LRFD – Floor beam Unbraced top flange Lateral Torsion Buckling We have to check if there is plastic failure (yielding) or lateral-torsion buckling. This depends on the length between the lateral braces, related to the limiting lengths. Lp is the limiting length for plastic failure Lr is the limit length for torsional buckling. If Lb < Lp it is plastic failure If Lp < Lb < Lr we have a different failure criteria If Lb > Lr we use the lateral buckling stress criteria Plastic Failure If Lb < Lp Mn = Mp = sy Zx Zx is the plastic section modulus about the x axis Lp < Lb < Lr Mn Cb M p M p 0.7sy Sx L L b p L L M p r p Lb > Lr Mn = scrSx ≤ Mp The following definitions apply 2 Cb E Jc Lb scr 2 1 0.078 Lb Sx ho rts r ts 2 Lp 1.76 ry E Lr 1.95 rts 0.7 s y E sy 2 0.7sy Sx h0 J c 1 1 6.76 Sx h0 EJc c For a doubly symmetric I-shape c=1 For a channel, h0 Iy c 2 Cw Where h0 = distance between flange centroids Conservative simplifications Cb E scr Lb rts 2 Lr rts E 0.7s y r 2 ts I y Cw Sx A beam of A992 steel with a span of 20 feet supports a stub pipe column with a factored load combination of 55 kips A992 Steel: structural steel, used in US for I-beams. Density = 7.85 g/cm3. Yield strength = 50 ksi. No flooring – no lateral bracing on top flange Find max moment. Assume beam weighs 50 lbs/ft From distributed load, Mmax = w L2/8 From point load, Mmax = P L / 4 Mmax = 55,000 * (20/4) + 50 * (20^2)/8 = 277.5 kip-ft Use trial method • Find a beam that has a fMp of at least 277.5 kip-ft • • • • • Need to check if it will fail in plastic mode (Mp) or from flange rotation (Mr) Tables will show limiting unbraced lengths. Lp is full plastic capacity Lr is inelastic torsional buckling. If our length is less than Lp, use Mp. If greater than Lr, use Mr Selected W Shape Properties – Grade 50 Prop W18x35 W18x40 W21x50 W21x62 fMp (kip-ft) 249 294 416 540 Lp (ft) 4.31 4.49 4.59 6.25 Lr (ft) 11.5 12.0 12.5 16.7 fMr (kip-ft) 173 205 285 381 Sx (in3) 57.6 68.4 94.5 127 Iy (in4) 15.3 19.1 24.9 57.5 ho (in) 17.28 17.38 20.28 20.39 ry (in) 1.22 1.27 1.30 1.77 J (in4) 0.506 0.81 1.14 57.5 Cw 1140 1440 2560 5970 W18 x 40 looks promising 294 > 277.5 But, Lp = 4.49. Our span is 20 feet. And, Lr = 12.0 again, less than 20’ fMr = 205, which is too small. W21x50 has Lr = 12.5, and fMr = 285. That could work! Nominal flexural design stress Mn = scr Sx The buckling stress, scr , is given as 2 Cb E Jc Lb scr 2 1 0.078 Lb Sx ho rts r ts 2 Terms in the equation rts = effective radius of gyration h0 = distance between flange centroids J = torsional constant (torsional moment of inertia) Cw = warping constant c = 1.0 for doubly symmetric I-shape Effective radius of gyration 2 ts r rts I y Cw Sx 24.9 • 2560 1.635 in 94.5 So the critical stress is 2 1.0 2 29,000 1.14 • 1.0 20 • 12 scr 18.77 ksi 2 1 0.078 20 x 12 94.5 • 20.28 1.635 1.635 Then the nominal moment is Mn = scr Sx = 18.77 • 94.5 = 1,774 kip-in = 147.9 kip-ft We need 277.5!! If we had the AISC design manual, they show unbraced moment capabilities of beams. We would have selected W21x62, which turns out to handle 315.2 kip-ft unbraced.