Drug Information Resources Review Jennifer L. Rodis, PharmD, BCPS The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy October 25, 2011 Objectives Review the differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary resources Discuss the value of each resources type Provide a refresher on searching Pubmed Types of Literature Types of literature 3 main types of drug information literature – Tertiary Interpretation of primary data – Secondary No interpretation, just helps you find sources – Primary Original research & analysis Real-life Research Tertiary Literature Summarizes and interprets the primary literature Information generally well accepted Place to start for basic information and guidance Can inform your subsequent research Tertiary Literature Advantages – Convenient, accessible – Often available online – Review process of information is already done Disadvantages – Lag time – Not as complete – Author’s interpretation Tertiary Literature Textbooks – Electronic also Compendia – Electronic also Full-text computer databases (Internet) Review articles Tertiary Resources – Drug Databases Online – Lexi Comp CRL – MICROMEDEX – Drug Facts and Comparisons – MD Consult – AHFS Drug Information – Epocrates Print – PDR (Physician’s Desk Reference) Tertiary Resources - Books Print Books – Remington’s – Trissel’s (2 titles) – Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs – Redbook – Drugs in Pregnancy & Lactation (aka: Brigg’s) – Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference Tertiary Resources - Other UpToDate Pharmacist’s Letter Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database Ohio Administrative Code (pharmacy.ohio.gov) FDA.gov (Orange Book, Drugs@FDA) CDC.gov Professional Organizations – APhA’s MTM Central Package Insert Manufacturer web sites Using Tertiary Literature 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Does author have expertise? Is the information current? Is the information supported with citations? Does the resource contain relevant information? Is the resource free of bias or errors? Is it clear/concise/easy-to-use? Secondary Literature Guides you to the primary and tertiary literature Indexing – Bibliographic info only Abstracting – Bibliographic citation plus brief summary of article or resource Almost all are electronic format Secondary Literature Advantages – Simple search strategies – Very current citation information – Access point for tremendous amount of primary sources Disadvantages – Understanding coverage of the database – Tweaking search strategies unique to each database Secondary Resources ClinAlert EMBASE (Elsevier) International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) Iowa Drug Information System (IDIS) Journal Watch Lexis-Nexis MEDLINE / PubMed Primary Literature Primary research – Journal articles that are: Case reports Drug studies Original reports of data – Meta-analysis? – Unpublished studies Primary Literature Considerations Evaluating the basics – Peer-reviewed – Journal reputation – Source of funding Digging deeper – Study methodology – Clinical relevance – Patient populations Primary Literature Advantages – Most current published source – Tremendous range of information – Personally assess utility/validity Disadvantages – Overwhelming volume – Interpretation of results – Not yet vetted by experts Primary Literature Peer-reviewed journals – JAMA – New England Journal of Medicine – American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy – Annals of Internal Medicine Non-peer reviewed journals – Supplements – Pharmacy Today What’s the difference? Ease of Use Tertiary Secondary Primary What’s the difference? Most Current Primary Secondary Tertiary Alternate Sources of DI Internet, Listservs, and medical news briefs Local and national professional organizations and meetings Pharmaceutical manufacturers Drug information and poison control centers Searching Strategies Begin broad, then narrow your search – Start with tertiary sources Use “related articles” – Bibliographies – Secondary resource guides Always be sure to assess most up to date information available – Primary sources Searching Pubmed Searching Strategies 1. Develop focused question and break into parts What is the question asking? “Is peptic ulcer prevention with proton pump inhibitors and NSAIDs dose-related?” – – proton pump inhibitors, dose, non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents, prevention of peptic ulcer disease Other forms of the above words and phrases Searching Strategies Putting together an answerable question is key to successful evidence-based medicine practice – Use PICO method Patient or problem Intervention Comparative intervention Outcome Be Specific! Example: PICO What is the minimum or maximum dose of NSAIDs at which Patient or problem proton-pump inhibitors are Intervention Comparison Outcome effective for peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis? Searching Strategies 2. Read up on the basics of the question Start with tertiary resources for foundation Build on information gathered from texts, review articles, and drug databases with a primary literature search Searching Strategies 3. Gather as many articles as possible for all of the parts of the search Use MeSH headings to help narrow or broaden your search MeSH = Medical Subject Headings – Official indexing terms for MEDLINE Searching Databases: Basic Boolean “AND” – Combines 2 terms (shrinks search) “OR” – Gives database more choices (broadens search) “NOT” – Limits search (removes undesired terms) Basic Boolean Both words must be present in results paroxetine AND suicide Basic Boolean Either word can be present in results paroxetine OR suicide Basic Boolean The first but not the second term will be present in the results paroxetine NOT suicide Pubmed Search Example What is the minimum or maximum dose of NSAIDs at which proton-pump inhibitors are effective for peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis? Search keywords Proton pump inhibitors and dose and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents proton pump inhibitors and dose and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and prevention of peptic ulcer disease MeSH term search: PPIs, NSAIDs, PUD http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19240698 Resources Adapted from lectures by Bridget Protus, PharmD, CGP, MLS delivered 1/2010. Thrower MR. Literature retrieval and Finding Resources Electronically. In: Felkey BG, Fox BI, Thrower MR. Health care informatics: a skills-based resource. Washington DC: American Pharmacists Association; 2005. p. 191-228. West, PM. Literature evaluation. In: Pharmacotherapy self- assessment program: science and practice of pharmacotherapy, 5th ed. (PSAP V). Kansas City: American College of Clinical Pharmacy; 2005. p. 93-110. Shields, KM. Drug information resources. In: Malone PM, Kier KL, Stanovich JE. Drug information: a guide for pharmacists, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2006. p.61-101. Resources Thrower MR. Literature retrieval and Finding Resources Electronically. In: Felkey BG, Fox BI, Thrower MR. Health care informatics: a skills-based resource. Washington DC: American Pharmacists Association; 2005. p. 191-228. West, PM. Literature evaluation. In: Pharmacotherapy self-assessment program: science and practice of pharmacotherapy I, II, III. Kansas City: American College of Clinical Pharmacy; 2005. p. 93-5.