The Balanced Scorecard Planning for long-run organizational success The Balanced Scorecard: A Good Idea in 1992 Balanced Scorecard in 1992 “The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that Drive Performance” Harvard Business Review, 1992 The Balanced Scorecard: A Great Idea by 2002 Balanced Scorecard by 2002 21 translations 17 translations 50% usage in Fortune 500 Harvard Business Review “Hall of Fame” 50,000+ BSC on-line members Balanced Scorecard Hall of Fame Implemented Strategies and Achieved Breakthrough Results… Fast Mobil 3 years Saatchi & Saatchi + $2b • Last to first • Cash flow +$1.2b • ROI 6% --> 16% ATT Canada 3 years + $7b 2-5 years Cigna Brown & Root 2-5 years 3 years • #1 in growth & profitability + $3b Duke Children’s City of Charlotte 3 years • Customer Satisfaction = 70% • Public Official Award • Customer Satisfaction #1 • Cost/Case 33% Wells Fargo Southern Garden 3-5 years • # Customers 450% • Best Online Bank • Least Cost Producer 2 years Chemical Bank 3 years • 99% Merged Target Asset Retention UPS Hilton Hotels • Customer Satisfaction • Market Revenue Index • Revenues • Net Income 9% 33% 2 years 3 years 3 years Question: How can complex organizations achieve results like this in such short periods of time? Answer: Alignment! The Balanced Scorecard process allows an organization to align and focus all its resources on its strategy BUSINESS UNITS EXECUTIVE TEAM STRATEGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HUMAN RESOURCES BUDGETS AND CAPITAL INVESTMENTS © 1998 Renaissance Worldwide, Inc. and Robert S. Kaplan, All rights reserved. A Gap Exists Between Mission-Vision-Strategy and Employees’ Everyday Actions MISSION Why we exist VALUES What’s important to us VISION What we want to be STRATEGY Our game plan TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT What we must improve EMPOWERMENT / PERSONAL OBJECTIVES What I need to do The Balanced Scorecard Links Vision and Strategy to Employees’ Everyday Actions MISSION Why we exist VALUES What’s important to us VISION What we want to be STRATEGY Our game plan BALANCED SCORECARD Translate, Focus and Align STRATEGIC INITIATIVES What are the priorities TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT What we must improve EMPOWERMENT / PERSONAL OBJECTIVES What I need to do STRATEGIC OUTCOMES Satisfied SHAREHOLDERS Delighted CUSTOMERS Efficient and Effective PROCESSES Motivated & Prepared WORKFORCE Balanced Scorecard Balance between Financial measures of performance Long-range competitive abilities Balanced Scorecard Four aspects of firm performance Financial Customer Internal business Innovation and learning Financial Perspective How do we look to stockholders? Survive Succeed Prosper Customer Perspective How do our customers see us? New products Responsiveness Quality Internal Business Perspective At what must we excel currently? Manufacturing/service excellence New product/service introduction Innovation and Learning Perspective Can we continue to improve and create value? Technological leadership Time to market Employee training and satisfaction Perspectives are Interrelated Innovation pleases customers which are necessary for good financial results Good financial results make financing improvements possible The Complete Balanced Scorecard Strategy Map Improve Shareholder Value Financial Perspective: the drivers of shareholder value Shareholder Value ROCE Productivity Strategy Improve Cost Structure Increase Asset Utilization Cost per Unit Internal Perspective: how value is created and sustained Learning & Growth Perspective: role for intangible assets – people, systems, climate and culture Enhance Customer Value Customer Profitability Asset Turnover •Market and Account Share Customer Perspective: the differentiating value proposition Revenue Growth Strategy Customer Acquisition Customer Retention Create Value from New Products & Services New Revenue Sources Customer Satisfaction Product Leader Customer Solutions Customer Value Proposition Product/Service Attributes Price Quality Time Operations Theme (Processes that Produce and Deliver Products & Services) Low Total Cost Relationship Function Service Customer Management Theme (Processes that Enhance Customer Value) Image Relations Brand Innovation Theme (Processes that Create New Products and Services) Regulatory and Society Theme (Processes that Improve the Environment and Communities) Human, Information, and Organizational Capital Strategic Competencies Strategic Technologies Climate for Action Overall Concepts Not just a set of measures Measures must relate to strategy Critical success factors Measures are interrelated Must understand how the perspectives influence each other Overall Concepts Not a quick process Implementation requires Thought Analysis Data-gathering Time Overall Concepts Thought What is our strategy? What is critical to implementing the strategy? How can we measure our progress? Overall Concepts Analysis What are the linkages between functions? What drives the achievement of goals? What measures correlate with the drivers? Overall Concepts Data-gathering What data is available? What isn’t? How should it be gathered? Reported? Overall Concepts Time Cannot be done in an afternoon Successful implementation may take several months Never-ending process Implementation Steps Initiative must start at the top Only senior management has grasp of overall strategy And the authority to make strategic decisions Doomed without commitment from the top Implementation Steps Requires teamwork, collaboration Different perspectives, expertise required Not a one-person job Won’t produce buy-in Implementation Steps Interview senior managers Input on strategic objectives Input on critical success factors Input on possible measures Implementation Steps Gain consensus Senior managers develop tentative scorecard as a group Individual reactions Suggested refinements Implementation Steps Expand consensus Larger group refines tentative scorecard Finishing touches Consensus on vision, objectives, measures, targets, implementation program, etc. Implementation Steps Selection of metrics Must relate to strategic goals May not be “exact” May come from external sources Not too many Not too few Implementation Steps Roll-out Link to data bases and information system Communicate to employees Develop scorecards for lower levels Implementation Steps Periodic reviews Has strategy changed? Are the objectives valid? Are the activities valid? Are the measures valid? The scorecard evolves with the organization The Road to Disaster Senior management not committed No one else will be either Lack of consensus Lack of commitment The Road to Disaster Consultants Good Provide needed expertise Bad Take over the project Consensus, commitment of employees is lost The Road to Disaster Failure to communicate Employees don’t understand: Strategy Their roles Importance of the scorecard measures The Road to Disaster Lack of “push-down” Lower levels operating as before Operations are not tied to corporate scorecard Scorecard is ignored at lower levels The Road to Disaster Carve it in stone It won’t be perfect, ever Must evolve Delay implementation until perfect See above The Road to Disaster The compensation issue Powerful motivator of performance Poorly designed scorecard will not show strategic improvements even if individual measures show progress The Scorecard as a Change Agent Four steps Translating the vision into action Communicating and linking Business planning Feedback and learning Translating the Vision Strategy must be reduced to a set of objectives and measures which can be operationalized “We want to be the best” won’t do Communicating and Linking Corporate strategy must be communicated to all levels Lower levels must have objectives linked to corporate objectives Business Planning Integrate the financial plan with the business plan Use the scorecard to allocate resources to critical activities Avoids the short-term spending mentality Feedback and Learning Monitor short-term results to determine if progress is being made toward long-term objectives May need to refine measures, activities, objectives, even strategy Mobil NAM&R Strategy Map Increase ROCE to 12% Financial Perspective Revenue Growth Strategy Increase Customer Profitability Through Premium Brands New Sources of NonGasoline Revenue Customer Perspective Share of Targeted Segment Mystery Shopper Score Non-Gasoline Revenue & Margin Become Industry Cost Leader Volume vs. Industry Premium Ratio Cash Flow “Win-Win Dealer Relations” Basic Maximize Use of Existing Assets Cash Expense (cpg) vs. Industry “Delight the Consumer” Differentiators Clean Safe Quality Product Trusted Brand Speedy Purchase “Build the Franchise” Internal Perspective Productivity Strategy ROCE Net Margin (vs. industry) Friendly Helpful Employees “Increase Customer Value” Create NonGasoline Products & Services Understand Consumer Segments New Product Acceptance Rate “Achieve Operational Excellence” Improve Hardware Performance Yield Gap Unplanned Downtime Best-In-Class Franchise Teams More Consumer Products Recognize Loyalty On-Spec On-Time Improve Inventory Management “Be a Good Neighbor” Improve Environmental, Health and Safety Inventory Levels Run-Out Rate Industry Cost Leader Activity Cost vs. Competition Dealer Quality Rating Help Develop Business Skills Environment Incidents Safety Incidents A Motivated and Prepared Workforce Climate for Action Learning & Growth Perspective • Aligned • Personal Growth Personal BSC Employee Feedback Competencies • Functional Excellence • Leadership Skills • Integrated View Strategic Skill Coverage Ratio Dealer Profit Growth Dealer Satisfaction Technology • Process Improvement Systems Milestones The Balanced Scorecard Framework Is Readily Adapted to Non-Profit and Government Organizations The Mission "If we succeed, how will we look to our taxpayers (or donors)?” ”To achieve our vision, how must we look to our customers?” “To satisfy our customers, financial donors and mission, what business processes must we excel at?" “To achieve our vision, how must our people learn, communicate, and work together?” The Mission, rather than the financial / shareholder objectives, drives the organization’s strategy Boston Lyric Opera Strategy Map Our mission is to ensure the long-term future of opera in Boston and New England by (1) producing the highest quality professional productions of diverse opera repertoire that are artistically excellent as well as musically and theatrically innovative; (2) developing the next generation of opera talent; (3) engaging and educating a diverse community about opera to become enthusiastic audience members, educators, supporters, and volunteers. (HBS Case #9-101-111) National/International Opera Scene Supporters/Subscribers CUSTOMER Target Generous and Loyal Contributors/ Prospects Focus on Board Investment and Recruitment Build Artistic Reputation for High Standards Launch Unique Residency Program for Artists Enhance Customer Relationships INTERNAL BUSINESS PROCESSES Streamline Ticketing/Gift Acknowledgement Processes Increase One-on-One Contact Improve Board Support Systems Provide Staff with Skill Training Promote Collaborations Insure Operational Excellence Develop Web-based Service/ Products Contract “Best” Talent Develop Strategic Job Competencies LEARNING AND GROWTH Present Diverse Repertory Community Leverage Board Effectiveness with Education and Fundraising Training Develop Innovation Review Process Increase Brand Awareness Increase Cost Efficiency/Quality Assurance Increase Revenue Systematize Financial Processes Launch Comprehensive PR Campaign Develop New Products/ Program Strengthen Strategic Alignment Build Growth-Enabling Infrastructure Develop Strategic Communications Plan Create HR Plan Incorporate Milestone Evaluations Fiscal Health FINANCIAL Focus on Educ./Comm. Programs for Greater Boston Build Community Support Build Multi-Year Support Invest in Strategic Technologies Growth Planning Create Long-Term Investment Strategy Develop Realistic Pro Formas Institutionalize Multi-Year Budgeting Develop Administrative Residency Program Typical Balanced Scorecard Project Schedule Week Task 1: Define Strategic Architecture Project Kickoff Task 2: Draft the Balanced Scorecard Workshop I Task 3: Develop Measures, High Level Targets & Initiatives Workshop II Task 4: Develop Implementation Plan Workshop III 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 Wks 4 Wks 4 Wks 2 Wks 13 14 15 16 Balanced Scorecard Project Team BSCol Engagement Officer/ Principal (part-time) BSCol Project Leader (full-time) BSCol Project Team 1-2 Consultants (full-time) Executive Sponsor/ Steering Committee • Overall project ownership • Consultations/pre-presents as needed • 2 days/week Client Project Leader Client Core Team Staff knowledgeable of business strategies and organization Executive Leadership Team • 1-2 staff • 2-3 days/week • Briefings with others as needed • 3 half- to full-day workshops • One 90-minute briefing/ interview • Consultations/ pre-presents as needed How are Organizations Doing on the Journey? A survey of online members of the BSCol: 500 responses; 250 reported, “Yes, we have BSC.” 50% of these: too early to tell about impact. Of the 125 who had sufficient experience with the program: Achieved breakthrough results Some progress No or limited results 15% 64% 21% (n = 19) (n = 80) (n = 26) What Separates the Winners from the Losers? Executive Team has created a sense of urgency Strategy translated to a strategy map and Balanced Scorecard Corporate/Business Unit measures are linked & aligned Employees are aware of the strategy Individual and team goals are aligned with the strategy The BSC is an integral part of the strategic planning process The budget is driven by the strategy Breakthrough Results Some Progress No Results 84% 53% 20% 84% 41% 0% 72% 39% 0% 56% 32% 0% 42% 26% 0% 100% 40% 0% 42% 29% 0% For further information, visit www.bscol.com Our Mission: “To facilitate the worldwide awareness, use, enhancement, and integrity of the Balanced Scorecard as a value-added management process” Conferences Membership Research Consulting Training Networking Publications Certification