Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI QDMRK SPRING-2 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Design Randomisation* 1:1 Double-blind > 18 years ARV-naïve HIV RNA > 1,000 c/mL Any CD4 cell count No primary resistance in RT or protease N = 411 N = 411 W48 W96 DTG 50 mg QD + RAL placebo + 2 NRTI** RAL 400 mg BID + DTG placebo + 2 NRTI** *Randomisation (DTG vs RAL) was stratified by HIV RNA (< or > 100,000 c/mL) at screening and NRTI backbone **NRTI backbone (TDF/FTC or ABC/3TC if exclusion of the HLA-B*5701 allele) selected by investigator Objective – Non inferiority of DTG at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL by intention to treat, snapshot analysis (1-sided significance level of 2.5%, lower margin of the 95% CI for the difference = -10%, 90% power) SPRING-2 Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:735-43 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Baseline characteristics and patient disposition DTG + 2 NRTI N = 411 RAL + 2 NRTI N = 411 37 35 Female 15% 14% HIV RNA (log10 c/mL), median 4.52 4.58 HIV RNA > 100,000 c/mL 28% 28% CD4 cell count (/mm3), median 359 362 CD4 < 200 per mm3 13% 12% Hepatitis B / hepatitis C coinfection 2% / 10% 2% / 9% Dual NRTI on day 1 : TDF/FTC / ABC/3TC 59% / 41% 60% / 40% Discontinuation by W48 47 (11.4%) 56 (13.6%) N = 16 N = 24 N=8/N=2 N=6/N =1 N=4 N=7 N = 13 / N = 4 N = 11 / N = 7 62 (15%) 79 (19%) Median age, years For virologic failure For adverse event / For liver stopping criteria Lost to follow-up Protocol deviation / Withdrew consent Discontinuation by W96 SPRING-2 Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:735-43 ; Raffi F. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13:927-35 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Response to treatment at week 48 HIV RNA < 50 c/mL % 100 DTG + 2NRTI RAL + 2 NRTI Primary analysis 89.9 87.8 88.4 Non-inferiority was also supported by Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion of patients without virological failure by week 48 85.4 75 50 The number of patients who achieved the primary endpoint was similar between subgroups in analyses that combined high and low HIV RNA strata and backbone NRTI 25 0 SPRING-2 ITT, snapshot Per protocol Adjusted difference (95% CI) = 2.5% (- 2.2 ; 7.1) Adjusted difference (95% CI) = = 1.6% (- 2.7 ; 5.9) Median CD4/mm3 increase at W48 : + 230 in both groups Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:735-43 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at week 48 by stratification factors DTG 50 mg QD N = 411 RAL 400 mg BID N = 411 Difference in % (95% CI) DTG – RAL Number of Responders/Number Assessed Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA ≤ 100,000 c/mL 267 / 297 (90%) 264 / 295 (89%) 0.4 (-4.5, 5.3) >100,000 c/mL 94 / 114 (82%) 87 / 116 (75%) 7.5 (-3.1, 18.0) P = 0.236* Background Dual NRTI ABC/3TC 145 / 169 (86%) 142 / 164 (87%) -0.8 (-8.2, 6.6) TDF/FTC 216 / 242 (89%) 209 / 247 (85%) 4.6 (-1.3, 10.6) P = 0.264* * Test for homogeneity SPRING-2 Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:735-43 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Response to treatment at week 96 HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at week 96 DTG + 2 NRTI RAL + 2 NRTI % % ITT snapshot, by baseline stratification factors 100 100 83.5 80.8 76.4 82 78 80.4 82 86 77 75 75 74 76 63 50 50 25 25 0 0 ITT, snapshot Per protocol Adjusted difference Adjusted difference (95% CI) = (95% CI) = 4.5 % (- 1.1 ; 10.0) 3.2 % (- 2.1 ; 8.6) SPRING-2 HIV-1 RNA (c/mL) > 100,000 ≤ 100,000 NRTI backbone TDF/FTC ABC/3TC Raffi F. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:927-35 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Virologic non-responders (ITT, snapshot) at week 96 by baseline stratification factors DTG 50 mg QD N = 411 RAL 400 mg QD N = 411 Baseline HIV-1 RNA < 100,000 c/mL 10/297 (3) 17/295 (6) Baseline HIV-1 RNA > 100,000 c/mL 12/114 (11) 26/116 (22) ABC/3TC 10/169 (6) 16/164 (10) TDF/FTC 12/242 (5) 27/247 (11) ABC/3TC TDF/FTC ABC/3TC TDF/FTC (N = 169) (N = 242) (N = 164) (N = 247) Baseline HIV-1 RNA < 100,000 c/mL 6/132 (5) 4/165 (2) 8/125 (6) 9/170 (5) Baseline HIV-1 RNA > 100,000 c/mL 4/37 (11) 8/77 (10) 8/39 (21) 18/77 (23) SPRING-2 Raffi F. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:927-35 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Virologic failure definition – 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA > 50 c/mL, on or after W24 Criteria for resistance testing – All patients with protocol defined virologic failure (PDVF) – Genotype of RT and integrase on baseline and suspected virologic failure samples Resistance data at PDVF DTG + 2 NRTI , N = 411 PDVF Integrase genotype results at baseline and time of PDVF Emergent integrase-resistance mutations Reverse transcriptase genotype results at baseline and time of PDVF Emergent NRTI-resistance mutations RAL + 2 NRTI, N = 411 D0-W48 W48-W96 D0-W48 W48-W96 20 (4.9%) 2 28 (6.8%) 1 8 2 18 1 0 0 1* 0 12 2 19 1 0 0 4* 0 * 1 patient with INSTI mutations (T97T/A, E138E/D, V151V/I, N155H) and NRTI mutations (A62A/V, K65K/R, K70K/E, M184V), 1 patient with M184M/I, 1 with M184M/V, 1 with A62A/V SPRING-2 Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:735-43 ; Raffi F. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:927-35 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Adverse events at week 48 Any adverse event AE in > 5% of subjects in either group Nausea Headache Nasopharyngitis Diarrhoea Upper respiratory tract infection Dizziness Pyrexia Fatigue Insomnia Bronchitis Depression Pharyngitis Influenza Asthenia Syphilis SPRING-2 DTG + 2 NRTI RAL + 2 NRTI 82% 83% 14% 12% 11% 11% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 2% 13% 12% 12% 11% 6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:735-43 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Graded laboratory toxic effects : rates similar between groups Serious adverse events at week 48 DTG + 2 NRTI RAL + 2 NRTI Any serious adverse event N = 29 (7.1%) N = 31 (7.3%) SAE related to study drug N=3 N=5 0 N=1 Arrhythmia N=1 0 Convulsion 0 N = 2* Diarrhoea 0 N=1 Hepatitis N=1 0 Hypersensitivity N=1 N=1 0 N = 1* Aphasia CPK increased * 1 patient with elevated CPK + convulsion Safety between W48 and W96 – Adverse events leading to discontinuation : 0 for DTG vs 3 for RAL – No serious adverse events related to study drugs SPRING-2 Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:735-43 ; Raffi F. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13:927-35 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Mean change in serum creatinine concentration (µmol/L) from baseline 40 30 DTG 50 mg QD RAL 400 mg BID 20 12.3 14.6 4.7 8.2 10 0 -10 -20 Baseline 4 8 12 16 24 32 40 48 60 72 84 96 Mean change in estimated creatinine clearance (CG formula) at W96 : – - 19.6 mL/min for DTG vs – 9.3 mL/min for RAL No discontinuations due to renal events through 96 weeks SPRING-2 Raffi F. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:927-35 SPRING-2 Study: DTG QD + 2 NRTI vs RAL BID + 2 NRTI Conclusion – DTG 50 mg QD was virologically non-inferior to RAL BID, (both + 2 NRTIs) over 48 and 96 weeks – No INSTI mutations were detected through 96 weeks with DTG – DTG was similar to RAL in terms of safety and tolerability – Low occurrence of adverse events leading to discontinuation : 2% in each group – Between W48 and W96 : few new virologic failures and few discontinuations for adverse events – No discontinuation due to renal events through 96 weeks – Mean increases in creatinine with accompanying decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate • occurred in both study groups by week 4 • generally stabilised and did not change up to week 96 SPRING-2 Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:735-43 ; Raffi F. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:927-35