Integrating Needs Assessment with Organizational Strategy

advertisement

IAPD/IPRA Conference

January 2011

Integrating Needs Assessment with

Organizational Strategy

Ron Vine, President, Leisure Vision

Barbara Heller, President ,Heller and Heller

Consulting, Inc.

Session Overview

• Creating a strategy focused organization based on community needs

• Why do a community needs assessment study?

• Steps to completing a community needs assessment study

• Benchmarking comparisons

• Why do strategic planning?

• Strategic planning development and deployment

• Developing and implementing strategy

Leisure Vision Illinois Clients

• Wheeling Park Dist.

• Champaign Park Dist.

• Mundelein Park Dist.

• Schaumburg Park Dist.

• Elk Grove Park Dist.

• Highland Park District

• City of Rock Island

• Geneva Park District

• Winnetka Park Dist.

• Gurnee Park Dist.

• River Trails Park Dist.

• Hoffman Estates Park Dist.

• Bloomingdale Park Dist.

• Deerfield Park Dist.

• Lindenhurst Park Dist.

• Carol Stream Park Dist.

• Urbana Park Dist.

• Downers Grove Park Dist.

• Lisle Park Dist

• Freeport Park Dist.

• Northbrook Park District

• Park District of Oak Park

• Des Plaines Park Dist.

• Glenview Park District

• Sugar Grove Park Dist.

• Lake Bluff Park District

Why Did These Park Districts Do Needs

Assessment Studies?

To understand usage of Park District today

• Usage and satisfaction with parks

• Usage and satisfaction with major facilities

• Participation and satisfaction with programs

• Marketing efforts used the most

• Barriers to participation

• Position as a market provider for youth and adults

• Value of park services

Why Did These Park Districts Do

Needs Assessment Studies

To understand community vision of Park District tomorrow

Needs for parks, trails, and facilities

Unmet needs for parks, trails, and facilities

Priorities for parks, trails, and facilities

• Usage of special facilities, i.e. community centers, aquatic facilities

• To understand opportunities to expand Park District percent of service market

Why Did These Park Districts Do Needs

Assessment Studies

To understand support for funding improvements

• Support for increasing program markets for priority programs

• Level of increased tax support for priority projects

• Potential success of tax funding initiatives

Money is Not A Problem it is A Solution. Awareness is the Problem

Steps in the Community Needs

Assessment Process

Setting the Stage

Build Stakeholders and Community Confidence

Conducting the Needs Assessment Survey

Analysis of the Needs Assessment Survey including Benchmarking

Buy-In Starts at the Process Beginning and Continues Through Implementation

Set the Stage

Be a Leader from the start

Empower staff and community

Build confidence in the integrity of needs assessment survey process

Build Confidence

Stakeholder Interviews - One on one interviews with key decision makers

( elected officials, business people, sponsors, boards, etc.)

Focus Groups – (8-15 persons)

( Park

Board, staff, youth sports associations, seniors, youth, non-profits, citizen users, school officials, arts organizations)

Understand Issues of Key Importance to Build Consensus Inside and Outside District

& to Build Early on Trust , Transparency and Buy-In

Test What You Hear Though

Needs Assessment Surveys

Quantitative Public Input includes statistically valid phone and mail/phone surveys that build buy-in

A survey of 400 households has a 95% level of confidence with a margin of error of +/-4.9%

A survey of 800 households has a 95% level of confidence with a margin of error of +/-3.5%

A survey of 2,800 households has a 95% level of confidence with a margin of error of +/-1.9%

@ Leisure Vision (913) 829-1215

Ensure Survey Results can be Broken

Down by Key Demographic Groups, i.e.

Household With and With-out Children, Visitors to Parks

User of Programs, Geographic Areas

Glenview Park District

Program Participation

Q10. Have You or Members of Your Households Participated in Any Recreation Programs Offered by the Glenview

Park District During the Past 12 Months?

by percentage of respondents

Yes

50%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (March 2009)

No

50%

No

22%

Gurnee Park District

Rating of Park Conditions

Q3. Have Respondent Households Visited Any

Gurnee Park District Parks During the Past Year by percentage of respondents

Q3a. How Respondent Would Rate the Physical

Condition of ALL the Gurnee Park District

Parks They Have Visited

Excellent

47%

Yes

78%

Fair

2%

Good

51%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (July 2007)

Level of Satisfaction with Overall Value

Received from the Geneva Park District

Q25. Level of Satisfaction with the Overall Value

Households Receive from the Geneva Park District by percentage of respondents

Very Satisfied

45%

Somewhat Satisfied

31%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (June 2010)

Neutral

13%

Don't Know

6%

Very Dissatisfied

1%

Somewhat Dissatisfied

4%

Needs for Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Woodridge Park District

Q10a. Estimated Number of Households in the Woodridge

Park District That Have a Need for Various

Parks and Recreation Facilities by number of households based on 12,406 households in the Woodridge Park District

Neighborhood parks

Bicycle pathway system

Large community parks

Outdoor swimming pool/water park

Nature center with trails

Park shelters/picnic areas

Indoor fitness and exercise facility

Playground equipment

Indoor walking/running track

Sledding Hill

Indoor swimming pool/leisure pool

Outdoor concert/entertainment stage

Golf course

Outdoor tennis courts

Fishing piers on ponds

Indoor basketball/volleyball courts

Outdoor basketball courts

Indoor multi-use sports field

Multi-use fields (soccer, football, lacrosse)

Baseball and softball fields

Outdoor sand volleyball courts

Disc golf course

Garden Plots

Skateboard park

Cricket field(s)

0

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (January 2010)

273

2,000

3,809

3,759

3,164

3,064

2,816

2,543

2,543

2,295

2,221

1,464

7,903

7,642

6,501

6,277

7,642

7,419

6,178

6,178

6,067

4,627

4,553

5,732

5,533

4,000 6,000 8,000

9,342

10,000

Unmet Needs for Parks and Recreation

Facilities in the Woodridge Park District

Q10c. Estimated Number of Households in the Woodridge

Park District Whose Needs for Parks and Recreation

Facilities Are Only Being 50% Met or Less by number of households based on 12,406 households in the Woodridge Park District

Indoor walking/running track

Indoor fitness and exercise facility

Indoor swimming pool/leisure pool

Sledding Hill

Nature center with trails

Outdoor concert/entertainment stage

Fishing piers on ponds

Indoor basketball/volleyball courts

Outdoor swimming pool/water park

Indoor multi-use sports field

Park shelters/picnic areas

Large community parks

Garden Plots

Outdoor tennis courts

Bicycle pathway system

Outdoor sand volleyball courts

Outdoor basketball courts

Neighborhood parks

Playground equipment

Golf course

Skateboard park

Disc golf course

Multi-use fields (soccer, football, lacrosse)

Baseball and softball fields

Cricket field(s)

0

136

773

712

658

593

1,814

1,543

1,472

1,471

1,463

1,404

1,243

1,234

1,106

967

4,695

4,601

4,448

4,216

2,684

3,108

2,484

2,391

2,331

2,316

Calculated by multiplying the number of households hav ing needs by the percentage of households whose needs are being

50% met or less.

Unmet needs exist for a wide range of outdoor and indoor parks and facilities

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

50% Meets Needs 25% Meet Needs 0% Meets Needs

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (January 2010)

Priorities for Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Woodridge Park District

Q11. Parks and Recreation Facilities That Are

Most Important to Respondent Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices

Neighborhood parks

Bicycle pathway system

Indoor fitness and exercise facility

Indoor walking/running track

Indoor swimming pool/leisure pool

Outdoor swimming pool/water park

Nature center with trails

Large community parks

Playground equipment

Sledding Hill

Golf course

Fishing piers on ponds

Park shelters/picnic areas

Outdoor tennis courts

Indoor multi-use sports field

Multi-use fields (soccer, football, lacrosse)

Outdoor concert/entertainment stage

Baseball and softball fields

Indoor basketball/volleyball courts

Garden Plots

Outdoor basketball courts

Outdoor sand volleyball courts

Disc golf course

Skateboard park

Cricket field(s)

Other

0%

7%

5%

4%

4%

4%

4%

3%

2%

1%

3%

8%

8%

8%

8%

7%

12%

12%

12%

10%

10%

34%

28%

22%

20%

19%

18%

25%

Neighorhood parks and outdoor sw imming pool are most important facilities for households w ith children under 10

20%

Bicycle pathw ay system and indoor pool most important w ith households w ith children 10-19

Neighborhood parks and bicycle pathw ay system most important for household w ithout children

30%

Most Important 2nd Most Important 3rd Most Important 4th Most Important

40%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (January 2010)

Understanding Program Areas With

Highest Growth Opportunities

Q12. Recreation Programs that Are

Most Important to Respondent Households

Q13. Recreation Programs That Households Currently Participate in Most Often at Northbrook Park

District Facilities

28%

Adult fitness and wellness programs

6%

Community special events

Youth sports programs

Golf lessons/clinics

Youth summer camp programs

Senior programs

Adult sports programs

4%

6%

12%

14%

11%

11%

11%

21%

18%

20%

16%

17%

Market Growth

Opportunities

Exist for

Programs of

Importance in

Northbrook Park

District Facilities

10%

Youth Learn to Swim programs

5%

Golf leagues

9%

8%

9%

Water fitness programs

3%

0% 10% 20%

Most Important for All Respondents

Participate Most Important at Northbrook Park District Facilities

30%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (August 2009)

Understanding Support for Bond Elections

Q14. How Respondents Would Vote on a Bond Levy in Kettering to Fund the Types of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Arts Capital

Projects That Are Most Important to Their Household and for the

Amount They Would Support by percentage of respondents

Vote in Favor

54%

Might Vote in Favor

14%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (May 2008)

Not Sure

18%

Not provided

4%

Vote Against

10%

Benchmarking Provides Better Information

Regarding Realistic Performance Goals

Q10. Have You or Members of Your Households Participated in Any Recreation Programs Offered by the Glenview

Park District During the Past 12 Months?

by percentage of respondents

Participation is considerably higher than national benchmark of

30%

Yes

50%

Participation is higher than

Illinois benchmark of

43%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (March 2009)

No

50%

Benchmarking Provides Better Information

Regarding Realistic Performance Goals

Q3. Have Respondent Households Visited Any

Gurnee Park District Parks During the Past Year by percentage of respondents

Excellent rating are considerably higher than national benchmark of

30%

Excellent rating are considerably higher than

Illinois benchmark of

34%

Q3a. How Respondent Would Rate the Physical

Condition of ALL the Gurnee Park District

Parks They Have Visited

Excellent

47%

No

22%

Yes

78%

Fair

2%

Good

51%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (July 2007)

Benchmarking Provides Better Information

Regarding Realistic Performance Goals

Q25. Level of Satisfaction with the Overall Value

Households Receive from the Geneva Park District by percentage of respondents

Very Satisfied

45%

Very satisfied is significantly higher than national benchmark of 26% and the Ilinois benchmark of 31%

Somewhat Satisfied

31%

Neutral

13%

Don't Know

6%

Very Dissatisfied

1%

Somewhat Dissatisfied

4%

Source: Leisure Vision/ET C Institute (June 2010)

Developing Strategy

• Why?

• Who is involved?

• Community, stakeholder input

• Map out the process

• What is the difference between strategic planning and master planning?

Strategic Planning Benefits

Checklist for Strategy Development

• How do you conduct your strategic planning?

• What are the key process steps?

• Who are the key participants?

• What are your short and longer term planning time horizons?

• How do you ensure the plan addresses: SWOT, major shifts in technology, markets, customers, etc., long term organizational sustainability, your ability to execute the plan?

• What are the key objectives and timeline?

• How do your strategic objectives address innovation, and balance the needs of all stakeholders

Review of Organizational Performance and

Results

 Mission. Vision, and Values development or review

 SWOT

 Financial measures (non-tax revenue, gross revenues, fund balances )

Review of Organizational

Performance and Results

 Customer measures (customer satisfaction, customer referrals, lost customers, customer issues)

 Internal business results (internal customer satisfaction, efficiency measurements, process improvements, operational measures, benchmark comparisons)

 Employee measures (satisfaction, core competencies, alignment with strategy)

Consideration of Demographics and Trends

 Aligning strategy with community needs

 Aging population, yet park and recreation offerings are youth oriented

 Ethnic diversity

 Balance of programs among age segments and ethnic groups

 US Census information

 School district, city planning

 Environmental Services Research Institute

 US Sporting Goods Association, American

Sports Study

 Trends process/lifecycle review

The Balanced Scorecard Approach to

Strategy

• Addresses the leadership infrastructure

• Can include master plan elements/or bridge to master plan

• The four perspectives: customer, financial, internal business support, and employee learning and growth

• Cause and effect relationships

• Themes, Objectives, Measures, and Initiatives

• Building a Strategy Map

Strategy Hierarchy

Major Focus Areas

Strategic Themes

Strategic Objectives

Strategic Measures

Strategic Initiatives

Tactics

Cascade to business units

Creating Value through the Balanced

Scorecard

Customer Perspective

– Product/service attributes (price, programs, quality, availability)

– Relationship (customer loyalty)

– Service (access mechanisms, standards, requirements, and encounters)

– Image

Financial Perspective

– Productivity, growth, financial results

Internal Perspective

– Operations Management (maintenance practices, program development, park design)

– Customer Management processes (support systems and use of technology)

– Innovation processes

– Regulatory and Social processes (safety, environmental)

Learning and Growth Perspective

– Human capital

– Information capital (management of organizational knowledge)

– Organization capital

Customer

Perspective

Financial

Perspective

Internal

Perspective

Employee

Learning &

Growth

Perspective

STRATEGY MAP

Delight the Customer

Expand recreation opportunities, aligned with customer need

Improve customer satisfaction and loyalty

Financial Capability

Non-tax revenue

Aligning financial resources

Build image and brand

Operational Excellence

Drive innovation

Streamline critical processes

Continuous Employee Development

Provide a quality product at a good value

Growing program and facility revenue

Build strategic alliances

Foster a positive work environment

Develop competencies

Develop customer focus

BALANCED SCORECARD

Vision: To serve the community by delivering best in class parks and recreation opportunities.

Mission: The Park District is a leader in providing leisure experiences that enhance the quality of life for our community.

Strategic Themes

Delight the customer

Financial capability

Operational

Excellence

Strategic Objectives

• Expand recreation opportunities, aligned with customer need

• Improve customer satisfaction and loyalty

• Provide a quality product at a good value

• Non-tax revenue growth

• Aligning financial resources

• Growing program and facility revenue

• Build image and brand

• Drive innovation

• Streamline critical processes

• Build strategic alliances

Strategic Measures

• Program registration (q)

• Customer satisfaction

(q)

• Customer referral (q)

• Customer retention (q)

• Program and facility revenue

(q)

• Alternative revenue (q)

• Non-tax revenue percentage

(q)

• New programs (q)

• Internal customer satisfaction (a)

• Partner satisfaction (a)

• Efficiency savings (q)

• Key process documented (q)

Continuous employee development

• Foster a positive work environment

• Develop competencies

• Develop customer focus

• Employee satisfaction (a)

• Regrettable turnover (q)

• Percent competencies achieved (q)

• Percent service staff rated high (a)

Effectively Deploying Strategy

• Top leadership commitment

• Retreats

• Regular reporting system

• Annual report

• Measurement system (12-20 Key Measures)

• Continuous communication with employees

• Performance appraisal for senior leaders

• Cascading to divisional and personal levels after a year

• Governance and staff involvement

Effectively Deploying Strategy, cont’d

Stakeholder sharing…cliff notes version

Spreadsheet, software for tracking

Just in time adjustments, annually

Visual management

Tie it into budget process

Institutionalize the process—board retreat, staff retreat, educate employees about strategy, recalibrate measures

Deploying Strategy, cont’d.

• Strategy formulation process Fair process: engagement, explanation, and expectation clarity

• Attitudes: Trust and communication: I feel my opinion counts

• Behavior: Voluntary Cooperation: I’ll go beyond the call of duty

• Strategy Execution: Exceeds Expectations: Self

Initiated

Blue Ocean Strategy: Kim, Mauborgne

Summary/Discussion

Download