So What Can We Learn from Stakeholder Allocation Games? Gregory Kiker, Associate Professor Dept of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, University of Florida Acknowledgements • Planning for Sea Level Rise in the Matanzas Basin (NOAA funded) – UF: Kathryn Frank, Paul Zwick, Greg Kiker – Michael Shirley: Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve (GTM NERR) – OK State Univ: Dawn Jourdan • Water allocation role playing in the Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint River Basin – UF: Bill Pine – FSU – Steve Leitman Agenda 1. Getting local and personal: Sea Level Rise predictions meet stakeholders in NE Florida 2. Getting even: Water Management in the Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint River Basin: The Never-ending Dixie Water War Photo: http://www.marketingmedia.co.za National Estuarine Research Reserve System Science Collaborative: • • • • Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuary Research Reserve (GTMNERR) Low elevation estuary between St Augustine, FL (America’s oldest city) and the Palm Coast (rapidly growing retirement community) NOAA-funded (3 years) Model Runs Meet Stakeholders! SLAMM: Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model • Simulates the dominant processes involved in wetland conversions and shoreline modification due to long term-sea level rise. • The study area is divided into cells and each cell is simulated separately Dry Land Various Wetlands Open Water 2D representation 3D representation SLAMM Inundation Model Elevation (Migration of Wetlands Boundaries due to Sea Level Rise) MWHSinland Salt Boundary MWHinland MTL MLW Distance Inland Tidal flat TidalSalt flatmarsh Salt marsh Scrub-scrub or Water Scrub-scrub or brackish brackish Estuarine Beach Beach Beach Tidal fresh and dry land (Inland Fresh Marsh, Swamp) SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2010 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2020 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2030 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2040 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2050 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2060 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2070 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2080 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2090 SLAMM results 2m SLR by 2100 2100 SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2010 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2020 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2030 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2040 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2050 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2060 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2070 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2080 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2090 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water SLAMM results Pellicer Creek 2m SLR by 2100 2100 Legend 2m_2010 Value Developed Dry Land Swamp Legend Cypress Swamp Inland Fresh Marsh 2m_2010 Value Transitional Salt Marsh Developed Dry Developed Dry Land Regularly Flooded MarshLand Swamp Mangrove Swamp Cypress Swamp Cypress Swamp Estuarine Beach Inland Inland FreshFresh Marsh Tidal Flat Marsh Marsh Regularly Flooded Marsh Inland Open Water Regularly Flooded marsh Mangrove Estuarine Water Mangrove Estuarine Beach Tidal Creek Beach Tidal Flat Open Ocean Water Ocean Beach Irregularly FloodedFlooded Marsh Irregularly Marsh Inland Open Water Vegetated Tidal Flat Tidal Flat Transitional Salt Marsh Ocean Beach Transitional Salt Estuarine Water How much difference is there between the sea level rise scenarios? What general areas are vulnerable to change and habitat migration? What areas are vulnerable to the loss of dry land and wetland? So How Much Will This Cost Us? • Simple flood/value rules – 10% flood means 10% taxable value lost… (very conservative…) • Under a scenario of 1 m sea level rise by 2100, we project that 2,639 ha and $1 billion in land value will be lost to inundation • If you want to replace wetlands as they are lost then we will need 2,758 ha of new wetland area costing about $3.8 billion in land value Linhoss, A., G. Kiker, R. Watkins, M. Shirley, and K. Frank. 2014. Sea-level rise, inundation, and marsh migration: Simulating impacts on developed lands and environmental systems. Journal of Coastal Research (In press). Linking decision analysis and Stakeholders • Role plays have been developed by Dr. D. Jourdan (Univ of Oklahoma) and Briana Ozor (Univ of Florida) • 5 stakeholder roles with context/budgets for negotiation • 8 alternatives for combination/negotiation • More details at Planningmatanzas.org Example Roles Example Alternatives Coastal Protection: The Board Game! The way forward… SLR in the GTMNERR • • Areas within 2.5 to 5km of the ocean are generally affected Changes in landcover area (0.2 to 2.5m SLR) – Developed Areas: loss of 10 to 400 ha – Undeveloped Area: loss of 40 to 800 ha – Because it is largely located within 5km of the ocean, St. Augustine is particularly vulnerable to the loss of developed and dry land – Estimated losses are in the tens of millions to billions • Ecological Losses: Vulnerable habitats throughout study area – Regularly Flooded Marshes loose 45% (1,100 ha) under the 2m SLR scenario. – Tidal Flats loose 25% (650 ha) under the 2m SLR scenario. – Swamps loose 7% (1,800 ha) under the 2m SLR scenario. • • • 12 stakeholder meetings for role play and extended decision analysis – combinations?/portfolios? Four stages of stakeholder response - (1) Stunned silence (2) Panic/Anger (3) Organizing (4) Purpose and Passion More info and videos- www.planningmatanzas.org Agenda 1. Getting local and personal: Sea Level Rise predictions meet stakeholders in NE Florida 2. Getting even: Water Management in the Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint River Basin: The Never-ending Dixie Water War Photo: http://www.marketingmedia.co.za LAKE LANIER Chattahoochee River # Atlanta # FEDERAL STORAGE RESERVOIRS ApalachicolaChattahoocheeFlint Basin Columbus # Flint River # # # Gulf of Mexico Albany Apalachicola River The ACF Basin Water Wars: A Not-So-Brief History 1989: Atlanta applies to the Corps for increased water withdrawals and Alabama sues the Corps. States already had contentious relationship over federal navigation project for over a decade. 1992-1997: Comprehensive Study of water use in the basin conducted after negotiated agreement. 1998: ACF Compact approved by Congress and three states requires development of a Water Allocation Formula by December 1998. First such Compact in the southeast and first in US since passage of major environmental laws in the 1970s. 1999 – 2003: Compact negotiation extended 14 times when agreement could not be reached by three States. The ACF Basin Water Wars: A Not-So-Brief History Part II • 2003: Memorandum of Understanding between States on principles of Water Allocation Formula and then the termination of ACF Compact. • 2004-2005: Multiple lawsuits relating to the ACF water management proceed through courts in Washington, D.C., Birmingham and Atlanta. • 2006: Corps of Engineers and U.S. Fish and Wildlife present Interim Operating Procedures (IOP) for managing ACF reservoir system. The ACF Basin Water Wars: A Not-So-Brief History Part III • 2007: Severe drought requires modifying IOP to include Emergency Drought Operations (EDO) as the Apalachicola River experiences record low flows and endangered species are threatened. Court case consolidated to single court. • 2008: District Court of Appeals rules in favor of Florida and Alabama on case relating to water supply withdrawals from Lake Lanier. Georgia appeals decision. Corps of Engineers announce preparation of new Water Control Plan for ACF basin. The ACF Basin Water Wars: A Not-So-Brief History Part III • 2009: Magnuson Ruling. Maintains that city of Atlanta has no right to water from Lake Lanier (federal reservoir). In 3 years, all rights return to early 1970s, leaving Atlanta without access to Lake Lanier. Atlanta appeals. • 2011: 11th Circuit Court overrules Magnuson ruling, restores Atlanta’s right to withdraw from Lake Lanier. Gives US Army Corps one year to decide how to allocate the water. Florida and Alabama appeal to Supreme Court… • 2013: Florida appeals to the supreme court citing USACE delays in water allocation plans will irrevocably harm Apalachicola Bay fisheries. • 2014: Supreme Court agrees to hear the case… To address basin wide water quantity issues in a multi-state basin in the U.S., there are four options: 1) A lawsuit through the U.S. Supreme Court, 2) Federal legislation requiring interstate management, 3) Creating an Interstate Water Compact, and 4) Pretend you have no problems and pass them on to unsuspecting future generations. The major players: a complex group • • • • • • States of Florida, Georgia and Alabama Environmental interests Agricultural interests Lake Lanier Association City of Atlanta Middle Chattahoochee Association (Power companies & Municipal uses) • Flint River Agricultural Association • Fed Agencies: US Army Corps of Engineers/USFWS • Tri Rivers Navigation Association Role play and computer aided negotiation Role play and computer aided negotiation “User Demands” ACF Spreadsheet: Control Page “Future” and drought reductions Lake Lanier and West Point Levels and Releases (monthly) ACF Spreadsheet Results: Lake Lanier Levels Lake Lanier Levels over 10 years Average Climate Moderate Drought Severe Drought ACF Spreadsheet Results: WP & George Levels Walter F George & West Point Levels over 10 years Average Climate Moderate Drought Severe Drought ACF Spreadsheet Results: Flows into Florida Flows to FL Levels over 10 years Average Climate Moderate Drought Severe Drought Model Output Data for Metric Calculations and Negotiations ACF Role Play via Distance Learning The way forward… in the ACF • For the better part of 6 years, Steve Leitman and I (and a few others) have hosted 4 to 6 group negotiations (per year) of students on the ACF – With no exogenous requirement for an agreement, less than 10% will come to a settlement… – Among student negotiators, there is a fundamental and almost universal ignorance and aversion to naming meaningful environmental performance metrics – This same challenge also seems to exist in the actual negotiations – Lawsuits are still the best way to slow/delay or end-run negotiations • In good rainfall years, everyone relaxes … In bad rainfall years everyone panics… • Real life trials of this stakeholder allocation would be significantly more complicated (ask the ACF Stakeholders - http://acfstakeholders.org/ ) So What Can We Learn from Stakeholder Allocation Games? • Complex issues do not have the simple answers that stakeholders want… • Games that have simple rules are fun … games of complex systems are hard and frustrating (how can I win?) • Once all the quick fixes have been exhausted, then the hard work begins • Expanded consciousness of complex issues does tend to create more understanding/empathy amongst stakeholders • Challenge: the proactive/engaged people show up for meetings, everyone else does not… The Way Forward: To integrate many types of information to help inform decisions Monitoring interval Exceedance Monitoring Indicator value Agreed safety margin based on uncertainty and risk aversion Required action trigger Model-based projection Lower confidence interval Best technical estimate Now of the level of indicator where irreversible change occurs Mgmt Ecosystem reaction Inertia time Time [Source: Scholes & Botha,2011] Thank you for your attention