Mathematical Proofs

advertisement

Chapter 4 More on Directed Proof and Proof by

Contrapositive

• 4.1 Proofs Involving Divisibility of Integers

• 4.2 Proofs Involving Congruence of Integers

• 4.3 Proofs Involving Real Numbers

• 4.4 Proofs Involving sets

• 4.5* Fundamental Properties of Set Operations

• 4.6* Proofs Involving Cartesian Products of Sets

Section 4.1 Proofs Involving Divisibility of Integers

In general, for integers a and b with a≠0, we say that a divides b if there is an integer c such that b=ac. In this case, we write a | b .

If a | b, then we also say that b is a multiple of a and that a is a divisor

|

Result: Let a, b, and c be integers with a≠0 and b ≠0. If a|b and b|c, then a|c.

Proof. Assume that a|b and b|c. Then b=ax and c=by, where x, y

Z.

Therefore, c=by=(ax)y=a(xy). Since xy

Z, a|c.

Examples

Result: Let a, b, c, x, y

 Z, where a≠0. If a|b and a|c, then a|(bx+cy).

Exercise.

Result: Let x, y

 

| |

Proof: Assume that 3 | x or 3 | y. WLOG, assume that 3 divides x.

Then x=3z for some integer z. Hence xy=(3z)y=3(zy). Since zy is an integer, 3 | xy.

#

Examples

Let x

Z. If 3 (x 2 -1), then 3 | x.

x=3q +2 for some integer q. We consider these two cases.

Case 1. x =3q+1 for some integer q. Then x 2 -1=(3q+1) 2 -1=3(3q 2 +2q).

Since 3q 2 +2q is an integer, 3 | x 2 -1.

Case 2. x=3q+2 for some integer q. Then x 2 -1=(3q+2) 2 -1=3(3q 2 +4q+1).

Since 3q 2 +4q+1 is an integer, 3 | x 2 -1.

#

Section 4.2 Proofs Involving Congruence of Integers

For integers a, b, and n≥2, we say that a is congruent to b modulo n, written a

 b (mod n), if n | (a-b).

For example: 15

7 (mod 4) since 4 | (15-7),



Note that: since every integer can be expressed as x=2q or as x=2q+1 for some integer q, it follows that either 2|(x-0) or 2|(x-1); that is, x

0 (mod 2) or x

1 (mod 2).

Similarly, we have x

0(mod 3), x

1(mod 3), or x

2(mod 3).

Etc.

Examples

Result: Let a, b , k, and b be integers, where n≥2. If a  b (mod n), then ka

 kb (mod n).

Proof: Assume that a

 b(mod n). Then n | (a-b). Hence a-b =nx for some integer x. Therefore, ka-kb=k(a-b)=k(nx)=n(kx).

Since kx is an integer, n | (ka-kb) and so ka

 kb (mod n).

#

Examples

Result: Let a, b, c, d, n

Z , where n ≥2. If a  b (mod n) and c

 d (mod n), the ac

 bd (mod n).

Proof: Exercise.

Examples

Let n

Z. If n 2





Proof. Let n be an integer such that n

0 (mod 3) or n

1(mod 3). We consider these two cases.

Case 1. n

0(mod 3). Then n=3k for some integer k. Hence n 2 -n=(3k) 2 -(3k)=3(3k 2 -k).

Since 3k 2 -k is an integer, 3 | n 2 -n. Thus n 2

 n (mod 3).

Case 2. n

1(mod 3). Then n=3x+1 for some integer x. Hence n 2 -n=(3x+1) 2 -(3x+1)=3(3x 2 +x).

Since 3x 2 -x is an integer, 3 | n 2 -n and so n 2

 n (mod 3).

#

Section 4.3 Proofs Involving Real Numbers

Some facts about real numbers that can be used without justification.

• a 2 ≥0 for every real number a.

• a n ≥0 for every real number a if n is a positive even integer.

• If a<0 and n is a positive odd integer, then a n <0 .

• If the product of two real numbers is positive if and only if both numbers are positive or both are negative.

• If the product of two real numbers is 0, then at least one of these numbers is 0.

• Let a, b, c 

R . If a ≥b and c ≥0, then ac ≥ bc.

Indeed, if c>0, then a/c ≥b/c.

• If a>b and c>0, then ac>bc and a/c>b/c.

• If a>b and c<0, then ac<bc and a/c<b/c.

Theorem

Theorem: If x and y are real numbers such that xy=0, then x=0 or y=0.

Proof. Assume that xy=0. We consider two cases, x=0 or x≠0.

Case 1. x=0. Then we have the desired result.

Case 2. x ≠0. Multiplying xy=0 by the number 1/x, we obtain

1/x(xy)=1/x(0)=0. Since 1/x(xy)= ((1/x)x)y=y, it follows that y=0.

#.

Result: Let x

R. if x 5 -3x 4 +2x 3 -x 2 +4x-1 ≥0, then x ≥0.

Proof. Assume that x<0. Then x 5 <0, 2x 3 <0, and 4x<0. In addition,

-3x 4 <0, -x 2 <0. Thus x 5 -3x 4 +2x 3 -x 2 +4x-1<0-1<0, as desired.

#

Examples

Result. If x, y

R, then 1/3x 2 +3/4y 2 ≥xy.

Proof. Since (2x-3y) 2 ≥0, it follows that 4x 2 -12xy+9y 2 ≥0 and so

4x 2 +9y 2 ≥12xy.

Dividing this inequality by 12, we obtain 1/3x 2 +3/4y 2 ≥xy.

#

Section 4.4 Proofs Involving sets

Recall, for set A and B contained in some universal set U,

A



B={x: x

A or x

B}.

A

B={x: x

A and x

B}.

A - B={x: x

A and x

B}.

    

A }.

To show the equality of two sets C and D, we can verify the two sets inclusions C

D and D

C.

To establish the inclusion C

D, we show that every element of C is also an element of D; that is, if x

C then x

D.

Examples

Result. For every two sets A and B, A-B=A

Proof. First we show that A-B

A

. Let x

A and x



B. Since x

B, it follows that x

. Therefore, x

A and x

; so x

A

.

Hence A-B

A

.

Next we show that A

 

A- B. Let y

A

. Then y

A and y

. Since y

, we see that y

B. Now because y

A and y

B, we conclude that y

A- B. Thus, A

B

A-B.

#

Examples

Result. Let A and B be sets. Then A

B= A if and only if B

A .

Proof. First we prove that if A

B= A, then B

A. We use a proof by contrapositive. Assume that B is not a subset of A. Then there must be some element x

B such that x

A. Since x

B, it follows that x

A

B. However, since x

A, we have A

 B≠A.

Next we prove the converse, namely, if B

A, then A

B=A. We use a direct proof here. Assume that B

A. To verify that A

B= A, we show that A

A

B and A

B

A. The set inclusion A

A

B is immediate. It remains only to show then that A

B

A. Let y

A

B.

Thus y

A or y

B. If y

A, then we already have the desired result.

If y

B, then since B

A, it follows that y

A. Thus A

B

A.

#.

Download