2010 Performance Evaluation Process
Information Session for Supervisors
Discussion Overview
Effective Performance Management Process Components
2009 Performance Evaluation Summary
Process Enhancements
Results
Preparing for 2010 Performance Evaluations
Process Enhancements
Tools and Tips for Conducting Effective Evaluations
Components of an Effective Performance
Management Process
Connects individual performance to SU’s Mission, Vision,
Values and Strategic Initiatives
Measures and Recognizes Individual Performance and
Contributions
Promotes Excellence and Professional Development
Connects to Mission, Vision, Values &
Strategic Initiatives
Job Description
Professional Dev.
Individual
Mission, Vision, Initiatives
Policies, Procedures,
Expected Competencies
Division/Department
Mission, Vision and Values
Strategic Initiatives
Policies, Procedures, Expected Competencies
University
2009 Performance Evaluation Summary
Enhancements
Professional Competencies linked to University Mission,
Vision and Values
Option of Narrative or Structured Format
Overall Rating, expanded to 5-point scale
Refined Goals Section
Solicited information on Development Needs and,
Supervisory Support and Improvement Opportunities
2009 Performance Evaluation Summary
Results
Overall University Completion Rate = 84%
Professional Skill Development Needs Expressed
Supervisory
Communications
Project/Time Management
Software/ OIT
2010 Staff Evaluation Process Enhancements
Further Refined Rating Definitions
Created separate Self-Evaluation and Supervisor
Evaluation Forms
Addition of Supervisory/Leadership Competency
Section
The Performance Management and
Evaluation Process
• 5 Key Performance Management Processes
• Performance Evaluation Overview/Timeline
• Tips on Preparing Performance Evaluations
5 Key Performance Management Processes
Articulation of Expectations: Job Clarification and Goal
Alignment
Consistent Performance Tracking
Check-In Meetings: interim performance conversations
Manage Performance Problems as they occur
Wrap it all together: The Annual Performance Evaluation
Performance Evaluation Overview and
Timeline
Set date and time for an evaluation meeting
Prepare for the meeting, including completion of a
performance evaluation form
Exchange evaluations forms prior to the meeting date
Meet to review and discuss performance and set forth
plans for the future
Supervisor and employee finalize evaluation forms, and
submit to HR by August 31st
Preparation: Information Gathering
Notes from on-going meetings, assignments,
observations, performance discussion reflections during
the year
Job Description
Individual’s Resume
Previous Performance Evaluation and projects, goals
Feedback from students/customers, co-workers, others
Work samples, accomplishment
Objective and Valuable Documentation
Accurate Objective facts, records, and incidents
Time Appropriate Events or incidents should have taken
place within the evaluation period
Behavioral Address what someone does, rather than his
or her thoughts or beliefs
Consistent Use similar information and level of detail
for each person evaluated
Complete Include sufficient details and specific
examples to back up conclusions on performance.
Writing Do’s and Don’ts
Do
Describe behaviors
Be specific
Document observed
behaviors
Document impact of
behavior
Don’t
Use labels or judgments
Be general
Rely on hearsay
Judge based on personal
preference
Overall Performance Rating
The scale of 1-5 is used with specific definitions for each
point on the scale.
Consistency between ratings and comments on
performance, goals and professional development needs
Use whole numbers when rating a specific job
performance area or overall performance.
Performance
Not Acceptable
Needs
Performance
Development
1
2
Performance is
Performance meets
consistently below most of the job
job expectations.
requirements but
A corrective action requires more than
plan has been or is usual supervisor
being developed to follow-up and
achieve specific
direction.
results.
Employee will
Employee’s
require additional
performance will
education and
be review again
coaching from the
according to the
supervisor in order
corrective action
to consistently
plan’s objectives
meet job
and timeline.
expectations.
Meets
Expectations
3
Performance
consistently meets
and sometimes
exceeds job
requirements. All
critical goals are
achieved. Results
are consistent with
those of a fully
trained, highly
competent
employee. Over
the past year has
made the expected
contributions to the
department.
Exceeds
Expectations
4
Performance
consistently meets
and frequently
exceeds job
requirements and
established goals.
Results frequently
exceed competent
peers in the same
or similar
positions. Over the
past year has made
a significant
contribution to the
department.
Outstanding
5
Performance and
demonstrated
expertise is
consistently at a
superior level.
Employee achieves
outstanding results
and models
effective behaviors
that are an
inspiration to
others. Over the
review period,
employee has
consistently made
exceptional or
unique
contributions to the
department.
Rating Pitfalls to Avoid
The Halo Effect: Allowing one good aspect of a person’s
character or performance to influence the entire
evaluation.
The Horns Effect: Allowing one negative aspect of a
person’s character or performance to influence the entire
evaluation.
Partial Rating: Basing the rating on the most recent
period of time, not the total evaluation period.
Similar to me: Evaluating more favorably those who are
similar to the rater
Favoritism: Evaluating friends higher than other
employees.
What’s the harm in a bit of
“evaluation inflation”?
Impacts the person being evaluated: loss of full potential,
professional development, motivation
Impacts the work group: communicates that people are
not held fully accountable or that there is preferential
treatment
Impacts you as a manager: leadership effectiveness,
management decisions
Impacts overall performance of work group, department,
divisions, the university
Goal Setting
Goal setting is completed as part of the annual evaluation process.
As you review accomplishments and performance for the previous
period, you also set goals for coming year.
Both the employee and supervisor should agree on the goals.
What’s a goal?
Specific statements that describe results to be achieved
What’s a task?
The steps needed to accomplish a goal
SMART Goals
Specific
Results Oriented
Measurable
Time Bound
Achievable
Evaluation Meeting Preparation
What are the important items you want to discuss at the
meeting?
Is there one central message or critical point to be
addressed?
What questions do you have for the meeting?
What do you want to get out of this meeting?
In what ways will you actively contribute to a meaningful,
constructive and productive dialog?
At the Evaluation Meeting
Make sure the time and place are planned; allow for
enough time; no interruptions; a comfortable setting.
Be prepared. Know your goals for the meeting, have
examples ready.
Listen. To have a full picture, you need the other person’s
perspective.
Be candid—get to the point.
Be constructive in feedback
The Five Levels of Listening
1.
Listening to UNDERSTAND
2.
Listening for APPLICATION
3.
Listening to TELL MY STORY
4.
Listening for JUDGMENT
5.
NOT Listening
Giving Feedback
Constructive Feedback is:
descriptive of behavior and impact
specific not general
directed at behavior that can be changed
interactive to ensure clear communication
stated in the first person to assign responsibility
based on observed behavior
balanced
Receiving Feedback
Breathe! – it helps the body to relax and the brain to focus
Listen Actively to understand the other’s perspective
Paraphrase and Ask Questions to ensure you are accurately
receiving the intended message
Take time to absorb what you heard
Take responsibility for your actions and behavior
Focus on the whole message, not just one or two aspects
Wrap Up and Next Steps
Review the key points
Assure the employee that you want to work together to
help continue his or her development
Summarize agreed-on actions you will both take –
including writing of goals and their due dates
Ask the employee to sign the evaluation form
Components of an Effective Performance
Management Process
Connects individual performance to SU’s Mission, Vision,
Values and Strategic Initiatives
Measures and Recognizes Individual Performance and
Contributions
Promotes Professional Excellence and Professional
Development