Status MAMI facility KHUK-workshop , 30.11. 2012 Kurt Aulenbacher Institut für Kernphysik Uni Mainz 1 30.11.2012 Outline • SFB 1044 and the operation of MAMI • Prisma and erection of MESA 2 30.11.2012 MAMI at IKP Mainz 1.6 GeV c.w. polarized beam 150kW beam power 3 30.11.2012 Operation statistics 2005 – Nov. 2012 average availability for users: 85% ! 61% 72% 46% 51% HDSM-operation 40% 36% 1% MAMI total (1991 – 2012): 129592 hours of operation 30.11.2012 4 MAMI at IKP Mainz Operational highlights 2012: -A4- ”experiment PV e-scattering on deuterium@200MeV - KAOS chicane in high intensity operation 5 30.11.2012 MAMI beam time in 2012 (until November) Distribution between the experimental groups Operation for experiments of SFB 1044 will continue for (hopefully) many years 6 30.11.2012 PRISMA 15 June 2012: PRISMA excellence cluster is awarded to JGU PRISMA includes construction of innovative particle acclerator for hadron/particle physics experiments in the 100 MeV range Mainz Energy recovering Superconducting Accelerator 7 30.11.2012 MESA at IKP Mainz High power beam dump Experimental hall Accessshaft MESA-hall-2 MESA-hall-1 MAMI/MESA separation (shielding) -no new buildings -MAMI experiments continue seperatly 8 30.11.2012 MESA accelerator project rationale • Experiments conceivable which require a new & innovative accelerator • low energy (100-200MeV) therefore accelerator ‘affordable’ • MAMI acc. team competence represents basis for development • Project will be attractive for young students and researchers Make use of innovations in SRF accelerator science: 1. Energy recovery linac (ERL) 2. Recent progress in high gradient-c.w.-SRF Beam parameter goals in two different modes of operation: 1.) EB-mode External spin-polarized c.w. beam at 200 MeV (Q2=0.005GeV/c at 30 degree). L>1039 cm-2s-1 2.) ERL-mode: 10mA at 100 MeV with L~1035 cm-2s-1 9 30.11.2012 MESA-Scheme KEY: PS: Photosources: 100keV polarized (EB, ERL (low charge)), 500keV unpolarized (ERL, high charge) 2ERL IN: 5 MeV – NC injector SC: 4 Superconducting cavities 2 3 Energy gain 50 MeV per pass. 1-3 Beam recirculations for EB Orbit 1 common to ERL and EB, Orbit 2 could be separate for ERL and EB PIT PIT: Pseudo Internal target (ER-experiment) PV: Parity violation experiment (EB-mode) DU: 5 MeV beam dump in ERL-mode Area:22*14m2 MESA-LAYOUT IN 1 SC PS Existing walls: 2-3m thick shielding RC DU to PV-experiment 30.11.2012 EXPERIMENTAL BEAM PARAMETERS: 1.3 GHz c.w. EB-mode: 150 mA, 200 MeV polarized beam (liquid Hydrogen target L~1039) ERL-mode: 10mA, 100 MeV unpolarized beam (Pseudo-Internal Hydrogen Gas target, L~1035) 10 Accelerator Layout Design by Ralf Eichhorn (Deutscher Designpreis für Magnethochregallager) Alternative: Double axis acceleration a la CEBAF: more compact, but less flexible! 30.11.2012 11 Accelerator Layout PIT P2 V. Bechthold/R. Heine 12 30.11.2012 ERL-PIT-experiments 20s beam envelope for en=5mm beam in H2 6mm dia Dublett V. Tioukine Dublett Pump Assuming target density N=2*1018 atoms/cm-2 (3.2 mg/cm2, 5*10-8 X0) we have (at I0=10-2 A) luminosity of L= I0/e*N=1.2*1035cm-2s-1 (average) ionization Energy loss: ~ 17eV RMS scattering-angle (multiple Coulomb scattering): 10mrad single pass beam deterioration is acceptable Note: storage ring: beam emittance lifetime ~ 10milliseconds (stationary vs. variable background…) beam halo & long tails of distribution due to Coulomb scattering have to be studied 13 19.09.2012 EB workhorse experiment : PVES at low Q (P2 experiment within SFB 1044) 14 19.09.2012 MESA-beam-parameters stage1/stage-2 Beam Energy ERL/EB [MeV] 105/155 (105/205) Operating mode 1300 MHz, c.w. Source type Photosource d.c. 100keV, polarized (additional source 200keV, nonpolarized) Bunch charge EB/ERL [pC] 0.15/0.77 (0.15/7.7) Norm. Emittance EB/ERL [mm] 0.2/<1 (0.2/<1) Beam polarization (EB-mode only) > 0.85 Beam recirculations 2 (3) Beam power at exp. ERL/EB [kW] 100/22.5 (1000/30) Total R.f.-power installed [kW] 120 (160) 15 30.11.2012 MESA- stage1 Timescale Accelerator basic design: end 2013 Early 2014: ordering SRF Early 2016 delivery End 2017 operation …Thank you! 16 30.11.2012 SRF-main accelerator issues 9 cell ‘TESLA’ (E-XFEL) p-mode structure: Q-curve often measured under not realistic ‘vertical’ conditions…esp. dust particles & contamination films may appear during horizontal assembly, accidents in the vacuum system, etc…. New HIM-building Mainz: is planned to be equipped with a Clean room facility & high pressure (ultrapure) water rinsing (HPR) 30.11.2012 Problem for high c.w. current operation: HOM excitation PHOM~I2B 17 A REAL SRF ‘module’ True c.w.-operation SRF facilities: CEBAF, ELBE, S-DALINAC (3GHz) not: E-XFEL, FLASH, TESLA/ILC. c.w. requires lowering the Gradient due to power dissipation! J. Teichert et al. NIMA 557 (2006) 239 Such modules can be ordered from industry. Missing: sufficient higher order mode damping for I>2-4 mA. Note MESA stage-2 ERL-current is 40mA! modify after stage-1 or take the risk?? 18 30.11.2012 Injector issues Pro‘s for normal conducting injector: • no cryogenic load • considerably lower cost, established design, e.g. >9mA c.w. without BBU (HOM excitation strongly suppressed) • high flexibility: variable beta-design is feasible! probably better beam quality than existing SRF injectors GRP: Gun/rotator/ polarimeter (EB-mode) CBP: Chopper/buncher Preacc. (g-beta) HCI: 511keV high bunch charge injection (ERL-mode, stage-2) 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 2m, 2MeV at PHF=30kW 5MeV GRP CBP HCI IN DU PV RC 30.11.2012 19 Back-ups 20 30.11.2012 Spin polarized source layout strongly influenced by need of ‘false’ asymmetry control! Afalse <0.2ppb Spin direction GUN f=p/2 Ө Spin rotation axis 2.5m ● f=p/2 DSP ● f=var to second part Systematic electron optical helicity reversal! (similar to JLAB/QWEAK) Chop. buncher from first part graded-b 550keV 3m Injection of 550kV high charge source 21 tension with desire to have a SHORT injection for high charge separate 550kV gun 30.11.2012 Spin rotation and source beam energy Spin = V. Tioukine, K.A. NIM A 568 537 (2006) 1 1 me 2 EL 100kV Filter, L=0.3m operated at 23kV over 2cm gap not practical to handle filter at 500keV (=2), … but could probably work at 200keV (200keV source is able to reach emittance goal at 7.7pC!) JLAB development: A 200keV source is nowadays very compact - R. Suleiman et al. Proceedings ERL2011, 22 30.11.2012 Accelerator Layout arcs merger First Order beam optics for arcs, mergers & combiners 30.11.2012 23 Summary/Outlook • MESA: First ERL with particle physics experiments in Europe • Detailled considerations have begun for all subsystems • Superconducting Radiofrequency System and it‘s cryogenics is main cost driver. • MESA funding is part of ‚PRISMA‘ excellence cluster req • ERL operation restricted so far to 1mA in order to save costs for development and cryogenics of high current SRF sections (additional ~ 5 M€) • Great support from TU-Darmstadt, hope to continue collaboration • Mainz also collaborates with HZB (Berlin-Pro) &CERN (LHeC) • Photoinjectors collaborations with HZD (ELBE) and HZB • main issue now, after funding decision: creating a powerful team! • good reason to believe that stage-1 can be made operational within 5 years 24 30.11.2012 Backups 25 30.11.2012 WHY is source-emittance so important for ERL-experiments? 20s beam envelope H2 6mm dia Dublett Dublett Pump e Norm = 10 m m (or 3.2 p mm * mrad * m e c) (MESA goal) e Geo = e Norm e Geo (100MeV) 1 2 Beam diameter as a function ~ 50nm. of optical function b : r b eam ( z ) = e Geo * b ( z ) 2 point z* = 0 in the field free region around symmetry b ( z ) = b ( z *) 30.11.2012 Maximum z 2 b ( z *) = b (1 ( z / b ) ) choose : b = 1m * beam diameter * 2 * 0 . 62 mm over 2 Meters of length 26 Emittance requiments An normalized emittance of 5 mm is the key for successful operation of DM-experiment With tbunch << taccel we have a lower limit for emittance at the cathode e min = q bunch ( E W ) 6 pe 0 E cath mc 2 ~ 0 . 2 m m @ 7 . 7 pC @ 1 MV / m ( E W ) ~ 0 . 4 eV (KCsSb), 0 . 1eV (NEA - GaAs) But: vacuum space charge destroys beam emittance… Countermeasures: 1.) accelerate with high field to relativistic velocities because Fq~1/2. a) ERL-d.c guns ~3-6MV/m to 0.25-0.5 MeV b) SRF gun with 15MV/m to ~ 5 MeV (FZD, future: BERLinPRO). MESA –baseline for ERL-source: 200keV ‘inverted‘ Photogun a la JLAB (P. A. Adderley et al. PR-ST-AB 13 010101 (2010)) +350keV electrostatic Postaccelerator (reduced Version of famous 2MeV d.c.-MAMI-A injector) 27 30.11.2012 SRF-main accelerator issues 9 cell ‘TESLA’ (E-XFEL) p-mode structure: Q-curve often measured under not realistic ‘vertical’ conditions…esp. dust particles & contamination films may appear during horizontal assembly, accidents in the vacuum system, etc…. New HIM-building Mainz: is planned to be equipped with a Clean room facility & high pressure (ultrapure) water rinsing (HPR) 28 30.11.2012 A REAL SRF ‘module’ True c.w.-operation SRF facilities: CEBAF, ELBE, S-DALINAC (3GHz) not: E-XFEL, FLASH, TESLA/ILC. c.w. requires lowering the Gradient due to power dissipation! J. Teichert et al. NIMA 557 (2006) 239 30.11.2012 Such modules can be ordered from industry. Missing: sufficient higher order mode damping for I>2-4 mA. Note MESA ERL-current is 40mA! 29 Recirculator • 200 MeV EB could require vertical stacking of 3fold recirculation • Merger Systems complicated due to limited space • But Magnets very small (compared to MAMI) • Beam power (EB) 30kW@200 MeV (ERL) 50kW at 5MeV • R.f power needed EB ~ 120kW ERL ~ 140kW • 1300 MHz R.f. supplied by reliable & stable semiconductor amplifiers (not Klystrons!) • Experiments are TINY PV-Experiment 14m Dark photon-exp. 30 30.11.2012 405nm Laser • Advantage of 405 nm: KCsSb QE~30mA/Watt. Cost ~ 3k€/watt (d.c.); • optimum beam quality: 1mm dia-spot at 1m only with collimation tube! • electron gun current presently limited by power supply (<3mA) • Diode is well suited for pulsing at GHz-frequencies , (<40ps at full power) • Could provide ~1W (40ps, r.f. synchronized) for MESA (1 lifetime ‘overhead’) five DVD-player diodes in parallel! collimation tube Laser-out d.c or R.f 2cm €100 purchase from eBay 30.11.2012 31 Lifetime issue Milliampere- test experiment with NEA-GaAs GaAs operation would be possible, but inconvenient • long lifetime required KCsSb (unpolarized) photocathode • lifetime about 100 hours @25mA demonstrated recently at Cornell 30.11.2012 32 PCA fabrication chamber at Mainz-HIM PCA-Apparatus : •KCsSb technology available at Mainz • good results >30mA/Watt (>10% Q.E) • evidence for *100 stability increase with respect to GaAs (2000 hours at 10mA?) 33 30.11.2012 DM: Focusing through the PIT e Norm = 10 m m (or 3.2 p mm * mrad * m e c) (MESA goal) e Geo = e Norm e Geo (100MeV) 1 2 as a function Beam diameter ~ 50nm. of optical function b : r b eam ( z ) = e Geo * b ( z ) 2 point z* = 0 in the field free region around symmetry b ( z ) = b ( z *) Maximum z 2 b ( z *) = b (1 ( z / b ) ) choose : b = 1m * beam diameter * 2 * 0 . 62 mm over 2 Meters of length 34 30.11.2012 DM: Focusing through the PIT H2 E0=104MeV 20s beam envelope 6mm dia Dublett Pump Dublett Assuming target density N=2*1018 atoms/cm-2 (3.2 mg/cm2, 5*10-8 X0) we have (at I0=10-2 A) luminosity of L= I0/e*N=1.2*1035cm-2s-1 (average) ionization Energy loss: ~ 17eV could allow to recuperate more energy than in conventional ERL (2.5MeV). RMS scattering-angle (multiple Coulomb scattering): 10mrad single pass beam deterioration is acceptable Note: storage ring: beam emittance lifetime ~ 10milliseconds (stationary vs. variable background…) beam halo & long tails of distribution due to Coulomb scattering have to be studied 35 30.11.2012 MESA-experiments-3: Applied physics High beam power electron beam may be used for: • ERL-mode: Production of NV-nanodiamonds (e.g. medical markers) • EB-mode: High brightness source of cold (polarized) positrons G. Werth et al. : Appl. Phys. A 33 59 (1984) Color: NV-centers introduced in Diamond. Irradiated at MAMI for 3 days, 50mA at 14MeV MESA can produce ~109 positrons/s in a beam of <1cm diameter at 120eV surface science: magnetic structures positronium production (J. Tisler et al. ACS NANO 3,7 p.1959 (2009)) 36 30.11.2012