Chapter 2. Hardware Comparison 1. 2-Socket Rack-Mounted Servers HP ProLiant DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 2. 1-Socket Rack-Mounted Servers HP ProLiant DL120 G7 vs. Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX100 S7 3. 1-Socket Tower Servers HP ProLiant ML110 G7 vs. Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX140 S1 FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 0 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED 1. 2-Socket Rack-Mounted Servers HP ProLiant DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 The PRIMERGY RX300 S6 was compared to the HP ProLiant DL380 G7 server from the various viewpoints. The results show Fujitsu is the clear winner in the areas of cooling, features and serviceability. Fujitsu provides hot-swap components, server cooling efficiency and on-board failure notification LEDs, which can be good selling points. As for hardware design, both servers are closely competitive. When it comes to power consumption, it seems HP has an advantage over Fujitsu in being able to provide lower-voltage servers. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 1 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Tested Configurations For display only HP ProLiant DL380 G7 Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 Type Xeon E5640 Xeon E5640 Cores 8 cores (2 x 4-core) 8 cores (2 x 4-core) 6GB (3 x 2GB) 6GB (3 x 2GB) 3 x 147GB 3 x 73GB Supported RAID levels RAID 5 RAID 5 Number of LAN ports (On-board LAN) 4 ports 2 ports Net weight 21.15kg 18.95kg - 679W Size (mm) / Height (U) 446 x 693 x 86 / 2U 445 x 720 x 88 / 2U List price (including tax) 778,050 Japanese yen 836,850 Japanese yen Machine image Processors Memory HDD Max. power consumption (Figures in data sheets) FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 2 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Features and Benefits of the ProLiant DL380 G7 HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. Power and cooling With a sea of sensors throughout the server and highefficient power supplies, HP produces a new level of energy efficiency. Optimized for space-constrained installations G4 G7 ‘A sea of sensors’ HP’s power supply that meets or exceeds 80 PLUS GOLD 5U 2U The latest G7 model provides 300% larger disk capacity, yet needs less than half the space, compared to the G4 generation. Server management tools “HP Systems Insight Control Suite” Delivers best-in-class remote management performance. Much faster remote consoles than the older-generation products. • 800% faster remote console • 360% faster virtual media An integrated solution that helps improve operational efficiency and reduce system administration expenses. HP Systems Insight Manager FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL Remote management (HP iLO 3) HP SmartStart Intuitive interfaces 3 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Comparison Points For display only HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 Throughout the tests, the ‘selling points’ of the HP ProLiant hardware were carefully examined against the Fujitsu PRIMERGY system. Tested areas included the following: ■ Power consumption • Energy-efficient power supplies. ■ Power consumption • Power supply units with high energy conversion efficiency. ■ Cooling • Smart cooling: ‘A sea of sensors’ ■ Cooling • Efficient air intakes and optimized airflow within a rack. ■ Space optimization • Reduce space requirements. Hardware: ProLiant DL380 G7 FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL Hardware: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 4 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Hardware Comparisons HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. It seems Fujitsu is a clear winner on server cooling, features and ease of serviceability. On the other hand, in the area of hardware design, HP has a slight advantage over Fujitsu. ◎ :Particularly superior ○ : Superior △ : Equivalent × : Inferior Hardware comparisons No. Category Tested items × Cooling • Proper ventilation in servers • Internal server temperatures • Fan control ◎ • The HP server has a number of small ventilation holes, but the actual temperature measurements show the Fujitsu server can operate at much lower temperature. • Both servers provide fan control features. Design • Server weight • Noise levels △ • The lighter-weight Fujitsu server is more space optimized. • HP has an advantage over Fujitsu in terms of noise levels. ○ • The PRIMERGY RX300 offers hot-swap fans. • The HP server can contain more LAN ports than Fujitsu PRIMERGY. But LAN ports on the Fujitsu server have LEDs that can indicate link status and the LAN speed. • The Fujitsu and HP servers hold the same number of PCI slots. • HP and Fujitsu are closely competitive in being able to provide advanced security features (TPM). ◎ • The Fujitsu server ensures that notification LEDs are lit even when the server is unplugged. This is not offered by HP. • The dedicated fan cover on the Fujitsu server can be removed/ reinstalled while server remains in rack. On the other hand, the HP server must be uninstalled from a rack enclosure for every maintenance task. • Power consumption • Power supply efficiency 2 3 4 5 Comments • HP has an advantage over Fujitsu in terms of server power consumption. • Both servers have equivalent levels of power conversion efficiency (Just a difference of certification organizations). Power consumption 1 Is Fujitsu better than HP? Features • • • • Serviceability • Failure notification LEDs • The ability to perform maintenance tasks while the server remains in a rack enclosure. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL Hot swap components Supported LAN ports Supported PCI slots Data security 5 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of HP over Fujitsu Server Power Consumption HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. The measurement figures represent the actual numbers obtained in this test environment. According to actual power measured, the Fujitsu server consumed 30W more power than the HP ProLiant DL380 (at the maximum). Power consumption of the Fujitsu server is higher than HP’s regardless of the operational status (when running, idling or in a standby mode). HP ProLiant DL380 G7 Max. power consumption (Information in data sheets) No data published Standby mode Results of actual measurements FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 7.7W 679W < Idle mode 97.8W < Intensive workloads 260.8W < 6 14.4W Fujitsu-HP difference varies from 7 to 30 Watts. 128.2W 275.1W Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Fujitsu and HP are at the same level Power Supply Efficiency HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. The Fujitsu RX300 S6 server uses power supply units that meet the CSCI-Gold efficiency standard. That is equivalent to 80 PLUS GOLD level that HP claims is its advantages in power efficiency. HP offers 80 PLUS GOLD-certified power supplies. Power loads Conversion rates 20% 87% or higher 50% 90% or higher 100% 87% or higher Fujitsu uses CSCI Gold-compliant power supply units. = Power loads Conversion rates 20% 87% or higher 50% 90% or higher 100% 87% or higher * CSCI is a global consortium dedicated to reducing the energy consumption of the IT sector started by Google and Intel in 2007. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 7 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of Fujitsu over HP Cooling (Proper Server Ventilation) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. Due to the insufficient number of ventilation holes, the HP server fails to deliver an adequate volume of fresh cold air required to cool the internal components. There’s no ventilation holes around the disk area, and it will likely increase the risk of disk failure due to thermal problems. Insufficient ventilation holes at front and rear of the HP server. The small holes cannot deliver sufficient t volume of fresh cold air. Sufficient ventilation holes are reserved at the front and rear of the server to ensure fresh cold air is routed to the internal components. Front Front Very small vent holes around hard drives. The extremely air-permeable honeycomb design to send fresh air to hard disks. Limited air intakes. Rear Rear The rear side of the server has large perforated ventilation holes aligned with airflow to further improve cooling efficiency. Small vent holes are scattered at the rear of the server, but they are not aligned with air flow. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 8 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of Fujitsu over HP Cooling (Component Layouts) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. Many components sit at the rear of the HP system board. The congested component layout produces hot spots within the server chassis, consequently leading to lower mean time before failure (MTBF). A multi-layer arrangement of heat-generating components will create hot spots within the server. Front Front Not many components sit on the motherboard to mitigate congestion. The component layout is optimized in align with airflows to cool all components efficiently and effectively. Rear Many components sit at the rear of the system board (Near the entrance of PCI card slots). Rear 3 1 2 Air-intake holes are arranged between PCI slots, allowing fresh cold air blowing to PCI cards. 6 4 5 PCI slots FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL A few ventilation holes near the congested area. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 PCI slots 9 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of Fujitsu over HP Cooling (Airflow Efficiency) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. Thermal design of the HP server is not optimized (Fewer ventilation holes than Fujitsu PRIMERGY, non-straight airflow paths). That makes it difficult to deliver air volume required to cool all internal components, and produces hot spots within the server chassis. The multi-layer arrangement of components will produce hot spots near the entrance of PCI slots. Besides, cold air is not delivered directly to this area due to the internal server design, consequently PCI cards may have lower MTBF. CPU Fresh air flows between CPUs. FAN Hot air discharge Cold air intake PCI PCI CPU Hot air discharge Hot spots Cold air intake No space between CPUs. PSU Hot air discharge Hot air discharge Not many components sit on the motherboard to avoid a congested layout. The Fujitsu server uses a straight-line cooling method to streamline cold air movements within the server chassis. FAN PSU Hot air discharge Hot air generated from the server circulates within a server rack. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 10 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of Fujitsu over HP Cooling (Internal Server Temperatures) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. The measurement figures represent the actual numbers obtained in this test environment. Server temperature measurements revealed that the HP server operates at a 10˚C higher temperature (Max.) than the Fujitsu server. During the test, both servers with their default settings were identically loaded. A scientific study (Arrhenius Theory of Reaction Rate*) says lifetime of temperaturedependent components (i.e. Capacitors) is halved for every 10 degree Celsius increase in temperature. High Failure Temperature Fujitsu PRIMERGY is much less susceptible to thermal issues, allowing longer component life. The HP ProLiant server operates at 10˚C higher (Max.) than the PRIMEGY server. Low Short Component life lengths Long * Arrhenius theory deals with the temperature dependence of the reaction rate constant, which can be used for accelerated aging test. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 11 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of Fujitsu over HP Design (Server Weight) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. The measurement figures represent the actual numbers obtained in this test environment. When comparing two identically rack-mounted solutions (15 Fujitsu/HP servers in a 19-inch rack), the Fujitsu rack system was 44kg lighter than the HP system. Fujitsu servers seem to be more suitable for customers with floor space constraints. * Typical floor load limits in normal office buildings: 300 to 500kg per square meter. 15 units x HP ProLiant DL580 (25.2kg-per-unit) + 1 x 40U rack (150kg) = 528kg This configuration cannot be installed in an office space with floor loading capacity of 500kg/m². > 15 units x PRIMERGY RX300 S6 (22.3kg-per-unit) + 1 x 40U rack (150kg) = 484.5kg The Fujitsu servers are lighter than HP’s, allowing higherdensity server deployments. This configuration can be installed in an office space with floor loading capacity of 500kg/m². * These calculations assume the rack enclosure weighs 150kg net, and installs in 1m². * Total weights shown above include rack rails and cable arms. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 12 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of HP over Fujitsu Design (Server Acoustic Noise Emissions) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. The measurement figures represent the actual numbers obtained in this test environment. Despite the Fujitsu server generating slightly higher noise levels than the HP server, it is still at an acceptable level for deployment in normal rack installations. Noise comparisons: Areas around server chassis measured in decibels (dBA). HP ProLiant DL380 G7 Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 Idle mode (dBA) 33.27 Full operation (dBA) 35.49 < < 47.42 47.59 * These figures are for reference only. Equivalent sound levels (For reference) 30dBA 40dBA 50dBA 60dBA Suburbs after midnight Library Quiet office space Quiet car interior FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 13 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of Fujitsu over HP Features (Supported LAN Ports) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. With LAN ports on the HP server, only link status can be viewed. But the LAN ports on Fujitsu PRIMERGY have LEDs that indicate data transmission speed. 1Gbps ? Rear Rear This LED indicates the speed of the currently running LAN in two distinctive colors. 100Mbps 1Gbps Only link status can be viewed. Link status To check LAN speed, it may be required to run some sort of speed test or a bandwidth meter within the operating system. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL Data transmission speed Users can check the LAN port link status and connection speed at a glance. 14 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of Fujitsu over HP Serviceability (Failure Notification LEDs) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. The HP system board doesn’t have failure notification LEDs to notify a faulty component, and thus the wrong component could be replaced by mistake. The system board on Fujitsu PRIMERGY has groups of notification LEDs that make it easy, quick and accurate to identify problems. The front panel displays health status of components. HP System Insight Display at the front of the server System Insight Display to indicate overall system health. A label on the underside of the server cover provides information on LED location. ?? Only disk failures can be notified. System Board FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 15 7 groups of components have notification LEDs. Underside of the server cover Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Advantages of Fujitsu over HP Serviceability (System Board Maintenance) HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6 For display only * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. To replace the system board assembly of the HP server, it must be removed completely from a rack enclosure. Service technicians need to prepare adequate flat space when conducting tasks, and re-install the removed assembly into the rack after the maintenance. Maintenance tasks can be completed while the server remains in a rack enclosure. To reach the metal latch at the rear of the server, it is necessary to pull out the server tray completely from a rack. Need a driver to release the latch. Simply press & release the lock at the center of the server (Drivers are not required). Small handles make it difficult to pull out the server tray. The ‘rightsized’ fingerpull handles 56cm The server-front instructions assist users to conduct replacement tasks. Front FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 16 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED Recap (HP DL380 G7 vs. Fujitsu RX300 S6) * Information in this page is based on data obtained from Fujitsu’s internal tests and measurements, and Fujitsu provides no guarantee of the accuracy and integrity of the information. The following summarizes the competitive advantages of the Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system. To differentiate your proposal in competition against HP ProLiant DL380 G7, high reliability and excellent serviceability of the PRIMERGY server can be good selling points. Server power consumption Equivalent levels: Specifications of power conversion efficiency. HP’s advantages: Lower power consumption with lower noise levels. Cooling Fujitsu’s advantages: Efficient airflow inside a rack; Server operation at lower temperatures. Design Fujitsu’s advantages: Lighter weight. HP’s advantages: Quieter server operations. Features Fujitsu’s advantages: Standard LAN ports that are equipped with LEDs to indicate LAN connection speed. Serviceability Fujitsu’s advantages: Failure notification LEDs on the Fujitsu server to assist quick, easy and accurate problem detection & identification; Support for hot-swap components. FUJITSU CONFIDENTIAL 17 Copyright 2012 FUJITSU LIMITED