Drug and Biologic Recalls American Conference Institute Summit on Drug and Device Product Recalls Philadelphia, PA James S. Cohen, Esq. 202.756.8276 jscohen@mwe.com March 21, 2011 www.mwe.com Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York Orange County Rome San Diego Silicon Valley Washington, D.C. Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices (Shanghai) © 2010 McDermott Will & Emery LLP. McDermott operates its practice through separate legal entities in each of the countries where it has offices. This communication may be considered attorney advertising. Previous results are not a guarantee of future outcome. The following legal entities are collectively referred to as "McDermott Will & Emery," "McDermott" or "the Firm": McDermott Will & Emery LLP, McDermott Will & Emery/Stanbrook LLP, McDermott Will & Emery Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater LLP, MWE Steuerberatungsgesellschaft mbH, McDermott Will & Emery Studio Legale Associato and McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP. These entities coordinate their activities through service agreements. This communication may be considered advertising under the rules regulating the legal profession. Drug and Biologic Recall Overview FDA: alternative method to remove or correct marketed products deemed to pose risk to public health Applicable laws and policy regulations relating to drugs and biologics – 21 C.F.R. Part 7, Subpart C (Recalls – Guidance on Policy, Procedures, and Industry Responsibility) – 42 U.S.C. § 262 (biological products) – 21 C.F.R. § § 1270.43, 1271.440 (HCT/Ps) – 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Adjudications) www.mwe.com 2 Drug and Biologic Overview, Cont. Voluntary vs. Mandatory Policy and Process Relation to current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) and current Good Tissue Practice (cGTP) and corrective actions Other enforcement Planning and Interacting with FDA www.mwe.com 3 Part 7 Sets forth basic framework for recalls – Recall Policy, Health Hazard Evaluation, Strategy, procedures – Company’s Responsibilities – FDA’s responsibilities Recall: a firm’s removal or correction of a marketed product that the FDA considers to be in violation of the laws it administers and against which the Agency would initiate legal action, e.g., seizure Is not a market withdrawal and stock recovery www.mwe.com 4 Part 7, Cont. Market withdrawal: when a distributed product is removed by a firm for a minor violation that would not be subject to legal action by the FDA, or which involved no violation. For example, – normal stock rotation practices – routine equipments adjustments/repairs Stock Recovery: when a firm conducts a removal or correction of a product that has not been marketed, or has not left the immediate control of the firm -– product is located on premises owned by or under control of the firm, and no portion of the product lot has been released for sale or use www.mwe.com 5 Part 7, Cont. Correction: the repair, modification, adjustment, relabeling, destruction, or inspection (including patient monitoring) of a product without its physical removal to some other location www.mwe.com 6 Part 7, Cont. – Class I recall: a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death – Class II recall: a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote – Class III recall: a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences. www.mwe.com 7 Voluntary vs. Mandatory Most recalls are voluntary A firm may voluntarily initiate a recall FDA may request a firm to voluntarily initiate a recall Biological products: FDA may order a mandatory recall of biological products under the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) FDA may order a mandatory recall of a human cell, tissue and cellular and tissue-based product (HCT/P) under 21 C.F.R. Part 1270 www.mwe.com 8 Part 7 – Policy and Process FDA’s recall policy: – Considered to be an effective method of removing or correcting consumer products that are in violation of FDA laws • Firms conduct voluntary recalls to “carry out their responsibility to protect the public health and well-being from products that present a risk of injury or gross deception or are otherwise defective” Firm-initiated recall – A manufacturer or distributor (often set out in contract) decides to initiate a recall, contacts and provides information to the FDA, such as • identity and amount of product, reason for the removal or correction, firm’s risk evaluation, copy of recall communication, and proposed recall strategy www.mwe.com 9 Part 7 – Policy and Process FDA district office: – Submits Recall Alert to Center Recall Unit (CRU) and ORA Office of Enforcement (headquarters) – Gathers product information, and may conduct inspection – Submits a recall recommendation and other information about the product to Center (CDER or CBER) – Offers guidance to firm – Monitors the recall – When complete, terminates Class II and II recalls, recommends termination of Class I recalls www.mwe.com 10 Part 7 – Policy and Process District may conduct an establishment inspection for a Class I or significant Class II recall – Assess root cause(s) of problem – Obtain/review firm’s corrective action plan – Document violations for possible regulatory action if no correction action – Assess overall compliance www.mwe.com 11 Part 7 - Policy and Process Center’s recall staff (RCU): – Initiate a health hazard evaluation • Will have a HHE committee comprised of appropriate experts • May use precedent HHE’s – Finalize a recall strategy – Classify the recall – Update FDA’s Recall Enterprise System (RES) with classification, audit strategy, and any recommendations, then post the information to the FDA’s website www.mwe.com 12 Part 7 – Policy and Process Recall strategy: – Developed by Agency for FDA-requested recall, and by firm for firminitiated recall, and suited to each individual case • Results of HHE • Ease in identifying the product • Degree to which deficiency is obvious to consumer • Degree to which product remains unused in marketplace • Continued availability of essential products – Particularly relevant for biological products www.mwe.com 13 Part 7 – Policy and Process Elements of Recall Strategy: – Depth of recall – Public warning – Effectiveness check level • Verify that all specified consignees have received notification of the recall and have taken appropriate action • Center Recall Unit will review or develop recall strategy District Office will coordinate with and notify firm by letter of Agency assessments and determinations – Includes notification that recall has been posted to the FDA website – requests periodic status reports – advises that failure to conduct effective recall could result in seizure of violative product or other legal sanctions www.mwe.com 14 Part 7 – Policy and Process Termination of a recall: – When district office determines all recall activity, including monitoring and product disposition, has been completed – Center concurrence needed for termination of Class I recall www.mwe.com 15 Biological Products FDA may order a mandatory recall for a biological product A “biological product” is “a virus, therapeutic serum, toxin, antitoxin, vaccine, blood, blood component or derivative, allergenic product, protein (except any chemically synthesized polypeptide) or analogous product, or arsphenamine or derivative of arsphenamine (or any other trivalent organic arsenic compound), applicable to the prevention, treatment, or cure of a disease or condition of human beings” 42 U.S.C. § 262(i) www.mwe.com 16 Biological Products Mandatory recall authority (42 U.S.C. 262(d)): – If FDA determines that a batch, lot, or other quantity of a licensed product presents an imminent or substantial hazard to the public health • The Agency shall issue an order immediately ordering the recall of the batch, lot, or other quantity of product. • The order shall be issued in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 554 – requires opportunity for a hearing – Civil penalty up to $100,000 per day for each violation www.mwe.com 17 HCT/Ps HCT/Ps regulated solely under 42 U.S.C. § 361 (PHSA) are subject to the FDA’s donor eligibility, establishment registration and listing, and cGTP requirements For these products, FDA may issue an Order of Retention, Recall, Destruction, and Cessation of Manufacturing – For human tissue intended for transplantation recovered prior to 5/25/05 (21 C.F.R. § 1270.43) – For human cell, tissue, and cellular and tissue-based products (HCT/Ps) (21 C.F.R. § 1271.440) • Part of the Agency’s current Good Tissue Practice regulatory framework • May be issued to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable disease (42 U.S.C. § 264) www.mwe.com 18 HCT/Ps FDA may order a recall (and/or detention) when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a HCT/P is – violative because manufactured in violation of Part 1271 and, therefore, the conditions of manufacture do not provide adequate protections against the risk of communicable disease, or – the HCT/P is infected or contaminated so as to be a source of dangerous infections to humans, or – The establishment is otherwise in violative of Part 1271 (current Good Tissue Practice) www.mwe.com 19 HCT/Ps If reasonable grounds exist to believe that there is a danger to health, the order will be effective immediately Otherwise, effective after the passage of five days from the establishment's receipt of the order, or if a Part 16 hearing is requested, a decision is made effectuating the order Establishment may request Part 16 hearing within five working days of receipt of the recall or detention order (but not held in abeyance) www.mwe.com 20 Relation of Recall to cGMP/CGTP Depending on the cause of the recall and/or the results of FDA inspection, cGMP or CGTP issues may be at issue – Review situation to determine root cause(s) – Determine what specific and/or systemic corrective actions, if any, are necessary – If FDA’s inspects, or if recall is significant, FDA will look at these activities, and at effectiveness of recall, with expectations – Product liability considerations www.mwe.com 21 Other Enforcement If the underlying cause(s) of recall are not addressed and resolved, or if FDA concludes that the recall was not effective – FDA may inspect at any time and determine other violations exist requiring corrective or remedial action – For HCT/Ps, Order of Destruction, Order of Cessation of Manufacturing – Warning Letter, seizure, injunction, prosecution www.mwe.com 22 Planning and Interaction with FDA Response to recall event should be robust, comprehensive, and proactive Firm should present all analyses and proposed plan to FDA at the time of notification, if possible Involve scientific staff in HHE and other aspects of recall strategy and plan (FDA will doing the same on its end) Firm should include own health hazard evaluation and proposed recall classification (I, II, or III) to FDA www.mwe.com 23 Planning and Interaction with FDA Firm should prepare and be ready to issue its own notice to customers in lieu of or in advance of FDA press release Firm should maintain constant and regular contact with district office during recall period Firm should always be one step ahead of FDA in planning complete recall strategy, or FDA will set it for the firm Importance of well-reasoned and well-presented basis for recall strategy (including classification, extent of recall into distribution chain) www.mwe.com 24 Thank You Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions jscohen@mwe.com 202-756-8276 www.mwe.com 25