at the production conditions set according to the Visimix and DynoChem simulation and optimization results. The required impurities level is N.M.T 0.15% (for each impurity) at the final product. Impurity levels at production: % TEMO % CYANO % IMAM Lot No. % TMA cryst crude EOR cryst crude EOR cryst crude EOR cryst crude EOR 99.95 99.04 97.57 <0.03 0.31 0.70 <0.03 0.10 1.28 0.03 0.34 0.31 99.91 99.59 98.07 <0.03 0.06 1.08 <0.03 <0.03 0.59 0.03 0.15 0.15 99.19 99.19 96.14 <0.03 0.07 2.59 0.00 0.09 1.75 0.04 0.33 0.36 99.71 99.57 94.35 <0.03 0.05 0.80 <0.03 0.08 4.10 0.04 0.30 0.75 99.93 96.8 94.39 <0.03 2.81 0.88 0.04 <0.03 3.76 0.03 0.39 0.85 99.98 99.71 96.91 <0.03 <0.03 0.49 <0.03 <0.03 1.96 <0.03 0.29 0.45 99.83 99.45 93.32 <0.03 0.25 1.68 0.05 <0.03 3.80 <0.03 0.30 0.74 99.84 99.55 84.65 <0.03 <0.03 0.57 0.04 0.07 11.85 <0.03 0.35 2.10 F001 F002 F004 F005 F007 F008 F009 F010 At the end of crude step the impurity levels are higher then spec – We can’t skip crystallization Scale up optimization using simulation experiments DATA Experiment RESULTS Stirrer Temp. 0 EOR Yield TEMO TMA CYANO IMAM C h % mmol % % % Nº rpm 1 650 37 2.86 95.71 703.33 0.95 0.11 3.25 2 490 23 12.24 98.26 726.14 0.30 0.33 1.11 3 570 31 4.49 97.34 719.33 0.48 0.45 1.73 4 450 33 4.08 96.52 713.29 0.62 0.67 2.19 517 35 2.86 96.38 712.26 0.62 0.86 2.14 6 583 36 2.45 96.41 712.47 0.64 0.76 2.19 7 597 8 543 39 2.04 95.43 705.22 0.90 0.60 3.06 9 637 27 6.53 98.1 724.96 0.34 0.32 1.24 10 623 32 3.67 97.28 718.9 0.47 0.58 1.67 11 503 29 6.12 97.48 720.39 0.46 0.41 1.65 12 477 40 1.63 94.79 700.51 0.81 1.65 2.74 13 530 21 15.51 98.54 728.24 0.26 0.22 0.98 14 463 28 6.94 97.52 720.68 0.43 0.50 1.55 15 557 24 10.2 98.28 726.29 0.30 0.30 1.12 16 610 20 15.51 98.78 729.96 0.21 0.20 0.81 5 The experimental array (Simulation experiments) 25 8.57 98.24 725.97 0.30 0.33 1.13 Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Process parameters vs. constraints Case Target Function Yield 0 EOR [hr] Stirrer [rpm] TEMP [ C] A High demand to the product and the reactor. Yield →max, EOR≤8 98.1 8 546 26 B The price of the product equals 10 times the value of reactor availability. (10∙yield-EOR)→max 98.4 8.3 623 25 C High demand of the product with low availability of reactors. One hour of available reactor equals 10 times yield. (1∙yield-10∙EOR)→max 95.2 1.5 483 39 D High availability of reactors, High cost of impurity purification. (10∙yield-10∙IMAM-1∙EOR)→max 98.9 14.4 637 20 Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Non ideal stirring – non homogeneity • • • When DynoChem simulation does not match experimental data we should suspect a stirring problem and non homogeneity conditions in the reaction solution. VisiMix software is used in order to find the required stirring characteristics. New conditions are applied on experiments before fitting a model at DynoChem software . For example: The product XXXX is produced at a solid liquid reaction. The main reaction at this process is: BBCM + TA + POCA →XXXX POCA reagent properties: • Solid • High particle size: mean=735mm • High density: 2300 kg/m3 suspension must be achieved in order to fit a DynoChem model to the reaction. VisiMix was used for suspension calculation. Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Non ideal stirring – non homogeneity • Before performance of scale up experiments VisiMix simulation was used to check suspension at different Mini Pilot Reactors: Reactor Volume, L RPM Main Characteristic Liquid – Solid Mixing Solid suspension quality Max. degree of non uniformity of solid distribution AXIAL, % RADIAL, % 7603 10 500 (Max) 7605 25 400 7605 25 500 (Max) 7607 50 150 (Max) Complete suspension is questionable. Partial settling of solid phase may occur. Complete suspension is expected. Complete suspension is expected. Complete suspension is questionable. Partial settling of solid phase may occur. 22.3 65.7 10.3 34.3 29.1 76.3 132 90.8 Not all Mini Pilot reactor are capable of full suspension of POCA. Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Financial aspects Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Adjusting the EOR time according to the financial optimization saves about 4% of the material. Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Summary and Conclusions • • • As part of the continuous professionals' formation policy of our company ours engineers and operative personal have to permanent learn about causes and consequences of changes present in scale-up, scale-down challenge . Using software package like VisiMix and Dynochem orient the eng during the process development to the best results. Scale-up (or down) is a very complex enterprise and, for to arrive an acceptable results, needs to be faced by an interdisciplinary team-work of: – Technicians – Chemical process ENG – Chemists – Mathematical statistics experts, – Computation ENG – And others As a result of the team-work we arrive at the desired result and at the same time every participant and their collaborators update his knowledge in a large spectrum of related sciences and arts. Scale up optimization using simulation experiments Thank you for your attention