Turning Research into an Article for
Feminist Economics and other
Scholarly Journals
Günseli Berik and Diana Strassmann
Editors, Feminist Economics
Barcelona, June 27-29, 2012
This PowerPoint presentation is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs License; additional terms may apply.
Key Questions
• What are the characteristics of a good article?
• How can you enhance your chances of publication?
• Common submission mistakes
• Where to submit?
• How to respond to conflicting reviews
• What if your paper is rejected?
• What is a good example of an empirical Feminist
Economics article?
Common Starting Points
• Crafting a paper from:
• A PhD dissertation or a Master’s Thesis
• A Report
• Keep in mind that journals care about importance,
originality, and potential impact of their papers
• Remember: an article is not a report
Developing Your Article:
A Good Article
What are the characteristics of a good article?
• A well-focused research question, situated within
the literature
• Makes the case for the importance, originality,
and potential impact of the article
• Is a good fit for the journal:
• genre
• mission
• current debates
Developing Your Article: Share
Your Draft Paper with Others
• Form a network of peers
• Workshop your paper locally
• Present your paper at conferences
• Respond to the advice you get
• Ask others to comment on your paper
• Consider a co-author
Developing Your Article:
For Non-native English Speakers
• Short sentences
• Use grammar and spell check
• Solicit advice on usage/language
• Consider professional editing help
Consider the Journal’s
Audience
• Revise papers originally developed for an audience
different from your target journal’s
• e.g., national audience, specialist group, conference,
etc.
• Provide a contextual framework, especially for
broader or different audiences
• Consider genre, length, and level of detail
appropriate for your audience
• Read and follow journal policies and guidelines
carefully
Developing Your Article:
International Orientation
• Explain things unique to your country
• Do not treat a phenomenon as though a particular
country's experience is universal
• Explain country-specific economic behaviors and
international relevance
• Include citations to contributions from other parts of
the world
• Specify geographical context of any cited studies
Developing Your Article:
Choosing a Journal
Many possible reasons for choosing a journal
• potential impact on debates
• prestige, reputation, impact ranking
• reviewing speed
• audience for journal
• which issues/proportion of journal
welcome “open” submissions?
• diversity in where you publish
How to Judge Whether Your Paper
Might Fit
• Review the journal’s website
• Examine the journal’s mission
• Look at past and themed issues
• Consider whether you could connect your paper to
better fit into the forum
Edited Books versus Journals
Disadvantages of books
• Not a referred publication
• If not yet accepted by a press, may not get published
• Contents often less accessible through indexing and
reference sources (can lead to lower impact, citations)
• Many universities count book essays as less important
• Often published more slowly than themed journal
special issues; more expensive
Revise Your Paper to Better Fit
the Journal
• Recast introduction and reorient paper
• Consider the journal’s audience
• Engage with and cite existing literature, especially if
from the journal
• Conform to journal guidelines and policies
Conform to Journal Policies
and Guidelines
• Read policies and guidelines carefully
• If any are not clear, ask for clarification
• Most journals do not permit submissions under review
elsewhere or already published in a book
• Follow procedures to the letter to avoid reviewing
delays and rejections
Rewrite Again
• Get more feedback after recasting paper
• Make sure paper is clearly developed and tightly
argued
• Don’t include excessive tables
During and After the
Reviewing Period
• Contact the editor if you have questions or if you have
particular circumstances (upcoming review)
• Ask for clarifications if you don’t understand a revision
request or if you would like more guidance
• Alert the editor as soon as possible if you need extra
time to revise, particularly if you’ve been given a
deadline
• Don’t ignore revision requests: if you disagree, explain
your position thoroughly and respectfully
After Acceptance
• Respond punctually to queries, requests for publishing
agreements, and proofs
• Keep in mind journal’s copyediting processes are meant
to improve paper’s readability and citations
• Don’t expect that paper will appear in next issue;
journals often have planned their contents several
issues ahead
Participating in a Community
of Scholars
• Offer to review papers, and if invited to do so,
accept and do a careful, timely job
• Acknowledge the help of others
Example: Empirical Feminist
Economics Article
Structure of an Article*
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology and Analysis
4. Discussion of Results
5. Conclusions
6. References
7. Appendix
* Section headings do not have to be cut and dried as above,
but each should signal the content of the section.
1. Introduction
Provides an overview of the article
• What is the research problem?
• Why is this an important research question?
• Spells out the main positions in the literature to
situate the problem
• Places the paper within the journal’s mission
(engages with topics, ideas addressed by journal)
• How will you analyze this issue?
• What contribution is the research likely to make to
the literature?
2. Literature Review
• Purpose: to justify the article by evaluating the state
of knowledge on the topic; provides context
• What do we already know about this issue?
• What is contested?
• What do we not know?
• Join a conversation: tie your paper in with current
discussions
• Engage with other papers published by the journal on
the topic
2. Literature Review:
A Critical, Thematic Evaluation
Identify the main trends and patterns in the literature:
• Contribution of each scholar’s work
• Common/differing assumptions; concepts;
methodologies
• The points of agreement/disagreement among authors
• Strengths and weaknesses of studies
• The evolution of literature on the topic in recent years
2. Literature Review
A Critical, Thematic Evaluation
• Avoids stacking summaries of one study after another
• Shift the focus from existing literature to the
argument you are developing
• Be selective in citations: “Why am I including this
reference?” The answer must:
• Make a similar argument or an argument you are
disagreeing with
• Illustrate a weakness that you propose to overcome
2. Literature Review
The Relevant Literature
• Move from general statements on background to
detailed and critical evaluation
• Three types of relevance:
1. Background
•
acknowledge, but not at length or in detail
•
e.g. studies on history of the problem
2. Somewhat relevant
•
greater attention but without critical detail
•
e.g. general literature on the problem
3. The most relevant
•
careful examination of studies that directly pertains to article
•
e.g. region- or country-specific literature
2. Literature Review
The Relevant Literature Example
Topic: Microcredit in Kenya
Question: Does microcredit empower women in Kenya?
Literature review:
•
Poverty reduction policies in developing countries
•
General literature (mostly South Asia focused) on the question
•
Sub-saharan Africa and/or Kenya-specific literature on poverty reduction
policies and microcredit-empowerment nexus
Literature review could span separate sections, each with
informative and engaging headings
2. Literature Review
The Relevant Literature Example
Question: What is the impact of financial crisis of 2008 on
gender inequalities in labor market of country X?
Literature review:
• Background on Country X macroeconomic policies
• General literature on the question (includes review of
methodologies used, empirical findings)
• Regional and/or Country X-specific literature on the question
2. Literature Review
Thesis Statement
• Comes at the end of the literature review
• concludes section with the most relevant literature
• Explain how your study will
• fill the gap or add to the scholarship
• connect and contribute to the accumulated knowledge
on the topic
• Explain what you expect to find or show
• Bridge into the Methodology section of the paper
Make Clear Your Contribution
• Old question/new evidence
• Old question/new methodology (and evidence)
• New question
• New theory
Indicate contribution in the Introduction, the thesis
statement, Methodology, and Conclusion sections
Do not claim as original the points already made in
previously published papers.
3. Methodology and Analysis
• Explain:
• how you will examine the research problem
• the methodology and the data you will use
• The analysis (e.g. regression analysis)
• Aim to communicate methodology to a broad
audience
• Avoid excessive jargon
4. Discussion of Results
Focus on the results that are most relevant for your
paper’s main question/argument
• Not every single coefficient
• Not every robustness check
5. Conclusions
• Summary of the main findings
• Discussion of implications of the study
• e.g. theoretical, empirical, or policy
• Emphasize the contribution of the study to existing
literature
• Future directions for research (the gaps that
emerge/are left based on your article)
Overview of a Research Article
FE Questions to Reviewers
1. Does the manuscript make an important contribution to feminist economic
scholarship?
2. Does the manuscript build upon and adequately reference the appropriate
literature?
3. Is the manuscript clearly written and accessible to a broad audience with any
tables and figures clearly laid out?
4. Is the manuscript’s length appropriate to its purpose? Are there an
appropriate number of tables and/or figures?
5. Is the manuscript appropriately worded for an international audience e.g.
with specific country references and institutional definitions included where
necessary? (Please see the journal's policy on international orientation.)
6. If statistical techniques are used, is the journal's policy on statistical
reporting adhered to? (Please see the journal's policy on statistical
reporting.)