Forward guidance Lars E.O. Svensson Web: larseosvensson.se The RBNZ and IJCB conference “Reflections on 25 years of Inflation Targeting” Wellington, New Zealand, December 1-2, 2014 Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, SE-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden, www.sse.edu 1 Outline Forward guidance as special or normal policy? The Swedish experience of publishing a policy-rate path: Success and dramatic failure The broader picture of Riksbank monetary policy The New Zealand experience of publishing an interest-rate path: Less dramatic, monetary policy better focused Conclusions 2 Forward guidance: Special or normal? Some info about future policy settings • Policy rate, other policy instruments (balance sheet) Recently: Fed, BoC, ECB, BoE • Special: Binding Effective Lower Bound • Implementing more expansionary monetary policy 3 Forward guidance: Special or normal? For many years: RBNZ, Norges Bank, Sveriges Riksbank, Czech NB • Normal: Published forecast of interest rate (policy rate or 90-day path) • RBNZ 1997-, NB 2005-, SR 2007-, CNB 2008- Integral part of flexible inflation targeting • Stabilize inflation around announced inflation target and resource utilization around long-run sustainable rate • Forecast targeting: Set policy rate and policy-rate path such that forecasts for inflation and resource utilization “look good” 4 Forward guidance in form of published policy rate path: Reasons for normal? 1. Transparency: Coherent CB forecast of target variables requires CB forecast of instrument. Then publish this. 2. Effectiveness: Management of expectations (of the future policy rate) 3. Informativeness: Central bank should have more info about its future policy settings. Should be useful info for private sector and other authorities 4. Justification: Provides a coherent way of justifying policy choice by comparison with policy alternatives 5. Accountability: Simplifies external evaluation of policy by comparison with policy alternatives and assessments of tradeoffs between target variables 5 Developments of forward guidance as something normal Forecasts of target variables conditional on: 1. Constant policy rate • • If inflation forecast above (below) target, increase (reduce) policy rate Inconsistencies, not credible (Leitemo, Woodford) 2. Market expectations of policy rate: “market policy-rate path” • • CB forecasts of target variables may not “look good” CB policy-rate path may differ from market path 3. Central-bank forecast of policy rate: “CB policy-rate path” • Consistent (inconsistent) if market path equal (differ) from CB path 6 The Swedish experience of publishing a policy-rate path Previously discussed by Svensson (2009, 2010) and Woodford (2012, 2013) Success and failures Evaluate according to (1) Predictability: Market forward rates predict policy-rate path (2) Credibility: Market forward rates in line with (adjust towards) policy-rate path (successful management of expectations) Distinguish “actual” and “intended” monetary policy A “credible “ policy-rate path may not necessarily be “appropriate” Success: February 2009 Failure: September 2011 7 Riksbank policy rate and Riksbank policy-rate paths Feb 2007-Sep 2014 8 Riksbank policy rate and market policy-rate paths Feb 2007 – Sep 2014 A brief history Feb 2007 – Sep 2014: Go 9 Success! February 2009 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 10 Failure! September 2011 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 11 The Swedish experience What was behind the discrepancy between Riksbank and market policy-rate paths in September 2011? What was the broader picture of Riksbank policy? 12 Behind the discrepancy: Another discrepancy for foreign policy rates September 2011: Riksbank forecast of foreign policy rates much above market expectations of foreign policy rate 13 Behind the discrepancy: Yield curves 1.7 pp 14 Behind the discrepancy: Another discrepancy for foreign policy rates A lower Riksbank forecast for foreign policy rates would have implied a lower policy-rate path • With unchanged policy-rate path, a forecast of stronger krona, the inflation forecast would have shifted down and the unemployment forecast would have shifted up High forecast of foreign policy rates served to shift inflation forecast up and unemployment forecast down, supporting high policy-rate forecast Resulted in Riksbank inflation forecasts biased upwards 15 Riksbank CPI inflation forecasts 2011 and 2012 and outcome 16 Actual yield curve implied much easier policy than intended Market did not believe Riksbank policy-rate path Market possibly understood that it would lead to too strong a krona, which would have forced the Riksbank to back down (this confirmed by informal discussions with market participants) “Actual” MP much easier than “intended” “Intended” MP would have implied 5-year bond rate 1.7 pp higher Good for the economy that the RB policy-rate path was not credible 17 The broader picture: CPI inflation 1995-2014 on average below target 18 Average inflation expectations close to target 1997-2011: Average inflation below average inflation expectations To New Zealand 19 Average unemployment 1997-2011 about 0.8 pp higher than if inflation had been on target 0.8 pp Svensson (2015), “The Possible Unemployment Cost of Average Inflation Below a Credible Target,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2015(1). 20 Why the tightening in June/July 2010? Leaning against the wind because of concerns about household debt and housing prices Not clearly explained June/July 2010: “Another factor [in relation to the policy-rate increase] is that household indebtedness has increased significantly in recent years” (June/July 2010 press release) “[A]n interest rate increase was also a signal to avoid new financial imbalances from building up and that household indebtedness ought not to rise too much” (Governor Ingves, in June/July 2010 minutes) Sending a signal to households that mortgage rates would soon return to normal Tradeoff w/ inflation and unemployment not admitted until op-ed by Governor Ingves in October 2012 21 Ex ante: Riksbank and Fed forecasts June 2010 Inflation Unemployment Riksbank and Fed forecasts quite similar Policies very different • Fed: Keep policy rate between 0 and 0.25%, forward guidance, prepare QE2 • Riksbank: Start raising the policy rate from 0.25 to 2% in July 2011 Riksbank: Ex ante clearly a premature tightening Source: Svensson, Lars E.O. (2011), “Practical Monetary Policy: Examples from Sweden and the United States ,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall 2011, 289-332. 22 The leaning: Policy rates in Sweden, UK, and US; Eonia rate in euro area Oct 28 23 The leaning: Inflation in Sweden, euro area, UK, and US 24 The leaning: Real policy rate in Sweden, UK, and US, real Eonia rate in euro area 25 Ex post: Policy-rate increases from summer of 2010 led to inflation below target and higher unemployment (and probably a higher debt ratio) LTV cap Source: Svensson (2013), “Unemployment and monetary policy – update for the year 2013,” Svensson (2013), “Leaning against the wind increase (not reduces) the household debt-to-GDP ratio”, posts on larseosvensson.se. Cont. 26 Unemployment in Sweden and New Zealand 27 Riksbank’s case for leaning against the wind Higher debt could imply (1) a higher probability of a future crisis, or (2) a deeper future crisis if it occurs Hence, a tradeoff between (a) tighter policy now with lower debt but worse macro outcome now and (b) easier policy now with more debt but worse expected future macro outcome Worse outcome now is an insurance premium worth paying Is that true? The answer can be found in the Riksbank’s own boxes in MPR of July 2013 and February 2014, plus Schularick and Taylor (2012) and Flodén (2014) This involves putting numbers on the cost and benefit of leaning 28 Cost of 1 pp higher policy rate: 0.5 pp higher unemployment rate Source: MPR July 2013, chapt. 2; Svensson, post on larseosvensson.se, March 31, 2014. 29 Benefit (1) of 1 pp higher policy rate: Lower probability of a crisis Schularick & Taylor (2012): 5 % lower real debt in 5 yrs implies 0.4 pp lower probability of crisis (average probability of crises about 4 %) Riksbank, MPR Feb 2014, box: 1 pp higher policy rate leads to 0.25 % lower real debt in 5 years Lowers probability of crises by 0.25*0.4/5 = 0.02 pp Assume 5 pp higher unemployment in crisis (Riksbank crisis scenario, MPR July 2013, box) Benefit (1): Expected lower future unemployment: 0.0002*5 = 0.001 pp Cost: Higher unemployment rate now: 0.5 pp Source: Svensson, post on larseosvensson.se, March 31, 2014. 30 Benefit (2) of 1 pp higher policy rate: Smaller increase in unemployment if crisis Flodén (2014): 1 pp lower debt ratio may imply 0.02 pp smaller increase in unemployment rate in crisis Riksbank MPR Feb 2014, box: 1 pp higher policy rate leads to 0.44 pp lower debt ratio in 5 yrs Smaller increase in unemployment in crisis: 0.44*0.02 = 0.009 pp With probability of crisis as high as 10 %, divide by 10 (Shularick & Taylor: 4 %) Benefit (2): Expected lower future unemployment: 0.0009 pp Cost: Higher unemployment now: 0.5 pp Source: Svensson, post on larseosvensson.se, March 31, 2014. 31 Summarize cost and benefit of 1 pp higher policy rate Should have been > 1! Riksbank’s case does not stand up to scrutiny 32 The New Zealand experience of publishing an interest-rate path Longest experience, starting in June 1997 Previously examined by Archer (2005), Moessner and Nelson (2008), Anderson and Hofman (2009), Detmers and Nautz (2012), Bergstrom and Karagedikli (2013) Less dramatic than the Swedish experience RBNZ monetary policy better focused 33 RBNZ policy rate, 90-day rate and RBNZ 90-day paths Mar 1999 – Sep 2014 34 RBNZ policy rate and market policy-rate paths Mar 2004 – Sep 2014 35 RBNZ monetary policy: The broader picture 36 RBNZ monetary policy: The broader picture Inflation deviation from target midpoint 37 Average inflation expectations equal average inflation: No increase in average unemployment To Sweden 38 Unemployment in Sweden and New Zealand New Zealand: A brief history 2004Q1-2014Q3: Go 39 Success: March 2005 2005Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 40 Success: March 2009 2009Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 41 Actual policy tighter than intended: Sep 2009 2009Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 42 Dec 2011: Actual policy easier than intended 2011Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 43 March 2012: Actual policy follows market 2012Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 44 Conclusions Swedish experience much more dramatic, and special Leaning against the wind: A high policy-rate path got priority over inflation and resource utilization Case of “wag the dog” New Zealand experience much less dramatic Policy better focused on traditional goals A few cases of actual policy tighter/easier than intended Market sometimes ahead of RBNZ Sometimes problems with transparency, effectiveness, informativeness, justification, and accountability Keep publishing policy-rate paths 45 46 History: Sweden February 2007 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 47 June 2007 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 48 October 2007 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 49 December 2007 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 50 February 2008 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 51 April 2008 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 52 July 2008 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 53 September 2008 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 54 8 October 2008 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 55 23 October 2008 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 56 December 2008 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 57 February 2009 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 58 April 2009 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 59 July 2009 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 60 September 2009 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 61 October 2009 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 62 December 2009 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 63 February 2010 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 64 April 2010 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 65 July 2010 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 66 September 2010 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 67 October 2010 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 68 December 2010 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 69 February 2011 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 70 April 2011 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 71 July 2011 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 72 September 2011 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 73 October 2011 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 74 December 2011 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 75 February 2012 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 76 April 2012 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 77 July 2012 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 78 September 2012 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 79 October 2012 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 80 December 2012 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 81 February 2013 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 82 April 2013 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 83 July 2013 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 84 September 2013 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 85 October 2013 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 86 December 2013 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 87 February 2014 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 88 April 2014 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 89 July 2014 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 90 September 2014 Repo Rate Old repo-rate path 5 New repo-rate path Day before 4 After announcement 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 0 2016 Back 91 92 92 History: New Zealand 2004Q1- 2014Q3 2004Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 93 2004Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 94 2004Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 95 2004Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 96 2005Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 97 2005Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 98 2005Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 99 2005Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 100 2006Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 101 2006Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 102 2006Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 103 2006Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 104 2007Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 105 2007Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 106 2007Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 107 2007Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 108 2008Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 109 2008Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 110 2008Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 111 2008Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 112 2009Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 113 2009Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 114 2009Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 115 2009Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 116 2010Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 117 2010Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 118 2010Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 119 2010Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 120 2011Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 121 2011Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 122 2011Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 123 2011Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 124 2012Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 125 2012Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 126 2012Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 127 2012Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 128 2013Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 129 2013Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 130 2013Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 131 2013Q4 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 132 2014Q1 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 133 2014Q2 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2 134 2014Q3 9 6 9 Official Cash Rate 90-day rate 8 Old 90-day path New 90-day path 7 Before announcement After announcement 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 8 7 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Back 2 135