F.T.A.A. Free Trade Area of the Americas Nicole Anello Kara Breissinger Neena Dreslin Nicholas Lee NAFTA- Objectives Reduce trade barriers between parties Promote conditions of fair competition Increase investment opportunities Protection of intellectual property rights Overall, to benefit all members through increased and fairer trade practices NAFTA PROS Created jobs in Mexico Increased trade between all partners Reduced tariffs and non-tariff barriers CONS Pollution at the Mexican border Very low wages Poor labor standards in Mexico U.S. jobs lost Objectives vs. Reality U.S. companies want to take advantage of low cost labor They want to get away from unions Hoped to build lucrative markets in Northern Mexico The low cost labor is preventing Mexicans from improving their standard of living No unions=unfair working conditions Crime is increasing, native work force is being exhausted What is going on today?? The facts show that Mexico has been harmed in many ways U.S. blue-collar jobs have decreased on the whole The net impact of immigration should be that it will decrease Cultural identity is being lost Sweatshops & Human Rights Proponents of NAFTA Push: More Jobs (US, Mexico, and Canada) Higher Wages Better Deals on Goods and Services Effects US workers lost hundreds of thousands of jobs Mexican workers encountered low wages and unfair labor practices Claim Against Washington State Apple Industry Failure of US Labor Law to Protect Workers’ Rights Inadequacy and Failure of US Labor Law Mary Mendez (worked 7 years in apple industry) Difficulty Forming Union (armed guards) Threatened with Immigration Unfair Wage Reductions if in Union Anti-union Propaganda and Threats In Addition… Illegal Chemical Hazards Fired and Overworked Injured People “Anglos” had lighter jobs and are better paid May take up to two years for Labor Law Violations to Reach Arbitration Chapter 11 Purpose To ensure that US investors abroad receive the same type of protection that foreign investors get in the US with or without a treaty Reality May lead to a fundamentally different world in the degree of power corporations hold on democratic governments -Dan Seligman, Director of the Sierra Club’s Trading Program Chapter 11 in Practice California Case: Methanex v. the US Methanex, a Canadian Company Produces Gasoline Additive MTBE Caused cancer in lab animals Gov. Gray Davis authorized its phase out Filed a suit for $970 million in compensation Behind closed doors Questions our own sovereignty Is it our decision or an un-elected body’s decision? NAFTA denies tribunals the power to overrule state law History of the FTAA Free Trade Area of the Americas First Summit of the Americas: Miami, 1994 Declaration of Principles 34 heads of state addressed common issues and sought solutions to shared problems defined the goals of the FTAA 12 working groups established negotiate for the FTAA lead to a committed initiation of FTAA negotiations in 1998 What Does it Mean for the US in the future? Possible free trade with all countries of North, Central, and South America Increased competition and standards for US made goods and services Further integration; similar to the modern day European Union Creation of a single currency and common market General Objectives To promote prosperity through increased economic integration and free trade among the countries of our hemisphere. To establish a Free Trade Area, concluding negotiations by 2005. To maximize market openness through high levels of disciplines. General Objectives To provide opportunities to facilitate the integration of the smaller economies in the FTAA. To strive to make our trade liberalization and environmental policies mutually supportive. To secure observance and promotion of workers rights. PROS & CONS Free trade region Benefits of further integration Increased competition Promote prosperity Congress not involved NGOs denied participation Extreme power given to corporations “Deepen negative effects of NAFTA” Possible Negative Effects Ability of corporations to bypass environmental and worker protection laws Services will be liberalized Exacerbation of environmental destruction Negative expansion of IPR Increase use of GMOs Human Rights Largest fear FTAA values corporate profits over human costs increase of poverty and inequality QUESTIONS?