Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation for AF: What is the Evidence? AHA QCOR Washington DC D. George Wyse MD PhD May 20, 2010 Disclosures* DSMB, SC or Grant Reviewer (Research) • Boerhinger Ingelheim (PHRI); RE-LY; RE-LYABLE • Medtronic (Mayo) – TRENDS; PACIFIC • Sanofi Aventis/Bristol Myers Squibb (PHRI) - ACTIVE-A; ACTIVE –W; ACTIVE-I • Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer (DCRI) – ARISTOTLE • Sanofi Aventis – BOREALIS, DETECT-AF • Biotronik (Axio) - IMPACT • Boston Scientific/Guident (PHRI) - SIMPLE • NHLBI (DCRI; U Penn) – TACT; COAG • European Commission – FP-7 Grant Applications • Sanofi Aventis (PHRI) – POSEIDON PHRI – Population Health Research Institute – McMaster University DCRI – Duke Clinical Research Institute; Mayo – Mayo Clinic Axio – Axio Research Corporation * All < $10,000 U. Penn – University of Pennsylvania Advisory Board • Merck • Bayer Speaker • Sanofi Aventis • BMS Outline • Key Patient Characteristics of RCT of LA/PV RFA and AAD • Quantitative “Gradient” between Groups of SR vs. AF in AAD vs. RFA RCT • Goals for Therapy of AF • • • • Reduce Mortality Prevent Stroke/SE Preserve/Improve Ventricular Function and Prevent CHF Relief of Symptoms • RFA of AV Junction and Pacemaker Age and Duration of Follow-up in RTC of LA/PV Catheter Ablation for RFA Study N Mean/median Age Mean FU Haissaguerre (2000) 90 51 0.7 Natale (2000) 15 59 0.8 Oral (2003) 40 51 0.5 RAAFT Pilot (2005) 70 53 1.0 APAF (2006) 198 56 1.0 CACAF (2006) 137 62 1.0 A4 (2008) 112 51 1.0 CABANA Pilot (2009) 60 64 1.0 AAD RCT: AFFIRM, AF-CHF & ATHENA N = ~ 10,000 Mean Age = 70y Mean FU = 4.5y Table unpublished, courtesy of Win Shen – Mayo University Quantitative “Gradient” Gradient = 70% SR vs. AF; AAD vs. RFA PABA-CHF – not “prevalence” Gradient = 40% AFFIRM New Engl J Med 2002;347:1825 New Engl J Med 2008;358:2667 New Engl J Med 2008;359:1778 Gradient = 40% AF-CHF Goals of Therapy for AF Reduce Mortality Death After RFA for AF Short-term 1.8 1.6 1.4 Based on 45, 115 procedures in 35, 569 patients between 1995-2006 = 0.98 per 1,000 Percent 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 JACC 2009;53:1798 0.2 0 PV n Se is os A TI ke ro nj St e l I ss N Ve ic n re Ph X o em X H mo eu Pn s i ps de Se na po m Ta th ea D Circulation 2005;111:1100 Death After RFA for AF Long-term • 65 ± 9 years • PAF = 69% • No CV Dis = 34% • LVEF = 54 ± 12% Death in RCT vs. AAD • RR = -0.003 (95% CI -0.01- 0.02; p = 0.74) Am Heart J 2009;158:15 + Annual Mortality in AFFIRM ~ 3.5% J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:185 Prevent Stroke/SE Stroke/TIA from RFA for AF Short-term “Yin-Yang” of Anticoagulation 1.8 1.6 Percent 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 PV is os en St A TI ke j ro St l I n e ss N Ve ic n re Ph X o em X H mo eu Pn is e ps ad Se n po m Ta th ea D Circulation 2005;111:1100 Stroke/SE after RFA Short-term Stroke in RCT vs. AAD • RR = 0.004 (95% CI -0.01-0.02; p = 0.54) Am Heart J 2009;158:15 Circulation 2006;114:759 Impact of Absence of AF on Stroke Stroke In AF Patients Cardioembolic ~60 - 65%* Other ~35 - 40%* •LAA •LA •LV •Valves Atheroembolic Arterial Thrombosis Hemorrhage Other * Neurology 1993;43:32 & Arch Intern Med 2005:165:1185 Perception of AF after RFA Episodes of AF Circulation 2005;112:307 % Episodes with No Symptoms AF Patterns Before/After AF Ablation with 24/7 Monitoring • “Permanent Cure” after 3 mo blanking = 3/14 J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18:818 Preserve/Improve Ventricular Function & Prevent CHF RFA and LV Function A meta analysis of RCT A = RR for reduced LVEF vs. normal LVEF B = Absolute % LVEF after vs. before RFA Relief of Symptoms Symptoms Ablation vs. AAD • Symptomatic AF • Failed at least 1 AAD • No amiodarone in 6 months • LA diameter <5cm • Mean age = 56y • Mean follow-up = 13 months J Am Med Assoc 2010;303:333 Symptoms of AF CCS- SAF Class N = 484 30 Percent 25 20 15 Percent 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 Symptom Class Circ Arrhythmia EP 2009:2;218 CABANA Trial Design Qualifying AF R RF Ablation PV isolation ± Center Preferred Enhancements Drug Therapy Rate or Rhythm Control Ablate [and Pace] Effects of AV Junction Ablation & Pace A Meta Analysis Circulation 2000;101:1138 PACIFIC Trial Pilot Qualifying AF (Failed 1 Drug Therapy) Age ≥65y R AV Junction Ablation + Device Drug Therapy Rate or Rhythm Control R RV Apex Pacing Biventricular Pacing