Laboratory Auditing and Energy Efficiency (LEAF)

advertisement

The Lean Laboratory

Peter James, S-Lab

(Safe, Successful, Sustainable Laboratories) www.goodcampus.org

www.effectivelab.org.uk

About Us

 Linking key laboratory stakeholders

- e.g. researchers, lecturers, technical support, estates, designers & suppliers

 Enabling strategic discussion of lab design, management and operation

- identifying and driving improvement

 Conference and workshops

Awards scheme

Good practice advice/publications

 Audit and assessment tools

2012 Award Winners

 Imperial – Continuous Commissioning

Liverpool – Central Teaching Laboratory

Loughborough – Kit Catalogue

 Oldham 6th Form College – Regional

Science Centre

Mike Foulkes/Plymouth – ISO 9001

Sheffield Hallam – Cell Culture Lab

St Andrews – Chemistry Teaching

Andrea Sella/UCL – Water Efficiency

Why Labs Will Change

 Core to STEM institutions

 Financial pressures

 Student/staff expectations

 Regulatory/stakeholder demands

 Evident inefficiencies

 More good practice examples

 Developing capability/confidence

The Conference View

 Is there scope to significantly increase the efficiency and effectiveness of labs, without compromising quality of work or safety?

- 66% said great scope

- 30% said some scope

 What would most help to achieve this?

- more pressure from funders (60%)

- more focus by senior staff (57%)

- more cross-functional working (54%)

University of Liverpool

- Central Teaching Laboratory

University of St Andrews

- Chemistry Teaching Lab

Imperial College

- Continuous Commissioning

The Lab as a Business

 A 10,000 m 3 + successful laboratory

£30 million + income streams

 A building cost of £25-30 million

Equipment assets of £5-10 million

Operating costs of £15-20 million

Space costs of £300+ per m 2

Utilities £500,000 +

Materials/consumables £500,000+

 Are assets and resources used effectively?

 Are they understood?

Lab Energy Costs

Lab Audited

Liverpool -

Bioscience

Edinburgh –

Cancer Research

York - Biology

GIA/m2 Electricity cost £

Gas cost £

Total Energy

Cost £

7,750 247,000 60,000 307,000

3,000 152,000 48,000 200,000

12,740 373,000 102,000 475,000

Manchester -

Chemistry

Cambridge -

Chemistry

3,816 432,000 161,000 593,000

27,603 888,000 211,000 1,099,000

Lab Energy Split (£)

Bioscience Chemistry

Ventilation

(including related heating)

Equipment

45

25

60

15

Conventional

Heating/Hot Water

Lighting

20

10

20

5

Model

Freezer Energy Varies

Capacity Cost per

(litres) litre (£)

Annual running cost at 7.3p/kWh

570 0.54

£306 New Brunswick (Green model)

New Brunswick (Green)

New Brunswick (Green)

Van der Woude Revco

Lab Impex Research

Heraeus

Illshun DF8517

Kaye Sanyo MDF-U70V

New Brunswick

570

570

570

570

691

484

728

101

0.55

0.57

0.76

0.85

0.93

1.12

1.13

1.79

£314

£326

£434

£487

£641

£541

£824

£180

Case 2 – Better Chemical

Management, Edinburgh

 Tracking all chemicals through barcoded containers

Users see in-house inventory when ordering

£100,000 first year savings of chemical purchasing costs

£12,000/year savings of management/disposal costs

 Fast access to chemicals

 Regular chemical audits

 SciQuest e-procurement links

Derek Burgess,

Procurement Manager

Lean Lab Principles

– Equipment and Resources

 Making issues visible

 Addressing root causes

Right sizing

Adjusting to needs

 Optimal efficiency

High utilisation

Effective management & communication

 Rich information

Leaner Cold Storage

 Making issues visible, e.g.

- total cost (incl space, heat load)

- compromised performance

- reporting/monitoring requirements

 Addressing root causes, e.g.

- storing unwanted samples

- overly high storage temperatures

- lack of ownership

 Right sizing

- based on actual storage needs

- standardised eqt sizes/procurement

Leaner Cold Storage

 Adjusting to needs

- appropriate temperatures (storage policy)

- filling/blanking empty space

- modular spaces

 Optimal efficiency

- regular maintenance

- cool locations

- buying high efficiency models

- chest rather than upright

- larger models

Leaner Cold Storage

 High utilisation

- optimised containers & racking

- central services

- shelf/area allocation

 Management and communication

- cross-functional approach

- clear responsibilities

- policies (storage, procurement etc)

- incentives (shared savings)

 Rich information

- inventory management (expiry)

- individual bar coding

Leaner Chemicals

 Making issues visible

- total costs (incl storage & disposal)

- waiting times

- reporting/security requirements

 Addressing root causes

- nasty chemicals, why?

- concerns about purity

 Right sizing

- smaller containers

 Adjusting to needs

- microscale experiments

 Optimal efficiency

Leaner Chemicals

 High utilisation

- tracking amounts & locations

 Effective management & communication

- policies

- shared savings

 Rich information

- computerised database

Laboratory Energy Opportunities

Fabric & lighting (LED)

Wider operating parameters

Efficient/modular equipment

Low flow/alternative containment

Demand responsiveness

Free cooling/heating

High efficiency equipment

Eqt consolidation/sharing

Lay out & zoning

Storage policies/actions

Central services

Space efficient/natural write up

Supply

Building &

Services

Activities

Voltage optimisation/reduction

High efficiency transformers

High efficiency back up

Zero/low carbon sources

Thermal recovery/storage

Design &

Management

Good understanding

Effective maintenance

Monitoring/recommissioning

Right sizing

Energy awareness/incentives

Biosciences –

Big Energy Users

• Freezers (-20 and -80)

• Controlled environmental chambers

• Water baths

• Incubators

• Ovens

• Icemakers

• Hybridisers

• Autoclaves

• Mass spectrometers

• Laser microscopes

Chemistry –

Big Energy Users

• Hotplates/heater-stirrers

• Mass spectrometers

• Gas chromatography

• Rotary evaporators

• NMRs

• Ovens

• Fridges

• Pumps

• Water baths

Equipment

Freezer (-20)

Envtal chamber

Water bath

Incubator

Freezer (-80)

Oven

Ice maker

Hybridiser

Incubator-shaker

Thermal Cycler

(PCR)

Liverpool Bioscience

- Equipment

Typical Energy use peak rated per unit power (W) (kWh/year)

Total energy use

(kWh/year)

Costs

(£/year)

1,000

1500-2500

500 – 1500

850

1,200

1,500

2,400

750

1,500

250-1600

4380

8760

3276

3723

5256

4336.2

10512

3285

2592

288

249,660

105,120

101,556

89,352

73,584

47,698

31,536

19,710

18,144

9,504

19,973

8,410

8,124

7,148

5,887

3,816

2,523

1,577

1,452

760

Equipment Energy Varies

Biological

Safety Cabinet kWh

Trimat 2

(Ducted) 0.44

ESCO ACZ 4D1

(recirculating) 0.33

Annual running cost

@7.3p/kWh

£281.37

£211.03

Growth Cabinet

Annual

Running

Growth Cabinet kWh Cost

Sanyo Fitotron

Percival small

Conviron

20.64

26.90

£549

£716

Percival scientific 36.36

Sanyo 2

£968

62.0

£1,814

92.85

£2,711

-80 Freezer Costs

40

30

20

10

0

70

60

50

570L 725L 585L

Capacity (L)

760L

Data supplied by University of Newcastle

Min

Ave

Max

-80 Freezer Costs

For 725L freezer:

Energy ranged from 6,000 –21,000 kWh/y

Costs ranged from ~£500 - £1800/y

Difference = £1300/y PER FREEZER!

 Procure Energy Efficient Freezers

 Energy Star label for Lab Grade freezers

Case 5 – Replacing

Freezers at Newcastle

£725 litre freezer energy

- 6,000 –21,000 kWh/y

£180,000 of central funding to replace old models

 36 -80 freezers replaced, saving 131,000 kWh

 7 years, at 9.5p per kWh

Reduced space, more reliable

More £ for research

Clare Rogers, Director

Estates Support Services

Case 4 – Improved Sample

Tracking, Queen Mary

 Blizard Institute Cell & Molecular Science

 Combined 8 research centres, 40 liquid nitrogen dewars into centralised store

 Barcode tracking & standardised containers

 50% fewer samples

 Easier sample retrieval

 Less degradation risk

 Human Tissues Act compliance easier

Lab Assessment

•Self-assessment tool for lab users (and estates)

•Inspired by work of LabRATS

•Building (high level) and Lab

Specific Assessment templates

•Lab specific assessment – 30 criteria in 9 categories

•Evidence of compliance

•Best practice guidance

•2-3 hrs per lab

Lab Assessment categories

Ambient conditions & ventilation

Chemicals and materials

Cold storage

Fume cupboards

Lighting

Scientific equipment

Waste & recycling

Water

Innovation

Download