Why is there so much variation in mating systems and parental care? • Solitary species • Monogamous species • Polygynous species with 1 male, > 1 female • Polygynous species with >1 male, > 1 female • No parental care • Bi-parental care • Male parental care only • Female parental care only WHY???? Questions: • Why are males more brightly colored than females in some species but not others? • Why are males larger than females in most mammals but fewer birds? • Why is sexual dimorphism usually greater in polygynous species than in monogamous species? • Why are males more brightly colored and ornamented than females in some species but not others? Pheasant Redwing blackbird • Why are males larger than females in most mammals? Why do they have ‘weapons’? • Why is sexual dimorphism usually greater in polygynous species than in monogamous species? Physiological differences between males and females in reproduction Males are relatively unselective in mating, whereas females are more choosy Males have greater reproductive potential, give less parental care Males compete more for females than vice versa Evolution of traits in males (size, color, song) that enhance competitive ability or signal condition, resources Sexual selection: Selection favoring traits that give certain individuals an advantage over others in obtaining mates Intra-sexual selection favors traits that affect the ability of members of the same sex to compete with each other for mates (usually concerns male-male competition) Inter-sexual selection favors traits that attract members of the opposite sex (usually concerns female choice of males) Constraints (ecological, social, physiological) Males freed from parental care Intense competition for mates Strong sexual selection Pronounced sexual dimorphism Males’ parental care essential Less intense mate competition Weaker sexual selection Less pronounced sexual dimorphism Reproductive effort = parental effort + mating effort Parental effort Mating effort Males Females Mating system Intensity of sex. selec. Monogamous Weak Polygynous Strong Male-male competition in elephant seals 8 males fertilized 348 females Breeding season 3 months long, favoring male endurance Males lose 34-41% of body mass 120 Latency (sec) 100 Winner Loser 80 60 40 20 0 Seen Unseen Oliveira et al. 1998 Number of songs 60 40 20 0 Overlapped Alternated Random Overlaps (DOM.) (SUB.) Interaction treatment Peake et al. 2001 Intra-sexual selection: two points 1. Big males don’t necessarily have big sons. Body size depends on age and condition in addition to genes 2. Big dominant male can coerce females to mate. Yet it might also be in the interest of females to do so, because of: genetic quality(?), protection, better resources Constraints (ecological, social, physiological) Males freed from parental care Intense competition for mates Strong sexual selection Pronounced sexual dimorphism POLYGYNY Males’ parental care essential Less intense mate competition Weaker sexual selection Less pronounced sexual dimorphism MONOGAMY DEGREES OF POLYGYNY IN MAMMALS Slight polygyny: lions M:F body wt 1.3/1 More polygyny: gorillas 2.3/1 Extreme polygyny: elephant seals 3.1/1