RATIONAL USE OF ANTIBIOTICS

advertisement

RATIONAL USE OF

ANTIBIOTICS

R. Anita Indriyanti

Pharmacological Department

Bandung Islamic University

References :

1. Lippincott’s Illustrated Reviews :

Pharmacology, 2 nd ed

(Chapter 28)

2. Buku Pedoman Kuliah Farmakoklinik

Farmakologi III

Jilid 1 edisi 2

Prof. DR. Herri S. Sastramihardja, dr.,

SpFK

A medical doctor has to know the definite clinical pharmacology of antibiotics, how to select and use them rationally.

30% of inpatient individuals has been given antibiotics

Side effect

Definition AB

Resistance

Ideal antibiotics

In vitro

Classification

Spectra

Chemical structures

Mechanism of action

DEFINITION

AB are chemical substances obtained from microbes/microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes) that able to inhibit or eradicate the growth of the other microorganisms.

Antimicrobial all antiinfections semisynthetic synthetic nature  antibiotics

IDEAL ANTIBIOTICS CRITERIA

1.

Most selective, most effective to infectied microorganisms

2.

More bactericidal effect in the site of action

3.

Antibacterial effect is not interfered by body fluid, exudate, plasma protein or enzymes and persist for a long duration in the blood

4.

Minimal toxicity

5.

Resistance develops slowly

6.

Given by any route

7.

Reachable cost

In vitro

1. Primary bacteriostatic effect  inhibit the growth of m.o

Sulfonamide, tetrac, chloramph, erythromycin (low concentration), lincomycin, clindamycin and fusidic acid

2. Primary Bactericidal Effects 

Eradicate/kill

Pen, cef, aminoglic, erythromycin (high concentration), cotrimazol. Rifampisin and vankomycin.

Those classification is not absolute but relative

SPECTRUM OF AB EFFECTS

1. Narrow spectrum antibiotics (NSAB)

Main effect : sensitive for gram positive bacteria and bacil e.g. : Pen. G, Pen. Resistent penicillinase semisynthetics, bacitracin, macrolides, lincomycin, vancomycin

2. Broad Spectrum Antibiotics (BSAB)

Main effect : sensitive for gram positive and gram negative bacteriae e.g. : Pen. (ampicillin and amoxycillin), cefalosporins, tetracyclins, chloramphenicol, trimetroprim and sulfonamides

Widely used of BSAB  an umbrella in treating the unidentified bacterial infection

 resistance 

RESISTANCE and

MECHANISM OF ACTION recall in microbiology

SIDE EFFECTS

1.

ALLERGIC REACTION

2.

TOXIC REACTION

Direct effects in unproper dose e.g. : aminoglycosides

3.

SUPERINFECTION : new infection caused by pathogen microbes or fungi during AB therapy to primary infection.

SUPERINFECTION : frequent potentially harmed risk

Causa : Enterobacter, Pseudomonas,

Candida and other fungi. Those agents are difficult to be eradicated by today available antibiotics.

AVOIDING SUPERINFECTION

1.

Stop the giving antibiotics

2.

Treatment according to bacterial identification and sensitivity test

The specimen was taken from feces and secretion of upper respiratory tract, to be analyzed

RATIONAL THERAPY OF ANTIBIOTICS

ANTIBIOTICS

HOST

PHARMACOKINETICS

PHARMACODINAMICS

CHARACTERISTIC

OF ANTIBIOTICS

HOST ASPECTS

BIOCHEMICAL &

PHYSIOLOGICAL &

PATHOLOGICAL

CONDITIONS

DEFINITION OF RATIONAL USE OF

ANTIBIOTICS (WHO)

PROPER INDICATION

PROPER DRUG

PROPER DOSAGE

SE MONITORING

RATIONAL USE OF AB

PROCEDURES

STEPS TO PROCEDURES

Define the patient problems specify the therapeutic objectives

Verify the suitable of your personal treatment

Start the treatment

Give information, instruction and warning

Monitoring and stop treatment

Clinical diagnosis

Identification, sensitivity test of bacteria

Pharmacodynamics

Pharmacokinetics

Host factors

RATIONAL USE OF ANTIBIOTICS

PREVENTION IN HIGH

SUSCEPTIBILITY TO

GET INFECTION

PROPHYLAXIS

THERAPY

M.O

ERADICATING

DEFINITIVE THERAPY

EMPIRIC THERAPY

IN NON SURGICAL CONDITIONS

IN SURGICAL CONDITIONS

DEFINITIVE THERAPY

It is the most effective, least toxicity and the narrowest selection

Based on :

* identification of bacteria

* sensitivity test

* interpretation in the content of the overall clinical picture

* the AB of choice directed to M.O

EMPIRIC AB THERAPY

Giving AB directly without identification and sensitivity test of bacteria, but…… obtaining specimen for lab. analysis before giving AB.

Empiric AB therapy based on local epidemiological data :

What is the pathogen M.O potentially infected

AB given based on susceptibility pattern

Initiated after obtaining specimen

Started with AM combination or single

BSAB

SELECTING AB IN EMPIRIC THERAPY

The site of infection

There are barriers inside the body : brain, prostate, bone

Other : foreign bodies local factors

Patient’s history :

PATIENT HISTORY

Age  baby, child, adult, old age !

Immune system  immunocompromised!

Who?

Renal dysfunction  accumulation! How ?

Hepatic dysfunction  metabolism! How ?

Genetic factors  G6-PD. Attention, contraindication !

Pregnancy  teratogenic, embryogenic

Lactation  vulnerable AB for new born

INDICATION IN EMPIRIC THERAPY

Infection of unknown origin

Neutropenic patients

Characteristic symptoms of meningitis

MISUSE of AB :

Treatment of untreatable infection

Therapy of fever of unknown origin

Improper dosage

Inappropiate reliance on AB alone

Lack of adequate bacterial information

STRATEGIC FOR EMPIRIC THERAPY

Empiric therapy :

Coverage by a combination of antibiotics such as

Clindamycin plus gentamycin

Effective against gram positive, gram negatives and anaerobes

Or

A single broad spectrum AB

Such as imipenem/cilastatin

Receive culture report

With sensitivities

If gram positive only

Continue gram pos.

Coverage, discontinue

Gram neg. and anaerobic

Coverage if mixed

↓ continue therapy as initiated

If gram negative only

Continue gram neg.

coverage, discontinue

Gram pos. and anaerobic

Coverage

Chapter 28, Fig.28.1 Lippincott’s ed.2

nd

If anaerobic only

↓ continue anaerobic coverage, discontinue gram positive and gram negative coverage

PROPHYLAXIS

SURGICAL

1.

Contaminated op.

2.

Clean – contaminated op

3.

Selected op  may suffer post-op.infection

NON SURGICAL

PREVENT :

1. Streptococcal infection in patient with a history of

RHD

2. In pre-dental extraction who have implanted prosthetic devices

3. TB/meningitis in close contact individual

4. Protect fetus from infection in HIV-infected pregnant woman

Common Error in AB prophylaxis

1.

Selection of wrong AB

2.

The initial therapy too early or too late

3.

Excessive duration

4.

Inappropriate use of BSAB

DISADVANTAGES TO PROPHYLACTIC

AB

1.

Toxic/allergic reaction

2.

Superinfection with more resistant flora

3.

The infection may be temporarily masked

4.

Ecology of the hospital flora may be altered

COMMON CAUSES OF FAILURE OF AB

THERAPY

DRUGS : ө inappropriate drug ө inadequate dose ө improper route of administration ө accelerated inactivation ө poor penetration

HOST : ө poor host defence ө undrained pus ө retained infected foreign bodies ө crusta/necrotic tissues

Cont.

- Pathogen ө drug resistence ө superinfection ө dual infection initially

- Laboratory : ө erroneous report of susceptible pathogen

AB – COMBINATION

Synergisme (3) :

1) Blockade of sequential steps in a metabolit sequence

- Trimethoprim - sulfamethoxazol

2) Inhibition of enzymatic inactivation

- Amoxycillin - clavulanat

3) Enhancement - Aminoglycosides

- Penicillins - Aminoglycosides

Antagonism (2) :

1. Inhibition of cidal activity by static agent

- Tetracyclines – Betalactam AB

2. Induction of enzymatic inactivation

- Ampicillin - Piperacillin

CLINICAL INDICATION OF AB

COMBINATION :

► Mixed infection

► Synergism effect

► Risk of developing resistant organism <

► Increase AB coverage or

► Infection of unknown origin

DISADVANTAGES OF AB COMBINATION

- Increase risk of toxicity

- Increase MDR-pathogens

- Increase cost

- Increase antagonism (bacteriostatic

+ bactericide)

Download