Lecture 2: Relativistic Space-Time • Invariant Intervals & Proper Time • Lorentz Transformations • Electromagnetic Unification • Equivalence of Mass and Energy • Space-Time Diagrams • Relativistic Optics Useful Sections in Rindler: Section 6-7, 19-21, 15-18 Einstein’s Two Postulates of Special Relativity: I. The laws of physics are identical in all inertial frames II. Light propagates in vacuum rectilinearly, with the same speed at all times, in all directions and in all inertial frames Time Dilation: d t d c= t t -v v v v v v d x = vt d2 +v2t 2 =(d/t )2+v2 =(c /t )2 + v2 t c= t t = t 1 - (v/c)2 Recall: d2 +(x )2 c= t (c t )2 = d2 + (x )2 Thus, d2 = (c t )2 - (x )2 invariant choose frame ''at rest” or, more generally, S2 = (c t )2 - [(x )2+ (y ''Invariant Interval” )2+ (z )2 ] = (c t)2 “Proper Time” Lorentz Transformations: Consider light beam moving along positive x-axis: x = ct x - ct = 0 or Similarly, in the moving frame, we want to have x = ct x - ct = 0 or x - ct = a(x - ct ) We can insure this is the case if: Generally, the factor could be different for motion in the opposite direction: Subtracting x + ct = b(x + ct ) t = (a+ b) 2 t - = (a+ b) 2 [t - = A [t - (a-b) 2 x/c (a-b) x/c (a+b) ] Bx/c ] t = A [t t = A t - Bx/c ] So, we know that A = g (at fixed x) Similarly, x = g [ x - Bct ] In non-relativistic limit (g 1) : x [ x - Bct ] Must correspond to Galilean transformation, so Bc = v B = v/c x = g [ x - vt ] t = g [ t - (v/c2)x ] ''Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction” ''Aether Drag” George Francis Fitzgerald Maxwell’s Equations Hendrik Antoon Lorentz Lab Frame v +q - + - + - + F I (pure magnetic) B - + In Frame of Test Charge +q F (pure electrostatic) - + + + + - + Lorentz Lorentz expanded contracted Symmetry: The effect of a force looks the same when viewed from reference frames boosted in the perpendicular direction Electricity & Magnetism are identically the same force, just viewed from different reference frames UNIFICATION !! (thanks to Lorentz invariance) Lab Frame v - + +q - + - + F I F = qv B | F | = qv Imo/ (2pr) B llab+ = l llab- = l + lq- = lg lq = lg + l´ = lq+ - l- = l(g-1g) =lgb2 - + (pure magnetic) In Frame of Test Charge - +q + E = l / 2preo = lgv2 / (2preoc2) = lgv2 mo/ (2pr) + - + F Lorentz Lorentz expanded contracted (pure electrostatic) | F ´| = Eq = lgv2 moq / (2pr) lv = I | F ´| = gIvmoq / (2pr) | F | = | F ´| / g = qvImo / (2pr) Einstein’s The 2 Postulates of Special Relativity: I. The laws of physics are identical in all inertial frames II. Light propagates in vacuum rectilinearly, with the same speed at all times, in all directions and in all inertial frames Planck’s recommendation for Einstein’s nomination to the Prussian Academy in 1913: “In summary, one can say that there is hardly one among the great problems in which modern physics is so rich to which Einstein has not made a remarkable contribution. That he may sometimes have missed the target in his speculations, as, for example, in his hypothesis of light quanta, cannot really be held against him, for it is not possible to introduce really new ideas even in the most exact sciences without sometimes taking a risk.” 1905 “Einstein’s Box”: L emitter E/c = Mv recoil p=Mv motion stops distance travelled d = vt = v (L/c) = EL/(Mc2) But no external forces, so CM cannot change! Must have done the equivalent of shifting some mass m to other side, such that Md = mL p = h/l (De Broglie) E = pc p=E/c absorber E = hn (Planck) = hc/l M {EL/(Mc2)} = m L Space-Time: ct +y -x +x -y ct returns to point of origin ct2 slope = (ct2 - ct1)/(x2-x1) = ct/x = c/v = 1/b moves with constant velocity (b) until t2 ct1 object stationary until time t1 -x x1 x2 +x ct tanq = x/ct = v/c = b light sent backwards v=c v=c qmax = 45° q 45° -x tanqmax = 1 45° +x ct “absolute future” “absolute elsewhere” -x no message sent from the origin can be received by observers at x1 until time t1 ct1 x1 “absolute past” +x there is no causal contact until they are “inside the light cone” ct “absolute future” “absolute elsewhere” -x +x “absolute past” ct q -x +x ct q -x +x ct q -x +x ct q -x +x ct q -x +x ct q q -x +x ct q q -x +x S ct S´ q q -x +x Spacetime Showdown -x ct +x Relativistic Optics v t = g t f = 1/t = 1/gt = f/ g Transverse Doppler Reddening a a a a a v a v a a v/c v a1 - (v/c)2 a v/c (a v/c)2 + (a1 - (v/c)2 )2 = a2 Terrell Rotation (1959) a1 - (v/c)2 v a1 - (v/c)2 a v/c (a v/c)2 + (a 1 - (v/c)2 )2 = a2 Penrose (1959): A Sphere By Any Other Frame Is Just As Round h h v d More generally, from somewhat off-axis hyperbolic curvature h h v d SS 433 Jet orientation fixed by relative Doppler shifts History of jet precession (period = 162 days) vt d s If assumed distance to object increases, so must the distance traversed by jet to preserve same angular scale for “peaks” and, hence, jet velocity must increase. q Light observed from a given point in the jet was produced t = (s-d)/c earlier, thus distorting the apparent orientation of the loops Can fit distance to the source = 5.5 kpc (K. Blundell & M. Bowler) Can even show evidence of jet speed variations! Angular compression towards centre of field-of-view Intensity = light received solid angle increases towards centre “Headlight Effect” From “Visualizing Special Relativity” www.anu.edu.au/Physics/Searle