Lecturer: Tran Thi Hoang Vi Contributors Nguyen Thi Ngoc Tram Nguyen Xuan Truong Nguyen Cam Tu Nguyen Thi Phuong Thanh Contents Q&A Answering questions of lecturer and classmates Common-size Analysis Activity Ratios Liquidity Ratios Solvency Ratios Profitability Ratios Dupont Analysis Financial Statements Analysis Company Introduction Introduction Establishing history Nature of business Organization Revenue/ Net income/Total Equity Introduce peer company In comparison with other listed pharmaceutical companies Company name: DHG Pharmaceutical Joint-Stock Company Abbreviation: DHG PHARMA Headquarters: 288 Bis Nguyen Van Cu, An Hoa Ward, Ninh Kieu District, Cantho City Vision: “For a more beautiful and healthier life” Mission: DHG Pharma always provides high quality products and services to satisfy the aspiration for a more beautiful and healthier life Website: http://www.dhgpharma.com.vn Chartered capital: 653,764,290,000 VND Establishment Precursor of DHG Pharmaceutical Joint-Stock Company was 2/9 Pharmaceutical Factory and was founded on 02 September 1974 at Kenh 5 Dat Set, Khanh Lam Commune, U Minh District, Ca Mau Province The 2/9 Pharmaceutical Factory was assigned to be under the management of Hau Giang Health Service People’s Committee of Hau Giang Province decided to merge the Material Medical Supply Company into Hau Giang Pharmaceutical United Factory Hau Giang Pharmaceutical United Factory was founded basing on the consolidation of 3 units: Stateowned Pharmaceutical Factory, Level 2 Pharmaceutical Company and Herbal Medicine Station Hau Giang Pharmaceutical United Factory was equitized to become DHG Pharmaceutical Joint-Stock Company Mrs. Pham Thi Viet Nga Chairperson of DHG Pharma and Vinh Hao Algae JSC PhD of Business Administration BSc Pharmacy Leading DHG Pharma to the best pharmaceutical brand in Vietnam with an increase of 4.5 times in revenue and 7.5 times in profit after 7 years equitization Awarded one of Top 50 businesswoman of Asia in 2013 by FORBES Magazine Leading position in Vietnam pharmaceutical industry for 17 successive years since 1996 12 invested brands account for over 50% of the sales of the whole company 60% Growth Rate 57% 50% 46% 40% 30% 26% 25% 20% 19% 20% 17% 18% 16% 16% 18% 21% 11% 10% 5% 0% 2006 2007 DHG 2008 2009 2010 2011 Domestically produced medicines market 2012 31-Dec-09 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-12 ASSETS I. Current Assets 79.66% 79.24% 74.69% 76.43% 1. Cash and cash equivalent 38.38% 35.31% 23.40% 30.23% 1.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 3. Accounts receivable 19.51% 24.52% 24.55% 24.15% 4. Inventories 20.15% 19.07% 25.81% 21.52% 0.56% 0.34% 0.93% 0.53% II. Long-term assets 20.34% 20.76% 25.31% 23.57% 1. Fixed assets 15.57% 16.67% 23.02% 21.74% 2. Investment property 0.00% 0.35% 0.00% 0.00% 3. Long-term investments 2.05% 2.20% 0.88% 0.70% 4. Other long-term assets 2.71% 1.53% 1.41% 1.13% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 2. Short-term investment 5. Other current assets Total assets RESOURCES I. Liabilities 1. Current Liabilities 1.1 Short-term borrowing 1.2 Account payable - trade 1.3 Advances from customers 1.4 Taxes payable to State Treasury 1.5 Payable to employees 1.6 Accrued expenses 1.7 Other payables 1.8 Bonus and welfare fund 2. Long-term Liabilities 2.1 Deferred taxes liabilities 2.2 Provision for severance allowance 2.3 Unearned revenue 2.4 Science and technology development II. Equity 1.1 Share capital 1.2 Capital surplus 1.3 Treasury Shares 1.4 Investment and development fund 1.4 Financial reserves 1.5 Retained profits 2. Non-business expenditure fund and other funds III. Minority interest Total resources 32.60% 29.12% 4.86% 4.69% 0.07% 2.34% 5.53% 10.59% 1.04% 0.00% 3.48% 0.00% 0.93% 0.00% 29.16% 25.91% 0.70% 4.74% 0.08% 2.20% 5.53% 9.28% 1.77% 1.62% 3.25% 0.00% 1.16% 0.01% 30.18% 27.26% 1.06% 6.19% 0.04% 1.42% 6.31% 8.31% 1.70% 2.23% 2.92% 0.00% 1.69% 0.00% 28.37% 27.48% 0.82% 3.10% 0.05% 1.41% 6.61% 10.18% 2.67% 2.63% 0.89% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.54% 2.08% 1.22% 0.89% 66.89% 17.52% 24.89% -0.03% 0.31% 1.95% 21.75% 70.36% 14.79% 20.81% -0.03% 11.23% 3.53% 20.02% 69.23% 32.66% 0.00% -0.02% 14.35% 3.33% 18.91% 70.96% 27.49% 0.00% -0.02% 20.65% 2.81% 20.04% 0.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.51% 100.00% 0.48% 100.00% 0.60% 100.00% 0.66% 100.00% Dec 31, 2009 Total Revenue Less sales deductions Net Sales Cost of Sales Gross Profit Financial Income Financial Expenses In which: Interest Expense Selling Expenses General and Administration Expenses Net Operating Profit Other Income Other Expenses Gains from others Share of losses in associates Profit before Tax Income Tax expense - current Income tax benefit - deferred Net Profit after Tax Dec 31, 2010 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2012 100% 1.37% 98.63% 46.46% 52.17% 1.33% 0.19% 23.13% 6.42% 23.05% 100% 0.86% 99.14% 49.51% 49.63% 0.17% 0.00% 23.57% 6.58% 21.30% 100% 0.79% 99.21% 51.06% 48.14% 0.29% 0.00% 22.26% 7.38% 20.17% 100% 0.62% 99.38% 50.43% 48.95% 0.15% 0.09% 24.06% 7.40% 18.77% 0.80% 0.71% 0.09% -0.01% 23.14% 2.65% 0.02% 20.47% 0.30% 0.45% 0.40% 0.05% -0.19% 21.15% 2.50% -0.02% 18.68% 0.11% 0.40% 0.61% -0.22% -0.40% 19.55% 2.90% -0.07% 16.72% 0.17% 1.34% 0.28% 1.06% -0.01% 19.83% 3.18% -0.01% 16.66% 0.18% 31-Dec-09 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-12 100% 100% 100% 100% Net cash generated from operating activities 19.99% 12.58% 10.49% 15.95% Net cash used in investing activities -0.95% -3.62% -7.50% -2.97% Net cash used in financing activities 1.99% -6.12% -9.98% -4.44% Revenue Activity ratios Liquidity ratios Solvency ratios Profitability ratios Short Term Activity Ratios Inventory Turnover DOH 4.5 140 3.81 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 3.11 3.66 3.37 2.97 3.52 3.25 2.9 3.06 2. Days of inventory on hand Lower level of inventory turnover will result in higher days of inventory on hand ratio DOH = 𝑵𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒅 𝑰𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝑻𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 120 100 80 60 40 0.5 20 0 0 2010 DHG 2011 PMC 2012 Health Care Industry 115.84 121.06 110.88 117.46 124.30 94.56 1. Inventory Turnover Measure from 2010 to 2012 nearly 3.0 times per year, the entire inventory of DHG was sold and replaced. Inventory turnover = 2010 𝑪𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝑮𝒐𝒐𝒅𝒔 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝑨𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝑰𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 2011 DHG 2012 PMC Comparing to the ratio of Health Care Industry and PMC Company, The lower rates of inventory turnover as well as the higher rate of DOH from 2010 to 2012 show: - DHG had adequate inventory and was prevented from the shortages, but it was a bad sign because products tended to deteriorate as they sit in a warehouse. - Ineffective inventory management could lead to overstocking, deficiencies in the product line or marketing effort Source of Industry and PMC data: cophieu68.vn Short Term Activity Ratios DSO Receivables Turnover 80.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 12.28 11.86 10.83 70.00 60.00 4. Days of sales outstanding 50.00 8.00 Lower level of receivable turnover will result in 5.51 5.32 6.00 higher 5.48 days of sales outstanding 4.00 Days of sales outstanding = 𝟑𝟔𝟎 𝑹𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 2.00 65.75 67.65 65.36 3. Receivables Turnover Measure from 2010 to 2012 nearly 5.4 33.24year, the entire receivables of times per 30.36 29.31 DHG was collected theoretically Receivables turnover = 𝑵𝒆𝒕 𝑺𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒔 𝑨𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒔 - - 2010 2011 DHG PMC 2012 2010 2011 DHG 2012 PMC • The Increase in accounts receivable turnover overtime indicates the improvement in process of cash collection on credit sales. • Receivables turnover of PMC (10.83 – 12.28) was nearly double DHG’s (5.32 – 5.51) (as well as the opposite side with DSO) show that DHG was taking longer to collect money from customer. The company’s credit or collection policies was not too stringent Short Term Activity Ratios Payables Turnover 50.00 Number of days of payables 30.00 46.38 45.00 40.00 35.00 30.00 26.86 26.05 23.94 25.00 35.71 5. Number of days of payables 30.77 Lower level of payables turnover will result in 25.00 20.00 higher number of days of payables turnover 15.04 13.82 360 13.40 15.00 Number of days of payables = 𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 10.00 5.00 - 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 4. Payables Turnover Measure from 2010 to 2012 nearly 14 times per year, the company pays of all its 11.70 10.08 creditors 7.76 Payables Turnover = 𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑦𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠 - 2010 2011 DHG PMC 2012 2010 2011 DHG 2012 PMC Having high liquidity in comparing with industry, the lower payables turnover ratio of DHG when comparing with PMC shows that the company was exploiting the leniency in lending policy of suppliers Short Term Activity Ratios 7. Working Capital Turnover 2.78 2012 2.44 2.60 2011 2.47 2.34 2010 2.78 2.10 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 DHG 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.90 PMC 0 < Working Capital Turnover: DHG Company had enough short term assets to cover its short term debt Working Capital Turnover > 2 : DHG Company had too much inventory and was not investing excess assets. Long Term Investment Activity Ratios 1. Total Asset Turnover 2. Fixed Asset Turnover 1.34 2012 1.89 1.31 2011 6.00 2012 8.57 6.53 2011 7.04 1.91 1.22 2010 7.53 2010 6.15 1.95 - 0.50 1.00 DHG 1.50 PMC 2.00 2.50 - 2.00 4.00 6.00 DHG PMC 8.00 10.00 1. Current Ratio 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 4.54 4.42 3.47 3.06 2.74 3.25 2.78 2.74 1.38 1.51 1.47 1.50 2009 2010 2011 2012 DHG Health Care Industry PMC 1 < Commonly acceptable current ratio < 2 Current ratio measure 2.74, 3.06, 2.74, 2.78 VND in current assets for every 1 VND in current liabilities at the end of 2009,2010,2011 and 2012 respectively. The current ratio was too high (>2) The company had high level of liquidity but may not was using its current assets or its short-term financing facilities efficiently Source of Industry Data: cophieu68.vn 2. Quick Ratio 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.19 2.02 2.49 2.31 1.98 1.76 1.79 1.61 1.50 1.00 0.86 0.79 0.80 2010 2011 2012 0.75 0.50 - 2009 DHG Health Care Industry PMC Commonly acceptable quick ratio > 1 Quick ratio measure 2.02, 2.31, 1.76, 1.98 in current assets after excluding inventory for every 1 VND in current liabilities at the end of 2009,2010,2011 and 2012 respectively Source of Industry Data: cophieu68.vn 3. Cash Ratio 1.60 1.40 1.36 1.35 1.33 1.20 1.00 1.10 0.86 0.83 1.14 0.86 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 - 2009 2010 2011 DHG 2012 PMC Because cash ratio is the most stringent and conservative of the three liquidity ratios (current, quick and cash ratio) Cash ratio > 1 in 3 years: 2009,2010 and 2012 indicates that DHG Company had enough cash/ cash equivalent to pay off all current obligations easily DHG has high liquidity 3.50 3.06 3.00 2.78 2.74 2.74 2.50 2.31 2.02 1.98 2.00 1.76 1.50 1.36 1.35 1.10 1.00 0.86 0.50 - 2009 2010 Current Ratio 2011 Quick Ratio Cash Ratio 2012 Debt ratios 1. Debt to assets ratio 0.70 0.58 0.60 0.58 0.56 0.54 0.50 0.40 0.33 0.30 0.29 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 2009 2010 DHG 2011 Health Care Industry 2012 PMC Debt to assets ratio < 0.5 measure that most of the company’s assets were financed through equity Company has more opportunities to borrow in the future at no significant risk. Source of Industry Data: cophieu68.vn Debt ratios 2. Debt to capital ratio 0.35 0.33 0.30 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.05 2009 2010 2011 DHG 2012 PMC Debt to capital ratio measure 33%, 29%, 30%, 29% of DHG’s capital represented by debt in 2009,2010,2011 and 2012 respectively Debt ratios 4. Financial Leverage ratio 3. Debt to equity ratio 1.60 0.60 0.50 0.49 0.44 1.20 0.40 0.40 0.33 1.40 1.28 1.18 1.33 1.18 1.00 0.80 0.28 0.30 0.18 1.44 1.41 1.40 0.41 0.20 1.49 0.60 0.18 0.40 0.10 0.20 - 2009 2010 DHG 2011 PMC 2012 2009 2010 DHG 2011 2012 PMC 0 (Liabilities = Equity) < Optimal debt to equity ratio < 0.5 - 1 1 (Liabilities = Equity) < Optimal financial leverage ratio < 1.5 - 2 Average ratio indicates that DHG company was talking advantage of the increased profits that financial leverage may bring Source of Industry Data: cophieu68.vn 1. Gross profit margin 0.60 0.52 0.50 0.48 0.49 0.38 0.38 0.38 2010 2011 2012 0.50 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.20 0.10 2009 DHG PMC DHG and PMC have the different trends in gross profit margin within 4 years The DHG’s gross profit margin is much higher than PMC in this period (11% higher) Per VND of safe of DHG can contribute more money for gross profit than PMC 2. Net profit margin 0.25 0.20 0.19 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.05 2009 2010 2011 DHG 2012 PMC DHG and PMC have the different trends in net profit margin within 4 years. From 2009 to 2010, PMC showed a great rise in net profit margin (from 0.12 to 0.14), while DHG’s rate decreased slightly (from 0.2 to 0.19). In the period of 2011-2012, there are no change in net profit margin of each company, DHG still much higher than PMC 2% 3. ROA – Return on total assets 0.30 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.28 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.10 2011 0.22 0.10 0.28 2012 0.22 0.10 0.28 0.05 - DHG Health Care Industry PMC 2009 0.28 0.10 0.23 2010 0.23 0.11 0.27 4. ROE – Return on capital equity 0.45 0.42 0.40 0.36 0.33 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.34 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 - DHG Health Care Industry PMC 2009 0.42 0.23 0.28 2010 0.33 0.25 0.32 2011 0.32 0.23 0.34 2012 0.32 0.24 0.36 • Be used to analyze return on equity (ROE) • Uses basic algebra to break down ROE into a function of different ratios analyst can see the impact of leverage, profit margins, turnover on shareholder returns. 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡 ROE = = 𝑅𝑂𝐴 = 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 x 𝑥 x 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐿𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡 x 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 = Net profit margin x Total asset turnover x Leverage ratio DHG ROE = PMC ROA x Leverage ROE = ROA x Leverage 2009 42% 28% 1.49 28% 23% 1.18 2010 33% 23% 1.41 32% 27% 1.18 2011 32% 22% 1.44 34% 28% 1.28 2012 32% 22% 1.40 36% 28% 1.33 DHG PMC = Net profit margin x Asset Turnover 2009 42% 20% 1.4 1.49 0.28 12% 2 1.18 2010 33% 19% 1.22 1.41 0.32 14% 1.95 1.18 2011 32% 17% 1.31 1.44 0.34 15% 1.91 1.28 2012 32% 17% 1.34 1.40 0.36 15% 1.89 1.33 ROE x Leverage ROE = Net profit margin x Asset Turnover x Leverage Earning leading revenue / net profit after tax, but almost DHG’s ratios in 3 years from 2009-2012 was not good as well as a small-scale company such as PMC and had downward trends in the future. Shortcomings: • Inventory/ receivables management was not effective • The company had high level of liquidity but may not was using its current assets or its short-term financing facilities efficiently • ROA The ability of attracting investor’s attention If you are an administrator… If you are an investor….. Annual Report 2010 – 2011 -2012 of DHG JSC Annual Report 2010 – 2011 -2012 of PMC JSC Industry data : cophieu68.vn