From Pattern Formation to Phase Field Crystal Model 吳國安 (Kuo-An Wu) 清華大學物理系 Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University 3/23/2011 Pattern Formation in Crystal Growth by Wilson Bentley (The snowflake man), 1885 Pattern Formation in Crystal Growth At the nanoscale (atomistic scale) Liquid-Solid interfaces Anisotropy ↔ Morphology Atomistic details ↔ Anisotropy? Hoyt, McMaster Solid-Solid interfaces Grain boundary Atomistic details ↔ growth? Al-Cu dendrite, Voorhees Lab Northwestern University Schuh, MIT Atomistic details ↔ Continuum theory at the nanoscale Pattern Formation in Macromolecules Polyelectrolyte Gels Hexagonal phase in solvent rich region Hex (-) Hexagonal phase in polymer rich region Competition between Enthalpy, Entropy, Elastic Network Energy, Electrostatic energy, … etc Hex (+) Pattern Formation in Biology Lincoln Park Zoo Chicago Rural Area, Wisconsin Pattern Formation in Biology Nuclear Lamina (核纖層)~30-100nm In animal cells, only composed of 2 types lamins Lamin (核纖層蛋白) A/C Lamin B1, B2 Bleb Formation in Breast Cancer Cell Nucleus Goldman Lab, Northwestern University Confocal Immunofluorescence of a normal cell nucleus Goldman Lab, Northwestern University Crystal Growth at the Nanoscale Solid-Liquid interface Crystal growth from its melt with interfacial anisotropy Solid-Fluid interface under stress Quantum dots InAs/GaAs Ng et al., Univ. of Manchester, UK Solid-Solid interface Grain boundaries Schuh/MIT Morphology vs. Anisotropy tT D2T LVn cD T TI TM n solid nT liquid V TM TrS n L nˆ d 2 S ij d i d j Anisotropy of Max(TI T ) Min(TrS ) Gibbs-Thomson condition 1/TrS (Max ΔT) Phase-field simulations of solidification What causes the anisotropy? Crystal growth – Solid-Liquid interface Basal Plane Anisotropy vs. Crystal structures 3 17 4 4 2 2 2 nˆ o 1 1 ni 2 3 ni 66nx ny nz 5 7 i i 0 uK eiK r K K K K K 110 BCC 111 FCC uK us WHY? fcc uK 0 bcc Ginzburg-Landau Theory F (uk ) GL Theory for bcc-liquid interface Free energy functional for a planar solid-liquid interface with normal zˆ a2 cij ui u j 0, K K a3 cijk ui u j uk 0, K K K i j i j k i, j i , j ,k n0 k BT 2 DF dr ui z 2 a4 cijkl ui u j uk ul 0, Ki K j Kk Kl b ci z 0 uK eiK r i , j , k , l i K Density Functional Theory of Freezing DF dr r ln a2 12 S K110 r 1 2 r 3 4 dr dr c r , r D r D r dr 1 2 a3u110 0 a4u 1 2 1 2 0F a2u110 2110 c( K0 ) S ( K0 ) / S ( K0 )2 b 2c KDF 110 FS FL , ci 1 ˆ K n zˆ 4 2 FS 0 u110 Liquid structure factor S(K) a3 and a4 are determined u110 Liquid by equilibrium conditions K0 Solid K (Å-1) Bcc-liquid interface profile For the crystal face z (110) {110} is separated into three subsets K1 10 , K 110 0 1 4 0 Kˆ zˆ 1 Kˆ zˆ 2 1 2 K110 , K 1 10 K101 , K10 1 , K 101 , K 101 Kˆ zˆ K 011 , K 01 1 , K 0 11 , K 0 11 D F 0 u110 DF 0 u 1 10 D F 0 u101 2 zˆ 1 4 us K101 K110 0 K110 zˆ Anisotropic Density Profiles z (1,1) K1 10 , 10 , 01 , 0 1 2D Square Lattices z (1, 0) K1 10 , 10 z (3, 1) K1 10 , 10 K 01 , 0 1 2 K 01 , 0 1 2 Symmetry breaks at interfaces → Anisotropy Comparison with MD results 1 n( z ) Lx Ly Lx Ly dxdy (r ) 0 0 0 uK eiK r K BCC Iron n x 10-23 (cm-3) Comparison with MD results Anisotropy 4 100 110 100 110 (erg/cm2) Fe 100 110 111 4 (%) MD (MH(SA)2) 177.0(11) 173.5(11) 173.4(11) 1.0(0.6) GL theory 144.26 145.59 137.57 1.02 Predict the correct ordering of and weak anisotropy 1% for bcc crystals Atomistic details (Crystal structures) matter! Methodology for atomistic simulations Molecular Dynamics (MD) Mean field theory Ginzburg-Landau theory 1 0 Rely on MD inputs Average out atomistic details Diffusive dynamics (ms) Larger length scale (m) Elasticity, defect structure, … etc? Realistic physics Resolve vibration modes (ps) Methodology for atomistic simulations Mean field theory Phase field crystal (PFC) Molecular Dynamics (MD) Realistic physics Resolve vibration modes (ps) Average out vibration modes (ms) Atomistic details – elasticity, crystalline planes, dislocations, … etc. Formulation - Phase Field Crystal (001) plane of bcc crystals (100) (110) Swift & Hohenberg, PRA (1977) 2D Patterns – Rolls, Hexagons Elder et al., PRL (2002) Propose a conserved SH equation The Free Energy Functional Equation of Motion Capillary Anisotropy? Elasticity? PFC Model – Phase Diagram Conserved Dynamics Phase diagram K {110} AK eiK r Multi-scale Analysis Seek the perturbative solution Assumption – interface width is much larger than lattice parameter Maxwell construction The solid-liquid coexistence region A weak first-order freezing transition (The multi-scale analysis of bcc-liquid interfaces will be carried out around c) Multi-scale Analysis – Amplitude equation Small limit – diffuse interface Multi-scale analysis Ai0 Z Equal chemical potential in both phases One of twelve stationary amplitude equations eiKi r Order Parameter Profile Comparison For the crystal face z (110) Determination of the PFC model Parameter from density functional theory of freezing u110 0.0923 for Fe with MH(SA)2 potential (MD) Comparison with MD results Anisotropy 100 110 4 100 110 (erg/cm2) Fe 100 110 111 4 (%) MD (MH(SA)2) 177.0(11) 173.5(11) 173.4(11) 1.0(0.6) GL theory 144.26 141.35 137.57 1.02 PFC 144.14 140.67 135.76 1.22 Predict the correct ordering of 100 > 110 > 111 and weak anisotropy 1% for bcc crystals What about Other Crystal Structures? Phase diagram K {110} AK eiK r y (110) x 11 1 1 11 z (011) 200 GL theory of fcc-liquid interfaces (10 1) 2 2 F a2u111 a4u1411 b2u200 b4u204 0 The principal reciprocal lattice vectror F a u a u a u 2 2 110 3 3 110 4 4 110 2 b u of fcc 31,111u1,200 1 cannot form triad 3 K ix 0 FCC-Liquid BCC-Liquid i 1 2 4 F a2u111 a4u111 F F u110 cannot form solid - liquid interfaces FCC Model The Two-mode PFC modelfcc model Twin Boundary 2 (1,1,1) 2 a (2, 0, 0) a 2 K 02 1 1,1,1 1 3 2 K12 S (K ) 1 4 2, 0, 0 3 3 Phase Diagram K FCC Polycrystal Design Desired Lattices Elasticity Example: Square Lattices Multi-mode model Single-mode model Dictate interaction angle (lattice symmtry) Grain Boundary Grain boundary is composed of dislocations Geometric arrangement of crystals determines dislocation distribution Distinct evolution for low and high angle grain boundary b D D b : magnitude of Burgers vector D : misorientation D Symmetric tilt planar grain boundary in gold by STEM GB sliding and coupling GB Coupling – Low Angle GB /2 GB Sliding – High Angle GB /2 Dt Well described by continuum theory Dn Sutton & Balluffi, Interfaces in Crystalline Materials, 1995 Large Misorientations 20 Curvature driven motion G.B. sliding (fixed misorientation) remains constant Well described by classical continuum theory Small Orientations Theory that only considers DF 2 R GB Misorientation decreases? Atoms at the center of the circular grain 5 Misorientation increases! Small Misorientations G.B. coupling For symmetric tilt boundaries Misorientation increases GB energy increases Misorientation-dependent mobility: (Taylor & Cahn) Intermediate Misorientations – cont. 10 v ~ C / rm Area r C (1 at ) 2 m 2.3 2 m1 Intermediate Misorientations Faceted–Defaceted Transition 10 Frank-Bilby formula Tangential motion of dislocations Annihilation of dislocations Intermediate Misorientations – cont. Spacing d1 is a function of GB normal 2 nˆ b1 b2 r d1 N1 nˆ b2 b1 b2 Instability of tangential motion occurs when R 3 sin F / 6 3 G F 2 cos 2 F / 6 2 G F 0 F /3 Dd Three-Grain System 5.2o Grain Rotation? GB wiggles 0o 5.2o Grain Rotation 5.2o 0o 5.2o 0o 5.2o Grain Translation 5.2º GB Wriggles 0º -5.2º Dihedral angle follows Frank’s formula not the Herring relation Self-Assembled Quantum Dots Quantum-dot LEDs Lee et al., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Other Applications - Tunable QD Laser - Quantum Computing - Telecommunication - and more Quantum dots InAs/GaAs Ng et al., Univ. of Manchester, UK Stress Induced Instability – Asaro-Tiller-Grinfeld Instability DU A Cullis et al. (1992): 40 nm Linear perturbation calculation DU 2 ˆ2 2 thick h kSi 0.79 EGe E , on ,0.21 k (001) Si A substrate - Grown at 1023 K 2 c (Defect-free 2 10 growth) 100 nm kc E hˆ exp ik x x ik y y kc zˆ h Film Misfit Parameter a as f as af Substrate 0 Schematic plot from Voorhees and Johnson Solid State Physics, 59 as xˆ k Later Stage Evolution - Cusp Formation - Dislocations High stress concentration at the tip Si0.5Ge0.5/Si(001) Jesson et al., Z-Contrast, Oak Ridge Natl. Lab., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993 Various sizes Simulation Parameters 0 The PFC model F dr 1 2 F 2 t 2 2 1 Ly 8 1 4 4 Hexagonal Phase Simulation parameters 0.10 Ly Lx Ny Nx Constant Phase o a 2 A 3 2 N x 448 1280 N y 2048 o Ly 1900 A o Lx 480 1360 A # of atoms 15, 000 40, 000 7 Ly 8 Constant Phase (1+xx)Lx Nonlinear Steady State for a Smaller k k Quantitative Comparison of Strain Fields xx 1% F dr 2 1 2 2 1 4 , F 4 t ˆxx , ˆyy ˆxx ˆyy y Correct elastic fields Elastic fields relax much faster than the density field AK eiK r K : conserved quantity AK : non-conserved quantity Critical Wavenumber vs Strain Linear perturbation theory - Sharp Interface - Homogeneous Materials kc Classical Elasticity Theory E xx PFC simulations Nonlinear Elasticity PFC simulations 2E xx2 E : Young's modulus : Surface energy W c xx2 Linear Elasticity kc ~ xx2 for small strains Nonlinear elasticity modifies length scale 1 Xie et al., Si0.5Ge0.5 films, PRL PFC modeling of nonlinear elasticity xx ~ 0 Liquid Inhomogeneous materials nonlinear elasticity Solid E ( xx ) xx 2% Finite Interface Thickness Effect Eint erface Esolid Liquid, E=0 Upper bounds c~1/2·xx-2 W~-1/2 E(x,y) Solid, E=Eo Interface thickness is no longer negligible at the nanoscale Finite interface thickness W Elastic constants vary smoothly across the Interface region Nonlinear Evolution for k ~ km k 3D Island – BCC Systems And More … VLS nanowires Nano-particles with defects And More … Pattern Formation - Examples Agular et al, Oxford University Ice Crystal North Pole Hexagon on Saturn Rock Formation in Ireland Honeycomb Graphene Collaborators Alain Karma Northeatsern University Mathis Plapp Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée Ecole Polytechnique Peter W. Voorhees Northwestsern University