Prediabetes Management 1 AACE Prediabetes Consensus Statement: Summary • Untreated individuals with prediabetes are at increased risk for diabetes as well as for micro- and macrovascular complications • Treatment goals are to prevent deterioration in glucose levels and modify other risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia – The same blood pressure and lipid goals are suggested for prediabetes and diabetes • Intensive lifestyle management is the cornerstone of all prevention efforts; pharmacotherapy targeted at glucose may be considered in high-risk patients 2 Handelsman Y, et al. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(Suppl 2):1-53. Garber AJ, et al. Endocr Pract. 2008;14:933-946. Prediabetes • Epidemiologic evidence suggests that the complications of T2DM begin early in the progression from NGT to frank diabetes • Prediabetes and diabetes are conditions in which early detection is appropriate, because – Duration of hyperglycemia is a predictor of adverse outcomes – There are effective interventions to prevent disease progression and to reduce complications 3 NGT, normal glucose tolerance ; T2DM , type 2 diabetes mellitus. Garber AJ, et al. Endocr Pract. 2008;14:933-946. Policy Paradigm Shifts Needed to Stem Global Tide of T2DM • Integrating primary and secondary prevention along a clinical continuum • Early detection of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes • Implementing cost-effective prevention and control by integrating community and clinical expertise/resources within affordable service delivery systems • Sharing and adopting evidence-based policies at the global level 4 T2DM , type 2 diabetes mellitus. Narayan KM, et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:84-92. 5 Feasibility of Preventing T2DM • There is a long period of glucose intolerance that precedes the development of diabetes • Screening tests can identify persons at high risk • There are safe, potentially effective interventions that can address modifiable risk factors: – – – – Obesity Body fat distribution Physical inactivity High blood glucose 6 T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Garber AJ, et al. Endocr Pract. 2008;14:933-946. Interventions to Reduce Risks Associated With Prediabetes • Therapeutic lifestyle management is the cornerstone of all prevention efforts • No pharmacologic agents are currently approved for the management of prediabetes – Pharmacotherapy targeted at glucose may be considered in high-risk patients after individual risk-benefit analysis 7 Garber AJ, et al. Endocr Pract. 2008;14:933-946. Lifestyle Intervention in Prediabetes Persons with prediabetes should reduce weight by 5% to 10%, with long-term maintenance at this level • A program of regular moderate-intensity physical activity for 30-60 minutes daily, at least 5 days a week, is recommended A diet that includes caloric restriction, increased fiber intake, and (in some cases) carbohydrate intake limitations is advised. 8 Garber AJ, et al. Endocr Pract. 2008;14:933-946. Primary Care-Based Counseling for T2DM Prevention: ADAPT 9 ADAPT, Avoiding Diabetes Thru Action Plan Targeting; T2DM , type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mann DM, Lin JJ. Implement Sci. 2012;23:6. Self-Reported Risk Reduction Activities in Patients With Prediabetes (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data) Percent of Patients 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 68% 60% 55% 42% Tried to lose or Reduced dietary Increased control weight fat or calories physical activity or exercise All 3 10 CDC. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1203-1205. Interventions Proven to Delay or Prevent T2DM Development Intervention 11 Rate of Conversion to Normal Glucose Tolerance Lifestyle (3 trials) 52%-58% Metformin (2 trials) 26%-31% Acarbose (1 trial) 25% Pioglitazone (1 trial) 48% T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sherwin RS, et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27,(Suppl 1): S47-S54. Eriksson K-F, Lindgärde F. Diabetologia. 1991;34:891-898. Ramachandran A, et al. Diabetologia 2006;49:289-297. Knowler WC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403. Defronzo RA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1104-15. Prevention of T2DM: Selected Lifestyle Modification Trials 12 Study Country N Baseline BMI (kg/m2) Intervention period (years) RRR (%) NNT Diabetes Prevention Program USA 3234 34.0 2.8 58 21 Diabetes Prevention Study Finland 523 31 4 39 22 Da Qing China 577 25.8 6 51 30 BMI, body mass index; NNT, number needed to treat; RRR, relative risk reduction; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. DPP Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403. Eriksson J, et al. Diabetologia. 1999;42:793-801. Li G, et al. Lancet. 2008;371:1783-1789. Lindstrom J, et al. Lancet. 2006;368:1673-1679. T2DM Incidence in the Diabetes Prevention Program T2DM incidence per 100 person-years 12 11 31% 10 8 6 7.8 58% 4.8 4 2 0 Intensive lifestyle intervention* (n=1079) Metformin 850mg BID (n=1073) Placebo (n=1082) *Goal: 7% reduction in baseline body weight through low-calorie, low-fat diet and ≥150 min/week moderate intensity exercise. 13 IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. DPP Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403. Effect of Age on Incidence of T2DM in the DPP T2DM incidence per 100 person-years 14 12 11.6 10.8 10.8 9.6 10 8 48% 6.7 6 6.2 7.6 Placebo 59% 71% 4.7 4 3.1 Metformin Lifestyle 2 0 25-44 45-59 Age (years) ≥60 *Goal: 7% reduction in baseline body weight through low-calorie, low-fat diet and ≥150 min/week moderate intensity exercise. 14 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program;. DPP Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403. Effect of Weight on T2DM Incidence in the DPP T2DM incidence per 100 person-years 16 14.3 14 12 10 9 51% 8.9 8.8 7.6 8 6 4 7.0 65% 61% 3.3 3.7 7.3 Placebo Metformin Lifestyle 2 0 22 to <30 30 to <35 BMI (kg/m2) ≥35 *Goal: 7% reduction in baseline body weight through low-calorie, low-fat diet and ≥150 min/week moderate intensity exercise. 15 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program. DPP Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403. 10-Year Weight Loss in the DPP Outcomes Study 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Years 16 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. DPP Research Group. Lancet. 2009;374:1677-1686. 10-Year Incidence of T2DM in the DPP Outcomes Study Placebo Metformin Lifestyle 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years 7 8 9 10 17 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. DPP Research Group. Lancet. 2009;374:1677-1686. 10-Year Incidence of T2DM in the DPP Outcomes Study 18 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; DPPOS, Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. DPP Research Group. Lancet. 2009;374:1677-1686. The Chinese Prevention Study The Effect of Metformin on the Progression of IGT to Diabetes Mellitus (N=321) Incidence of Diabetes (%/yr) 14 12 11.6 10 8 RRR=65% 6 4.1 4 2 0 Control Metformin 19 IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; RRR, relative risk reduction. Yang W, et al. Chin J Endocrinol Metab. 2001;17:131-136. Cumulative T2DM Incidence During Follow-up in the Chinese Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study 20 CI, confidence interval; DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Li G, et al. Lancet. 2008;371:1783-1789. Effect of Lifestyle Modification and Metformin on Cumulative Diabetes Incidence The Indian DPP (N=531) 60 55.0 RRR (%) Incidence (%) 50 28.5 P=0.018 26.4 P=0.029 28.2 P=0.022 n=136 n=133 n=133 n=129 Control LSM MET LSM & MET 40 30 20 10 0 21 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; LSM, lifestyle modification; MET, metformin; RRR, relative risk reduction. Ramachandran A, et al. Diabetologia 2006;49:289-297. T2DM Prevention in Women With a History of GDM: Effect of Metformin and Lifestyle Interventions • Findings from the DPP: – Progression to diabetes is more common in women with a history of GDM vs those without, despite equivalent degrees of IGT at baseline • Both intensive lifestyle and metformin are highly effective in delaying or preventing diabetes in women with IGT and a history of GDM 22 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ratner RE, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4774-4779. Effect of Acarbose on Reversion of IGT to NGT The Study to Prevent Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (STOP-NIDDM) Number of Patients 250 P<0.0001 240 n=241 (35.3%) 230 220 210 n=212 (30.9%) 200 Placebo Acarbose 23 IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; NGT, normal glucose tolerance. Chiasson JL, et al. Lancet. 2002;359:2072-2077. Group Lifestyle Balance Program Intervention University of Pittsburgh Primary Care Practice and Diabetes Prevention Support Center • DPP lifestyle intervention was adapted to a 12-session group-based program • Implemented in a community setting in 2 phases using a nonrandomized prospective design • Significant decreases in weight, waist circumference, and BMI were noted in both phases vs baseline • Average combined weight loss for both groups over the 3-month intervention was 7.4 pounds (3.5% relative loss, P<0.001) Weight Loss Achieved 70 60 Percent 50 40 30 20 10 0 Phase 1 Post Phase 2 Post Completers (n=51) (n=42) Both phases (n=67) Weight Loss > 3.5% Weight Loss > 5% Phase 2 6 mo Phase 2 12 mo Weight Loss >7% 24 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; mo, month. Kramer MK, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:505-511. Translating the DPP Into Community Intervention The DEPLOY Pilot Study Standard (4-6 months) DPP (4-6 months) Standard (12-14 months) DPP (12-14 months) Total Cholesterol (%) 15 10 • 11.8 6 5 0 -5 Pilot, cluster-randomized trial Group-based DPP lifestyle intervention vs brief counseling alone (control) among high-risk adults who attended a diabetes risk-screening event at one of two semiurban YMCA facilities -10 -15 -13.5 P=0.002 -20 -25 25 • -21.6 P<0.001 DEPLOY, Diabetes Education & Prevention with a Lifestyle Intervention Offered at the YMCA; DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; YMCA, Young Men’s Christian Association. Ackermann RT, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:357-363. Montana CVD and DPP Mean weight and physical activity min/week among participants by lifestyle intervention session 26 CVD, cardiovascular disease; DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program. Amundson HA, et al. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:209-223. Translation of the DPP’s Lifestyle Intervention • Four additional studies utilizing the DPP lifestyle interventions in community settings provided the following findings: – Promising evidence of the prevention of diabetes by significantly decreasing glucose levels and adiposity – Statistically significant improvements in many behavioral outcomes and anthropometrics, particularly at 6 months – Decreased fasting glucose and weight in at-risk African Americans – Approaches that improve recruitment of participants from underserved communities into research, especially research related to chronic disease risk factors 27 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program. Boltri JM, et al. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011;103:194-202. Katula JA, et al. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1451-1457. Ruggiero L, et al. Diabetes Educ. 2011;37:564-572. Santoyo-Olsson J, et al. Gerontologist. 2011;51(Suppl 1):S82-93. Pioglitazone for T2DM Prevention in IGT: ACT NOW Kaplan–Meier plot of hazard ratios for time to development of T2DM 28 ACT NOW, Actos NOW for the Prevention of Diabetes; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Defronzo RA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1104-1115. Effects of Exenatide and Lifestyle Modification on Body Weight and Glucose Tolerance in Obese Patients With and Without Prediabetes • Patients – N=152, weight 108.6 +/- 23.0 kg, BMI 39.6 +/- 7.0 kg/m2 (IGT or IFG 25%) • Design – 24-week randomized controlled trial: exenatide or placebo plus lifestyle intervention • Results: – Exenatide-treated patients lost 5.1 kg from baseline vs 1.6 kg with placebo (P<0.001) – Both groups reduced their daily caloric intake – IGT or IFG normalized at end point in 77% and 56% of exenatide and placebo subjects, respectively 29 BMI, body mass index; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance. Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1173-1175. Special Concerns for Thiazolidinedione Use in Patients With Prediabetes • Because of concerns about long-term safety, use of thiazolidinediones should be reserved for higher risk populations and those failing other, lower-risk strategies 30 Garber AJ, et al. Endocr Pract. 2008;14:933-946. Medical Weight-Loss Strategies • Orlistat may prevent progression from prediabetes to diabetes • Lorcaserin, a selective serotonin 2C agonist, is indicated for use in obese patients with at least 1 weight-related comorbid condition (eg, hypertension, dyslipidemia, CVD, glucose intolerance, sleep apnea) • Low-dose, immediate-release phentermine and controlledrelease topiramate is recommended for obese or overweight patients with weight-related comorbidities such as hypertension, T2DM, dyslipidemia, or central adiposity 31 CVD, cardiovascular disease; obese, BMI ≥30 kg/m2; overweight, BMI ≥27 kg/m2; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Garber AJ, et al. Endocr Pract. 2008;14:933-946. Pharmacologic Weight-Loss Strategies Drug name Orlistat Lorcaserin Phentermine/ topiramate) 32 Placebosubtracted mean % body weight loss from baseline Patients (N) in clinical program/ patients (n) with diabetes % of patients losing ≥5% of body weight Clinical trial withdrawal rates 2.4% (following 4 years of treatment with orlistat 120 mg TID) 7504/321 35.5%-54.8% (following 1 year of treatment with orlistat 120 mg TID) 8.8% 3.3% at 52 weeks 6888/510 47.1% 36%-50% 3.5%-6.4% 3678/808 45%-70% 31%-40% LOCF, last observation carried forward. Orlistat [package insert]. South San Francisco CA; Genentech USA; 2010. Belviq [package insert]. Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Eisai Inc.; 2012. Qsymia [package insert]. Mountain View, CA; VIVUS , Inc; 2012. DPP Year 1: Mean Change in Blood Pressure Systolic Change in BP (mm Hg) Baseline BP 124 124 Diastolic 124 79 0 0 -0.5 -0.5 -1 -0.91 -0.9 -1 -1.5 -1.5 -2 -2 -2.5 -2.5 -3 -3 -3.5 -4 -0.89 -1.3 -3.6 -4 Metformin 78 -3.5 -3.4 Lifestyle 78 Placebo Lifestyle Metformin Placebo 33 BP, blood pressure; DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program. Ratner R, et al. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:888. Effects of Metformin, Lifestyle Modifications, and Placebo on Hypertension Over 36 Months in DPP P<0.001 P=0.08 P<0.001 40 * 35 30 25 Baseline 20 12 months 15 24 months 36 months 10 5 0 Placebo Metformin Lifestyle 34 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; HTN, hypertension. Ratner R, et al. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:888-894. STOP NIDDM: Incidence of New Cases of Hypertension in IGT Patients 18 Hypertension defined as BP 140/90 mmHg 16 Placebo 14 12 10 Acarbose 8 6 4 RRR = 34% P=0.0059 2 0 0 35 1 3 2 4 Years After Randomization 5 BP, blood pressure; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; STOP NIDDM, Study to Prevent Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Trial Chiasson JL, et al. JAMA. 2003;290:486-494. DPP Study: Mean Change in Total and LDL Cholesterol Total Cholesterol Baseline (mg/dL) 202 127 Change in Lipids (%) 0 0 -0.2 -0.5 -0.3 -0.4 -1 -0.9 -0.6 -1.2 -1.5 -0.7 -0.8 -1 -2 -1.2 -2.3 -2.5 Lifestyle 36 LDL-C Metformin -1.3 -1.4 Placebo Lifestyle Metformin Placebo DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein. DPP Research Group. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2472–2479. Ratner R, et al. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:888-894. DPP Study: Mean Change in Triglycerides and HDL Cholesterol Triglycerides Change in Lipids (mg/dL) Baseline (mg/dL) HDL-C 172 40 0 1.2 -5 1 0.8 -7.4 -10 -11.9 -15 0.6 0.4 -20 0.3 0.2 -25 0 -25.4 -30 -0.1 -0.2 Lifestyle 37 1 Metformin Placebo Lifestyle Metformin Placebo DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program. DPP Research Group. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2472–2479. Ratner R, et al. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:888-894. DPP Study: Effects of Metformin, Lifestyle Modifications, and Placebo on Lipids: 3-year Timeframe 38 DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program. Ratner R, et al. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:888-894. CVD Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Trials Study 39 Outcome DPP 64 of 3234 patients (89 total events) DREAM 0.5 events/100 patient-years STOP NIDDM 1.4 events/100 patient-years CVD, cardiovascular disease; DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; DREAM, Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication; STOP NIDDM, Study to Prevent Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Trial. Ratner R, et al. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:888-894. DREAM Investigators. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1007-1014. Chiasson JL, et al. JAMA. 2003;290:486-494. STOP-NIDDM Study: Effect of Acarbose on Cardiovascular Event Incidence in Patients With IGT Cumulative Incidence (%) 5 4 Placebo RRR = 49% P=.03 3 2 Acarbose 1 0 40 47 subjects with CVD events 32 placebo 15 acarbose 0 1 2 3 4 Years After Randomization 5 CVD, cardiovascular disease; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; RRR, relative risk reduction; STOP NIDDM, Study to Prevent Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Trial. Chiasson JL, et al. JAMA. 2003;290:486-494. STOP NIDDM CVD Events Acarbose (N=682) Placebo (N=686) Hazard Rate Myocardial Infarction 1 12 0.09* Angina 5 12 0.45 Revascularization 11 20 0.61 CVD Death 1 2 0.55 Cerebrovascular Event or Stroke 2 4 0.56 Peripheral Vascular Disease 1 1 1.14 Any CVD Event 15 32 0.51* *P<0.05 41 CVD, cardiovascular disease; STOP NIDDM, Study to Prevent Non-Insulin Dependent. Chiasson JL, et al. JAMA. 2003;290:486-494. Cumulative Incidence of CVD Death During Follow-up in China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study Control Intervention 42 CVD, cardiovascular disease. Li G, et al. Lancet. 2008;371:1783-1789. Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Risk Factors Target LDL Blood pressure First-Line Agents Comments <100 mg/dL Statins Additional use of fibrates, bile acid sequestrants, ezetimibe, etc, should be considered as appropriate <130/80 mm/Hg ACE inhibitors, Angiotensin receptor blockers Calcium channel blockers are appropriate second-line treatment approaches Goal Low-dose aspirin is recommended for all persons with prediabetes for whom there is no identified excess in risk for gastrointestinal, intracranial, or other hemorrhagic condition 43 ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; LDL, low-density lipoprotein. Handelsman Y, et al. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(suppl 2):1-53. Garber AJ, et al. Endocr Pract. 2008;14:933-946.