An Introduction to LAMP :
Language Acquisition through Motor
Planning
Margaret Perkins M.A. CCC-SLP, ATP
Communication without Limitations
Augmentative
Alternative
Communication
Device used along side other approaches
– ABA, PECS, Floor time, etc.
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Pat Mirenda from ‘A Back Door Approach to
Autism and AAC’ September 2008
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
(1) that the children will become more proficient communicators, utilizing a variety of communication modes which may include AAC, speech production, or a combination of the two;
(2) that language comprehension and expression will develop so that the children can communicate beyond the one word level; and
(3) that the children will develop an increased understanding of the power of communication.
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Same as for all AAC users
–
–
–
–
S: Spontaneous
N: Novel
U: Utterance
G: Generation i.e. expressive, generative communication
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Sensory processing disorders in those individuals with autism are well documented in the basic science and literature and in first-person accounts of those living with autism. These children and adolescents respond differently to sensory experiences than do their peers without disabilities.
Tomchek & Dunn, AJOT Vol. 61, Number 2 p. 190
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Sensory processing refers to our ability to take in information through our senses (touch, movement, smell, taste, vision, and hearing), organize and interpret that information, and make a meaningful response.
-Foundation for Knowledge in Development
In contrast, sensory processing dysfunction is a disorder in which sensory input is not integrated or organized appropriately in the brain and may produce varying degrees of problems in development, information processing, and behavior.
-Cindy Hatch-Rasmussen, M.A., OTR/L www.autism.org/si
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Difficulty modulating sensory information may be involved with:
– Auditory Processing
Also Auditory filtering & auditory hyper & hyposensitivity
– Visual Responding
Avoidance of eye contact & inefficient use of eye gaze
Atypical use of peripheral vision
– Tactile hypersensitivity
Possibly interconnected with inflexible behaviors & repetitive verbalizations
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Most likely have Sensory Processing Impairment
Focus on coordinating three sensory systems for language acquisition
– Motor movement (proprioceptive system)
– Auditory (hearing)
– Visual
Should also be aware of
– Tactile and vestibular
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Likely have gifted Visual memory (rote)
Excellent visual spatial pattern recognition
Strength in rule-based learning
Gestalt learner (chunked learning)
– ‘the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”
Frequently hyperlexic
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Each Word has it’s own unique Motor Pattern
– Focus on Pattern, not icon
Language connections made through:
– Initiating a unique motor pattern and hearing a word
– Experiencing other’s reaction to the word
– repetition of the Motor
Pattern & experience with words
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
The goal is that the child will press the correct icon or icon sequence spontaneously and independently. However, to get to that end, you may have to help the child through the movement initially. You want to back off the amount of cuing that you are giving as soon as possible so that the child does not become cue dependent. Remember, it is a lot easier to remember how to get somewhere if you were the driver last time rather than the passenger.
Levels of motor assistance:
Hand over hand
Point to icon
Point to general area of icon
Point to device
Wait for child to activate
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Fitts and Posner (1967) proposed a three stage model of motor learning. The first stage is the cognitive stage in which the learner has to attend to the process of learning a motor action. This stage is marked by highly variable performance. The learner may or may not know what they are doing wrong or how to correct their performance and will need guidance to assist them. In the associative stage, he works on refining his skill and is able to detect and correct their errors. The autonomous stage is the result of a lot of practice. At this stage, the learner does not have to concentrate on the movement and can attend to other aspects of the activity.
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Natural Language
– Cognitive activity: Formulation of thoughts
– Motor activity: Speech & Gesture (automatic)
AAC Language
– Cognitive activity: Formulation of thoughts
– Motor activity: Device activation (automatic???)
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
"In the practiced automatic movements of daily life attention is directed to the sense impression and not to the movement. So, in piano playing, the beginner may attend to his fingers but the practiced player attends only to the notes or to the melody. In speaking, writing and reading aloud, and in games and manual work, attention is always directed to the goal, never to the movement. In fact, as soon as attention is directed to the movement, this becomes less automatic and less dependable."
Cattell, J.M.
1893
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Stop Looking
– Meaning of each location must be unique and consistent
– Focus more on patterns, less on picture interpretation
Location label (icon/picture/word) becomes ‘placeholder’
Stop Thinking
– Predictable next movement
– Teach patterns
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
“Using Motor Planning for language acquisition requires more than simply keeping icons in stable locations. It requires an understanding of where the system is headed years down the line, and teaching the motor patterns accordingly. The motor patterns must not change, rather they build upon themselves as vocabulary increases and language skills develop.”
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Law of Neural Habit (1890s)
– Repetition of a neuromotor pathway eventually requires less energy & enhances performance
Pathways are physiological, chemical processes
The same physiology that makes a movement strong also makes it hard to change
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
LAMP was developed with two “levels” of motor planning. Level 1 requires a single movement before the word is spoken by the device.
Level 2 requires two movements before a word is spoken.
Unity® vocabularies were used because they support consistent motor patterns that builds in a systematic fashion.
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
“Autistic children typically have problems processing auditory information. One auditory processing problem occurs when a person hears speech sounds but does not perceive the meaning of the sounds.
Sometimes the lack of speech comprehension is interpreted by others as an unwillingness to comply. However, the person may not be able to retrieve the meaning of the sound at that particular time.” Stephen M. Edelson, Ph.D, “Auditory Processing
Problems in Autism”
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
“Sensory Processing in Children With and Without Autism”
Compared 281 children 3-6 y.o. with ASD to age-matched peers who were typically developing.
Items
– Is distracted or has trouble functioning if there is a lot noise around
58% ASD compared to 2.9%
– Appears to not hear what you say
73% ASD compared to 4.3%
– Can’t work with background noise
12.5% ASD compared to 2.9%
– Has difficulty paying attention
79% ASD compared to 1.8%
Tomchek & Dunn, AJOT Vol. 61, Number 2 p. 190
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Keep language models short, simple, natural
Focus on words ‘spoken’ by child with AAC device
– And their natural consequences
Little to NO verbal prompts initially
– Limit auditory input that child needs to process
– Avoid ‘cluttering’ interaction with verbal prompting
May not be understood
Could encourage verbal prompt dependency and ‘key pushers’
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
“Input from the vestibular, proprioceptive, and auditory systems is critical for the development of speech and language (1989, Windeck & Laurel)
Children need to experience words, not just repeat them
– In LAMP each unique motor pattern = specific auditory signal
a specific word
Needs to be immediate (both signal and response)
– Engagement and attention likely short-lived for student with ASD
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
The AAC device is a tool that allows the child to “babble” and learn about language. For example, after saying
“more” to get bubbles, the child might think that pressing the key for “more” means “bubbles.” A beginning talker might make the same conclusion.
However, in another instance what the auditory signal means when the child says “more” and gets more juice, the meaning of “more” is revised by the child.
As the child learns with the AAC device, he/she is learning consistent motor patterns that result in an auditory signal. Depending on the natural consequence triggered by the auditory signal, the child may modify his/her perception of what the auditory signal means.
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
“ Communication is based on the use of the individual words of our language. True communication is spontaneous and novel. Therefore, communication systems cannot be based significantly on pre-stored sentences. Communication requires access to a vocabulary of individual words suitable to our needs that are multiple and subject to change. These words must be selected to form the sentences that we wish to say.”
ASHA’s AAC Glossary
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Is there research establishing a process for normal language acquisition?
Is normal language acquisition a simple or complex process?
Have you seen research that establishes how children with developmental disabilities acquire language?
In the absence of this research, on what do you base your intervention for helping children with disabilities acquire language?
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
From ASHA Leader
“To integrate AAC systems with the curriculum, we must consider several issues. First, language develops and expands in an orderly fashion. Our devices and systems must allow for this development from the beginning. Typically, children acquire spoken language by progressing from one-word utterances to two-word utterances to simple sentences and so on. Language form, function, and use proceed in a fairly predictable pattern. AAC intervention should begin early, and clinicians should provide support for the way we know language typically develops rather than use devices that generate complete sentences at the onset.”
Julie Schers and Pamela Hart, Wichita State University
The ASHA Leader Vol. 7 No. 16 Sept. 10, 2002
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Individuals with ASD tend to be ‘Gestalt Learners’
Tendency to take in chunks of info
– Phrase “I want spin toy” is learned as 1 entity
– Even the simple phrase “I want”
Phrases = participation, don’t build language skills
– Individual words are the building blocks of language
– We can have participators AND communicators
Two words can be something new
– Two phrases can only be two phrases
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
No Mistakes: Respond to all communication
Respond Naturally & with
Animation
– Ex. Loud crunching when pretending to ‘eat’
Use Natural responses to build language
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Emphasize words with a natural visual reaction
– “Interestingly, those individuals who do not have auditory processing problems are often ‘auditory learners.’ These children do very well using the ABA approach, whereas those who are visual learners do not do as well…given this, one might suspect that many visual learners have auditory processing problems and that visual learners will do well with a visual communication/instruction approach.”
Stephen M. Edelson, Ph.D, “Auditory Processing Problems in Autism”
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
‘go’ has a natural consequence that child can see
How would you respond to ‘Wednesday’ in a meaningful way?
‘more’ would have a similar visual consequence
“What color is this?” facilitates response ‘red’
Conveniently, core words are the most powerful
Can be used in virtually any activity
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Words that are common to peers of a similar age. They are common words used across all communication environments…which include structure words (e.g. want, more) that provide a framework for functional language use.
(Banajee et.al., 2003)
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Despite evidence that nouns are not among core vocabulary used by preschoolers…clinicians typically select nouns representing foods and objects as first symbols when designing AAC systems.
(Banajee, et. al., 2003)
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
333 Most Frequently Occurring Preschool Words: The Marvin Sampling
Compared with Banajee Sampling: all words present as at away baby back bad bad ball bathroom be bean because before being bet better big bird birds a about after again all almost already also an and another ant any are aren't around car catch cause chair come comes cookie corn could couldn't cup cut day did didn't different do does doctor bite black blue both box boy bugs but buy by bye call came can can't candy fall find finger fire first five fixed fly foot for from found get gets getting girl girls give go doesn't dog doing don't done door down drink duck eat eating else even everybody everything face her head hear hello help here here's hi high hill him his hold home horse hot house how huh goes going gonna good great green guys had hair hand hands has have haven't he he's name named need never new next nice no not of off oh other ok old on one only open maybe me mean messy middle mine mom mommy more most move much must my myself
Name kind know last leaves let let's lift like little long look looking lot lunch made make man many may hum
I
I'll
I'm if in inside is isn't it it's juice jump jumped jumping just really red remember ride right room run said same saw say see she she's show shut side sit so or our ours out over paint people pet name pick piece play please push put ready their them then there there's there's these they they'll they're thing things this those three threw through time to still some somebody someone something sometimes somewhere stop stuff swing tape tell than that that's the
Christine A. Marvin, today together too top toys trees try trying turn turtles two um up us use used very wait want wanted was wasn't watch water way we we'll
David R. Beukelman,
Denise Bilyeu we're well went were what what's when where where's which while who who whole why with won't would ya yes yet you you'll you're your yours
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
AAC, Vol. 10, Dec.,
1994
Toddler Vocabulary Arranged by Frequency
I
Words
No
Yes/yea my the want is it that a go mine you what on in here more out off some help all done/finished
Percentage
9.5
8.5
7.6
5.8
5.2
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.6
4.4
3.8
3.2
3.1
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.1
1.0
26 core words shown at left comprise 96.3 percent of the total words used by toddlers in this study
96.3%
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Banajee et al.
Essential for expressive communication
Children with ASD tend not to spontaneously generalize concepts
Core words can be used in multiple contexts with varied meanings
Essential for ASD student to make language connections
– Used to build flexibility with language meaning
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Fewer than 5 percent of all words used by toddlers are picture producers
(Banajee, Dicarlo & Stricklin, AAC , 2003)
Concrete graphics can only be made for picture producers
More than 90 percent of core vocabulary words are not picture producers
(Hill, Dissertation, Establishment of Performance Indices, 2001)
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
In preparation for learning child may need:
– Calming:
rocking, brushing, massage, push/pull, oral motor (chewing, sucking), quiet sounds
– Alerting:
swinging, rolling, dancing, oral motor (sour, crunchy).
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
“Sensory modulation impairments represent a mismatch between the external contextual demands of the child’s environment and his or her internal characteristics (e.g. attention, emotion, sensory processing) and can impair the ability of the child with autism to sustain engagement with people or in activities.”
Tomchek & Dunn, AJOT Vol. 61, Number 2 p. 190
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Vary activities to find motivator
– Use that motivator for language learning
Follow your student’s lead, give up control
– Can be flexible and still meet goals
Keep student challenged by building on activity
Attend to their every move
– Treat everything as intentional and purposeful
Be prepared to move
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Capture attention by doing surprising and novel things
Avoid predictability
Don’t be afraid to be
Goofy
Goal is to engage student
– Then teach language
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Use isolated interests as opportunity to teach language
PASSION Not OBSESSION
Compliance vs.
Communication
Stop asking “What” start asking “Which”
Stop Testing
Start Teaching
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Mis-hits offer a profound learning opportunity
– if met with natural consequences
Device exploration is OKAY
– Will depend upon reinforcement
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Hide keys temporarily if behavior is roadblock
– Hide keys as needed during activity
Adjust vocabulary based on child-directed activity
– Show keys (vocabulary) for specific activity
Remember goal: learn motor patterns for individual words
Use of AAC device mimics speech in that it’s a motor movement that produces a consistent sensory feedback
– Remember: Include keys for ‘mishit’ learning opportunities
– Try showing all keys when child is engaged in motivating activity
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Auditory signals
Technology bridges the cognitive gap
Keep same system as language grows
Dynamic display allows for quick programming to keep up with student.
Example of Vocabulary Builder Tool
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
During the initial stages of intervention, it may be necessary to limit use of the AAC device to a controlled setting. If possible, plan for one to five intensive therapy sessions before introducing the device in other settings, such as a classroom or home. As the child is gaining success in use of the device, introduce more use of the device in less controlled settings. The introduction of the device into these settings will be dependent on a wide range of variables, including the skills and attitudes of the communication partners and the degree of simulation in the environment.
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
John Halloran, M.S., CCC-SLP
Arkansas
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company
Margaret Perkins, MA CCC-SLP, ATP
Office: (760) 431– 8875
Toll Free: 1-800-262-1984 ext 420
Email: mcp.cons@prentrom.com
www.prentrom.com
Adapted from ‘LAMP: Language Acquisition through Motor Planning’ authored by
John Halloran, MS, CCC-SLP and Mia Emerson, MS, CCC-SLP
Prentke Romich Company