Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale

advertisement
Pain Management 101:
Basic Skills for Opioid Prescribing
Anthony J. Caprio, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Division of Geriatric Medicine
Center for Aging and Health
Palliative Care Consultation Service
University of North Carolina at Chapel
Objectives
1)
Examine the concept and assessment of pain
2)
Illustrate the differences between physical
dependence, tolerance, addiction, and pseudoaddiction.
3)
Practice prescribing opioids for chronic and
acute pain, titrate for adequate pain relief, and
incorporate special dosing considerations
4)
Convert between different opioids and between
different routes of administration
5)
Anticipate and treat side effects of opioids
“Illness is the doctor to whom we
pay most heed; to kindness, to
knowledge, we make promise only;
pain we obey.”
-Marcel Proust
Case: “Please Help Me!”



Mrs. D. has breast cancer with bone
metastases
Received radiation to femur and ribs
Pain previously controlled using
◦ Morphine Extended Release 30mg po q12h
◦ Morphine Immediate Release 5mg q4h prn pain
Now has “excruciating” back and leg pain
 “Please help me! I just want to die!”
 What do you do?

Types of Pain
Nociceptive Pain
1) Somatic: Caused by activation of pain receptors
(nociceptors) in the cutaneous or deep tissues
(musculoskeletal)
2) Visceral Pain: Poorly localized pain sensation from
internal organs and structures (chest, abdomen, pelvis)
Neuropathic Pain:
Results from injury to nervous system (burning or tingling)
5
Pain and Suffering

Suffering is more than the physical
experience of pain

Physical, Emotional, Social, Existential
contributions to the experience of
suffering

Duty of physicians to alleviate suffering

Suffering can never be completely relieved
by opioids
Tolerance

Reduced effectiveness over time

Tolerance to side effects is favorable

Tolerance to analgesia is rarely significant

When increasing doses required, suspect
worsening disease rather than tolerance
7
Physical Dependence

Withdrawal Symptoms produced by
abrupt cessation, rapid dose reduction,
decreasing blood level of the drug and/or
administration of an antagonist

Inevitable physiologic change from use of
opioids

NOT evidence of addiction
8
Addiction

Psychological dependence

Genetic, psychosocial, and environmental factors

Characterized by one or more of the following:
impaired control over drug use, compulsive use,
continued use despite harm, and craving.

Non-adherence to a therapeutic regimen

Differentiate from under-treatment of pain,
criminal drug diversion, and family dysfunction
9
Pseudo-addiction

Mimics addictive behavior, but is due to
the under treatment of pain
◦ hoarding medication
◦ seeking prescriptions from multiple providers
◦ repeatedly requesting more medication

Behavior disappears with proper
treatment
10
Assessing Severity of Pain

Numerical Rating
 Do you have pain?
 How bad is your pain?
 1 (mild) – 10 (severe)

Another way to think
about pain severity:
Mild (1-3)
Moderate (4-7)
Severe (8-10)
11
Pain is Personal

Pain ratings are relative to an individual

One person’s “4/10” may be acceptable
(allowing them to function reasonably well),
while another person’s “4/10” may be
debilitating.

You need to understand and negotiate the
level of pain control which will allow the
patient to tolerate the pain and function
reasonably well.
WHO 3-Step Analgesic Ladder
WHO: World Health Organization (see www.who.int/cancer/palliative/painladder/en)
Starting Opioids

Pick one drug and stick with it
◦ Avoid using multiple opioids simultaneously
◦ You won’t know which one is working or which one is
causing adverse effects
◦ Very confusing (and expensive) for patients

If effective, titrate drug for optimal effect

If not effective (after appropriate dose escalation)
or if limited by side-effects, switch to a different
opioid

Acute pain and chronic pain will have different
dosing considerations
Opioid-Induced Constipation

Never become tolerant and not necessarily dosedependent

ALL opioid prescriptions should be linked to a bowel
regimen (make it routine)

Stimulant laxative is often needed
◦ Stool softener may be helpful, but avoid “All Mush and No
Push”
◦ Schedule senekot (Senna) and titrate as needed

Give a specific plan: “If no BM in x days then take y; if still
no BM, then take z”

Methylnaltrexone is a peripherally-acting mu-opioid
receptor antagonist
Acute Pain Crisis

“An event in which the patient reports pain
that is severe, uncontrolled, and causing
distress for the patient, family members, or
both.”

Requires a “rapid response”

Reassess quickly and repeatedly
◦ frequency is determined by time to peak
concentration of the opioid
JAMA. 2008;299(12):1457-1467
Many Opioids Demonstrate
First Order Kinetics

Peak Plasma
Concentrations (Cmax)
Oral: 60 to 90 min
SC or IM: 30 min
IV: 6 minutes

Half-Life (t1/2)
◦ Often depends on renal
function
◦ Generally 3-4 hrs
◦ Many have active metabolites
Source: Emanuel LL, von Gunten CF, Ferris FD. EPEC curriculum, 1999.
Managing an Acute Pain Crisis

Administer double the rescue (breakthrough)
dose intravenously.

Repeat same dose in 15 minutes if there is no
or minimal pain relief.

If pain persists at 7 or higher on a 10-point
scale without adverse effects, increase the
intravenous rescue dose by 50%.

Continue to administer this dose every 15
minutes until patient experiences more than
50% pain relief or adverse effects develop.
JAMA 2008;299:1457-1467
Titrating Opioids for Pain Relief

For ongoing moderate to severe pain increase
opioids doses by 50-100%

For ongoing mild to moderate pain increase by 2550%

When dose escalating long-acting opioids or opioid
(continuous) infusions, do not increase the longacting drug or infusion basal rate more than 100% at
any one time

Use short-acting medications for breakthrough pain,
keep track of these extra doses and use this
information to adjust doses
Source: Fast Fact #020 www.eperc.mcw.edu
Breakthrough Medications

Generally 10% of the total daily dose

Divided into intervals based on the route of
administration and onset to peak analgesia
(ie. q4hours for oral medications)

More frequent intervals may be necessary

Generally, if a patient is requiring more than 3-4
breakthrough doses per day, you should
consider increasing the long-acting dose
Other Dosing Considerations

Theoretically no ceiling dose for opioids

Elderly
◦
◦
◦
◦

Lower doses of any drug may be necessary
Caution with NSAIDs (bleeding and renal effects)
Tylenol 3g/day maximum
Caution with neuropathic pain medications (start low and go slow;
avoid tricyclic antidepressants)
Renal failure
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Consider 25-50% dose reductions for opioids
Fentanyl and methadone are safest
Hydromorphone (Dilaudid) is a reasonable choice
Oxycodone should be used with caution (can accumulate)
Do Not Use meperidine (Demerol)
Changing Route of Administration

Parenteral (IV/IM) is more potent than oral
(po)

Intravenous and subcutaneous dosing are
usually similar
Oral : Parenteral
Morphine
Hydromorphone
3 :1
5 - 8 : 1 (wide range)
Case: Mrs. D.
1)
Calculate 24-hour oral morphine use:
Morphine 30mg po q12h = 60mg/24h
Morphine 5mg every 4h (prn)  30mg/24h
Total: 90mg oral morphine equivalents/24h
2)
Convert to IV morphine
90mg oral morphine = 30mg iv morphine
3)
Calculate Breakthrough Dose
10% of 30mg = 3mg iv (give q10-15min prn)
Case: Mrs. D’s Pain Crisis
1)
Pain is 10/10
2)
Double dose of the prn
Give at least 6mg iv x 1 now
3)
Re-evaluate in 15 minutes
Pain still rated 10/10
4)
Give another 6mg iv x 1
5)
Re-evaluate in 15 minutes
Pain rated 8/10
6)
Consider giving 9mg iv (50% increase)
7)
Re-evaluate pain in 15 minutes
Pain rated 5/10
50% reduction of her pain with 21mg iv morphine over 45 minutes
Indications for Changing Opioids
Intolerable adverse effects
2) Poor analgesic efficacy despite dose titration
3) Drug-drug interactions
4) Preference or need for a different route of
administration
5) Change in clinical status or clinical setting that
necessitates an opioid with different
properties
6) Financial or drug-availability considerations
1)
J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38:418-425.
Common Adverse Effects

Constipation

Nausea
◦
◦
◦
◦

Common adverse effect, not an allergy
Try antiemtics, trying other opioid or adjusting dose
Likely will become tolerant to these effects
Consider other causes of nausea like chemo and constipation
Sedation
◦
◦
◦
◦
Tolerance usually develops in 24-72 hours
Appears well before respiratory depression
Decrease dose or increase interval
Caution when starting neuropathic pain medications
(additive effects)
◦ Consider other sources of fatigue and sedation
(disease progression, process of dying)
26
Other Adverse Effects

Urinary retention

Delirium
◦ Consider rotating opioid, try lower doses
◦ Avoid anticholinergics and sedatives

Myoclonus
◦ observed with renal insufficiency, hepatic
insufficiency, and high opioid doses
◦ Switch opioids, correct electrolytes if possible
◦ Benzodiazepines may be helpful
Equianalgesic Dosing

No “one-size fits all” approach
◦ Genetic differences may account for variance
◦ Pain is complex and often has many components

Starting doses and equianalgesic conversions
are educated guesses (at best)

Assume that you will need to adjust up or
down based on clinical judgment
Equianalgesic Table
Not based on much evidence
 Large variability observed
 Table does not replace clinical judgment


You need to think and reassess, not just
plug-in numbers and write orders!
J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38:426-439
UNC HealthCare “Pain Card”
http://pharmacy.intranet.unchealthcare.org/clinresources/clinguidelines/pain.pdf
Equianalgesic Dosing:
More Than Just Reading the Table

Step 1:
◦ Calculate equianalgesic dose from table
◦ Apply “safety factor”: 25 - 50% automatic reduction to account
for incomplete cross-tolerance and individual variation
Exceptions: methadone (reduce more), transdermal fentanyl patch (safety factor
built-in to conversion tables) and transmucosal fentanyl (use lowest dose)

Step 2:
◦ Consider severity of the pain and other medical or psychosocial
factors that potentially alter potency or shift the likelihood that the
initial dose of the new drug will be analgesic, relatively free of
adverse effects, and unlikely to precipitate withdrawal
◦ Determine whether to apply an additional increase or decrease
of 15% - 30%
J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38:418-425.
Case: Mrs. D.

Eventually titrated to morphine PCA 6mg/h iv
over then next 2 days with better pain control
but increased itching and “jerking” noted

Convert to oral oxycodone
◦
◦
◦
◦

Morphine iv 6mg/h x 24h = 144mg
Oral morphine equivalents = 432mg
Oxycodone (oral) : Morphine (oral) = 1 : 1.5
Set-up ratio and then X= 432/1.5 = 288mg
Oxycodone equianlagesic dose = 288mg
Case: Dosing Considerations

Reduce dose by 50% for incomplete cross-tolerance

Increase dose by 20% based on your clinical judgment
◦
◦
◦
◦

Normal renal and hepatic function
Severe pain coming into hospital, still not optimally controlled
No problems with sedation
Good social support and will be monitored at home
Net effect is dose reduction by 30%
◦ 30% of Oxycodone 288mg ≈ 200mg

Prescribe
◦ Oxycodone Sustained Release 100mg po q12h
◦ Oxycodone Immediate Release 20mg po q4h prn breakthrough pain
(10% of 200mg = 20mg)
Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA)

Advantages:
◦ Quick administration
◦ Patient “in-control”
◦ Record of demands to help with dose titration

Disadvantages:
◦ can’t be used by delirious patients or those with an altered LOC
◦ reduces an important element of nursing pain assessment
◦ patient may avoid demands

Dosing considerations
◦ basal vs. demand
◦ basal + demand

Need to review PCA logs and interpret the MAR
Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) Orders

Continuous infusion Rate: mg/hr or mcg/hr
-Depends on whether patient is opioid naïve, nature of the pain, and any
previous information about opioid needs

Demand Dose: mg or mcg
(‘patient initiated dose,’ ‘patient demand dose,’ or ‘bolus dose’)
-Based on patterns of breakthrough pain, consider a bolus dose of 50% 150% of the hourly rate

Dosing Interval (Delay Interval): minutes
-Peak analgesic effect from an IV bolus dose is 5-10 minutes
-Should be in the range of 10-20 minutes

Hour Limit: mg or mcg
-Maximum amount of drug to be dispensed in a defined period of time
-Often set to deliver 3-5 times the estimated required hourly dose
Methadone

NMDA receptor antagonist and mu-opioid receptor agonist
properties
◦ Decreasing opioid tolerance
◦ Attenuating neuropathic pain

No active metabolites, not removed by dialysis

Inexpensive and Long-acting

Disadvantages
◦
◦
◦
◦

Non-linear conversion
Risk for overdose (by both prescribers and patients)
Many drug interactions
QTc prolongation
ASK for help with dosing!!
Pitfalls

Under-treated pain
◦ Avoiding opioids or not increasing the dose of an opioid
◦ Too long of an interval between breakthrough doses

Long-acting vs. short-acting opioids
◦ Starting long-acting opioids in a opioid-naïve patient
◦ Using long-acting medications for breakthrough pain

Precipitating opioid-withdrawal by abruptly stopping (or dosereducing) opioids

Treating patients with opioids but missing other sources of suffering

Methadone dosing without understanding pharmacokinetics

Potentially exceeding 4g of acetaminophen/day (3g/day in elderly)
Mrs. D.

PCA morphine is reduced and then discontinued
after po oxycodone sustained release is started

Myoclonus and itching resolve

Pain is generally 2-3/10 with exacerbations up to
6/10, treated with immediate release oxycodone

Also started on dexamethasone and evaluated for
additional radiation therapy

Discharged home with outpatient follow-up

Taking about 2-3 immediate release oxycodone
daily and able to care for herself and family
Summary

All patients on chronic opioid therapy will
develop physical dependence
◦ Tolerance develops
◦ Withdrawal symptoms if opioid is stopped

Few patients will become addicted to
opioids with appropriate prescribing and
assessments

Pseudo-addictive behavior related to the
under-treatment of pain
Summary (cont’d)

Pain crisis may require repeated q15min iv
opioid dosing until pain <7/10 or 50%
reduction in pain scores

Titrate opioids based on severity of pain

Breakthrough about 10% of total daily dose
given as short-acting opioid PRN; for oral
opioids generally no longer than q4h dosing
intervals

If >3-4 breakthrough doses per day, need to
titrate long-acting opioids
Summary (cont’d)

Try to use only one drug at a time

Parenteral is more potent than oral

Use equianalgesic tables with caution
◦ Automatic dose reduction by 25-50%
◦ Increase or decrease by 15-30% based on clinical
judgment
◦ Dose-reduce for advanced age and renal impairment

Ask for help with methadone dosing

Bowel regimen with every opioid prescription!!
Closing Thoughts
1)
Patients are different; pain relief and side effects will
vary with the same dose of the same medication
2)
Incomplete or inconsistent literature regarding
dosing, conversions, and equianalgesic tables
3)
Clinical judgment is key; no card, lecture, or
consultant can replace good judgment
4)
Good judgment comes from thoughtfulness, careful
observation/assessments, and lots of practice
5)
Suffering is more than the physical experience of
pain; suffering can never be completely relieved by
opioids
Download