Optimizing The Fleet Response Plan
ADM Bill Gortney
15 January 2014
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
1
Readiness Kill Chain
Past, Present, Way Ahead
Governance / C2 – Drives integration & synchronization vertically across weapons systems & horizontally across the readiness lifecycle
Ways
Means
• Installations
• Community
• Industry
• Elected
Leaders
RESOURCE
/ POLICY
ACCESS /
PROCURE
Assess
• Personnel
• Equipment
• Supplies
• Training
• Ordnance
• Networks
Ends
FRTP
PREINTRO
MAINT
BASIC
INTEGRATED
DEPLOY &
SUSTAIN
Weapon System
Surface
Aviation
Submarines
Common
Actions
C4ISR/CYBER
Synchronized
Training
Full Weapon
System Ops
NECC
OP/TAC HQs
Everyone is part of the Readiness Kill Chain
Everyone needs to know their place and role in the Readiness Kill Chain
Means and Ways must support the Ends – our Deployability / Sustainment model, the FRP
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
As of
08MAY13
2
What is RKC?
• The Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) is a way to break down institutional
barriers, increase understanding of readiness production, ensure a
common understanding of Navy readiness on the same page, and ensure
that policies, resources, and products deliver the right capability and
readiness for mission requirements.
• Specifically, RKC is a repeatable methodology to identify readiness
production barriers and root causes, followed by development of effective
strategies and solutions to remove these barriers. These processes result
in complete assessment and presentation for decisions used to improve
forward deployed readiness and resolve barriers in an informed and cost
effective manner.
• O-FRP is one example of implementation of the RKC. O-FRP uses the RKC
approach to analyze various stages of the processes for training,
inspections, parts, maintenance and manning to achieve desired end
states.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
3
CNO Guidance
WARFIGHTING
FIRST
OPERATE
FORWARD
We will operationalize
the Sailing Directions
BE
READY
“We will deliver credible capability for deterrence,
sea control, and power projection to deter or
contain conflict and fight and win wars.”
“Operate forward at strategic maritime
crossroads; Sustain our fleet capability through
effective maintenance, timely modernization, and
sustained production of proven ships and aircraft.”
.
“We must ensure today’s force is ready for its
assigned missions. Maintaining ships and aircraft
to their expected service lives is an essential
contribution to fleet capacity”
through the Optimized
Fleet Response Plan
“We developed the Optimized Fleet Response Plan to
using the Readiness
establish a more manning-balanced and sustainable
Kill Chain (RKC)
cycle…”
- CNO Position Report: 2013, p 3
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
4
CNO’s Tenets
• The CNO’s tenets as outlined in his Sailing directions and reinforced in the
Navigation Plan are clear.
• The Readiness Kill Chain approach provides us a holistic construct, or
methodology, to ensure the Fleet is focused on warfighting … forward …
and ready to conduct missions assigned and O-FRP is the answer to how
we balance those priorities.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
5
What is O-FRP?
• The Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP) has been developed to
enhance the stability and predictability for our Sailors and families by
aligning carrier strike group assets to a new 36 month training and
deployment cycle.
• Beginning in fiscal year ’15, all required maintenance, training, evaluations
and a single eight-month deployment will be efficiently scheduled
throughout the cycle in such a manner to drive down costs and increase
overall fleet readiness.
• Under this plan, we will streamline the inspection and evaluation process
and ensure that we are able to maintain a level of surge capacity.
• O-FRP reduces time at sea and increases home port tempo from 49% to
68% for our Sailors over the 36 month period. Initially focused on Carrier
Strike Groups, O-FRP will ultimately be designed for all U.S Navy assets
from the ARG/MEU to submarines and expeditionary forces.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
6
Fleet Response Plan
Problem Statement
• We have lost predictability
• For Sailors, families, industrial base
• Readiness producers, and readiness consumers
• Length does not accommodate maintenance and training … or maximize
operational availability
• Misaligned CSG / DESRON Chains of Command
• Manning levels not aligned to the phases of FRP
• Maintenance and modernization
• Not executing on time / budget
• Requires better synchronization
• Underfunded spares accounts
• Unconstrained inspection process
• Lack of standardized Operational /Tactical HQ academic, synthetic, and
live training
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
7
Potential Drivers to
Readiness Production
C2
C3
HST CSG
JUL10 – SEP13
C4
C5
“Cost Driver” – Schedule Driven FRP Inefficiency
Traditional Fleet FRP
C2
C2
NIM CSG
C3
FEB11 – SEP13
C3
C4
C4
C5
C5
“Cost Driver” – Maintenance and Schedule Driven FRP Inefficiency
Model Readiness
United States Fleet Forces
Actual profile
IKE CSG
FEB11 – SEP13
“Cost Driver” – Maintenance Driven FRP Inefficiency
Anticipated profile
United States Pacific Fleet
8
Understanding Potential Drivers to
Readiness Production Slide
• The previous slide graphically depicts inefficiencies.
• The solid blue line represents our readiness model and the dashed line is
reality for these three Strike Groups.
• Each of these three profiles is unique and our generic profile is not reliably
predictive of the investment of our “means and ways” in this process.
• IKE CSG faced maintenance challenges which delayed her work-ups and
deployment and then she conducted a second deployment after a short
homeport visit.
• HST CSG trained up and then delayed due to a change in presence
requirements – we “banked” her readiness during this delay.
• NIM CSG was a combination of both maintenance and schedule delays.
• Comparing a generic planning FRP profile to these CSGs profiles highlights
the need to find a model that is more predictable and reliable in the planning
process and ensures that we conserve scarce resources and money.
• O-FRP establishes a framework to develop a predictive model that will drive
each CSG to look and execute a more similar FRP profile.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
9
O-FRP Predecessor:
Enhanced Carrier Presence
• DepSecDef-driven concept to generate 3.0-4.0 CSG Ao
–
–
–
–
7-7-7 plan (Deploy/Dwell/Deploy)
49 percent Homeport Time
Deployments are 39 percent of the FRP length
ECP Frame work:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Provides a predictable FRP cycle
Extends/synchs CVN/CVW/SC FRP cycles to 36 months
Fixes CSG composition: Ships/aircraft/staffs remain aligned thru entire FRP cycle
Generates fully ready forces, trained to a single MCO certification standard
Establishes a stable and predictable maintenance plan
Maintenance interval remains constant
– ECP concept ended Jan 13 due to sequester/POM fiscal limits
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
10
“Managed Wholeness”
• The following series of slides describe progress achieved in our effort to
manage Fleet wholeness across the Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) through the
Optimized-Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP).
• “Managed Wholeness,” is a term USFF coined to describe how we are
leading our forces through the tough fiscal turbulence expected over the
coming years.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
11
Current Fiscal Environment
• We’ve started FY 14 under a Continuing Resolution Amendment at reduced
funding levels. Additionally, we are constrained by our current manpower
levels and force structure. As a result, we have to carefully manage the
wholeness of the Fleet with innovative cost saving measures that optimize
readiness at the reduced funding levels.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
12
Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP)
• Retains ECP framework / capacity with reduced global Ao (~2.0)
–
36 month FRP
–
Single 8-month deployment
–
Starts with HST CSG in Nov 2014
• Enables delivery of:
–
Fixed CSG Composition
–
Aligned and stabilized CSG manning throughout the FRP
–
Stable maintenance plan
–
Improved quality of work and enhanced quality of life
–
Embedded Electromagnetic Spectrum Maneuver Warfare and Naval
Integrated Fire Control – Counter Air
–
Forces trained to a single certification standard
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
13
Optimized FRP
Lines of Effort
Operational &
Tactical HQ’s
(USFF / CPF N7)
Advanced
Training
(USFF / CPF N7)
Lines of Effort
Unit Training
(TYCOMs)
Inspections
(USFF/CPF N43)
Parts
(USFF / CPF N41
OPNAV N8/N9)
Maintenance/
Modernization
(NAVSEA / NAVAIR
USFF / CPF )
Manning/
Individual Training
(OPNAV N1 /USFF)
CSG
Alignment
(USFF / CPF N3)
FRP Length
(USFF / CPF
OPNAV N3)
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
14
FRP Length
• Maximum CSG Operational Availability (Ao)
Length
ECP
O-FRP
7/7/7
8
–
36 month FRP
–
Supply-based; surge capacity dependent upon funding
Homeport
Tempo
0.49
0.68
–
Maximum forward presence with available capacity and funding
D / FRP
0.39
0.22
–
Predictable, yet adaptable
–
Able to meet FY14-16 with 2.0 CVN and 27 SC (includes 9+4 FDNF)
PREDICTABLE
ADAPTABLE
For the sunk cost of maintenance & training, maximize Ao, with a clean
chain of command, and an acceptable PERSTEMPO
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
15
What is AO?
• AO is “Operational Availability.” Basically, this is the time a platform is employable.
– This does not take into consideration OPTEMPO and PERSTEMPO.
• The formula is the cycle length minus maintenance and training.
• For example, in the 36-month O-FRP cycle, there are approximately 6 months
maintenance and 6 training. Therefore, AO is approximately 24 months.
AO = [ Cycle length – (maintenance time and training time)]
AO = 36-(6+6) = 24
• This does not mean that a Carrier Strike Group will be deployed for the entire
Operational Availability. Under O-FRP, deployment lengths are metered by Service
Quality of Life factors. AO is simply a measure of when a platform is employable, and
is used for planning both for rotational deployment and to determine surge capacity
should a National emergency arise.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
16
FRP Length
• 36 month FRP cycle becomes the foundation upon which we generate CSGs
ready for deployment and provides maximum Ao for CSG presence/funding
level.
• Under a sustainable O-FRP, a single 8 month deployment generates a
deployed to FRP ratio (D/FRP) of 0.22 (or in other terms 5 CVNs can
generate 1.0 global presence) with the ability to go to 0.38 (or 3 CVNs to
generate a 1.0 presence) should resources ever become available.
• These CSGs will be composed of 7-8, vice current 3-4, surface combatants
who will be aligned under a single DESRON and will aggregate for training
and certification.
• Surface combatants’ deployment dates may vary slightly due to maintaining
Global Force Management Allocation Plan (GFMAP) adjudicated presence
requirements: Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), SCAN EAGLE, and FIRE
SCOUT.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
17
CSG Alignment
• Problem:
CSG and Destroyer Squadron
Misalignment
-
–
-
Operational Control (OPCON) and
Administrative Control (ADCON)
Chain of Command and FITREPS
DESRON Commanders do not
deploy with their assigned SC
CSGs deploy with SC from
multiple squadrons
Multiple Independent deployer
CERTEX events required
• Advanced training produces
lesser qualification (MSO vs.
MCO)
DESRON SC FRP cycles not in
alignment
Capability mismatch with CSG
• Solution:
Fixed CSG Composition
-
-
C2 Aligned with FRP cycle
OPCON aligned with deployment
cycle
SC schedules more predictable
BMD integrated within CSG
Surface combatant CMP aligned
with CVN
Cost effective, Major Combat
Operations Independent
deployers
Iterative changes will be required in out years to complete
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
18
CSG Alignment
• When examining DESRON alignments in conjunction with O-FRP, we saw
an opportunity to fix numerous discrepancies, such as wholesale surface
combatant swap outs between CSG multiple deployments as well as
integrating BMD capability into CSGs.
• O-FRP aligns surface combatant and CVN/CVW cycles to optimize
resources required to achieve deployment certification.
• Simple administrative alignment near term achieves 90% DESRON
alignment. 21 of 29 moves have been mapped out for TYCOM execution to
support 4 CSG’s.
• USFF is changing DESRON assignments so that all CRUDES will be aligned
to their CSGs starting with the GHWB CSG for their FEB 2014 deployment.
• Ownership alignment also allows ISICs to begin transmitting Commanders’
intent to assigned units early – operational and professional expectations.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
19
Manning Wholeness
• Personnel readiness standard
– 92/95/1 minimum deployment manning levels
– Take risk in non-deployed units and post
deployment surge
100.0%
• Actions to achieve wholeness
–
–
–
–
Recruit/Access to meet demand
Manage ‘Street to Fleet’ supply chain
Fund the Individuals Accounts
Define and prioritize critical operational
shore duty billets
95.0%
90.0%
85.0%
80.0%
• Manage and sustain wholeness
–
–
–
–
Fit
Fill
Fit Forecast
Fill Forecast
Fit Threshold
Report and manage individual PERSTEMPO
Incentivize and retain quality sailors
Manage FIT/FILL risk ashore
Established PERS-454 to streamline LIMDU
process
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
20
FIT/FILL/CRITICAL NEC
• In the previous slide, we used “92/95/1” as our endstate. This is also known
as “FIT / FILL / Critical NEC”
• The first number is “FIT”
– This indicates that a commanding officer will have 92 percent of sailors
authorized with the right skill sets
• The second number is “FILL”
– This number indicates that at least 95 percent of the required manning is on
board
• The third and final number indicates that there is at least 1 sailor on board
that has the qualifications for every critical Navy Enlisted Classification
(NEC)
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
21
Manning
• The Fleet continues to face a fit/fill below the standard of 90/90/1 with an
upward in trend of cross decks and diverts needed to maintain that
standard.
• After a TYCOM RKC review and a USFF N1 led Navy-wide working group, a
CNO approved POAM was developed to increase the personnel readiness
target, set actions to achieve wholeness and manage and sustain the gains.
• OPNAV N1 was given the lead to execute the POAM.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
22
HST CSG Manning to O-FRP
HST FILL / FIT
100%
RCN Fill Threshold
RCN Fill
95%
RCN Fill Proj
Achievementof92% Fitand95%Fill
90%
85%
80%
75%
70%
65%
Maintenance
60%
RCN Fit Threshold
RCN Fit
RCN Fit Proj
NEC Fit
NEC Fit Proj
Crit NEC Fit
Crit NEC Fit Proj
BBD QofA
Basic
Integrated
Sus
Avail
BBD P4 Proj
COGNOS Data Source : Nov 5, 2013
HST CSG
SJA Fill (Payband)
Curre nt M onth
HST CSG
SJA Fit (Payband)
RCN Fill
%
RCN Fit
%
NEC Fit
%
Crit NEC
Fit %
CVN 75 H.S. TRUM A N
92%
90%
70%
70%
90
COM CA RSTRKGRU 10
90%
90%
53%
53%
87
1
CG 72 VELLA GULF
90%
85%
73%
73%
85
20
CG 61M ONTEREY
90%
89%
71%
71%
86
7
CG 56 SA N JA CINTO
89%
86%
73%
73%
85
17
DDG 80 ROOSEVELT
94%
90%
67%
67%
86
6
DDG 87 M A SON
85%
83%
65%
65%
82
23
23
Unit
FILL THRESHOLD
SUP FILL
JNY FILL
FIT THRESHOLD
APP FILL
102%
102%
97%
97%
SUP FIT
JNY FIT
APP FIT
92%
92%
87%
87%
82%
82%
85%
83%
65%
65%
82
104%
91%
45%
45%
87
1
VFA 32
90%
86%
75%
75%
89
12
VFA 37
94%
92%
64%
64%
89
0
VFA 105
90%
89%
80%
80%
89
6
VA W 126
88%
85%
72%
72%
83
9
VA Q 130
89%
87%
80%
80%
89
7
HSC 7
94%
91%
81%
81%
87
1
HSM 74
96%
89%
60%
60%
84
77%
Nov-13
Dec-13
Jan-14
Feb-14
Mar-14
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Nov-13
Aug-14
M a n n i n g
Di stri bution
Dec-13
Jan-14
Feb-14
Mar-14
Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14
Jul-14
A c t i o n s
Unplanned
40
TBD
20
Aug-14
Total
0
Nov-13
Dec- 13
Ja n-14
Feb-14
Ma r- 14
Apr-14
United States Fleet Forces
Ma y-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
40
CVW 3
DDG 94 NITZE
77%
Re quire d
BBD QoA
M anning
(Ne w
Actions to
M e tric
92% (bas e d
Unde r
on Curre nt
Re vie w )
M onth)
7
180
Aug-14
United States Pacific Fleet
23
Maintenance & Modernization
• CNO Availability schedules are set:
–
–
–
–
–
–
Aligned with CRUDES assignment to CSGs
Stable, predictable and integrated maintenance and modernization plan
Proper availability planning
Allowance for timely port loading adjustments
Integrated with assessments
Aligns Surface Ship Class Maintenance Plan to 36 months to match CVNs
• Modernization improvements:
– Interoperable and aligned CSG/ARG C5I capabilities
– Integrated SOVT test to include all associated supporting systems
• Improved aircraft inventory management to fully support training plan
• Adjust SFRM to 36 month FRP
Stable, Predictable, Integrated Maintenance & Modernization
that aligns and synchronizes CSG capabilities
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
24
Maintenance & Modernization
• Turning to maintenance and using the kill chain “As is” / “To be” construct,
we found that maintenance was impacted by changes in schedules and
funding, and is constrained by port loading.
• Thumb-rule used by maintenance providers is that costs go up by 3x for
work packages changes through mid-availability and as much as 8X for
changes in work packages from mid-to-late availability. So, this is a
significant cost driver.
• We also found that modernization is not aligned to the group and that there
is significant variance in combat systems. For instance, in the 62 ship
Arleigh Burke Class, there are 42 different configurations of only 8 major
C4I systems. Clearly, an interoperability challenge.
• Configuration variance reduction is one element that will improve
maintenance and modernization execution.
• Providing a stable and predictable FRP length with clear ownership
alignment to a particular CSG would alleviate many of these challenges.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
25
Maintenance & Modernization
RKC Analysis
• Commander’s Intent
– Use a Readiness Kill Chain approach
– Analyze the various stages of the end to end process
• Ship/Submarine Maintenance and Modernization:
– NAVSEA lead
– Drive Work Package development and Planning effort to be done
earlier
– Integrate Class Maintenance Plan requirements with Modernization
• Aircraft Depot Maintenance
- NAVAIR lead
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
26
Surface Spares Wholeness
• Spares availability critical to readiness
• Stagnant/downward trends in key indicators drove action to get right parts
on the shelves
• Outfitting Spares
– Additional $51M added to outfitting spares accounts May’13; minimal spares
backlog
– Outfitting spares funding “green” across Future Year Defense Plan
• Fleet Shipboard Spares
– Significant investments in AEGIS/BMD spares FY10-13
– COSAL updates every 2 months since July 2012
– Additional $21M investment in surface spares end of Fiscal Year 2013
• Ship Construction Spares
– $14.6M added back to LPD-25 & LHA-6 programs end of Fiscal Year 2013
Coordinated Shipboard Allowance List (COSAL)
effectiveness improving and expected to continue
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
27
Inspections
= Independent Inspections
“As-Is”
PRESENT: 466 inspections
Maintenance
“To-Be”
FUTURE:
Basic
INSURV MI / MCMA
MI
MCMA
Integrated
INSPECTION
PERIOD III
INSPECTION
PERIOD II
INSPECTION
PERIOD I
United States Fleet Forces
Deployment
CNO designated USFF as
Executive Agent for Fleet
Assessment:
- Oversee changes to
Inspections, Certifications,
Assessment and Visits events
- Approval authority for new or
expanded requirements
- Standardize Assessment
Criteria
- Maximize training value
- Develop enduring process for
continual review
- Lead senior advisory group to
CNO on ICAV matters
United States Pacific Fleet
28
28
Inspections
• This diagram approaches inspection and assessment processes in the “As
is: at top and “To be” on the bottom of the chart. The curves represent a
generic readiness curve and are sub divided horizontally by phase.
• Our Fleet Action Working Group found that there are 466 different
inspections, certifications, assists and visits scattered across the FRP.
Some of these are time based, some are conditions based and others are
policy or law. Many are, frankly, outdated.
• Developing an assessment and inspection continuum across the FRP will:
—Optimize external assessment and inspection events to eliminate redundancy
—Optimize assessment timing within the FRP
—Standardize assessment and inspection requirements
—Standardize expectations to minimize impacts to ship’s force personnel
• Develop institutionalized process for continuous adjudication of future
inspections within the FRP.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
29
Creating a Smarter INSURV
• Reduced from 5 days to 3 days
– Commences on Tuesday vice Monday to reduce burden on crew
• Improved Operational Risk Management
– Ships do not get underway before 0700 to enhance safety
– Ship leadership afforded crew rest through improved scheduling of events and
elimination of redundant and out dated requirements
• Linked to Readiness Events
– Accepts TYCOM TSRA PMS data as INSURV data. This makes INSURV even
shorter (3 days or less)
• Analyzes more data over broader period of time
– Collects TYCOM mid-cycle assessment data as INSURV data. This increases the
amount of data used to identify maintenance and readiness trends
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
30
EA For Fleet Assessments
IPR
25 SEP 13
17 JAN 14
18 OCT 13
PHASE ONE
FAWG
DELIVERABLES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
“AS-IS” ICAV
LIST – CMP
PROPOSED
ICAV CHANGES
COMPLETE
PROPOSED
“TO-BE” STATE
COMPLETE
ICAV CHARTER
DRAFTED
RESOURCES
PHASE TWO
TYCOM/SYSCOM REVIEWS
ECD
14 FEB 14
DELIVERABLES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
EA FOR ICAV DESIGNATED –
COMPLETE
REFINE/CONCUR WITH ICAV
CONCEPT - COMPLETE
COMMENT/CONCUR WITH ICAV
CHANGES – STAKEHOLDERS
REVIEWING CHARTER
All AIRFOR AND SURFOR ICAVs
TIED TO FOUR PHASES IN FRP –
COMPLETE
AIRFOR AND SURFOR
IDENTIFIED ICAVS TO COMBINE
- COMPLETE
LINKAGE INSTRUCTION
DRAFTED AND TESTED ON JET
BLAST DEFLECTORS (JBDs) –
COMPLETE
SUBLANT JOINED FAWG
DELIVERABLES
ECD
1 OCT 14
PHASE THREE
FLEET CDR REVIEW
PHASE FOUR
CENTRAL ICAV AUTHORITY
(CICAVA)
DELIVERABLES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
SIGN CHARTER – TYCOMS
HAVE REVIEWED WITH
ONLY MINOR CHANGES
DESIGNATE CICAVA –
CONTAINED WITHIN
CHARTER
STANDUP CICAVA
RESOURCE CICAVA
INSURV MESSAGE
INSURV HAS ACTION TO
LEAD LINKAGE
ESTABLISHMENT BETWEEN
TYCOM AND INSURV
INSPECTIONS
DELIVERABLES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DRAFT AND SIGN ICAV INSTRUCTION
ASSUME DUTIES FROM FAWG
PRIORITIZE ICAV CHANGES
DEVELOP ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
SURFACE SHIP INSURV
INSPECTIONS REDUCED TO 3.5 DAYS
– APR 2014
PHASE FIVE
STEADY STATE
DELIVERABLES
1.
2.
CICAVA MAKES CHANGES
DELETE, MOVE CONSOLIDATE,
AND OPTIMIZE ICAV EVENTS
(MOVE FROM AS-IS TO TO-BE)
CICAVA ACTS AS
THE GATEKEEPER
TO SYNCHRONIZE
ALL ICAV EVENTS
CICAVA EXTENDS
PROCESS TO
OTHER FRPDRIVEN ENTITIES
BLUE – COMPLETED
RED – NOT COMPLETED
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
31
O-FRP Training
• Carrier, air-wing, and all surface combatants training aligned
• ALL units trained to one standard
• People and equipment ready for training at the end of maintenance
• Basic unit training
– Retains training time entitlement
– Integrates inspection, certification, and continuous maintenance requirements
24 Weeks
CRUDES
READ-6
/ CMAV
TIER 1 - Mobility
CVN
TIER 2 - Unit Tactical
WCC
TYCOM Tasking
CVW
A-A ARP
Non Skid
TSTA
A-G ARP
• Advanced unit and integrated group training
– Standardized Group Sail
– More efficient training schedule
– Standardized training Fleet-wide
14 Weeks
CRUDES
Group
Sail
Academic
CVN
CVW
United States Fleet Forces
Synthetic
TSTA /
FEP
Live
CVW FALLON
United States Pacific Fleet
32
Operational Level to Tactical Level
Headquarter Alignment
Combatant
Commander
– Functions based on Mission Essential
Tasks aligned from Combatant to Tactical
Commander
– Personnel assigned with right skill sets to
meet HQ “fit”
– Interoperable systems between
Operational and Tactical Level HQ
– Standardized and codified staff training
and exercise program
Alignment
• Aligned and standardized Navy
warfighting staffs from operational to
tactical level
CTG
NCC
CTF
CSG, CVW, DESRON, PHIBRON
Standardization
Optimized – Fleet Response Plan will provide aligned
and standardized Operational and Tactical Level Headquarters
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
33
Headquarters Alignment
• Both tactical and operational (TL / OL) staffs have 2 main focus areas:
—Support commander’s decision cycle, and assure subordinate success
•
•
•
•
Key elements in the kill chain are Tactical and Operational Level staffs.
TL HQs need to be functionally aligned to OL HQs.
Achieving this requires standardized tactical staff academic training.
Revised Strike Group Tactical Training Continuum (SGTTC) codifies
individual training for tactical staffs.
—Standardizes training by billet
• Includes CSG CDR, CVW, DESRON, ESG, PHIBRON, TACRON, Warfare CDRS, and
staffs
• Sets individual requirements for pipeline and Fleet training
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
34
Optimized FRP
Lines of Effort
OL/TL HQ’s
(USFF / CPF N7)
HST – IOC MAY 14
Advanced
Training
(USFF / CPF N7)
GHWB – IOC AUG 13
GHWB
VIN
TR
HST
TR – IOC SEP 13
Lines of Effort
Unit Training
(TYCOMs)
HST
Inspections
(USFF/CPF N43)
GHWB
HST
VIN
GHWB
VIN
Parts
(USFF / CPF N41
OPNAV N8/N9)
Maintenance/
Modernization
(USFF / CPF N43/N6)
HST
Manning/
Individual Training
(USFF / OPNAV N1)
CSG
Alignment
(USFF / CPF N3)
FRP Length
(USFF/CPF
OPNAV N43)
GHWB
VIN
TR
HST
GHWB
VIN
HST / GHWB / TR by MSG – AUG 13
Foundation to O-FRP
United States Fleet Forces
----------
CVN/CVW There Now
----------
SC w/HST
United States Pacific Fleet
35
First O-FRP CSG: TRUMAN
• Starts with maintenance cycle in Nov 14. CRUDES will be aligned by HST
CSG FRP start (NOV 2014), pending rework of class maintenance plans by
NAVSEA.
• Inspections begin approximately 1 month prior to Basic training phase
• Manning is aligned to Basic training phase to gain efficiency in training
audience participating in all of work-ups
• Integrated training occurs in Nov 15
• CSG alignment has already started by message in Aug 13 for HST / GHWB /
and TR. The first CSG to be aligned for deployment will be GHWB in Feb
14.
• HST CSG staff will receive pipeline and fleet training for OL/TL alignment in
May 14.
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
36
Follow On Carrier Strike Groups
• The other CSGs officially enter O-FRP at the maintenance phase: GHWB –
May 14, VIN – Jul 15, TR – Dec 15
• Where able, we have instituted elements of O-FRP as early as possible.
GHWB conducted elements of Integrated training by conducting a new GRP
Sail event.
• TR is conducting increased integrated training b/c of NIFC-CA. CSG
alignment for HST / GHWB / TR is de facto complete after the first ADCON
shift message in August 13 (CCSGs already briefing their “to be” units at
update briefs)
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
37
Readiness Kill Chain
Navy-Wide Approach to Managing Wholeness
Governance / C2 – Drives integration & synchronization vertically across weapons systems & horizontally across the readiness lifecycle
Ways
Means
• Installations
• Community
• Industry
• Elected
Leaders
RESOURCE
/ POLICY
ACCESS /
PROCURE
Assess
• Personnel
• Equipment
• Supplies
• Training
• Ordnance
• Networks
Ends
FRP
PREINTRO
MAINT
BASIC
INTEGRATED
DEPLOY &
SUSTAIN
Managing Wholeness
1. Cost to Own..……
2. O-FRP………………..
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
OL/TL HQs………………………………………………………………………………………….
Advanced Training...........................................................................................................
Unit Training…………………………………………………………………………………………....
Inspections…………………………………………………………………………………………..….
Parts…………………………………………………..
Maintenance……………………………………………………………………………………….…..
Manning…………………….
CSG Alignment…………………………………………………………………………………………
FRP Length……………………….
3. Surge Capacity.....
It takes everyone to manage Fleet wholeness across the Readiness
Kill Chain
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
38
Optimized FRP
Take Aways
Operational &
Tactical HQ’s
Standardize & align NCC, CSG and Warfare CDR training tracks
Advanced
Training
Combine JTFX / C2X; standardize Group Sail; NIFC-CA & EMMW
Lines of Effort
Unit
Training
Inspections
Parts
Maintenance/
Modernization
ISIC-led, CSG-wide aggregated training with a predictable schedule
Consolidate to specific inspection periods aligned to the FRP
RKC methodology to ensure spares are available when needed
Stable, predicable, synchronized execution of Maint & Modernization
Manning/
Individual
Training
Sea Centric Manning; Incentivize and Retain Quality Sailors
CSG
Alignment
C2 aligned with FRP cycle
FRP Length
36 Month Fleetwide introduction begins with TRUMAN CSG in Nov 2014
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
39
UNCLASSIFIED
United States Fleet Forces
United States Pacific Fleet
40