[AD Hoc Networks] by: Farhad Rad 1 Agenda : Definition of an Ad Hoc Networks routing in Ad Hoc Networks IEEE 802.11 security in Ad Hoc Networks Multicasting Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks 2 3 Introductin: MANET (Mobile Adhoc NETworks) An ad hoc network is a collection of wireless mobile hosts forming a temporary network without the aid of any established infrastructure or centralized administration” Military Applications Rescue Operations Virtual Classrooms solution Mobile Ad hoc Networks 4 Routing in Ad Hoc Networks: Challenges to Routing in MANETs Routing Protocols for MANETs Ad-hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Comparisons and Conclusions 5 Challenges to Routing in MANETs Lack of a fixed infrastructure Each node in the network must route messages towards their destination Nodes operate on battery power (Routing of messages may cause faster battery consumption, leading to node going offline) Nodes are constantly moving, leaving, or joining 6 Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks: Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector Protocol (DSDV) Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) Ad-hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) 7 8 9 Ad-hoc On Demand Distance Vector : (AODV) Routes are discovered on demand AODV is capable of both unicast and multicast routing AODV uses sequence numbers to ensure the freshness of routes It is loop-free scales to large numbers of mobile nodes AODV maintains routes for as long as the route is active. 10 Route Discovery: Node can initiate route discovery by broadcasting a Route Request (RREQ) message RREQ contains: Source and Destination addresses Sequence number of source Last known sequence number of destination Broadcast ID (incremented with each RREQ) Number of hops 11 الگوريتمهاي DVيا بردار فاصله • يكي از روشاي پويا در مسيريابي • مورد استفاده در شبكه ARPA • استفاده در مسيريابهاي كوچك • نامهاي متفاوت روش DV • پروتكل RIP • الگوريتم مسيريابي Bellman - Ford • الگوريتم مسيريابي Ford – Fulkerson • الگوريتم Distance Vector Routing 12 اصول كار روش DV • محاسبه خطوطي را كه به صورت فيزيكي با مسيريابهاي ديگر دارد و درج در جدول مسيريابي • بينهايت درنظرگرفتن هزينة خطوطي كه مسيرياب با آنها در ارتباط مستقيم نيست • ارسال ستون هزينه از جدول مسيريابي براي مسيريابهاي مجاور در بازههاي زماني مشخص، توسط هر مسيرياب (“يعني فقط براي مسيريابهائي كه با آن در ارتباط است نه تمام مسيريابها ”) .دريافت اطالعات جديد ا زمسيريابهاي مجاور در در فواصل Tثانيهاي • به هنگام نمودن جدول مسيريابي پس از دريافت جداول مسيريابي از مسيريابهاي مجاور ، طبق يك الگوريتم بسيار ساده 13 الگوريتمهاي DVيا بردار فاصله زيرساخت ارتباطي يك شبكة فرض ي با دوازده مسيرياب جدول مسيريابي مربوط به مسيرياب J 14 مشكل عمده پروتكلهاي DV عدم همگرايي سريع جداول مسيريابي هنگام خرابي يك مسيرياب يا يك كانال ارتباطي = مشكل شمارش تا بينهايت راه حل : ً وقتي يك مسيرياب ميخواهد اطالعاتي را به همسايههايش بدهد هزينه رسيدن به آنهايي را كه قطعا بايد از همان مسيرياب بگذرند را اعالم نميكند( .يا اعالم ميكنند) 15 مسئله شمارش تا بينهايت به خبرهاي خوب واکنش سريع ولي به خبرهاي بد واکنش کندي نشان مي دهد. 16 مسئله شمارش تا بينهايت هرگاه مسيريابي از زيرشبکه خارج شود هرکدام از ساير مسيريابهاي فعال احساس ميكنند از طريق ديگري مسيري بهتر به آن وجود دارد. 17 AODV introduction: Generating Route Request Processing and Forwarding Route Requests Generating Route Replies Receiving and Forward Router Replies 18 Aodv Algorithm: Source: A A B C D E F G H I Dest. : I A broadcast Route Request packet. If the receiving node has a route to the destination: Set up reverse path entry as before Sends back a Route Reply message (RREP) to the source containing : o Last known sequence number of destination o Number of hops to destination 19 Comparisons : Percentage of Packets Received Correctly 20 Routing Overhead in Packets 21 Conclusions: Routing protocols for MANETs will become important due to of wireless devices Different routing protocols for different needs DSDV does not perform well with highly mobile nodes DSR and AODV seem to give similar results 22 An overview of IEEE 802.11 802.11 refers to a set of WLANs that was approved by IEEE in 1997. Specifies the lowest two layers of the OSI model Standard Data rate Physical Layer Operating Frequency 802.11 1-2 Mbps FHSS/DSSS 2.4 GHz 802.11b 11 Mpbs Max. DSSS/HRDSSS 2.4 GHz 802.11a 54 Mbps Max. OFDM 5.5 GHz 802.11g 54 Mbps Max. OFDM 2.4 GHz 23 IEEE 802.11 IEEE 802.11 was first designed for wireless fixed networks Many problems occur when building ad hoc Networks with the IEEE 802.11 standard as the lowest two layers Until now, IEEE 802.11 doesn’t function well in wireless ad hoc netwroks 24 Modes of operation: Infrastructure-based: The main most mature technology for WLANs Most commonly used to construct Wi-Fi hotspots Costly for dynamic environments 25 Modes of operation: Infrastructureless-based: Also called Ad Hoc mode Stations form an Independent Basic Service Set (IBSS) Any stations within the same transmission range can communicate 26 IEEE 802.11 Architecture: Physical Layer : infrared, FHSS, or DSSS in 1997 OFDM and HR-DSSS were added in 1999 MAC Layer: Distributed Coordination Function (DCF): Provides the basic access method to the 802.11 MAC protocol Uses random backoff time following a busy signal Based on CSMA/CA Point Coordination Function (PCF): Only used in infrastructure-based 27 Common Problems in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks: A B C A B C D The hidden-station problem * The exposed-station problem * Degradation in throughput Collision occurs 28 Solution for the hidden and exposed station problems: Hidden Station Problem Solution: Extension for the DCF protocol by a virtual carrier sensing mechanism. Adding two control frames: Ready-To-Send (RTS), Clear-To-Send (CTS) Sending station transmits RTS to receiver and waits for CTS Receiver will not send CTS if receiving from another station Avoiding collision Exposed Station Problem Solution: A node can identify itself as an exposed node if it hears an RTS frame but not a CTS frame from the other transmitting node. Therefore, it concludes that it can have a simultaneous transmission Avoiding the reduction in throughput 29 Exposed node problem: Add info of your choice here Add text, graphic or photo at left 30 Mobility Problem: In ad hoc networks nodes can change their positions anytime TCP protocol cannot distinguish between congestion on one hand and route failure or packet loss due to transmission on the other hand This results in reduction in the performance of the network because of the slow start mechanism of the TCP protocol Mobility Problem Solutions: Route Failure and Rout Re-establishment notifications Explicit Link Failure Notification (ELFN) signal Ad hoc TCP (ATCP) : by adding a thin layer between TCP and IP layers 31 MAC Protocol & TCP : IEEE 802.11 was designed for wireless infrastructure LANs not for multi-hop ad hoc networks 802.11 doesn’t function well ad hoc networks because of the TCP protocol mechanisms and the difference among the transmission, sensing and interference ranges Three major problems will occur: Instability problem In-compatibility problem One hop Un-fairness problem 32 Instability Problem: 2 1 3 4 5 If station 1 is sending to station 5, the throughput can drop down to zero in some scenarios because of the following The hidden and exposed station problems that may prevent station 2 from receiving RTS or sending CTS to station 1 The random backoff time High window size that the TCP uses Solutions for the Instability Problem Decreasing the maximum window size of the TCP layer making the interfering range the same as the communication range 33 In-Compatibility Problem: This problem is defined as two simultaneous TCP traffics cannot coexist in the network. Once one session develops, the other one is shut down. The overturn can happen at any time randomly. the main causes of this problem are the hidden station problem, the exposed node problem and the exponential back-off scheme in the MAC layer. Solutions for the In-Compatibility Problem: Changing the back-off policy by penalizing stations that transmit too much data, so the other stations can still use the media. Adjusting the interfering and the sensing range 34 One-hop unfairness problem: If there are two simultaneous TCP connections one is a single-hop connection and the other is a multi-hop connection, the single-hop connection will be activated even if the multi-hop connection started first. 1 2 First Connection 3 4 5 6 Second Connection Causes are hidden station problem, the exposed node problem and the exponential back-off scheme 35 Unicast and Multicast: 128.146.199.0/24 Unicast : With n receivers, sender must replicate the stream n times Sender 128.146.116.0/24 Receiver 128.146.222.0/24 36 Multicast: 128.146.199.0/24 Source transmits one stream of data for n receivers Sender Replication happens inside routers and switches 128.146.116.0/24 Receiver 128.146.222.0/24 Receiver Receivers 37 Multicast Routing Protocols for Ad hoc Networks: Tree Based Protocols Ad hoc Multicast Routing (AMRoute) Ad hoc Multicast Routing Protocol utilizing Increasing id numberS (AMRIS) – Mesh Based Protocols On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol (ODMRP) Core-Assisted Mesh Protocol (CAMP) 38 Multicast Routing Protocols: protocol AMRoute ODMRP AMRIS CAMP Configuratio n Tree Mesh Tree Mesh Loop - Free No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Dependency on unicast Protocol Periodic Messaging Control Packet Flood 39 On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol (ODMRP): Source broadcasts periodically Join Request. Nodes receiving the request, save upstream node id and rebroadcast the message. 40 ODMRP: When a receiver gets the request, it updates its member table and return message Join Table to its neighbors. Nodes that are on the path from receiver to source, become part of the Forwarding Group 41 ODMRP: If source wants to leave the group, simply stop sending JOIN REQUEST packets If a node wants to leave the group it stops sending JOIN TABLE packets for that group 42 Simulation: Metrics Packet Delivery Ratio: The ratio of the number of data packets actually delivered to the destinations versus the number of data packets supposed to be received. Number of control packets transmitted per data packet delivered: The ratio of control packets transmitted to data packets delivered gives a measure of efficient utilization of control packets in delivering data. Number of data packets transmitted per data packet delivered Number of control and data packets transmitted per data packet delivered 43 Simulation Model: network of 50 mobile hosts Radio propagation range for each node was 250 meters and channel capacity was 2 Mbits/sec. …. ODMRP transmits more data packets than AMRIS because it exploits multiple redundant routes for data delivery 2.5 D a t a P a c k e t s T X e d /D a t a P a c k e t D e liv e re d There are 21 nodes in the multicast group and 5 nodes are chosen as sources Da ta P a cke ts T X e d /Da ta p a cke t De live re d a s a fu n ctio n o f M o b ility 2 1.5 ODMRP A MRIS 1 0.5 0 0 1 2 5 10 20 M o b ility (m /s e c) 44 Simulation Model: A ll Pack e ts T Xe d /Data Pack e t De live r e d as a fu n ctio n o f M o b ility AMRIS has the smallest number of packet transmissions because it uses a tree A ll P a c k e t s T X e d /D a t a P a c k e t D e liv e re d 2.5 2 1.5 ODMRP A MRIS 1 ODMRP transmits more data packets on redundant paths 0.5 0 0 1 2 5 10 20 M o b ility (m /s e c) 45 Network Traffic Load: AMRIS is very sensitive to traffic load ODMRP is also affected at higher loads, but the packet loss rate is much lesser than AMRIS PDR as a function of Network Traffic Load 1.2 1 Packet Delivery Ratio 0.8 AM RIS 0.6 ODM RP 0.4 0.2 0 1 5 10 25 Netw ork Traffic Load(pkts/sec) 46 Challenges: Security in Ad Hoc Networks Qos Routing Protocol Multicasting ……….. 47