All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Challenge Us Specified Domestic Transactions BMR & Associates LLP Privileged & confidential All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative Budget 2012 Agenda Transfer Pricing - Concept All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Domestic Transactions - What Has Changed Specified Domestic Transactions Key TP Audit Issues Way Forward 3 Transfer Pricing BMR & Associates LLP Privileged & confidential All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative Concepts What is Transfer Pricing? Transfer Pricing (TP) is a mechanism for the pricing of goods and services between related entities Tangible Goods Intangible Goods – trademarks, trade-names, patents Services – management, engineering, after-sales services and ensuring an appropriate allocation of income between the various tax jurisdictions (usually) in which a multinational company operates. TP for tax purposes is governed by local jurisdictional authorities. More than 50 countries have issued formal rules regulating transfer pricing practices. The regulations, in most instances, are accompanied by documentation requirements and penalty provisions for non-compliance. TP Regulations introduced in India in FY 2001-02 for International Transactions. Specified Domestic transactions included in the scope of TP w.e.f. FY 2012-13 (Finance Bill 2012) 5 All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose TP mechanism provides the conceptual framework for pricing intercompany transactions Domestic Transactions BMR & Associates LLP Privileged & confidential All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative What has changed Budget 2012 – Scope Of Transfer Pricing Regulations Expanded Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘IT Act’) already contain provisions to curb claim of excess expenditure / re-compute the income on transactions between related parties Scope of Transfer Pricing (‘TP’) regulations expanded to include ‘specified domestic transactions’ (‘SDT’) if aggregated value of such transactions exceeds INR 5 crs during the year ‘Specified domestic transactions’ cover: Expenses or payments made to domestic related persons as specified in Section 40(A)(2)(b) Transactions between undertakings of same taxpayer or transactions by taxpayer with closely connected persons for purpose of Chapter VI-A (which includes 80-IA) and Section 10AA Rationale of applicability of TP regulations to domestic transactions Objectivity of determining income and reasonable expenditure between related parties TP regulations now applicable to SDT Preparation of Form No. 3CEB and TP study report mandatory 7 All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Section 40A(2) disallows excess / unreasonable expenses between related parties Section 80IA(8) / 80IA(10) – Tax officer empowered to re-compute the income of eligible undertaking based on fair market value if transactions with related parties or other undertakings of same entity is not as per market value BMR & Associates LLP Privileged & confidential All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative Specified Domestic Transactions Specified Domestic Transactions any expenditure in respect of which payment has been made or to be made to a specified person [section 40A(2)(b)]; any transaction referred to in section 80A; any business transacted between the taxpayer and other person as referred to in subsection (10) of section 80-IA; any transaction, referred to in any other section under Chapter VI-A or section 10AA, to which provisions of sub-section (8) or sub-section (10) of section 80-IA are applicable; or any other transaction as may be prescribed Applicability Applicable where aggregate amount of exceeds INR 5 crores (approximately USD 1 million) in a year. Applicable from Financial Year (FY) 2012-13 onwards All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose any transfer of goods or services referred to in sub-section (8) of section 80-IA; Who are the specified persons - Section 40A(2)(b) Section 40A(2)(b) - list of persons/ entities to be treated as related parties/ specified persons Specified persons having substantial interest ( i.e. more than 20% voting power or share in Scope expanded to include sister concerns Illustrative list of entities/ persons that may be included for a corporate taxpayer (not an exhaustive list): a) those holding 20% or more equity in the tax payer; b) companies whose 20% or more shares are held by such a company that holds more than 20% equity in the tax payer; c) those companies in which the tax payer holds 20% or more equity; d) Directors of tax payer company, and relatives of such Directors; e) Directors of companies in category (a) above; and relatives of such Directors; f) If an individual holds 20% or more equity in the tax payer, then relatives of such an individual; all other companies where such individual is a Director; all other Directors of such a company, and relatives of all such Directors; etc All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose profits) in taxpayer’s business and vice-versa covered Indirect interest illustrated Related parties as mentioned u/s 40A(2)(b) Direct Interest X1 X2 Indirect Interest X Coverage Substantial direct and indirect interest? X1 X2 X3 X5 X4 X6 X7 X3 X8 X5 X4 X6 X7 X8 All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Transactions between sister concerns now covered X Tax Holiday - Transfer Pricing Test Sub-section (8) of section 80-IA (and similar such provisions in 10AA and Chapter VI-A) Inter unit transfers (goods and services etc.) Tax holiday unit Other unit Sub-section (10) of section 80-IA (and similar such provisions in 10AA and Chapter VI-A Tax holiday company Business transacted (wider than transfer of goods or services) Other person having close connection More than ordinary profits earned by business unit claiming deduction (adherence to ALP proposed) Transactions to be reported in Accountant’s Report and arms’ length nature to be substantiated in the TP Documentation All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Not corresponding to market value (adherence to ALP proposed) Section Nature of undertaking covered 80IA Undertakings engaged in Developing, operating and maintaining, developing and operating and maintaining infrastructure facilities Generation/ transmission or distribution of power Reconstruction / revival of power generating plants 80IB Undertakings located/ engaged in Industrially backward districts as notified Scientific research and development Refining mineral oil / commercial production of natural gas Operating cold chain facility for agricultural produce Processing, preservation and packing of meat / meat products or poultry / marine/dairy products Operating and maintaining a hospital of specified capacity 80IC Undertaking located in notified Centre/ Parks/ Areas in Sikkim Himachal Pradesh/ Uttaranchal North –Eastern states 80ID Undertaking engaged in business of hotel / convention centre in specified areas/ districts 10AA Undertakings having a Special Economic Zone unit All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Tax Holiday beneficiaries impacted by Domestic TP X Ltd. X Ltd. X Ltd. (non-tax holiday) (non-tax holiday) (non-tax holiday) Sale at 120 v/s ALP (ie 100) Y Ltd. (non-tax holiday) Disallowance of INR 20 [40A(2)(b)] Sale at 120 v/s ALP (100) Sale at 80 v/s ALP (100) Y Ltd. Y Ltd. (tax holiday) (tax holiday) Double Disallowance INR 40 [40A(2)(b) and excessive profit] Inefficient pricing structure – Reduced tax holiday benefit All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Possible Tax Leakages – If ALP Not Followed (Illustrations) Penalties Penalty In case of a post-inquiry adjustment, there is deemed to be a concealment of income 100-300% of tax on the adjusted amount Failure to maintain documents 2% of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction Failure to furnish documents 2% of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction Failure to furnish accountant’s report INR 100,000 Failure to report a transaction in accountant’s report 2% of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction Maintaining or furnishing incorrect information or documents 2% of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction Maintenance of contemporaneous and robust documentation is the key to avoid penalties 15 All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Default BMR & Associates LLP Privileged & confidential For discussion purposes only All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative Way Forward Next Steps Immediate Identification of: covered entities and persons covered transactions Review of the pricing mechanism for the covered transactions Planning for corrective steps to be taken: Functions, Assets and Risk (FAR)analysis Economic Analysis including Benchmarking for price setting Ongoing Review of existing transaction for change in facts and circumstances Examining any new transactions and reviewing the pricing mechanism for such transaction Year end compliance Preparation of Transfer Pricing Documentation (TP Report): Covered persons Covered transactions Nature and quantum of transactions Arm’s length pricing of all such transactions using Prescribed methods Filing of Accountant’s Report in [Form No. 3CEB] within the prescribed time limit i.e. 30th November of the relevant assessment year All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose BMR & Associates LLP Privileged & confidential All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative TP Regime in India and the approach to be adopted Transfer Pricing Documentation – Sec 92D / Rule 10D Price related Profile of industry Transaction terms Agreements Profile of group Functional analysis Invoices (functions, assets and risks) Profile of taxpayer Pricing related Economic analysis (method Profile of associated correspondence selection, comparable enterprises (letters, emails etc) benchmarking) Contemporaneous documentation requirement Forecasts, budgets,– Rule 10D estimates Documentation to be retained for 9 years No specific documentation requirement if the value of specified transactions is less than one crore rupees. 19 All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Transaction related Entity related Accountants Report – Sec 92E / Rule 10E To be filed by the due date for filing return of income (no e-filing) Opinion whether prescribed documents have been maintained the particulars in the report are “true and correct” Form No. 3CEB [See rule 10E] Report from an accountant to be furnished under section 92E relating to international transaction(s) 1. We have examined the accounts and records of ENTITY NAME AND POSTAL ADDRESS - PAN No. relating to the international transactions entered into by the assessee during the previous year ending on 31st March 2012. 2. In our opinion proper information and documents as are prescribed have been kept by the assessee in respect of the international transaction (s) entered into so far as appears from our examination of the records of the assessee. 3. The particulars required to be furnished under section 92E are given in the Annexure to this Form. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the particulars given in the Annexure are true and correct. Review is limited to specified domestic transaction conducted by assessee Relevant annexures and appendices be attached Inputs: Related party ledgers extracts Related party Schedule under AS-18 Sample Invoices/ Vouchers / DN / CN Relevant intra-group agreements CUP information All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose To be obtained by every person entering into a specified domestic transaction Place : Chennai Date : For B S R & Co. Chartered Accountants 20 Computation of Arm’s Length Price – Section 92C of the Act Determination of ALP using one of the Prescribed methods – Best suited to the facts and circumstances of each particular specified domestic transaction and Provides the most reliable measure of an arm’s length price in relation to the specified domestic transaction shall be “Most Appropriate Method” Prescribed Methods Traditional Transaction Method CUP Method & Sixth Method RPM Method CPLM Method Transactional Profit Method PSM Method All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Where more than one ALP is determined, the arithmetic mean of such prices is taken to be the ALP TNMM Method No hierarchy or preference of methods prescribed under the Act 21 Methods CUP and Sixth Method RPM Product Comparability Very High High Functional Comparability Approach Remarks Medium Prices are benchmarked Very difficult to apply as very high degree of comparability required Medium GPM (on sales) benchmarked Difficult to apply as high degree of comparability required Difficult to apply as high degree of comparability required CPLM High High GPM (on costs) benchmarked PSM Medium Very High Profit Margins TNMM Medium Very High Net Profit Margins Complex Method, sparingly used Most commonly used Method 22 All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Summary of Methods BMR & Associates LLP Privileged & confidential All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative BMR Approach Transfer Pricing Process Stage 5 Stage 4 Stage 2 Stage 3 Pre-project planning • Preparation of project plan Functional analysis Information gathering • Interviews • Questionnaires Comparable data / Industry Analysis • Search strategy • Discussions with • Access to local & global database Management • Analysis of • Characterisation internal of each entity comparables • Judicious • Agreement identification of reviews arm’s length range Economic Analysis • Understand existing costing mechanism • Determination of billing methodology Issuance of Transfer Pricing Documentation • Consultation with management • Finalization of Transfer pricing documentation 24 All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Stage 1 TP Documentation Methodology 3 4 Documentation 2 Functional Analysis Economic Analysis/ Benchmarking 5 Accountant’s Report This exercise will assist in meeting the taxpayer’s requirements from a TP perspective All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose 1 Information Gathering TP Documentation Methodology – Detailed steps STEP 1 – Information Gathering Industry profile Taxpayer‘s profile AE’s profile Price Related Transaction terms, forecasts and budget estimates Market Profile Functional analysis – functions performed, assets used & risk assumed Economic Analysis - method selection & benchmarking Sequential progression Transaction Related Agreements Invoices Pricing related correspondence – letters, e-mails, etc. All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Entity Related TP Documentation Methodology – detailed steps (contd...) STEP 2 – Functional Analysis Functional analysis based on information gathered in Step 1 Audit of the functions performed, assets utilised and risks assumed by Taxpayer for the specified Conduct interviews with company management and business personnel to understand the business/ strategic objectives from a TP perspective Document the functional analysis STEP 3 – Economic Analysis/ Benchmarking Select the ‘most appropriate method’ based on functional interview and availability of data Searching for comparable transactions/ companies using internal data and/ or publicly available databases at our disposal Apply quantitative and qualitative screens with appropriate financial adjustment to the comparables Conclude if Taxpayer‘s related party transactions comply with the arm’s length standard All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose domestic transactions being tested TP Documentation Methodology – detailed steps (contd...) STEP 4 – Documentation Preparation of draft TP Documentation that incorporates findings resulting from the above mentioned steps Incorporate Taxpayer‘s review comments and issue the final TP Documentation Timelines: Usually 6-8 weeks from the date of receiving required information STEP 5 – Accountant’s Report by a Chartered Accountant Firm Liaison with Taxpayer‘s personnel, after the close of statutory accounts to arrange for Accountant’s Report completion in the prescribed format Timelines: Usually 2 weeks from the date of receiving required information All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Discuss these findings with Taxpayer to ensure factual consistency BMR & Associates LLP Privileged & confidential All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative Thank You All rights reserved | Preliminary & Tentative | Draft for discussion purpose Challenge Us