What makes difficult asthma difficult? SCH Journal Club Nicki Barker 2012 June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 1 Aim To determine whether breathing retraining improves quality of life for children with dysfunctional breathing June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 2 Objectives • Clarify the problem identified • Share an understanding of difficult asthma and dysfunctional breathing • Critically appraise a relevant piece of literature • Assess the impact of the literature on current practice June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 3 Difficult asthma ‘persistent symptoms and/or frequent exacerbations despite treatment at step 4 or step 5’ June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 4 Difficult asthma? • Compliance issues • Incorrect diagnosis • Asthma plus a co-morbidity June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 5 BTS guidelines 2012 ‘dysfunctional breathing should be considered as part of a difficult asthma assessment’ June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 6 BreathWorks • Specialist assessment of dysfunctional breathing • Children aged 8-16 • Referral currently via respiratory clinics • Thursday afternoon in physiotherapy O/P’s June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 7 Dysfunctional breathing (DB) Dysfunctional breathing HVS June 2012 VCD Dysfunctional breathing in children Breathing pattern disorder 8 DB: A model HVS VCD BPD DB: A paediatric model HVS VCD BPD Evidence for breathing ex’s • Buteyko breathing technique may be considered to help patients to control the symptoms of asthma • Reduces symptoms and bronchodilator use June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 11 The Clinical Question Population Children with dysfunctional breathing Intervention Breathing retraining Comparison Normal care Outcome QOL, symptom scores, changes in asthma medication, objective measures Design June 2012 Intervention RCT Dysfunctional breathing in children 12 Breathing retraining for dysfunctional breathing in asthma: a randomised controlled trial Thomas M, McKinley RK, Freeman E, Foy C, Prodger P, Price D. Thorax Feb 2003; 58(2):110-5 June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 13 The Clinical Question Population Adult asthma patients with dysfunctional breathing Intervention Breathing retraining Comparison Equivalent amount of professional attention Outcome QOL, symptom scores, changes in asthma medication Design Intervention RCT June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 14 Methods • • • • • • Patients aged 17 to 65 n=33 Diagnosis of currently treated asthma Single semi-rural UK GP practice Nijmegen questionnaire score of 23 Randomised to breathing retaining or asthma education June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 15 Study flow diagram Thomas M et al. Thorax 2003;58:110-115 Outcome measures • Primary – Asthma specific health status (AQLQ) – Nijmegen questionnaire scores • Secondary – Changes in asthma medication and medication usage June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 17 Using the CASP tool A/ Are the results of the trial valid? Screening Questions 1 Did the trial address a clearly focused issue? Yes Can't tell No 2 Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomized? Yes Can't tell No 3 Were all of the patients who entered the trial properly accounted for at its conclusion ? Yes Can't tell No June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 18 CASP cont. Detailed Questions 4 Were patients, health workers and study personnel ‘blind’ to treatment? Yes Can't tell No - Virtually impossible with physiotherapy interventions 5 Were the groups similar at the start of the trial? Yes Can't tell No - Control group appeared to have greater inhaled steroid dose 6 Aside from the experimental intervention, were the groups treated equally? Yes Can't tell No - 75mins versus 60mins and in a different format June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 19 CASP cont. B/ What are the results? 7 How large was the treatment effect? - Not clearly stated and no MCID available for Nijmegen Questionnaire 8 How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect? - Confidence interval and limits not stated C/ Will the results help locally? 9 Can the results be applied to the local population? Yes Can't tell No – Questionable choice of measures, adult to paediatric applicability 10 Were all clinically important outcomes considered? - No objective measures used Yes No 11 Are the benefits worth the harms and costs? Yes No - Minimal likelihood of harm. Costs – time of therapist and patient June 2012 20 Key thoughts • • • • • • • 50% benefitted at 1 month 25% benefitted at 6 months Small numbers Short duration intervention Intervention not representative of clinical situation Application of findings to children Impact of co-existent asthma June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 21 Quality of life as measured by PedsQL MCID = minimal clinically important difference Symptom score using Nijmegen Questionnaire Take home messages • Consider dysfunctional breathing in cases of difficult asthma • Key signs of DB are: • Frequent sighing, unsteadiness/irregularity of breathing, upper chest dominated breathing, mouth breathing, difficulty breathing in, throat tightness • Refer appropriate cases to BreathWorks • Support the research needed to better understand DB in children June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children 24