T. Ostler, J. Barker, R. F. L. Evans and R. W. Chantrell
Dept. of Physics, The University of York, York, United Kingdom.
U. Atxitia and O. Chubykalo-Fesenko
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, CSIC, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
S. El Moussaoui, L. Le Guyader, E. Mengotti, L. J. Heyderman and F. Nolting
Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
A. Tsukamoto and A. Itoh
College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan.
D. Afansiev and B. A. Ivanov
Institute of Magnetism, NASU Kiev, Ukraine.
A. M. Kalashnikova , K. Vahaplar, J. Mentink, A. Kirilyuk, Th. Rasing and A. V. Kimel
Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
MMM, Scottsdale, AZ Oct/Nov 2011

•
• Recently we showed recently that using
induce switching in ferrimagnetic
transient ferromagnetic-like state. For more on this see (ED-07).
anti-parallel align parallel application of laser pulse
• What is the role of the magnetic field?
Gd
H
H
Fe
Initially sublattices align antiparallel.
Fe demagnetis es very quickly and reverses to align with
Gd.
Gd then reverses.
Back to ground state.
?
Radu et al. Nature 472, 205-208 (2011).

• (Brief) details of numerical model.
• Results of numerical model.
• Experimental confirmation of switching in thin films of GdFeCo, independent on initial state.
• Switching in microstructures using linearly polarised laser pulse.
• Mechanism for switching?

• GdFeCo is amorphous .
• In numerical model we allocate Gd and Fe spins randomly on closed packed lattice to required composition.
• Exchange parameters paremeterised on experimental observations
J
Fe-Fe
>0 (ferromagnetic)
J
Fe-Gd
<0 (antiferromagnetic)
J
Gd-Gd
>0 (ferromagnetic)
Atomic Level
• Model features local moment variation important for reversal.
m
Fe
< m
Gd
,
• We can use the model to observe the dynamics of individual spins with time.
Fe
Gd
Macrospin
For more details on this model see Ostler
.
84, 024407 (2011).

• Starting temperature is 300K. Sequence of 50fs (FWHM) gaussian heat pulses.
• Increases electronic temperature
(TTM[1]) to which the spin system in coupled.
• Heat dissipates on 100ps time-scale.
• Reversal occurs each time a pulse is applied.
• No applied field throughout simulation.
[1] - Chen et al. International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, 49, 307-316 (2006).

• We have experimentally verified the switching mechanism by studying the response of ferrimagnetic
Gd
24
Fe
66.5
Co
9.5
to the action of 100fs (FWHM) right circularly polarised laser pulses.
• After action of each pulse the magnetization switches, independently of initial state.
Fe
Initially film magnetised
“up”
Gd
MOKE

Similar results for film initially magnetised in “down” state.

Beyond regime of
reversal, i.e. cannot be controlled by laser polarisation.
Therefore it must be a heat effect.
Stanciu
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 047601 (2007).
20 m m


Reversal seen in 2 m m microstructures of Gd
25
Fe
65.6
Co
9.4
.

Large enough distance apart to eliminate dipolar coupling effect.

Magnetisation direction measured using a PEEM employing the XMCD effect (measuring Fe edge).

Switching occurs every time, even with just linearly polarised light.
2 m m
XMCD

• What breaks the symmetry?
• Numerical simulations suggest that the fact that the sublattices are non-equivalent in longitudinal relaxation time is key for reversal.
time
0ps ~1ps ~2ps ~3ps anti-parallel ground state.
Fe demagnetises faster than Gd.
Fe spins reverse and begin to form
“stable” sublattice.
AFM exchange field drives Gd to opposite state.

• Demonstrated numerically switching can occur using only a heat pulse without the need for magnetic field.
• Shown that reversal with polarised light on thin films can occur independently on polarisation and initial state.
• Microstructures show switching under the action of linearly polarised laser.
• Have shown that stray fields do not play an effect in the mechanism.
• The importance of the non-equivalence in longitudinal relaxation times of the sublattices.
• This switching mechanism is a feature of this type of ferrimagnetic material and only requires heat!


Experiments performed at the SIM beamline of the Swiss Light Source, PSI.

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), de Stichting voor
Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM).

The Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR).

European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) Grants No. NMP3-SL-2008-
214469 (UltraMagnetron) and No. 214810 (FANTOMAS),

Spanish MICINN project FIS2010-20979-C02-02

European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-
2013)/ ERC Grant agreement No 257280 (Femtomagnetism).

NASU grant numbers 228-11 and 227-11.

• Energetics of system described by Hamiltonian:

Dynamics of each spin given by Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert Langevin equation.

Effective field given by:

Moments defined through the fluctuation dissipation theorem as:


Previously it was shown that
reversal controllable using circular polarisation of light[1].

Beyond a certain pump fluence we have shown that this control is not possible and the system reverses independently on polarisation.
High Fluence

Below threshold fluence pump fluence see control of magnetisation.
Low Fluence
[1] - Stanciu et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 047601 (2011).


Previous studies have tried to switch using the changing dynamics at the compensation point[ref].

Simulations show starting temperature not important.

Supported by experiments on different compositions of GdFeCo support the numerical observation.

• So far all results show reversal in no field, with numerical model showing the mechanism is mediated by the transient ferromagnetic-like state.
• What happens now if we apply a field to oppose the formation of this state?
• Numerical model shows that in certain conditions the field required to prevent the formation of this state can be 40T!
• Field required to prevent formation of this state depends on measurement time as system will begin to precess back.