Proposed Transmission Systems

advertisement
THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF
TAMIL NADU AS ON 30.04.2009
 TNEB’s own generating stations
(Hydel, Thermal, Gas and wind)
5690 MW
 Private Sector Power Plants (IPP)
1180 MW
 Shares from Central Sector Generating Stations
2825 MW
 External Assistance (Eastern Grid)
305 MW
 Others ( Captive Power Plants)
214 MW
Total
10214 MW
RENEWABLE
OR
NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES
 Wind Mill Private (infirm)
4310.615 MW
 Co-Generation
466.100 MW
 Bio-mass
109.550 MW
 Total (Renewable sources )
4886.265 MW
INSTALLED CAPACITY AND PERCENTAGE OF
INSTALLED CAPACITY AS ON 30.04.09
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2009-10
in MW
Year
Central
Sector
State
Sector
2009 – 10
1124
33
Wind Merchant
Energy
Power
Plant
500
-
Total
1157
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING NEXT 5 YEARS
in MW
Year
Central
Sector
State
Sector
Wind Merchant
Energy
Power
Plant
Total
2010 – 11
1174
660
600
-
2434
2011 – 12
717
1200
500
2600
5017
2012 – 13
847
---
500
5000
6347
2013 – 14
760
600
500
5000
6860
2014 – 15
---
2200
400
5540
8140
Total
3498
4660
2500
18140
28798
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2009-10 - Central Sector
Sl.No
Project Name
Type
Capacity/
Share in
MW
Expected
Commissioning
1.
Kaiga APP Stage-II Nuclear
Unit-2
(Share)
(220 MW)
36
December 2009
2.
Neyvel TS-II
Expansion Unit-I
(250 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
163
February 2010
3.
Kudankulam APS
Unit-1 & 2
Nuclear
(Share)
925
December 2009
& March 2010
2
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2009-10 - State Sector
Sl.No
Project Name
Type
Capacity/
Share in
MW
Expected
Commissioning
1.
Periyar vaigai SHEP
-I (2x2 MW)
Hydel
4
December 2009
2.
Periyar vaigai SHEP
-II (2x1.25 MW)
Hydel
2.5
December 2009
3.
Periyar vaigai SHEP
-III toIV(2x2 MW)
Hydel
4
December 2009
4.
Periyar vaigai SHEP
- IV (2x1.25 MW)
Hydel
2.5
December 2009
5.
Bhavani Barrage- I
(2x5 MW)
Hydel
10
February 2010
6.
Bhavani Barrage- II
(2x5 MW)
Hydel
10
February 2010
Total
33
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2010-11 - Central Sector
Sl.No
Project Name
Type
Capacity/
Share in
MW
Expected
Commissioning
1.
NTPC – TNEB at
Vallur Stage-I
(2X500 MW)
Thermal
(Share
750
Unit-1 Aug-2010
Unit-2 Jan-2011
2.
PFBR Kalpakkam
(2 X 250 MW)
Nuclear
(Share)
167
2010-2011
3.
Simhadri Stage-II
(2 X 500 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
95
Unit-III Nov-2010
4.
Neyveli TS Unit-II
(1 X 250 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
162
Jun 2010
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2010-11 - State Sector
Sl.No
Project Name
Type
Capacity/
Share in
MW
Expected
Commissioning
1.
Bhavani Kattalai
Barrage – II
(2 X 15 MW)
Hydel
30
December 2010
2.
Bhavani Kattalai
Barrage – III
(2 X 15 MW)
Hydel
30
March 2010
3.
North Chennai TPS
Stage – II
(1 X 600 MW)
Thermal
600
Unit-1
December 2010
Total
660
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2011-12 - Central and State Sector
Sl.No
Project Name
Type
Capacity/
Share in
MW
Expected
Commissioning
1.
NTPC – TNEB Vallur
Stage –II ( 1 X 500 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
375
Unit-3 Jul 2011
2.
NLC – TNEB Tuticorin
(2X500 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
247
Unit-1 Mar 2012
3.
Simhadri Stage-II
(2X500 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
95
Unit-4 May 2011
4.
MTPS Stage-III Unit-1
(600 MW)
Thermal
600
Jul 2001
5.
NCTPS Stage – II Unit-2
(600 MW)
Thermal
600
Unit-2 Jun 2011
Total
1917
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2012-13
Sl.No
Project Name
Type
Capacity/
Share in
MW
Expected
Commissioning
1.
NLC-TNEB at Tuticorin
Unit-2 (2 X 500MW)
Thermal
(Share)
247
Aug 2012
2.
TNEB – BHEL at
Udangudi Unit- 1
(2 X 800 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
600
Mar 2013
Total
847
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2013-14
Sl.No
Project Name
Type
Capacity/
Share in
MW
Expected
Commissioning
1.
TNEB – BHEL at
Udangudi Unit - 2
(2 X 800 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
600
Unit-2 Sep 2013
2.
Krishnapatnam (AP)
UMPP
( 5 X 800 MW)
Thermal
(Share)
160
Sep 2013
3.
Ennore Annexe
(1X600MW)
Thermal
600
Sep 2013
PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION
DURING 2014-15
Sl.No
Project Name
Type
Capacity/
Share in
MW
Expected
Commissioning
1.
Kattupalli UMPP
(5 X 800 MW)
Thermal
1600
2014-15
2.
NCTPS Stage III
(1X600MW)
Thermal
600
2014-15
Total
2200
Power Evacuation System 2009-10
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx. Cost
(Rs. in lakhs)
1.Kudankulam
a.
Kudankulam-Abishekapatty
2 Nos. 400KV DC (Quad)
Line)
b.
Abishekapatty-Thrissur 2
Nos. 400 KV DC Line
c.
Abhishekapatty-Myvadi
400 KV DC Line
d.
Abishekapatty-Edaman
e.
LILO of ChekkanuraniTrivandrum at
Abhishekapatty 400 KV SS
Executed by PGCIL
Commissioned
Power Evacuation System 2009-10
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx. Cost
(Rs. in lakhs)
2.Neyveli TS II – Expansion
a.
Neyveli TS II – Pugalur
400 KC DC Line
Executed by PGCIL
b.
Pugalur – Chekkanurani
400 KV DC Line
Commissioned
c.
Arasur-Myvadi
400 KV DC Line
Executed by PGCIL
d.
Pugalur 400/230 KV SS
Executed by PGCIL
Power Evacuation System 2009-10
Sl.No
3.
4.
5.
Name of Line
Bhavani Barrage PH I (2
X 5 MW) LILO of
Pykara – Mettupalayam
Bhavani Barrage I 110
KV DC
Bhavani Barrage PH II
(2 X 5 MW) LILO of
Mettupalayam –
Irumborai at Bhavani
Barrage II 110 KV DC
Periyar – Vaigai HEP – I to
IV Barrages Gullapa
Govindapatty 110/22 KV SS
22 KV link line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx. Cost
(Rs. in lakhs)
15
486.90
5
162.30
Power Evacuation at 22 KV to be
executed by O&M
Power Evacuation System 2010-11
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx. Cost
(Rs. in lakhs)
1. NTPC-TNEB Joint Venture – North Chennai
a.
DC Line Vallur TPS –
Alamathi 400 KV Line
Executed by PGCIL
b.
DC Line Vallur TPS –
Melakottaiyur 400 KV
Line
DC Line Tiruvalam –
Chittor 400 KV Quad Line
Executed by PGCIL
c.
d.
e.
DC Line Tiruvalam –
Singarapet 400 KV Quad
Line
DC Line Tiruvalam –
Alamathi 400 KV Line
Executed by PGCIL
100
14000.00
70
9880.00
Power Evacuation System 2010-11
Sl.No
2.
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
Kalpakkam PFBR
a. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Siruseri
b. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Arni
c. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Kanchi
Executed by PGCIL
3.
Simhadri Stage-II (2X500MW) Unit-I DC Line Executed by Central
LILO Vizag-Vermagiri 400 KV Line
Sector
4.
North Chennai TPS Stage II
a. DC Line, NCTPS II- Alamathi 400 KV Line
68
11966.00
b. DC Line, NCTPS II- SV Chatram 400 KV Line
168
18296.00
c. DC Line, NCTPS II- TNEB JV 400 KV Line
8
912.00
Power Evacuation System 2010-11
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
5.
Bhavani Kattalai Barrage II
110 KV SC Line BKB II –Pallipalayam
110 KV SC Line BKB II– Thiruchengod
23
416.30
6.
Bhavani Kattalai Barrage III
110 KV SC Line BKB III –Nallur
110 KV SC Line BKB III– Kabilarmalai
15
272.70
Wind Evacuation System 2010-11
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
1.
Kanarpatty 400/230 KV SS (TNEB)
Kanarpatty-Abishekapatty – 400 KV DC Quad
Line
30
14335.32
2.
230 KV DC Line
Kanarpatty-Maranthy
25
3175.88
3.
230 KV DC Line
Kanarpatty-Sayamalai
25
3229.00
4.
LILO of 230 KV Line Ponnapuram-Palladam at
Velarsi Vadamalaipalayam
22
2187.69
Wind Evacuation System 2010-11 - Contd
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
5.
Vannikonandal
LILO of one of the circuits of Kayathar
Chekkanurani-230 KV Line
100
4181.00
6.
Nallamanickenpatti-Vannikonandal
230 KV SC Lin
16
426.00
7
Samugarangapuram
Kanarpatty-Samugarangapuram 230 KVSC Line
80
2132.00
8
Samugarangapuram-Kayathar 230 KV SS –
230 KV SC Line
100
2665.00
9.
Kethanur
LILO of Palladam – Ingur 230 KV DC Line
40
1672.00
Additional Lines 2010-11
Sl.No
1.
Name of Line
LILO of Sriperumbudur-Kalivanthapattu
400 KV SC Line at SunguvarChatram
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
11
1100.00
230 KV Lines
2.
230 KV SC Line, Sankaneri – Kanarpatty
80
2132.00
3.
DC Linking of Kudankulam Startup – TTPS 230
KV SC Line at Suitable Location and rearranging
in such a way to connect the TTPS end to
Kanarpatty SS and Kudankulam Startup bus to
Samugarangapuram SS in order to avoid wind
power injection at TTPS Bus
80
2132.00
4.
BasinBridge (GMR) – TNEB HQ) OCF – 230
KV SC Line UG
24
1723.00
Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
5.
Arasur-Karamadai 230 KV SC Line
48
1106.00
6.
Arasur-Palladam 230 KV SC Line
35
807.00
7.
Arasur 400/230 KV SS – Arasur 230 KV SS
24
376.00
8.
LILO of Pugalur – Palladam 230 KV SC Line
50
1332.00
9.
LILO of Pugalur – Alandur 230 KV SC Line
120
3198.00
10.
Mayvadi-Othakalmandapam and
Othakalmandpam 2nd Circuit 230 KV Line
115.60
2327.34
Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
11.
Karaikudi 400 KVSS–Sempatty 230 KVSC Line
140
4228.00
12.
Tuticorin Sipcot – Chekkanurani 230 KV SC Line
13.
Abishekapatty-Udayathur 230 KV SC Line
130
95
3464.50
2869.00
14.
Palladam-Othakalamandapam 230 KV SC Line
50
1332.00
15.
Kalivanthapattu-Kadaperi 230 MC/DC Line
99.6
5273.57
16
Kalivanthapattu-Veerapuram 230 KV SC Line
23.4
666.00
17.
Valuthur – Paramakudi 230 KV SC Line
50
1133.50
18.
Rearrangingof MTPS – Malco line in such a way
to form MTPS – Govi and Malco –
Pallakapalayam 230 KV SC Line
130
3464.00
Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
19.
LILO of one of the Tondiarpet-Mylapore at
BasinBridge 230 KV DC
2
84.00
20.
Neyveli Zero Unit-Ulundurpet 230 KV SC Line
25
666.00
21.
Villupuram-Ulundurpet 230 KV SC Line
52
1385.00
22.
LILO of MTPS-Gobi 230 KV SC Line at
Anthiyur 230 KV SS
92
2451.80
23.
LILO of Sriperumbudur-Koyambedu SC Line at
Guindy 230 KV SS
26
692.00
24
LILO of Tondiarpet-BasinBridge at Vyasarpadi SS
2
52.30
25.
Alamathi-Vyasarpadi 230 KV SC Line
30
799.50
Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
26
LILO of Kundah III – PUSHEP 230KV DC Line
at Karamadai SS
2
83.62
27.
LILO of Arasur-Ingur at Karamadai SS
6
250.00
28.
LILO of one of the circuits of AmathapuramChekkanurani at Nallamanickempatti 230 KV DC
Line
16
669.00
Power Evacuation System 2011-12
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
1.
NTPC – TNEB JV North Chennai Scheme
mentioned in Unit I & II (2010-11)
Covered in 2010-11
2.
NLC – TNEB JV Project (Tuticorin)
400 KV DC Quad Line from JV Project to
Chekkanurani
Executed by PGCIL
3.
Simhadri Stage II (2 X 500 MW) Unit II Scheme
already mentioned in Unit-I
Executed by Central
Sector
4.
North Chennai TPS Stage II Scheme mentioned
in Unit I (2010-11)
Covered in 2010-11
Power Evacuation System 2011-12 – Contd.
Sl.No
5.
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
MTPS Stage III
400 KV (TNEB)
a. 400 KV DC Line MTPS – Arasur
280
17630
b. 400 KV DC Line MTPS–Singarpet 400 KVSS
200
12593
a. 230 KV DC Line LILO of MTPS –Gobi 230 KV
SC Line at MTPS Stage III
85
3554
b. 230 KV DC Line – LILO of Malco –
Pallkapalayam 230 KV SC Line at MTPS Stage
III
50
2091
230 KV (TNEB)
Wind Evacuation System 2011-12
Sl.No
1.
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
Kayathar 400/230-110 KV SS (TNEB)
i. 400 KV DC Line – Kanarpatty – Kayathar
18
4200
ii. 400 KV Kayathar-Karaikudi DC Quad Line
200
2800
iii. 400 KV Karaikudi-Pugalur DC Quad Line
250
35000
80
5
3344
209
5
209
230 KV Lines
i. 230 KV DC Line Kayathar 400 KV–Valliyur SS
ii. 230 KV DC Line, LILO of Kayathar –
Anuppankularm SC Line at Kayathar 400 KVSS
iii. 230 KV DC Line, LILO of Kayathar –Pasumalai
SC Line at Kayathar 400 KVSS
230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB
for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by
MPP -2011-12
Sl.No
Name of Line
1.
Panneerkulam
LILO of one circuit of Kayathar – Chekkanurani
DC Line at Panneerkulam
7
332
230 KV SC Line Panneerkulam – Chekkanurani
100
2665
Villiseri
LILO of Second Circuit of KayatharChekkanurani DC Line at Villiseri
250
10500
Periyapatty
LILO of Myvadi-Othakalamandapam SC Line at
Periyapatty
80
3344
2.
3.
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB
for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by
MPP -2011-12 – Contd.
Sl.No
Name of Line
4.
Vagarai
230 KV DC Line LILO of Udumalpet-Sempatty
SC Line at Vagarai
5.
6.
7.
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
50
2905
Kumarapuram
230 KV SC Line Kanarpatty – Kumarapuram
35
1463
Vagai Kulam
230 KV DC Line Vagaikulam – Sayamalai
15
627
30
129
Sankaralinkapuram
230 KV DC Line SankaralingapuramKumarapuram
Other Proposed Lines - 2011-12
Sl.No
1.
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
Karamadai 400/230 KV SS (TNEB)
400 KV DC Line, Arasur- Karamadai
80
11200
LILO of Kundah – Thudialur SC Line at
Karamadi
10
418
230 KV SC Line Thudialur – Karamadai
7
186
Other Proposed Lines - 2011-12 – Contd.
Sl.No
2.
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
Singarpet 400/230 KV SS (TNEB)
400 KV 400 KV DC Line, Singarapet-Hosur
170
21155
16
2240
230 KV DC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS – Singarapet
230 KV SS
85
3553
SC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS – Singarapet
230 KV SS
135
3598
SC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS –
Vinnamangalam 230 KV SS
165
4398
LILO of Pugalur-Ottiambakkam DC Line at
Singarapet
Power Evacuation System 2012-13
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
1.
TNEB – BHEL JV at Udangudi
(2 X 800 MW) Unit-1
To be Evacuated by
PGCIL at 765 KV
2.
NLC – TNEB at Tuticorin
To be Evacuated by
PGCIL
Power Evacuation System 2013-14
Sl.No
Name of Line
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
1.
TNEB – BHEL JV at Udangudi
(2 X 800 MW) Unit-1
To be Evacuated by
PGCIL at 765 KV
2.
Krishnapatnam (AP), UMPP (4000 MW)
(5 X 800 MW)
Executed by Central
Sector
3.
ETPS Annexe
230 KV DC Line on MC Towers, ETPS AnnexeKorattur lake
Korattur Lake – Ambattur Industrial Estate
230/110 KV SS – DC Korattur lake to Guindy
(UG)
20
836
144
2340
Power Evacuation System 2014-15
Sl.No
Name of Line
1.
Kattupalli – UMPP
(5 X 800 MW) Unit-1
2.
NCTPS Stage III (600 MW)
Approx.
Length
(in c. km)
Approx.
Cost
(Rs. in
lakhs)
Evacuation Scheme
to be finalised
Environmental
Clearance under
study
Investment Required for
Power Evacuation System
During Next Five Years
Rs Cr
Year
Cental
Sector
2010-11
To be
evacuted
by PGCIL
at 400
/765 KV
2011-12
2012-13
State
Sector
Wind
Energy
1015.13
826.16
31.76
Merchant
Power
Plant
569.32 To be
evacuted by
565.79 PGCIL at
765 KV
141.63
Total
1584.75
1391.95
173.39
2013-14
--
141.63
141.63
2014-15
700.00
141.63
841.63
Total
2573.35
1560.00
4133.35
Investment Required for
Transmission Schemes
For Next Five Years
Year
Investment tp be
made by TNEB for
new Power
Evacuation Lines
(Rs. In crores)
Investment
proposed for
other T&D
Schemes
(Rs. in crores)
Total Investment
required
2010-11
1584.75
1200.00
2784.75
2011-12
1391.95
1440.00
2831.95
2012-13
173.39
1728.00
1901.39
2013-14
141.63
2074.00
2215.63
2014-15
841.63
2489.00
3330.63
Total
4133.35
8931.00
13064.35
TRANSMISSION FIXED ASSETS
VALUE AS ON 31.03.2008 (Rs.in
Crores)

GROSS ASSETS
: Rs. 6017.42

DEPRICIATION
: Rs. 2333.38

NET VALUE
: Rs. 3684.04
AVENUES FOR INVESTMENTS

Permitting private operator on “Build, Own
Operate and Maintain” basis

Joint venture with private operators

Joint venture with financial institutions

Funding by financial institutions
Permitting private operator
ADVANTAGES

Selection through competitive bidding

Total risk of completion/execution of project
rests with the operator

Total risk of availability lies with the operator

Deployment of technology and expertise
possible
PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE
OPERATORS





Identify the project
Selection of developers thro’ Tariff based
competitive bidding.
Appoinment of BPC
Short listing thro’ RFQ
Signing of TSA
PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION
OF PRIVATE OPERATORS- Cont.
• Monthly transmission charges – Escalable
charges and non – escalable charges
•Incentive - For availability of above 98%
•Penalty - For availability of less than 95%
JOINT VENTURE WITH PRIVATE OPERATORS

ADVANTAGES
Increased requirement of equity can be met through the
investor

Possible to get technology and expertise

DISADVANTAGES
Finding a private operator - cumbersome process

Possibility of mutual conflict

Cost of capital likely to be high
DISADVANTAGES

Likely to be a costlier option

Utilities continue to pay for 25 years at the
escalated rate

No buy back

Flexibility for transmission utility absent
JOINT VENTURE WITH FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS
ADVANTAGES

Increased requirement of equity can be met
through the investor

Easy to find partner
DISADVANTAGES

Possibility of mutual conflict

Cost of capital likely to be high

Likely conditionalities
FUNDING BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

ADVANTAGES
The cost of capital is the least

Less conditionalities

Full exploitation of available expertise

Ensure continuous growth of utility

DISADVANTAGES
Mustering equity

Ability to complete the project on time

Ability to maintain availability
FEASIBILITY OF EXECUTION BY THE
UTILITY
PREREQUISITES

Financial Capability

Technical Capability

Administrative Capability
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY
Assumptions


Gross asset as on 31/03/08
Equity (30%)
: Rs 6017 Crs
: Rs 1805 Crs

Outstanding Loan
: Rs 1878 Crs

ROE (17.48%)
: Rs 315 Crs

Investment from 2009-10 taken separately
Study of financial capability
2009-10
972
Investment
2010-11
2784.75
Capital cost
6017.42 Crs
972
6017.42
3700.18
Notional Equity
1805.22 Crs
291.6
1805.22
658.15
Notional loan
4212.19 Crs
680.4
1521.84
2447.36
Cumulative Depreciation
2333.38 Crs
56.57
2553.25
218.64
Outstanding Loan
1690.93 Crs
680.4
1521.84
2447.36
Repayment
169.09 Crs
68.04
152.18
244.73
Closing Loan
1521.84 Crs
612.36
1369.65
2202.62
average Loan
1606.38 Crs
646.38
1445.74
2447.36
debt/equity ratio
Return on Equity
0.62
17.481%
50.97
315.57
115.05
Study of financial capability
2011-12
Investment
2012-13
2831.95
2013-14
1901.39
2215.63
Capital cost
6017.42
6313.48
6017.42
7831.41
6017.42
9609.49
Notional Equity
1805.23
1088.77
1805.23
1594.67
1805.23
2189
Notional loan
1369.65
4603.96
1232.69
5539.05
1109.42
6606.44
Cum. Depreciation
2773.13
383.46
2993.01
437.55
3212.87
566.5
Outstanding Loan
1369.65
4603.96
1232.69
5539.05
1109.44
6606.44
Repayment
136.97
460.39
123.27
553.9
110.94
660.64
Closing Loan
1232.69
4143.56
1109.42
4985.15
998.50
5945.8
debt/equity ratio
Return on Equity
0.48
315.570
190.326
0.5
315.570
278.77
0.52
315.570
382.66
INFERENCE

Debt / Equity ratio remains above 43%

Assured O & M Charges sufficient to
cover other expenses.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
ADVANTAGES

Rich experience in executing 400 KV Sub
Station and lines.

Availability of qualified professionals .
DIS ADVANTAGES

Not well suitable for project management
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPABILITY
ADVANTAGES

Well Structured

Proven system

Committed Work Force
DISADVANTAGES

Tedious Time consuming Procedures

Resistance to change with time

Frequently changing leadership
COMPARISON OF OTHER TRANSMISSION
UTILITIES
S.No DESCRIPTION
TNEB
PGCIL
KPTCL
APTRANSCO
1
Total Sub Stations
694
120
382
367
2
Total EHT lines in
circuit KM
Total employees
21000
71500
36553
30450
12500
7500
3
4
5
6
7
Total revenue from
operation Rs.in Crs.
Employee cost
Rs in Crs
Equity Rs in Crs. As
on 31/03/08
Debt Equity ratio
4000
6676
375
644
315
420
38 : 62
66 : 24
223
Download
Related flashcards

Banking

21 cards

Finance ministries

62 cards

House of Medici

36 cards

Currencies of Germany

18 cards

Create Flashcards