Ian F. Akyildiz
Broadband & Wireless Networking Laboratory
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology
Tel: 404-894-5141; Fax: 404-894-7883
Email: ian@ece.gatech.edu
Web: http://www.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/bwn
IFA’2004
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Introduction
2
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Existing Network Infrastructure
Public Switched
Telephone Network
(PSTN): Voice
Internet: Data
Hybrid Fiber Coax
(HFC): Cable TV
IFA’2004
3
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Market Sectors for Applications
Four segments divided into two classes: voice-oriented and data-oriented, further divided into local and widearea markets
Voice:
– Local: low-power, low-mobility devices with higher
QoS – cordless phones, Personal Communication
Services (PCS)
– Wide area: high-power, comprehensive coverage, low
QoS - cellular mobile telephone service
Data:
– Broadband Local and ad hoc: WLANs and WPANs
(WPAN-Wireless Personal Area Network)
– Wide area: Internet access for mobile users
IFA’2004
4
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Evolution of Voice-Oriented Services
Year
Early 1970s
Late 1970s
1982
1983
1988
1991
1993
1995
1998
Event
First generation of mobile radio at Bell Labs
First generation of cordless phones
First generation Nordic analog NMT
Deployment of US AMPS
Initiation of GSM development (new digital TDMA)
Deployment of GSM
Initiation of IS-95 standard for CDMA
PCS band auction by FCC
3G standardization started
FDMA – Frequency Division Multiple Access
NMT – Nordic Mobile Telephony
AMPS – Advanced Mobile Phone System
GSM – Global System for Mobile
Communication
TDMA – Time Division Multiple Access
IFA’2004
IS-95 – Interim Standard 95
CDMA – Code Division Multiple Access
PCS – Personal Communication System
FCC – Federal Communication Commission
5
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Evolution of Data-Oriented Services
Year
1979
Early 1980s
1990
1990
1992
1993
1996
1997
1998
1999
Event
Diffused infrared (IBM Rueschlikon Lab - Switzerland
Wireless modem (Data Radio)
IEEE 802.11 for Wireless LANs standards
Announcement of Wireless LAN products
HIPERLAN in Europe
CDPD (IBM and 9 operating companies)
Wireless ATM Forum started
U-NII bands released, IEEE 802.11 completed, GPRS started
IEEE 802.11b and Bluetooth announcement
IEEE 802.11a/HIPERLAN-2 started
HIPERLAN – High Performance Radio LAN
CDPD – Cellular Digital Packet Data
U-NII – Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure
GPRS – General Packet Radio Service
IFA’2004
6
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Different Generations
1G Wireless Systems: Analog systems
– Use two separate frequency bands for forward
(base station to mobile) and reverse (mobile to base station) links: Frequency Division Duplex
(FDD)
– AMPS: United States (also Australia, southeast
Asia, Africa)
– TACS: EU (later, bands were allocated to GSM)
– NMT-900: EU (also in Africa and southeast Asia)
– Typical allocated overall band was 25 MHz in each direction; dominant spectra of operation was 800 and 900 MHz bands.
IFA’2004
AMPS – Advanced Mobile Phone System
TACS – Total Access Communication System
NMT – Nordic Mobile Telephony
7
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Different Generations
2G Wireless Systems: Four sectors
– Digital cellular
GSM (EU/Asia): TDMA
IS-54 (US): TDMA
IS-95 (US/Asia): CDMA
– PCS – residential applications
CT-2 (EU,CA): TDMA/TDD
DECT(EU):TDMA/TDD
PACS (US): TDMA/FDD
CT-2 – Cordless Telephone 2
DECT – Digital Enhanced Cordless Telephone
PACS – Personal Access Communication System
IFA’2004
8
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Different Generations
2G Wireless Systems: Four sectors (cont’d)
– Mobile data
CDPD shares AMPS bands and site infrastructure;
GPRS shares GSM’s radio system - data rates suitable for
Internet
– WLAN – Unlicensed bands, free of charge and rigorous regulations: very attractive!
IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.11b use DSSS physical layer;
HIPERLAN/1 uses GMSK;
IEEE 802.11a and HIPERLAN/2 use OFDM: next generation
CDPD – Cellular Digital Packet Data
GPRS – General Packet Radio Service
DSSS – Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum
GMSK – Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying
OFDM – Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
IFA’2004
9
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Different Generations
3G and Beyond
– Purpose: develop an international standard that combines and gradually replaces 2G digital cellular,
PCS, and mobile data services, at the same time increasing the quality of voice, capacity of the network, and data rate of the mobile data services.
– Radio transmission technology of choice: W-CDMA
– 3G was envisioned to provide multimedia services to users everywhere
IFA’2004
10
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Different Generations
3G and Beyond
– WLANs provide broadband services in hot spots
– WPANs connect personal devices together: laptop, cellular phone, headset,speakers, printers
– WLAN and WPAN are the future of broadband and ad hoc wireless networks
WPAN’s first standard: bluetooth – lower rates than WLAN but uses a voice-oriented wireless access method for integration of voice and data services
IFA’2004
11
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Different Generations
Relative coverage, mobility, and data rates of generations of cellular systems and local broadband and ad hoc networks.
IFA’2004
12
Operation of Wireless Networks
Getting familiar with terms:
– MS/MT: Mobile Station/Mobile Terminal
– BS: Base Station
– MSC: Mobile Switching Center
– HLR: Home Location Register (database)
– VLR: Visitor Location Register (database)
Cellular Network Architecture
Mobility Management
IFA’2004
13
Cellular Network Architecture
Mobile
Switching
Center
MSC
Backbone
Wireline Network
Location
Register
(Database)
Base Station
Controller
Radio
Network
Mobile
Terminal
IFA’2004
Base Station
Cell
14
Home Location Register
(HLR)
BACKBONE TELEPHONE NETWORK
Visitor Location Register
(VLR)
Mobile Switching Center
(MSC)
MSC
VLR
Mobile Terminal
(MT)
Local Signaling
IFA’2004
Long Distance Signaling
15
A CELL is the radio coverage area by a Base Station (BS).
The most important factor is the SIZE and the SHAPE of a
CELL.
Ideally, the area covered a by a cell could be represented by a circular cell with a radius R from the center of a BS.
Many factors may cause reflections and refractions of the signals, e.g., elevation of the terrain, presence of a hill or a valley or a tall building and presence in the surrounding area.
The actual shape of the cell is determined by the received signal strength.
Thus, the coverage area may be a little distorted.
We need an appropriate model of a cell for the analysis and evaluation.
Many posible models: HEXAGON, SQUARE, EQUILATERAL
TRIANGLE.
IFA’2004
16
Cell
R
(a) Ideal Cell (b) Actual Cell
R
R
R R
(c) Different Cell Models
IFA’2004
17
IFA’2004
Size and Capacity of a Cell per Unit of Area and
Impact of the Cell Shape on System Characteristics
18
Consider a high-power transmitter that can support
35 voice channels over an area of 100 km 2 with the available spectrum
If 7 lower power transmitters are used so that they support
30% of the channels over an area of 14.3 km 2 each.
Then a total 7*30% * 35 = 80 channels are available instead of 35.
1
6
2
7
5
4
3
IFA’2004
19
If two cells are far away from enough that the same set of frequencies can be used in both cells, it is called frequency reuse.
With frequency reuse, a large area can be divided into small areas, each uses a subset of frequencies and covers a small area.
With frequency reuse, the system capacity can be expanded without employing high power transmitters.
IFA’2004
20
Capacity Expansion by
Frequency Reuse
Same frequency band or channel used in a cell can be “REUSED’ in another cell as long as the cells are far apart and the signal strength do not interfere with each other.
This enhances the available bandwidth of each cell.
A group of cells that use a different set of frequencies in each cell is called a cell cluster.
IFA’2004
21
IFA’2004
22
IFA’2004
23
Example: A typical cluster of 7 such cells and 4 such clusters with no overlapping area
F
7
F
7
|
F
6
|-----
F
5
F
1
| D
|
F
4
F
6
|---------
F
5
F
2
F
3
F
7
F
1
F
4
F
6
F
5
F
2
F
3
F
1
F
4
F
6
F
5
F
2
F
3
F
7
F
1
F
4
F
2
F
3
IFA’2004
FREQUENCY REUSE DISTANCE D
24
RULE to Determine the Nearest Co-
Channel Neighbors
Determining the Cluster Size
To find nearest co-channel neighbors of a particular cell j
Step 1: Move i cells along any chain of hexagons; i
Step 2: Turn 60 degrees counterclockwise and move j cells.
i and j measure the number of nearest neighbors between co-channel cells
The cluster size, N,
N = i 2 +ij+j 2
If i =2 and j = 0, then N = 4
If i = 2 and j = 1, then N =7
IFA’2004
1
2
1
3
4
3
2
1
2
25
IFA’2004
RULE to Determine the Nearest
Co-Channel Neighbors Determining the
Cluster Size
26
Frequency Reuse
The distance between 2 cells using the same channel is known as the REUSE DISTANCE D.
There is a close relationship between D, R
(radius of each cell) and N (the number of cells in a cluster)
D = (sqrt 3N) . R
The REUSE FACTOR is then
D/R = sqrt (3N)
IFA’2004
27
Frequency Reuse
Let N be the cluster size in terms of number of cells within it and K be the total number of available channels without frequency reuse.
N cells in the cluster would then utilize all K available channels.
Each cell in the cluster then uses 1/Nth of the total available channels.
N is also referred as the frequency reuse factor of the cellular system.
IFA’2004
28
Capacity Expansion by
Frequency Reuse
Assume each cell is allocated J channels (J<=K).
If the K channels are divided among the N cells into unique and disjoint channel groups, each with
J channels, then K = J N
The N cells in a cluster use the complete set of available frequencies.
The cluster can be replicated many times.
Let M be the number of replicated clusters and C be the total number of channels in the entire system with frequency reuse, then C is the system capacity and computed by
C = M J N
IFA’2004
29
Suppose there are 1001 radio channels, and each cell is A cell
= 2100km 2 .
= 6 km 2 and the entire system covers an area of A sys
1.
Calculate the system capacity if the cluster size is 7.
2.
How many times would the cluster of size 4 have to be replicated in order to approximately cover the entire cellular area?
3.
Calculate the system capacity if the cluster size is 4.
4.
Does decreasing the cluster size increase the system capacity?
Solution:
1. J=K/N=143, A cluster
=N*6=42km 2 , M=2100/42=50, C=MJN=50,050 chs.
2. N=4, A c
=4*6=24km 2 , M=2100/24=87.
3. N=4, J = 1001/4 = 250 chs/cell. C = 87 * 250 * 4 = 87,000 chs.
4.
Decrease in N from 7 to 4 increase in C from 50,050 to 87,000.
Decreasing the cluster size increases system capacity. So the answer is YES!
IFA’2004
30
Geometry of Hexagonal Cells (1)
How to determine the DISTANCE between the nearest co-channel cells ?
Planning for Co-channel cells
D is the distance to the center of the nearest co-channel cell
R is the radius of a cell j
3 R
D i
R
3 R
30 o
0
IFA’2004
31
Let D be the actual distance between two centers of adjacent co-channel cells where D=
3 R
Let D norm be the distance from the center of a candidate cell to the center of a nearest co-channel cell, normalized with respect to the distance between the centers of two adjacent cells, .
3 R
Note that the normalized distance between two adjacent cells either with (i=1,j=0) or (i=0,j=1) is unity.
IFA’2004
32
Let D be the actual distance between the centers of two adjacent co-channel cells. D is a function of D norm and R.
From the geometry we have
2
D norm
j
2 cos
2
( 30 o
)
( i
i
2 j
2 ij
From N and D norm j sin( 30 o
))
2 equations
D norm
N
IFA’2004
33
With the actual distance between the centers of two adjacent hexagonal cells, the actual distance between the center of the candidate cell and the center of a nearest co-channel is then
D
D norm
3 R
3 N R
For hexagonal cells there are 6 nearest co-channel neighbors to each cell.
Co-channel cells are located in tiers.
In general, a candidate cell is surrounded by 6k cells in tier k.
For cells with the same size the co-channel cells in each tier lie on the boundary of the hexagon that chains all the co-channel cells in that tier.
IFA’2004
34
As D is the radius between two nearest co-channel cells, the radius of the hexagon chaining the co-channel cells in the k-th tier is given by k.D.
For the frequency reuse pattern with i=2 and j=1 so that N=7, the first two tiers of co-channel cells are given in Figure.
It can be readily observed from Figure that the radius of the first tier is D and the radius of the second tier is 2.D.
IFA’2004
35
IFA’2004
36
A candidate cell has 6 nearest cochannel cells. Each of them in turn has 6 neighboring co-channel cells. So we can have a large hexagon.
This large hexagon has radius equal to D which is also the co-channel cell separation.
The area of a hexagon is proportional to the square of its radius, (let =2.598),
A
Small
A
L arg e
R
2
D
2
[ 3 ( i
2 ij
j
2
) R
2
]
IFA’2004
R
D
37
The number of cells in the large hexagon is then
A
L arg e
A
S ma ll
3 ( i
2 ij
j
2
) R
2
In general the large hexagon encloses the center cluster of N cells plus 1/3 the number of the cells associated with 6 other peripheral large hexagons.
Hence, the total number of cells enclosed by the large hexagon is
N
6 ( 1
3
N )
3 N
Finally
N
( i
2 ij
j
2
)
IFA’2004
38
Geometry of Hexagonal Cells (6)
We assume the size of all the cells is roughly the same, as long as the cell size is fixed co-channel interference will be independent of transmitted power of each cell.
The co-channel interference will become a function of q where q
= D/R = sqrt (3N).
q is the CO-CHANNEL REUSE RATIO and is related to the cluster size.
A small value of q provides larger capacity since N is small.
For large q, the transmission quality is better, smaller level of co-channel interference.
By increasing the ratio of D/R spatial separation between cochannel cells relative to the coverage distance of a cell is increased.Thus, interference is reduced from improved isolation of RF energy from the nmber of cells per cluster N co-channel cells.
IFA’2004
39
Geometry of Hexagonal Cells (7)
Furthermore, D (distance to the center of the nearest cochannel cell) is a function of N and S/I in which
N
I is the number of co-channel interfering cells in the first tier and S/I = received signal to interference ratio at the desired mobile receiver.
IFA’2004
40
The
,
, is defined as
which is also referred to as the co-channel reuse ratio.
Also q = sqrt(3N)
Tradeoff
– q increases with N .
– A smaller value of N has the effect of increasing the capacity of the cellular system and increasing co-channel interference
– Tradeoff between q and N
IFA’2004
41
Interference
MAJOR LIMITING FACTOR for Cellular System performance is the INTERFERENCE
Implications:
CROSS TALK
Missed and Blocked Calls.
SOURCES OF INTERFERENCE?
Another mobile in the same cell
A call in progress in neighboring cell.
Other base stations operating in the same frequency band
Non-cellular systems leaking energy into cellular frequency band
IFA’2004
42
Interference
1. CO-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE
2. ADJACENT CHANNEL INTERFERENCE
IFA’2004
43
CO-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE
Frequency Reuse Given coverage area cells using the same set of frequencies co-channel cell!!!
Interference between these cells is called
CO-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE.
(Thermal noise increase SNR and combat it).
However, co-channel interference cannot be overcome just by increasing the carrier power of a transmitter.
Because increase in carrier transmit power increases the interference.
Reduce co-channel interference
Co-channel cells must be physically separated by a minimum distance to provide sufficient isolation.
IFA’2004
44
Intracell Interference: interferences from other mobile terminals in the same cell.
– Duplex systems
– Background white noise
Intercell interference: interferences from other cells.
– More evident in the downlink than uplink for reception
– Can be reduced by using different set of frequencies
Design issue
– Frequency reuse
– Interference
– System capacity
Bottomline: It determines link performance which in turn dictates the frequency reuse plan and overall capacity of the system.
IFA’2004
45
Co-Channel Interference
IFA’2004
Cell Site-to-Mobile Interference (Downlink
)
Mobile-to Cell-Site Interferences (Uplink
)
46
Co-Channel Interference
Base Mobile DOWNLINK
Mobile Base UPLINK
UPLINK All mobiles in 6 cells + central cell assigned to the same frequency channel
DOWNLINK All base stations in 6 cells and central cell have the same frequency channel.
DOTTED LINES show the interference of all 6 mobiles (all co-channel) received at central base station (interference)
Actual signal is from the mobile in the center cell to its own base station.
(Uplink Signal Interference ratio)
IFA’2004
47
Co-Channel Interference
Base Mobile DOWNLINK CASE
From the base stations (from co-channel cells) interference received by the mobile in the center cell.
Desired signal is from the base to mobile in the center cell.
A
A large
A small is the area of the hexagonal cells of the large one.
is the area of each cell.
/A small
A number of cells in this each repetitous
IFA’2004
48
Co-Channel Interference
For simplicity, we consider only the average channel quality as a function of the distance dependent path loss.
Signal-to-Co-channel interference ratio, ( by
S/I ), at the desired mobile receiver which monitors the forward channel is defined
S
I
i
N I
1
S
I i
S is the desired signal power from desired base station
I i interference power caused by the i-th interfering co-channel cell base station.
N
I is the number of co-channel interfering cells
IFA’2004
49
The desired signal power S from desired base station is proportional to r , where r is the distance between the mobile and the serving base station. loss component.
is the path
The received interference, I i
, between the ith interferer and the mobile is proportional to (D i
) .
The white background noise is neglected in the interference-dominant environment.
Assume the transmisson powers from all base stations are equal, then we have
IFA’2004
S
I
r
D i
50 i
N I
1
Consider only the first tier of interfering cells, if all interfering base stations are equidistant from the desired base station and if this distance is equal to the distance D between cell centers, then the above equation can be simplified to:
(i.e., r=R and assume D i
=D and use q=D/R):
I
S
r
i
N I
1
D i
N
I
R
D
( D / R )
N
I q
N
I
IFA’2004
51
Frequency reuse ratio, q
[ N
I
( S
I
)]
1 /
e.g., N
I
= 6 q
[ 6 ( S
I
)]
1 /
IFA’2004
52
Example: In AMPS systems; for =4, S/I = 18dB (i.e., 63.1),
[20 log (S/I) dB] are acceptable; then (assume N=6) q = (6 63.1) 1/4 4.41.
Thus, the cluster size N should be
(from eq. q=sqrt(3N) N = q 2 /3 = 6.79 7.
i.e.,A 7-cell reuse pattern is needed for an S/I ratio of 18dB.
Based on q=D/R, we can select D by choosing the cell radius R.
IFA’2004
53
IFA’2004
54
Example:
Co-Channel Interference
If S/I = 15 dB required for satisfactory performance for forward channel performance of a cellular system.
a) What is the Frequency Reuse Factor?
b) What Cluster Size should be used for maximum capacity?
(Use path loss component of =3 and =4) .
Assume 6 co-channels all of them (same distance from the mobile)
IFA’2004
55
Example:
Co-Channel Interference a) N= 7 and
S
I
Or 18.66 dB greater than the minimum required level ACCEPT IT!!! b) N= 7 and
S
I
q
N q
N
I
1
6
1
6
(
( 4
4 .
.
583
583 )
)
4
3
75
16 .
.
3
04
Or 12.05 dB less than the minimum required level
REJECT IT!!!
IFA’2004
56
Example:
Co-Channel Interference
N =i 2 +ij+j 2
N=12.
q=D/R=sqrt(3.N) = 6 and
S
q
1
6
I N
( 6 )
3
I
=3
36
Or 15.56 dB N=12 can be used for minimum requirement, but it decreases the capacity since 12 cell reuse offers a spectrum utilization of 1/12 within each cell.
IFA’2004
57
Worst Case Co-Channel Interference i.e., mobile terminal is located at the cell boundary where it receives the weakest signal from its own cell but is subjected to strong interference from all all the interfering cells.
We need to modify our assumption, i.e., assume D i
The S/I ratio can be expressed as
=D.
I
S
r
i
N I
1
D i
2 ( D
R )
R
2 D
2 ( D
R )
S
I
2 ( q
1 )
4
1
2 q
2 ( q
1 )
4
D
R
D+R
D+R
Used D/R=q and =4.
Where q=4.6 for normal seven cell reuse pattern.
D-R
D
D-R
IFA’2004
58
Example: Worst Case
Cochannel Interference (2)
A cellular system that requires an S/I ratio of 18dB.
(a) If cluster size is 7, what is the worst-case S/I?
(b) Is a frequency reuse factor of 7 acceptable in terms of co-channel interference? c) If not, what would be a better choice of frequency reuse ratio?
IFA’2004
59
Example: Worst Case
Cochannel Interference (2)
Solution
(a) N=7 q =
3 N
4 .
6
.
If a path loss component of =4, the worst-case signalto-interference ratio is S/I = 54.3 or 17.3 dB.
(b) The value of S/I is below the acceptable level of 18dB.
To ncrease S/I we need to decrease I,
I.e., Increase the frequency reuse factor, q=5.20 by using
N =9.
The S/I becomes then 95.66 or 19.8dB. Acceptable…
IFA’2004
60
ADJACENT CHANNEL INTERFERENCE
Interference resulting from signals which are adjacent in frequency to the desired signal is called
ADJACENT CHANNEL INTERFERENCE.
WHY?
From imperfect receiver filters (which allow nearby frequencies) to leak into the pass-band.
NEAR FAR EFFECT:
Adjacent channel user is transmitting in very close range to a subscriber’s receiver, while the receiver attempts to receive a base station on the desired channel.
NEAR FAR EFFECT also occurs, when a mobile close to a base station transmits on a channel close to one being used by a weak mobile.
Base station may have difficulty in discriminating the desired mobile user from the “bleedover” caused by the close adjacent channel
61
ADJACENT CHANNEL INTERFERENCE
How to reduce?
• Careful filtering
• Channel assignment no channel assignment which are all adjacent in frequency.
• Keeping frequency separation between each channel in a given cell as large as possible.
e.g., in AMPS System there are 395 voice channels which are divided into 21 subsets each with 19 channels.
• In each subset, the closest adjacent channel is 21 channels away.
• 7-cell reuse -> each cell uses 3 subsets of channels.
• 3 subsets are assigned such that every channel in the cell is assured of being separated from every other channel by at least 7 channel spacings.
IFA’2004
62
A method to increase the capacity of a cellular system by dividing one cell into more smaller cells.
Each smaller cell has its own base station and accordingly antenna height and transmission power can be reduced.
Cell splitting reduces the call blocking probability because the number of channels is increased.
But it increases the handoff rate, i.e., more frequent crossing of borders between the cells.
We have the formula in calculating path loss:
P r
(dBW) = P where d
0
(dBW) - 10 log to the transmitter, and P
0
10
(d/d
0
) is the distance from the reference point is the power received at
63
Let P t1 and P t2 be the transmit power of the large cell BS and medium cell BS, respectively.
The received power at the edge of large cell is
P t1
(R) .
The received power at the edge of R/2 cell, P to r2
10
(R/d
The received power at the edge of large cell, P to
P r1
= P
0
- 10 r1 log
0
) is proportional is proportional
P t2
(R/2) .
With the equal received power,
we have P
i.e., P t1
/P t1 t2
(R) = P
= 2 t2
(R/2) ,
IFA’2004
R/2
R
64
Suppose each BS is allocated 60 channels regardless of the cell size. Find the number of channels contained in a 3x3 km 2 area without cell splitting, i.e., R= 1km and with cell splitting, R/2 = 0.5km.
The number of cells for R=1km.
1.
2.
Each large cell can cover 3.14km
2 , for 9 km 2 approximately need 9/3.14 => 3 cells. However, 3 hexagon cannot cover a square of 3x3. A better approximation is 4 cells. So the number of channels is
4x60=240.
With small cells, the number of cells is approximately
(1/0.5) 2 x4 = 16. Then the number of channels is
16x60=960.
IFA’2004
65
Omni-directional antennas allow transmission of radio signals with equal power strength in all directions.
.
Reality is an antenna covers an area of 60 degrees or 120 degrees DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS!!!!
Cells served by these antennas are called SECTORED
CELLS!!!
Many sectored antennas are mounted a BS tower located at the center of the cell and an adequate number of antennas is placed to cover the entire 360 degrees of the cell.
IFA’2004
66
OMNIDIRECTIONAL
1
2
3
120 DEGREE SECTOR
5
6
1
4
3
2
60 DEGREE SECTOR
1
2
4
3
90 DEGREE SECTOR
IFA’2004
67
Advantages of Cell Sectoring:
Borrowing of channels
.
Coverage of smaller area by each antenna and hence lower power is required in transmitting radio signals.
Helps to decrease interference between co-channels.
Also the spectrum efficiency of the overall system is enhanced.
IFA’2004
68
Co-Channel Interference Reduction with the
Use of Directional Antennas (Cell Sectoring)
The basic form of antennas are omnidirectional.
Directional antennas can increase the system capacity.
(
S
I
) omni
R
q
i
N I
1
D i
6
1
2
If we sectorize the cell with
120 o in each sector, the S/I becomes:
3
(The number of interferers is reduced from 6 to 2.) q
(
S
I
)
120
2
The capacity increase in (S/I)
120
IFA’2004 vs (S/I) omni is 3.
1
3
2
69
Worst-Case Scenario in 120 o Sectoring
Let D be the distance between the adjacent cochannel cells.
With the distance approximation and use path loss component signal-to-interference ratio is
, the
(
S
I
)
120
D
(
R
D
0 .
7 R )
IFA’2004
D+0.7R
1
3
2
D
70
Each cell is allocated a predetermined set of voice channels.
The BS is the entity that allocates channels to the requests. If all channels are used in one cell, it may borrow a channel from its neighbors through MSC.
Fast allocation, but may result high call blocking probabilities.
IFA’2004
71
Dynamic Channel Assignment (DCA)
Voice channels are not allocated to each cell permanently.
When a request is received at the BS, this
BS request a channel from MSC.
DCA can reduce the call blocking probability, but it needs real-time data collection and signaling transmission between BS and MSC.
IFA’2004
72
CAC is used to avoid congestions over the radio links and to ensure the QoS requirements of ongoing services.
Quality of service (QoS)
– Packet-level factors
– Packet loss rate, packet delay, packet delay variation, and throughput rate.
Grade of service (GoS)
– Call-level factors
– New call blocking probability, handoff call dropping probability, connection forced termination probability.
IFA’2004
73
Determine the amount of available channels, i.e., the number of channels for accepting new and handoff requests.
When the N-th request arrives, i.e., there are (N-1) ongoing services.
If there are enough resources to admit the N-th request, then the new request is admitted.
Otherwise, it will be denied.
In order to maintain the continuity of a handoff call, handoff calls are given higher priority than the new call requests.
The prioritized call admission is implemented by reserving channels for handoff calls. This method is referred to as guard channels .
– Fixed reservation and dynamic reservation.
IFA’2004
74
The average number of mobiles requesting service (average call arrival rate):
The average length of time a mobile requires service (the average holding time): T
The offered traffic load: A = T
– e.g., in a cell with 100 mobiles, on an average, if 30 requests are generated during an hour, with average holding time T=360 seconds, then the arrival rate
=30/3600 requests/sec.
A servicing channel that is kept busy for an hour is quantitatively defined as one Erlang.
Hence, the offered traffic load (A) by Erlang is then
IFA’2004
A
30 Calls
3600 Sec
360 Sec call
3 Erlangs
75
How likely a new user can get a connection established successfully? Admission control of new calls.
It is measured by the probability of call blocking, which is a quality of service (QoS) factor, a.k.a.,
(GoS) factor.
Assume we have a total number of C channels in a radio cell.
If the number of active users during any period of time is C, then the call blocking probability is 1 .
If and only if the number of ongoing calls is less than
C, the probability of call blocking will be less than 1 .
IFA’2004
76
Probability of an arriving call being blocked
Prob that (Blocked Calls Cleared; Lost)) is
Pr ob [ Blocking ]
Pr ob [ Cell _ Losses )
Pr ob
A , C
A
C
C !
k
C
0
1
A k k !
, where C is the number of channels in a cell.
Prob(A,C) is also called blocking probability, probability of loss, or probability of
77
Probability of an arriving call being delayed, i.e., probability that no trunk (server=channel) is available for an arriving call in a system with C channels and the call is delayed, is
Pr[
0 ]
Pr
,
A
C
A
C
C !
( 1
A
C
)
C k
1
0
A k k !
where Prob(A, C) is the probability of an arriving call being delayed with load A and C channels.
IFA’2004
78
Prob that calls are lost..
GOS for telephone calls (realstic values 10^{-2} – 10^{-3}
Physical Interpretation-> Ratio of calls rejected to the total number of calls.
What can we do with these Erlang formulas?
a) Given a fixed offered traffic A in Erlangs and a fixed device capacity C, then find the prob of blocking… b) Determine the offered traffic in Erlangs that produces a given blocking probability for a fixed device capacity C.
c) Determine the required device capacity given the blocking probability and the offered traffic in Erlangs.
IFA’2004
79
An urban PC area has a population of 2 Million residents. A cellular company serves this area.
System has 394 cells with 19 channels each.
Find the number of users that can be supported at 2% blocking if each user averages 2 calls/per hour at an average call duration of 3 minutes!!
IFA’2004
80
Prob of Blocking 0.02 (GOS)
Number of Channels C=19
Traffic Intensity per User A/mu = 2* 3/60 = 0.1 Erlangs
From Erlang B chart, total carried traffic obtained as 12
ERLANGS.
The number of users which can be supported per cell is
12/0.1 = 120.
There are 39 cells total number of subscribers supported is
120 * 394 = 47280.
IFA’2004
81
Efficiency
Traffic nonblocked
Capacity
Erlangs
portions of
Number of nonblocked trunks ( channels ) traffic
Example: for previous example, if C=2, A= 3 then
B(2, 3) = 0.6, ------ Blocking probability, i.e., 60% calls are blocked.
Total number of rerouted calls = 30 x 0.6 = 18
Efficiency = 3(1-0.6)/2 = 0.6
IFA’2004
82
The advantage of cellular communications
– Capacity extension by frequency reuse
– Cell cluster and cochannel cells
– Number of cells in a cluster
– Frequency reuse ratio
Co-Channel interference
– Impact of cluster size
– Worst-case cochannel interference
Traffic load and call blocking probability
– Average delay
– Probability of queuing delay
Cell splitting and sectoring
Fixed channel allocation and dynamic channel allocation
IFA’2004
83