Graduation_presentation - Complex Photonic Systems | COPS

advertisement
Effects, Estimation, and
Compensation of Frequency Sweep
Nonlinearity in FMCW* Ranging
Systems
Committee members
Applied Physics
Prof. dr. A.P. Mosk (COPS), ir. R. Vinke (Thales), prof. dr.
W.L. Vos (COPS), ir. H.T. Griffioen (Thales)
Applied Mathematics
Dr. G. Meinsma (MSCT), prof. dr. A.A. Stoorvogel (MSCT),
dr. A. Zagaris (AAMP)
*
Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave
Contents
• Introduction
• Digital chirp generation and its effect on the
performance of a FMCW radar
• Compensation of frequency sweep
nonlinearity by digital post-processing
• Applications of FMCW to optics
• Conclusions
Radar
• Radio Detection And Ranging
• “To see and not be seen”
Heinkel HE-111 bombers
RAF Chain Home radar site
German U-boat surrendering
(depth charge in profile)
Pulsed radar
Intercept receivers
• Jamming
• Direction finding (DF)
• Anti-radiation missiles (ARMs)
DRS ZA-4501 shipboard
DF antenna array
Prowler armed with HARM high-speed anti-radiation missiles
LPI radar
• Low probability of intercept
power
pulse with high peak power
continuous wave with low
peak power
Thales Smart-L
power ~ megaWatt
time
Thales Scout Mk2
power ~ milliWatt
FMCW radar
• Frequency-modulated continuous-wave
frequency
carrier
frequency
𝑓𝑐 = 10
GHz
bandwidth
𝐡 = 50 MHz
sweep period
𝑇 = 500 µs
time
amplitude
time
1
chirp 𝑑 = cos 2πœ‹ 𝑓𝑐 𝑑 + 𝛼𝑑 2
2
,
where 𝛼 =
𝐡
𝑇
Principle of FMCW ranging
frequency
transmitted linear
chirp
received echoes
time
frequency
difference
target ‘beat’
frequencies
time
FMCW transceiver
chirp
generator
frequency
transmit
antenna
coupler
LO
time
RF
mixer
target
IF
power
spectrum
analyzer
frequency
receive
antenna
Frequency sweep nonlinearity
transmitted
non-linear
chirp
frequency
received
target
echoes
time
beat
frequency
time
“Ghost” targets
frequency
transmitted
non-linear
chirp
received
target echo
power
target
time
“ghost”
targets
beat
frequency
time
frequency
Analog chirp generation
• YIG (Yttrium, Iron, and Garnet)-tuned oscillator
A.G. Stove, Measurement of Spectra of
Microwave FMCW Radars, Thales
Aerospace UK, working paper (2006).
Digital chirp generation
• Direct digital synthesizer (DDS)
address
generator
RAM or
ROM
clock
• Clock speed 1 GSPS
• Integrated 14-bit DAC
D/A
converter
low-pass
filter
to
transmitter
Output of a AD9910 sweeping from 180
MHz to 210 MHz
Source: J. Ledford, Master’s Thesis, University of Kansas (2008).
Quantization of phase
‘phase accumulator’
sine look-up table
(ROM)
‘jump’ size
0000 … 0
1111 … 1
Δπœ™
clock
2πœ‹
radians
2π‘Š
π‘Š = number of bits of the phase accumulator
Δπœ™ =
AD9910 synthesizer
π‘Š = 19
Δπœ™ ≈ 1.2 × 10−5 radians
Worst-case “ghost” target
• ‘Spurious-free dynamic range’
SFDR = 20 log10 2Δπœ™ ≈ 92 dB
• “Ghost” targets practically negligible
power
SFDR = 92 dB
frequency
Compensation of phase errors
• Burgos-Garcia et al., Digital
on-line compensation of
errors induced by linear
distortion in broadband FM
radars, Electron. Lett. 39(1),
16 (2002).
• Meta et al., Range nonlinearities correction in FMCW
SAR, IEEE Conf. on Geoscience
and Remote Sensing 2006,
403 (2006).
Remember this?
frequency
time
intermediate
frequency (IF)
time
Compensation algorithm
collected non-linear
deramped data
transmitted nonlinearties removal
𝑓𝑏
time
𝑓𝑏
range deskew
time
𝑓𝑏
non-linearities
compensation
linear deramped
data
𝑓𝑏
time
time
Implementation
𝑄−𝛼 (𝑓)
𝑠𝐼𝐹2
𝑠𝐼𝐹
deskew filter
π‘ πœ–∗ 𝑑
𝑠𝐼𝐹3
𝑠𝐼𝐹4
π‘ πœ– 𝑑 ∗ π‘žπ›Ό 𝑑
“Peek”
π‘ πœ– 𝑑 ∗ π‘ž−𝛼 𝑑
“Meta”
π‘ πœ– 𝑑
1
chirp 𝑑 = cos 2πœ‹ 𝑓𝑐 𝑑 + 𝛼𝑑 2 + πœ– 𝑑
2
phase error
“Burgos-Garcia”
π‘ πœ– 𝑑 = exp 𝑗2πœ‹πœ– 𝑑
𝑄−𝛼
πœ‹ 2
𝑓 = exp 𝑗 𝑓
𝛼
Sinusoidal phase error (low frequency)
2πœ‹πœ– 𝑑 = 𝐴𝑠𝑙 sin 2πœ‹π‘“π‘ π‘™ 𝑑 ,
Parameter Value Unit
𝐡
𝑇
0
uncompensated
compensated (narrowband)
compensated (wideband)
ideal
10 GHz
-10
50 MHz
-20
500 μs
𝑅
15 km
𝐴𝑠𝑙
0.1 Rad
𝑓𝑠𝑙
4 kHz
Power spectrum (dB)
𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑠𝑙 β‰ͺ 𝛼
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
14.94
14.96
14.98
15
Range (km)
15.02
15.04
15.06
Sinusoidal phase error (high frequency)
2πœ‹πœ– 𝑑 = 𝐴𝑠𝑙 sin 2πœ‹π‘“π‘ π‘™ 𝑑 ,
Parameter Value Unit
𝐡
𝑇
0
uncompensated
compensated (narrowband)
compensated (wideband)
ideal
10 GHz
-10
50 MHz
-20
500 μs
𝑅
15 km
𝐴𝑠𝑙
0.1 Rad
𝑓𝑠𝑙
63 kHz
Power spectrum (dB)
𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑠𝑙 ~ 𝛼
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
14.9
14.95
15
Range (km)
15.05
15.1
Cubic phase error
2πœ‹πœ– 𝑑 = π‘˜3 𝑑 3
𝑓𝑐
𝐡
𝑇
𝑅
π‘˜3
Value
Unit
0
uncompensated
compensated (narrowband)
compensated (wideband)
ideal
10 GHz
-10
50 MHz
-20
500 μs
15 km
4 × 1011 Hz/s2
Power spectrum (dB)
Parameter
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
14.94
14.96
14.98
15
Range (km)
15.02
15.04
15.06
Quartic phase error
2πœ‹πœ– 𝑑 = π‘˜4 𝑑 4
𝑓𝑐
𝐡
𝑇
𝑅
π‘˜4
Value
Unit
0
uncompensated
compensated (narrowband)
compensated (wideband)
ideal
10 GHz
-10
50 MHz
-20
500 μs
15 km
4 × 1011 Hz/s2
Power spectrum (dB)
Parameter
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
14.94
14.96
14.98
15
Range (km)
15.02
15.04
15.06
FCMW in optics
• Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
3D image of a frog tadpole using a
Thorlabs OCS1300SS OCT
microscope system.
• Compensation algorithm not in the literature!
Conclusions
• Phase quantization effects in digital chirp
synthesizers have negligible effect on
performance
• Frequency sweep nonlinearity can be
compensated by digital post-processing of the
beat signal
• Algorithm is also applicable to optics, but not
mentioned in optics literature
Thank you for your attention!
Questions?
Extra slides
Effect on Doppler processing
Sinusoidal phase error, 3.1
3
cycles per sweep,
amplitude 0.1 radian
• Systematic phase errors have negligible effect
on Doppler processing
Spectrum of the complex exponential
‘signal’
‘replicas’
0,1, … , 7
πœƒπ‘š =
radians
8
Spectrum of the analytic signal
‘main’ signal
‘signal replica’
‘image replica’
Observed beat signal
‘signal ×signal’
‘signal × signal replica’
‘image replica ×
image replica’
‘signal × image replica’
Download