Neuraxial Techniques in Palliative Care Karen H Simpson Consultant in Pain Medicine Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust Cancer Pain Management • Pain management part of a broader therapeutic endeavor • Palliative care is the active, total care of the patient with active, progressive, life-threatening disease • Both involve a variety of health care professionals • Continuing management includes control of pain and symptoms maintenance of function psychosocial and spiritual support comprehensive end of life care Cancer pain • Pain common in cancer • WHO estimate 4 million people worldwide have cancer pain • Many patients have more than one site of pain • >50% of patients in hospitals and hospices have pain • Advanced cancer more likely to be painful • Breakthrough and incident pain common • Adequate pain relief achieved by 75% patients using simple techniques e.g. WHO analgesic ladder Why Pain Control Can Be a Problem • Survey of physicians actively involved in cancer care 1/3 wait until the prognosis <6 months before giving maximal analgesia (Von Roenn et al. 1993) • Study of 81 doctors only 5% could convert a parenteral dose of morphine to an equivalent of MST and were unfamiliar palliative radiation (Mortimer and Bartlett 1997) • Study of 318 nurses’ knowledge about pain assessment and management showed lack of understanding about opioids (Hamilton and Edgar 1992) Basic Pain Management Principles Meticulous assessment of pain and appropriate investigation Decrease pain & improve quality of life Do no further harm Allow patient and carers choices Use resources as effectively as possible Basic Pain Management in Cancer • Modify the disease process if the cause cannot be removed • Remove exacerbating factors • Explore meaning of pain for the patient and carers • Modify social/physical environment • Treat associated mood disorders • Regular oral analgesics and co-analgesics • Nerve block or neuromodulation • Neurosurgery Nerve Blockade or Neuromodulation • May help about 10% patients • If pain persists despite optimal oral analgesia • If effective oral analgesia gives intolerable side effects • Rapid, effective analgesia is required with limited time available for titration of oral analgesics or co-analgesics • Conditions that readily respond to nerve blocks e.g. joint pain, ischaemic pain Neuraxial blocks • Local anaesthetic/steroid • Somatic and/or sympathetic blocks • Neurolytic blocks • Spinal drug delivery • Neuro-destructive surgical procedures Ideally combined approach aimed at several different levels within nervous system provides optimum relief with least adverse effects Simple Nerve Blocks Complex Nerve Blocks Autonomic Nerve Blocks Spinal Drug Delivery • Much smaller drug doses needed • 1-2% patients with cancer pain • If simpler and more economic methods fail • Indications failure of systemic treatment intolerable drug side effects Choice of Patient for Spinal Drugs Contraindications • Local or systemic infection • Head pain • Non-correctable co-aggulopathy • Patient refusal • Lack of resources • Lack of aftercare and community support Indications • Segmental pain or spasticity • Positive response to test doses Investigations • Cord compression • Good CSF flow • Infection screen • Coagulation • Life expectancy • Aftercare Epidural or Intrathecal Drug Delivery Intrathecal or Epidural Delivery? • Intrathecal drugs need not pass dura • IT used in lower doses and volumes (10-20% epidural dose) • Large volumes epidurally - spinal cord compression • Change in epidural fat influences drug delivery • Epidural catheters blocked by fibrosis • Infection not more likely with intrathecal External or Internal Systems Implantable or External System? •Pain problem •Patient’s condition and expected survival •Experience of the team •Support available Spinal Drugs Opioids Clonidine Ketamine Octreotide Midazolam Neostigmine Baclofen Local anaesthetics Ziconotide Conclusions • Patients should be referred early for consideration of interventions • The pain must be carefully assessed and investigated • Careful explanation to ensure the full understanding and consent of the patient is essential • Patients and carers must be given adequate time to think about interventions and ask questions Conclusions • Those involved in patient’s care after block must understand the nature of the procedure what block can and cannot achieve how to look after the patient what the likely effects and side effects • Nerve blocks must not cause functional defects • Neuro-destructive procedures must be selective of sensory or autonomic nerves leaving motor paths and sphincters intact • Neuraxial techniques should not be a treatment given in isolation but must form part of an overall strategy for analgesia Conclusions • Nerve blocks often forgotten or left as a last resort • Patient may become too ill to tolerate technique or come to hospital for more complex procedures • Need careful selection of patients and timing of interventions • Early discussion between colleagues essential Conclusions • Anaesthetists should make themselves easily available for consultation about patients with difficult cancer pain • Pain services should offer prompt treatment • The choice of techniques offered depends on the skills and resources of the local pain management service