Soap vs. Sanitizer Laboratory Experiment Why wash your hands? Hand are the most frequent transmission route for many types of infections. Pathogens may enter through the mouth, nose, or eyes. Proper hand hygiene is the easiest way to reduce infections. How do you wash properly? Scrub your hands with soap and warm water for 20 seconds to 2 minutes. Scrubbing your hands physically removes dirt and grease, which wash away with the water What about hand sanitizer? When water is not available, hand sanitizer can be an effective alternative. The alcohol in hand sanitizer disrupts the coating on bacteria and viruses. Use enough sanitizer to keep your hands wet while you rub for at least 30 seconds. Soap vs. Sanitizer Experiment Problem/Question: Which is more effective at reducing the amount of bacteria on hands: washing with soap or antibacterial sanitizer? Hypothesis & Prediction: If washing with soap and water is more effective at reducing the amount of bacteria on hands, then the soap treatment will show a greater reduction in bacterial growth than the sanitizer treatment. Experimental Design Independent/Manipulated Variable: Dependent/Responding Variable: Soap Sanitizer Control: Bacterial growth Treatments: Cleanser/Chemical No soap or sanitizer Analysis: Compare percent reduction in bacterial growth Methods Label your Petri dish Group #Treatment Before/After Before After Methods How to sample: Methods Apply treatment for 30 seconds Analysis # Before - # After = Difference Difference ÷ # Before = Reduction Reduction x 100 = % Reduction TREATMENT Before Number of Bacterial Colonies After Difference % Reduction Control 1 Control 2 Control Average: Soap 1 Soap 2 Soap Average: Sanitizer 1 Sanitizer 2 Sanitizer Average: Analysis Sample results: Number of Bacterial Colonies After Difference % Reduction TREATMENT Before Control 1 119 500 -381 -320% Control 2 198 32 166 83.8% Control Average: -118% Soap 1 100 68 32 32% Soap 2 6 90 -84 -1400% Soap Average: -684% Sanitizer 1 7 1 6 85.7% Sanitizer 2 23 2 21 91.3% Sanitizer Average: 88.5% Expected ≈ 0 Expected > 0