MDOF SYSTEMS WITH DAMPING General case Saeed Ziaei Rad MDOF Systems with hysteretic damping- general case Free vibration solution: [M ]{x} ([K ] i[ D]){x} {0} Assume a solution in the form of: it {x} {X }e Here can be a complex number. The solution here is like the undamped case. However, both eigenvalues and Eigenvector matrices are complex. The eigensolution has the orthogonal properties as: []T [M ][] [mr ]; []T [ K iD][] [kr ] The modal mass and stiffness parameters are complex. MDOF Systems with hysteretic damping- general case Again, the following relation is valid: kr 2 r (1 ir ) mr 2 r A set of mass-normalized eigenvectors can be defined as: {}r (mr ) 1/ 2 { }r What is the interpretation of complex mode shapes? The phase angle in undamped is either 0 or 180. Here the phase angle may take any value. Numerical Example with structural damping x2 k4 k1 m2 m1 k2 k5 k3 m3 x1 k6 m1=0.5 Kg m2=1.0 Kg m3=1.5 Kg k1=k2=k3=k4=k5=k6=1000 N/m x3 Undamped .5 0 0 [M ] 0 1 0 0 0 1.5 3 1 1 [K ] 1 3 1 1 1 3 Using command [V,D]=eig(k,M) in MATLAB 0 0 950 .464 .218 1.318 [ r2 ] 0 3352 0 [ ] .536 .782 .318 0 0 6698 .635 .493 .142 Proportional Structural Damping Assume proportional structural damping as: d j 0.05k j , j 1,,6 0 0 950(1 .05i ) [2r ] 0 3352(1 .05i ) 0 0 0 6698(1 .05i ) .464(0 ) .218(180 ) 1.318(180 ) [] .536(0 ) .782(180 ) .318(0 ) .635(0 ) .493(0 ) . 142 ( 0 ) Non-Proportional Structural Damping Assume non-proportional structural damping as: d1 0.3k1 d j 0, j 2,,6 0 0 957(1 .067i ) [2r ] 0 3354(1 .042i ) 0 0 0 6690(1 .078i ) .463(5.5 ) .217(173 ) 1.321(181 ) [] .537(0 ) .784(181 ) .316(6.7 ) .636(0 ) . 492 ( 1 . 3 ) . 142 ( 3 . 1 ) Non-Proportional Structural Damping Each mode has a different damping factor. All eigenvectors arguments for undamped and proportional damp cases are either 0 or 180. All eigenvectors arguments for non-proportional case are within 10 degree of 0 or 180 (the modes are almost real). Exercise: Repeat the problem with m1=1Kg, m2=0.95 Kg, m3=1.05 Kg k1=k2=k3=k4=k5=k6=1000 N/m FRF Characteristics (Hysteretic Damping) Again, one can write: ([K ] i[ D] 2[M ]){X }eit {F}eit The receptance matrix can be found as: H ( ) ([K ] i[ D] [M ]) [][ ][] 1 2 2 r 2 FRF elements can be extracted: jrkr H jk ( ) 2 2 2 r 1 r ir r N or N H jk ( ) r 1 r Ajk ir 2 r 2 2 r Modal Constant T MDOF Systems with viscous damping- general case The general equation of motion for this case can be written as: [M ]{x} [C ]{x} [ K ]{x} { f } Consider the zero excitation to determine the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the system: {x} {X }e st This leads to: ([M ]s 2 [C]s [ K ]){X } {0} This is a complex eigenproblem. In this case, there are 2N eigenvalues but they are in complex conjugate pairs. MDOF Systems with viscous damping- general case sr , sr* * { }r , { }r r 1, , N It is customary to express each eigenvalues as: sr r ( r i 1 ) 2 r Next, consider the following equation: (s [M ] sr [C] [ K ]){ }r {0} 2 r Then, pre-multiply by {}qH : {} (s [M ] sr [C] [K ]){}r {0} H q 2 r * MDOF Systems with viscous damping- general case A similar expression can be written for { }q : (s [M ] sq [C] [K ]){ }q {0} 2 q This can be transposed-conjugated and then multiply by{ }r {} (s [M ] sq [C] [K ]){}r {0} H q 2 q ** Subtract equation * from **, to get: (s s ){} [M ]{}r (sr sq ){} [C]{}r {0} 2 r 2 q H q H q This leads to the first orthogonality equations: (sr sq ){} [M ]{}r {} [C]{}r {0} H q H q (1) MDOF Systems with viscous damping- general case Next, multiply equation (*) by sq and (**) by s r : sr sq{} [M ]{}r {} [K ]{}r {0} H q H q (2) Equations (1) and (2) are the orthogonality conditions: If we use the fact that the modes are pair, then sq r ( r i 1 r2 ) { }q { } * r MDOF Systems with viscous damping- general case Inserting these two into equations (1) and (2): { }rH [C ]{ }r cr 2 r r H { }r [ M ]{ }r mr { } [ K ]{ }r kr { } [ M ]{ }r mr 2 r H r H r Where mr , kr , c r are modal mass, stiffness and damping. FRF Characteristics (Viscous Damping) The response solution is: {X } ([K ] i[C] 2[M ])1{F} We are seeking to a similar series expansion similar to the undamped case. To do this, we define a new vector {u}: x {u} x 2 N 1 We write the equation of motion as: [C : M ]N2 N {u}2 N1 [ K : 0]{u} {0}N1 FRF Characteristics (Viscous Damping) This is N equations and 2N unknowns. We add an identity Equation as: [M : 0]{u} [0 : M ]{u} {0} Now, we combine these two equations to get: C M M K {u} 0 0 0 {u} {0} M Which cab be simplified to: [ A]{u} [ B]{u} {0} 3 FRF Characteristics (Viscous Damping) Equation (3) is in a standard eigenvalue form. Assuming a trial solution in the form of {u} {U}est (sr [ A] [ B]){ }r {0} r 1,,2 N The orthogonality properties cab be stated as: [ ] [ A][ ] [ar ] T [ ] [ B][ ] [br ] T With the usual characteristics: br sr ar r 1,,2 N FRF Characteristics (Viscous Damping) Let’s express the forcing vector as: F {P}2 N 1 0 Now using the previous series expansion: 2N X { }Tr {P}{ }r iX 2 N 1 r 1 ar (i sr ) And because the eigenvalues and vectors occur in complex conjugate pair: N X { }Tr {P}{ }r { }rH {P}{ *}r * * i X a ( i s ) a ( i s ) 2 N 1 r 1 r r r r FRF Characteristics (Viscous Damping) Now the receptance frequency response function H jk Resulting from a single force Fk and response parameter X j jr kr N H jk ( ) or r 1 ar ( r r i( r 1 r2 ) N H jk ( ) Where: r 1 r * * jr a*r ( r r i( r 1 r2 ) R jk i( / r )(r S jk ) 2 2 2ir r r {r Rk } 2( r Re{r Gk } Im{r Gk } 1 ) 2 r {r S k } 2 Re{r Gk } {r Gk } ( kr / ar ){ }r kr