VORTEX SOLUTIONS IN THE EXTENDED SKYRME FADDEEV MODEL NOBUYUKI SAWADO Tokyo University of Science, Japan sawado@ph.noda.tus.ac.jp In collaboration with Luiz Agostinho Ferreira, Pawel Klimas (IFSC/USP) Masahiro Hayasaka (TUS) Juha Jäykkä (Nordita) Kouichi Toda (TPU) arXiv:0908.3672 , arXiv:1112.1085, arXiv:1209.6452, arXiv:1210.7523 19 December, 2012 At Miami 2012: A topical conference on elementary particles, astrophysics, and cosmology, 13-20 December, Fort Lauderdale, Florida Objects of Yang-Mills theory (i) Gauge + Higgs composite models Abelian vortex (in U(1)) Abrikosov vortex, graphene, cosmic string, Brane world, etc. ‘tHooft Polyakov monopole GUT, Nucleon catalysis (Callan-Rubakov effect), etc. (ii) Pure Yang-Mills theory Instantons In the Cho-Faddeev-Niemi-Shabanov decomposition Monopole loop N.Fukui,et.al.,PRD86(2012)065020,``Magnetic monopole loops generated from two-instanton solutions: Jackiw-Nohl-Rebbi versus 't Hooft instanton” Condensates in a dual superconductivity Confinement The Skyrme-Faddeev Hopfions, vortices Glueball?, Abrikosov vortex?, Branes? β = πΌ(ππ π)2 +π½(ππ π × ππ π)2 +πΎ(ππ π)4 Exotic structures of the vortex…… Semi-local strings M.N.Chernodub and A..S. Nedelin, PRD81,125022(2010) ``Pipelike current-carrying vortices in two-component condensates’’ The Ginzburg-Landau equation P.J.Pereira,L.F.Chibotaru, V.V.Moshchalkov, PRB84,144504 (2011) ``Vortex matter in mesoscopic two-gap superconductor square’’ Summary We got the integrable and also the numerical solutions of the vortices in the extended Skyrme Faddeev Model. A special form of potential is introduced in order to stabilize and to obtian the integrable vortex solutions. We begin with the basic formulation. Cho-Faddeev-Niemi-Shabanov (CFNS) decomposition L.D. Faddeev, A.J. Niemi, Phy.Rev.Lett.82 (1999) 1624, ``Partially dual variables in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory” 3×4 β 6 = 6 Degrees of freedom electric 2 magnetic 2 remaining terms 1 The Gies lagrangian 1 6 ``Magnetic symmetry’’ ππ π + π΄π × π = 0 H. Gies, Phys. Rev. D63, 125023 (2001),``Wilsonian effective action for SU(2) Yang-Mills theory with Cho-Faddeev-Niemi -Shabanov decomposition t = ln k/L ∈ (−∞ , 0] ``renormalization group time’’ The integrability: the analytical vortex solutions Lagrangian (in Minkowski space) Sterographic project Static hamiltonian Positive definite for The equation of the vortex The vortex solution in the integrable sector L.A.Ferreira, JHEP05(2009)001,``Exact vortex solutions in an extended Skyrme-Faddeev model” O.Alvarez,LAF,et.al,PPB529(1998)689,``A new approach to integrable theories in any dimension” The zero curvature condition ππ π’ ππ π’ = 0 One gets the infinite number of conserved quantity Additional constraint π½π 2 = 1 π 2 π’ = 0 or π1 + ππ2 π’ The equation becomes ππ ππ π’ = 0 π1 − ππ2 π’ = − π3 + π0 π’ [ π3 − π0 π’] ππ π’ππ π’ = 0 or (π1 +ππ2 )(π1 − ππ2 )π’ = −(π3 + π0 )(π3 − π0 )π’ π’ = π£ π§ π€ π¦ = π§ π π ππ¦ π§ = π₯ 1 + ππ1 π₯ 2 , π¦ = π₯ 3 − π2 π₯ 0 π π π[π ππ+π(π₯ 3+π π₯0)] 2 Traveling wave vortex = π 1 π Vortex solutions in π½π 2 ≠ 1 Ansatz π’ π, π‘ = 1 − π(π¦) π(ππ+ππ§+ππ) π π(π¦) π₯ π = π0 (π, π cos π, π sin π , π§) π: = 1−π¦ π¦ (0≤ π¦ ≤ 1) The equation The solution has of the form: π π = π π π π π¦ = π2π π¦ π /(π2π π¦ π + (1 − π¦)π ) We have no solutions for π·ππ ≠ π. π. Derrick’s scaling argument G.H.Derrick, J.Math.Phys.5,1252 (1964), ``Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary particles’’ Consider a model of scalar field: Scaling: πΈ2 πΈ4 π= ππ(π) ππ =0 π= 4 πΈ0 πΈ4 and πΈ0 = 0 for π· = 3 for π· = 2 We need to introduce form of a potential to stabilize the solution. The baby-skyrmion potential ππΌ π½ π2 = 1 + π3 2 πΌ (1 − π3 )πΎ πΌ ≥ 0 πΎ > 0 Assume the zero curvature condition π π’ π, π, π§, π‘ = π Plug into the equation it is written as 4π3 π 2 0 = π½π − 1 4 1 + π π 2π0 2 π2 π + 1 + π2 π π=π π π π[πππ+π(π§+π)] with the potential: we assume πΆ = π − π/π΅, πΈ = π + π/π΅ 2π −3 2π −3 π−1 2 2+ π and π π π π 2π−4 4π−4 π= π 4 π − (π + 1) π 2 − 2− π π π π2 (π½π 2 −1) π0 2 π2 4π−4 2π−4 Analytical solutions for n = 1, 2 π π¦ = π2π π¦ π π2π π¦ π +(1−π¦)π and 2 2 π π 0 π = 1, π 2 = 0.0, = 1.0 π2 π= π 4 π2 (π½π 2 − 1) π0 2 π2 π0 2 π 2 π = 2, π = 0.0, = 1.0 π2 2 The energy of the static/traveling wave vortex The static energy per unit of length of the vortex with π = 1 πΈπ π‘ππ‘ππ 4π 1 2 − 1) = 2π + (π½π 3 π2 The energy per unit length of the traveling wave vortex with π ≥ 2 2π 1 2 − 1 π2 − 1 πΌ π πΈπ€ππ£π = 2ππ + π½π 3 π2 2π 2 2 +π 2ππ πΌ π + π½π 2 − 1 π 3 The infinite number of conserved current πΏπΊ πΏπΊ π½π β ∗ π¦π − π¦π ∗ π€βπππ πΊ β πΊ π’ πΏπ’ πΏπ’ 2 And the equation of motion is written as ππ π¦π − 2π’∗ 1 + π’ 2 2 π ππ π 2 2 π¦π π π’ = − (1 + |π’| ) 4 ππ’ ∗ The zero curvature condition ππ π’ππ π’ = 0 π¦π ππ π’ = π¦ ∗π ππ π’∗ = 0, π¦ ∗π ππ π’ = π¦π ππ π’∗ Thus the current is always conserved: β΅ ππ π½π πΏ 2πΊ π πΏπΊ π πΏ 2πΊ π ∗ πΏ 2πΊ π ∗ ∗ = π π’π¦π + π π¦π + ∗ π π’ π¦π − ∗2 π π’ π¦π 2 πΏπ’ πΏπ’ πΏπ’ πΏπ’ πΏπ’ 2 πΏπΊ π ∗ πΏ πΊ π ∗ − ∗ π π¦π − π π’π¦ π πΏπ’ πΏπ’πΏπ’∗ 2 πΏπΊ π2 ππ πΏπΊ π = − (1 + |π’|2 )2 ∗ − ∗ − 1+ π’ πΏπ’ 4 ππ’ πΏπ’ 4 2 2 ππ =0 ππ’ For πΊ β −4π/(1 + |π’|2 ) we get Noether current with π’ β¦ π ππΌ π’ ∗ − π’∗ π π’ π π’ ∗ )(π π’ ∗ π’ − π’ ∗ π π’) π’π π’ 2(π π’π 8 π π π π π 2 π½π = −4ππ2 − π (π½π − 1) 1+ π’ 2 2 π2 (1 + |π’|2 )4 The components: π½π = 0 The transverse spatial structure of the polar component π½π and the longitudinal component π½π§ are a pipelike structure. The charge per unit length: π= ππ₯1 ππ₯2 π½0 = −8ππ2 ππ2 π0 π 1 1 1 1 2 − 1 + Γ(1 + )Γ(1 − ) π½π 6 π2 π π π Broken axisymmetry of the solution The baby-skyrmion exhibits a non-axisymmetric solution depending on a choice of potential I.Hen et. al, Nonlinearity 21 (2008) 399 Old baby skyrmion potential π 01 π2 = (1 − π3 ) 2 New baby skyrmion potential π11 π2 = (1 − π3 )(1 + π3 ) 2 The energy density plot of π = 3 for old-, and new-baby potentials Symmetric: Nonsymmetric: π = 1 (old) π ≥ 2 new π ≥ 2 old For the potential π 2 2−π 2 2+π , the holomorphic solutions appear as a ground state! A sequence of the energy density plots of π = 3 for the several π½π 2 for the old-potential π½π 2 = 1.01 π½π 2 = 1.1 π½π 2 = 2.0 π½π 2 = 20.0 A repulsive force between the core of the vortices might appear It might be similar with the force between the Abrikosov vortex. Erick J.Weinberg, PRD19,3008 (1979), ``Multivortex solutions of the Ginzburg-Landau equations” The vortex matter/lattice structure is observed. Summary We got the integrable and the numerical solutions of the vortices in the extended Skyrme Faddeev Model. A special form of potential is introduced in order to stabilize and to obtain the integrable vortex solutions. Our integrable solution thus carries an infinite number of conserved quantity. The model (~two gap model) hides a SU(2) structure even if it describes the U(1) like observation such as SC. Outlook What it the origin of the potential? How can I observe our solutions in Physics? For SC, we may introduce an external magnetic field ππ → π·π = ππ + π΄π π ×. and see the structure change for the field. Geometrical patterns appear? Lago Mar Resort, USA, 17 Dec.,2012 Thank youοΌ Tanzan Jinja shrine,Japan, 16 Nov.,2012 The Skyrme-Faddeev model L.Faddeev, A.Niemi, Nature (London) 387, 58 (1997), ``Knots and particles’’ Lagrangian Static hamiltonian R.A.Battye, P.M.Sutcliffe, Phys.Rev.Lett.81,4798(1998) Positive definite for Hopfions(closed vortex) Coordinates: L.A.Ferreira, NS, et.al., JHEP11(2009)124, ``Static Hopfions in the extended Skyrme-Faddeev model” Axially symmetric ansatz Non-axisymmetric case: D.Foster, arXiv:1210.0926 Boundary conditions Hopf charge Hopf charge density (m, n) = (1, 1) (1, 2) (m, n) = (1, 3) (m, n) = (1, 4) (2, 1) (3, 1) (2, 2) (4, 1) Dimensionless energy, Integrability corresponds to the zero curvature condition The solution is close to the Integrable sector, but not exact. π½π 2